J. For. Sci., 2022, 68(10):395-412 | DOI: 10.17221/105/2022-JFS

The Slovak forest policy arrangement: Post-1989 residues and changesOriginal Paper

Lenka Halušková*
Department of Economics and Management of Forestry, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

After 1989, Central and Eastern European countries with planned economies launched a process of transformation. In the Slovak forest policy, the main changes have been in the structure of forest ownership, increasing the share of governance mechanisms within the decision-making, and the organization of the sector. The aim of the paper is to analyse the current Slovak forest policy arrangement in relation to the socialistic political history, via the Policy Arrangement Approach. The analysis is based on literature search and consultations with forest policy experts. In total, 55 scientific publications were analysed. Subsequently, the results were consulted with four national forest policy experts. Despite the three decades-lasting transformation process, in Slovakia, forest policy is characterised by a strong influence of governmental actors, centralisation, and prevailing hierarchical use of policy instruments. Nature protection actors enter the policy arena, for instance, to expand protected areas. The top-down planning has an impact on the forest owners' performance of rights to use their forests. Non-governmental actors attempt to enforce their interests through participation mechanisms, inter-ministerial commenting procedures, and voluntary instruments. Public opinion is turning towards nature protection and forestry as such has come under pressure with its traditionalist approach.

Keywords: actors; discourse; Policy Arrangement Approach (PAA); power resources; rules of the game

Published: October 25, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Halušková L. The Slovak forest policy arrangement: Post-1989 residues and changes. J. For. Sci. 2022;68(10):395-412. doi: 10.17221/105/2022-JFS.
Download citation

Supplementary files:

Download file105-2022-JFS ESM.pdf

File size: 59.75 kB

References

  1. Agrawal A., Chhatre A., Hardin R. (2008): Changing governance of the world's forests. Science, 320: 1460-1462. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Arts B., Buizer M. (2009): Forests, discourses, institutions: A discursive-institutional analysis of global forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 340-347. Go to original source...
  3. Arts B., Leroy P. (2006): Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance. Dordrecht, Springer: 290. Go to original source...
  4. Arts B., Behagel J., Turnhout E., De Koning J., Van Bommel S. (2014): A practice based approach to forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49: 4-11. Go to original source...
  5. Ayana A.N., Arts B., Wiersum K.F. (2018): How environmental NGOs have influenced decision making in a "semiauthoritarian" state: The case of forest policy in Ethiopia. World Development, 109: 313-322. Go to original source...
  6. Balest J., Hrib M., Dobšinská Z., Paletto A. (2016): Analysis of the effective stakeholders' involvement in the development of National Forest Programmes in Europe. International Forestry Review, 18: 13-28. Go to original source...
  7. Balest J., Hrib M., Dobšinská Z., Paletto A. (2018): The formulation of the National Forest Programme in the Czech Republic: A qualitative survey. Forest Policy and Economics, 89: 16-21. Go to original source...
  8. Báliková K. (2020): Implementačné a evalvačné analýzy ekonomických nástrojov na zabezpečovanie ekosystémových služieb lesa [PhD. Thesis]. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen. (in Slovak)
  9. Báliková K., Šálka J. (2022): Are silvicultural subsidies an effective payment for ecosystem services in Slovakia? Land Use Policy, 116: 106056. Go to original source...
  10. Báliková K., Dobšinská Z., Balážová E., Valent P., Šálka J. (2021): Forest land tax reductions - An effective payment for forest ecosystem services in Slovakia? Central European Forestry Journal, 67: 167-176. Go to original source...
  11. Beeko C., Arts B. (2010): The EU-Ghana VPA: A comprehensive policy analysis of its design. International Forestry Review, 12: 221-230. Go to original source...
  12. Blicharska M., Van Herzele A. (2015): What a forest? Whose forest? Struggles over concepts and meanings in the debate about the conservation of the Bialowieza Forest in Poland. Forest Policy and Economics, 57: 22-30. Go to original source...
  13. Blicharska M., Angelstam P., Antonson H., Elbakidze M., Axelsson R. (2011): Road, forestry and regional planners' work for biodiversity conservation and public participation: A case study in Poland's hotspot regions. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54: 1373-1395. Go to original source...
  14. Bouriaud L., Schmithüsen F. (2005): Allocation of property rights on forests through ownership reform and Forest policies in Central and Eastern European countries. Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen, 156: 297-305. Go to original source...
  15. Bouriaud L., Nichiforel L., Weiss G., Bajraktari A., Curovic M., Dobsinska Z., Glavonjic P., Jarsky V., Sarvasova Z., Teder M., Zalite Z. (2013): Governance of private forests in Eastern and Central Europe: An analysis of forest harvesting and management rights. Annals of Forest Research, 56: 199-215.
  16. Brescancin F., Dobšinská Z., De Meo I., Šálka J., Paletto A. (2018): Analysis of stakeholders' involvement in the implementation of the Natura 2000 network in Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 89: 22-30. Go to original source...
  17. Brodrechtová Y. (2019): Aktéri a ich moc pri obhospodarovaní lesov Slovenska- empirická analýza a poznatky z regiónu Podpoľania. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 185. (in Slovak)
  18. Brodrechtová Y., Smreček R. (2018): Aktéri a ich vplyv na obhospodarovanie lesov na Slovensku. In: Správy z výskumu lesníckej fakulty pre prax. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 24-31. (in Slovak)
  19. Brodrechtová Y., Navrátil R., Sedmák R., Tuček J. (2018): Using the politicized IAD framework to assess integrated forest management decision-making in Slovakia. Land Use Policy, 79: 1001-1013. Go to original source...
  20. Chudy R., Stevanov M., Krott M. (2016): Strategic options for state forest institutions in Poland: Evaluation by the 3L Model and ways ahead. International Forestry Review, 18: 387-411. Go to original source...
  21. Dobšinská Z. (2009): Koordinácia a integrácia lesníckej politiky a politiky rozvoja vidieka: aktéri, vzťahy a procesy. In: Kovalčík M. (ed.): Aktuálne otázky ekonomiky a inovačnej politiky lesného hospodárstva Slovenskej republiky, Zvolen, Nov 9, 2010: 131-145. (in Slovak)
  22. Dobšinská Z., Sarvašová Z. (2016): Perceptions of forest owners and the general public on the role of forests in Slovakia. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 12: 23-33. Go to original source...
  23. Dobšinská Z., Šálka J. (2009): Vzťahy lesníctva a ochrany prírody na Slovensku v kontexte prístupu advokačných koalícií. Politologický časopis, 4: 309-334. (in Slovak)
  24. Dobšinská Z., Šálka J., Sarvašová Z., Lásková J. (2013): Rural development policy in the context of actor-centred institutionalism. Journal of Forest Science, 59: 34-40. Go to original source...
  25. Dobšinská Z., Šálka J., Sarvašová Z. (2015): Politická moc záujmových združení. In: Sarvašová Z., Kovalčík M. (eds): Aktuálne otázky ekonomiky a politiky lesného hospodárstva Slovenskej republiky, Zvolen, Dec 10, 2015: 112-133. (in Slovak)
  26. Dobšinská Z., Sarvašová Z., Šálka J., Báliková K., Štěrbová M., Sujová K. (2019): Účinnosť nástrojov lesníckej politiky. Zvolen, National Forest Centre: 85. (in Slovak)
  27. Dobšinská Z., Živojinović I., Nedeljković J., Petrović N., Jarský V., Oliva J., Šálka J., Sarvašová Z., Weiss G. (2020): Actor power in the restitution processes of forests in three European countries in transition. Forest Policy and Economics, 113: 102090. Go to original source...
  28. Dryzek J.S. (1997): The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 220.
  29. Dúbravská B., Dobšinská Z., Sarvašová Z. (2021): Analýza mediálneho diskurzu k požiadavkám na zabezpečenie ekosystémových služieb lesa na území Mestských lesov Banská Bystrica. In: Hajdúchová I. et al. (eds): Finančná výkonnosť lesného hospodárstva a drevospracujúceho priemyslu v meniacich sa podmienkach. Zvolen, Technická univerzita vo Zvolene: 29-40. (in Slovak)
  30. Galan T. (2021): Vnímanie programu starostlivosti o lesy ako príkladu nástrojového mixu lesníckej politiky. [MSc. Thesis.] Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen. (in Slovak)
  31. Giessen L., Kleinschmit D., Böcher M. (2009): Between power and legitimacy - Discourse and expertise in forest and environmental governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 452-453. Go to original source...
  32. Glück P. (2000): Theoretical perspectives for enhancing biological diversity in forest ecosystems in Europe. Forest Policy and Economics, 1: 195-207. Go to original source...
  33. Golos P., Kaliszewski A. (2016): Social and economic conditions for providing public forest services in the State Forests National Forest Holding. Sylwan, 160: 91-99.
  34. Green Report (2020): Správa o lesnom hospodárstve v Slovenskej republike za rok 2019 Zelená správa (Green Report). Bratislava, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development SR, National Forest Centre: 53. (in Slovak)
  35. Green Report (2021): Správa o lesnom hospodárstve v Slovenskej republike za rok 2020 Zelená správa (Green Report). Bratislava, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development SR, National Forest Centre: 69. (in Slovak)
  36. Halaj D., Báliková K., Brodrechtová Y. (2022): The perception of an image of the state forest enterprise by general public in chosen region of the Slovak Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 68: 26-34. Go to original source...
  37. Hazarika R., Bolte A., Bednarova D., Chakraborty D., Gaviria J., Kanzian M., Kowalczyk J., Lackner M., Lstibůrek M., Longauer R., Nagy L., Tomášková I., Schueler S. (2021): Multi-actor perspectives on afforestation and reforestation strategies in Central Europe under climate change. Annals of Forest Science, 78: 60. Go to original source...
  38. Hendl T. (2016): The complexity of relational autonomy: A holistic approach to embodiment. The American Journal of Bioethics, 16: 63-65. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  39. Hochmalová M., Červená T., Purwestri R.C., Hájek M., Sloup R. (2021): Anchor of cultural forest services in the national forest policies of Central European countries. Central European Forestry Journal, 67: 212-229. Go to original source...
  40. Hrib M., Riedl M., Hýsková P., Maršík J., Jarkovská M. (2021): State forest administration performance in the Czech Republic: A case study of forestry legislation implementation in the South Bohemian Region. Central European Forestry Journal, 67: 248-257. Go to original source...
  41. Hricová Z. (2012): Úvod do výskumu priorít, motívov a postojov vlastníkov lesa k združovaniu. In: Kovalčík M. (ed.): Aktuálne otázky ekonomiky a politiky LH SR, Zvolen, Dec 6, 2012: 130-135. (in Slovak)
  42. Hricová Z., Ambrušová L., Sarvašová Z., Dobšinská Z., Kajba M., Šálka J. (2015): Politická moc združení neštátnych vlastníkov lesov. Zvolen, National Forest Centre: 174. (in Slovak)
  43. Hysing E., Olsson J. (2008): Contextualising the Advocacy Coalition Framework: Theorising change in Swedish forest policy. Environmental Politics, 17: 730-748. Go to original source...
  44. Jarský V., Sarvašová Z., Dobšinská Z., Ventrubová K., Sarvaš M. (2014): Public support for forestry from EU funds - Cases of Czech Republic and Slovak Republic. Journal of Forest Economics, 20: 380-395. Go to original source...
  45. Juerges N., Arts B., Masiero M., Hoogstra-Klein M., Borges J.G., Brodrechtova Y., Brukas V., Canadas M.J., Carvalho P.O., Corradini G., Corrigan E., Felton A., Karahalil U., Karakoc U., Krott M., van Laar J., Lodin I., Lundholm A., Makrickiene E., Marques M., Mendes A., Mozgeris G., Novais A., Pettenella D., Pivoriunas N., Sari B. (2021): Power analysis as a tool to analyse trade-offs between ecosystem services in forest management: A case study from nine European countries. Ecosystem Services, 49: 101290. Go to original source...
  46. Knopf J.W. (2006): Doing a literature review. PS: Political Science & Politics, 39: 127-132. Go to original source...
  47. Konôpka J. (2018): K niektorým problémom súčasného lesného hospodárstva na Slovensku. In: Sarvašová Z., Kovalčík M., Moravčík M. (eds): Aktuálne otázky ekonomiky a politiky lesného hospodárstva Slovenskej republiky, Zvolen, Dec 12, 2018: 151-157. (in Slovak)
  48. Kovalčík M. (2011): Hodnotenie efektívnosti hospodárenia na lesnej pôde. Forestry Journal, 57: 166-177. (in Slovak)
  49. Kovalčík M. (2018): Efficiency of the Slovak forestry in comparison to other European countries: An application of Data Envelopment Analysis. Central European Forestry Journal, 64: 46-54. Go to original source...
  50. Kovalčík M., Sujová K. (2018): Vybrané aspekty ochrany prírody na Slovensku z pohľadu neštátnych vlastníkov lesa. In: Sarvašová Z., Kovalčík M., Moravčík M. (eds): Aktuálne otázky ekonomiky a politiky lesného hospodárstva Slovenskej republiky, Zvolen, Dec 12, 2018: 138-150. (in Slovak)
  51. Kovalčík M., Lichý J., Šulek R. (2016): Possibilities of outsourcing in condition of Slovak forestry. In: Hajdúchová I. et al. (eds): Finančná výkonnost' lesných podnikov. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 76-86. (in Slovak)
  52. Krott M. (2010): Forest Policy Analysis. Dordrecht, Springer: 323.
  53. Krott M., Bader A., Schusser C., Devkota R., Maryudi A., Giessen L., Aurenhammer H. (2014): Actor-centred power: The driving force in decentralised community based forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49: 34-42. Go to original source...
  54. Krykorková J., Báliková K., Šálka J., Surový P., Krott M., Stevanov M.Z. (2022): Comparing the performance of state forest enterprises in Czech and Slovak Republics with a focus on concessions. International Forestry Review, 24: 175-196. Go to original source...
  55. Lengyel A. (2010): Forest policy experiences on private forestry development in selected South East European countries. In: Tuomasjukka T. (ed.): Forest Policy and Economics Support of Good Governance. Joensuu, European Forest Institute: 75-80.
  56. Lesmedium (2022): LESmedium. Available at: https://lesmedium.sk/casopis-letokruhy/2022/casopis-letokruhy-2022-02/vlastnici-si-chcu-svoju-p-du-v-chranenychuzemiach-spravovat-sami (in Slovak).
  57. Liefferink D. (2006): The dynamics of policy arrangements: Turning round the tetrahedron. In: Arts B., Leroy P. (eds): Institutional Dynamics in Environmental Governance. Dordrecht, Springer: 45-68. Go to original source...
  58. Logmani J., Krott M., Lecyk M.T., Giessen L. (2017): Customizing elements of the International Forest Regime Complex in Poland? Non-implementation of a National Forest Programme and redefined transposition of Natura 2000 in Bialowieza Forest. Forest Policy and Economics, 74: 81-90. Go to original source...
  59. Lojda J., Ventrubova K. (2015): The grant policy of the forestry sector in the Czech Republic after 2013. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 60: 64-72.
  60. Luptáková E. (2015): Analýza politického potenciálu Slovenskej poľovníckej komory z pohľadu jej funkcionárov [MSc. Thesis.] Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen. (in Slovak)
  61. Maier C., Lindner T., Winkel G. (2014): Stakeholders' perceptions of participation in forest policy: A case study from Baden-Württemberg. Land Use Policy, 39: 166-176. Go to original source...
  62. Malovrh Š.P., Paletto A., Posavec S., Dobšinská Z., Dordević I., Marić B., Avdibegović M., Kitchoukov E., Stijović A., Trajkov P., Laktić T. (2019): Evaluation of the operational environment factors of nature conservation policy implementation: Cases of selected EU and non-EU countries. Forests, 10: 1099. Go to original source...
  63. Makrickiene E., Brukas V., Brodrechtova Y., Mozgeris G., Sedmák R., Šálka J. (2019): From command-and-control to good forest governance: A critical interpretive analysis of Lithuania and Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 109: 102024. Go to original source...
  64. Matysiak A., Kapuscinski R. (2007): The contemporary issues related to forest management in the State Forests National Forest Holding. In: Quo Vadis, Forestry? Sekocin Stary, Jun 29-30, 2006: 208-214.
  65. Moravčík M., Konôpka J. (2009): Stratégia rozvoja lesníctva na Slovensku. Forestry Journal, 55: 65-84. (in Slovak) Go to original source...
  66. Moravčík M., Sarvašová Z., Merganič J., Kovalčík M. (2012): Close to nature management in high-mountain forests of Norway spruce vegetation zone in Slovakia. In: Blanco J.A. (ed.): Forest Ecosystems - More Than Just Trees. Rijeka, InTech: 375-414. Go to original source...
  67. Niedzialkowski K., Paavola J., Jedrzejewska B. (2012): Participation and protected areas governance: the impact of changing influence of local authorities on the conservation of the Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. Ecology and Society, 17: 2. Go to original source...
  68. Ochieng R.M., Visseren-Hamakers I.J., Brockhaus M., Kowler L.F., Herold M., Arts B. (2016): Historical development of institutional arrangements for forest monitoring and REDD + MRV in Peru: Discursive-institutionalist perspectives. Forest Policy and Economics, 71: 52-59. Go to original source...
  69. Paluš H., Krahulcová M. (2019): Ensuring ecosystem services of forests with the emphasis on their production function. In: Chobanova R. (ed.): Digitalisation and Circular Economy: Forestry and Forestry Based Industry Implications. Proceedings of Scientific Papers, Varna, Sept 11-13, 2019: 55-60.
  70. Paluš H., Parobek J., Vlosky R.P., Motik D., Oblak L., Jošt M., Glavonjić B., Dudík R., Wanat L. (2018): The status of chain-of-custody certification in the countries of Central and South Europe. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 76: 699-710. Go to original source...
  71. Paluš H., Krahulcová M., Parobek J. (2021): Assessment of forest certification as a tool to support forest ecosystem services. Forests, 12: 300. Go to original source...
  72. Park M.S., Youn Y.C. (2013): Development of urban forest policy-making toward governance in the Republic of Korea. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 12: 273-281. Go to original source...
  73. Peters B.G. (1998): Managing Horizontal Government: The Politics of Coordination. Ottawa, Canadian Centre for Management Development: 75.
  74. Rada pre štátnu službu (2019): Správa o stave a vývoji štátnej služby za rok 2018. Available at: https://radaprestatnusluzbu.vlada.gov.sk/data/files/7194_sprava-o-stave-avyvoji-ss-2018.pdf (in Slovak).
  75. Riedl M., Jarský V., Palátová P., Sloup R. (2019): The challenges of the forestry sector communication based on an analysis of research studies in the Czech Republic. Forests, 10: 935. Go to original source...
  76. Sabatier P.A. (1988): An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21: 129-168. Go to original source...
  77. Sarvašová Z., Dobšinská Z., Šálka J. (2010): Inovačná politika a lesníctvo: Zmeny v inovačnom správaní aktérov LH SR. In: Kovalčík M. (ed.): Aktuálne otázky ekonomiky a inovačnej politiky lesného hospodárstva Slovenskej republiky, Zvolen, Nov 9, 2010: 90-100. (in Slovak)
  78. Sarvašová Z., Lásková J., Fodrek L. (2012): Foreign examples of public functions integration into the market mechanism. Zprávy Lesnického Výzkumu, 57: 63-73.
  79. Sarvašová Z., Šálka J., Dobšinská Z. (2013): Mechanism of cross-sectoral coordination between nature protection and forestry in the Natura 2000 formulation process in Slovakia. Journal of Environmental Management, 127: S65-S72. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  80. Sarvašová Z., Dobšinská Z., Šálka J. (2014): Public participation in sustainable forestry: the case of forest planning in Slovakia. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 7: 414-422. Go to original source...
  81. Sarvašová Z., Zivojinovic I., Weiss G., Dobšinská Z., Dragoi M., Gal J., Jarský V., Mizaraite D., Pollumae P., Šálka J., Schiberna E., Šišák L., Wolfslehner B., Zalite Z., Zalitis T. (2015): Forest owners associations in the Central and Eastern European Region. Small-scale Forestry: 14: 217-232. Go to original source...
  82. Sarvašová Z., Štěrbová M., Dobšinská Z., Šálka J. (2017): Poradenstvo poskytované odborným lesným hospodárom- čiastkové výsledky dotazníkového prieskumu. In: Hajdúchová I. et al. (eds): Financovanie podnikov v lesnom hospodárstve. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 171-178. (in Slovak)
  83. Sarvašová Z., Štĕrbová M., Kulla L. (2020): Ako na zmiernenie konfliktov pri využívaní produkcie dreva v chránených územiach Slovenska? Zprávy z lesnického výzkumu, 65: 125-133. (in Slovak)
  84. Schusser C., Krott M., Movuh M.C.Y., Logmani J., Devkota R.R., Maryudi A., Salla M., Bach N.D. (2015): Powerful stakeholders as drivers of community forestry - Results of an international study. Forest Policy and Economics, 58: 92-101. Go to original source...
  85. Scriban R.E., Nichiforel L., Bouriaud L.G., Barnoaiea I., Cosofret V.C., Barbu C.O. (2019): Governance of the forest restitution process in Romania: An application of the DPSIR model. Forest Policy and Economics, 99: 59-67. Go to original source...
  86. Sedmák R. (2018): Systém hospodársko úpravníckeho plánovania na Slovensku - dozrel čas na zmenu? In: Správy z výskumu lesníckej fakulty pre prax. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 5-13. (in Slovak)
  87. Sedmák R., Fabrika M., Bahýľ J., Pôbiš I., Tuček J. (2013): Application of simulation and optimization tools for developing forest management plans in the Slovak natural and management conditions. In: Implementation of DSS Tools into the Forestry Practice. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 139-152.
  88. Shannon M.A., Schmidt C.H. (2002): Theoretical approaches to understanding intersectoral policy integration. In: Tikkanen I., Glück P., Pajuoja H. (eds): Cross-Sectoral Policy Impacts on Forests, Savonlinna, Apr 4-6, 2022: 15-26.
  89. Singer B., Giessen L. (2017): Towards a donut regime? Domestic actors, climatization, and the hollowing-out of the international forests regime in Anthropocene. Forest Policy and Economics, 79: 69-79. Go to original source...
  90. Stern P.C., Dietz T., Guagnano G.A. (1995): The new ecological paradigm in social-psychological context. Environment and Behavior, 27: 723-743. Go to original source...
  91. Synek M., Hrib M. (2019): Analysing data sources' sustainability to support forest policy decision-making in the Czech Republic. International Forestry Review, 21: 92-107. Go to original source...
  92. Szramka H., Adamowicz K. (2017): Trends in modification of the status of the State Forests in Poland. Sylwan, 161: 355-364.
  93. Šálka J. (2002): Kooperationsbeziehungen im Fonds zur Förderung des Waldes der Slowakischen Republik. In: Allgemeine Forst und Jagdzeitung. Frankfurt am Main, J.D. Sauerlander's Verlag: 123-130. (in German)
  94. Šálka J., Sarvašová Z. (2009): Governance v lesníctve. Zvolen, Národné lesnícke centrum: 262. (in Slovak)
  95. Šálka J., Sarvašová Z., Ambrušová L., Dobšinská Z., Hricová Z., Kajba M., Schwarz M. (2015): Procesný model pre záujmové združenia vlastníkov lesov. Zvolen, National Forest Centre: 166. (in Slovak)
  96. Šálka J., Dobšinská Z., Hricová Z. (2016): Factors of political power - The example of forest owners associations in Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 68: 88-98. Go to original source...
  97. Šálka J., Dobšinská Z., Sarvašová Z., Štĕrbová M., Paluš H. (2017): Lesnícka politika. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 275. (in Slovak)
  98. Šnídl V. (2021): Proti Budajovi sa sformovala hlučná facebooková scéna. Chce zabrániť presunu národných parkov pod štátnych ochranárov. Available at: https://dennikn.sk/2498956/proti-budajovi-sa-sformovala-hlucnafacebookova-scena-chce-zabranit-presunu-narodnychparkov-pod-ochranarov/ (in Slovak).
  99. Štěrbová M., Kovalčík M. (2020): Typology of contractors for forestry services: Insights from Slovakia. Forest Policy and Economics, 115: 102143. Go to original source...
  100. Šulek R. (2006): Common-pool resources in Central Europe: Case study of forestry in the Slovak Republic. In: IASCP Europe Regional Meeting, Brescia, Mar 23-25, 2006: 10.
  101. Šulek R. (2010): Principles of new forest legislation and policy in the Slovak Republic. In: Šulek R., Herbst P., Schmithüsen F.J. (eds): Legal Aspects of European Forest Sustainable Development, Proceedings of the 11th International Symposium, Zvolen, May 13-15, 2009: 106-110.
  102. Teder M., Mizaraité D., Mizaras S., Nonić D., Nedeljković J., Sarvašová Z., Vilkriste L., Zalite Z., Weiss G. (2015): Structural changes of state forest management organisations in Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Serbia and Slovakia since 1990. Baltic Forestry, 21: 326-339.
  103. Thomas C.S., Klimovich K. (2013): Interest groups and lobbying in Latin America: Theoretical and practical considerations. Journal of Public Affairs, 14: 165-182. Go to original source...
  104. Tuček J., Navrátil R., Sedmák R., Brodrechtová Y., Smreček R. (2015): Participatívne scenáre a backcasting pri strategickom plánovaní obhospodarovania lesov. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 332. (in Slovak)
  105. Tutka J. (2000): Effects of a change in forestry inputs and outputs. Zprávy Lesnického Výzkumu, 45: 34-36.
  106. Veenman S., Liefferink D., Arts B. (2009): A short history of Dutch forest policy: The 'de-institutionalisation' of a policy arrangement. Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 202-208. Go to original source...
  107. Výbošťok J., Pichlerová M., Pichler V., Navrátilová L., Dobšinská Z., Šálka J. (2018): Vnímanie lesa ako významnej zložky životného prostredia verejnosťou. In: Sarvašová Z., Kovalčík M., Moravčík M. (eds): Aktuálne otázky ekonomiky a politiky lesného hospodárstva Slovenskej republiky, Zvolen, Dec 12, 2018: 101-106. (in Slovak)
  108. Webb T.J., Bengston D.N., Fan D.P. (2008): Forest value orientations in Australia: An application of computer content analysis. Environmental Management, 41: 52-63. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  109. Weber N. (2012): Reflections on theories in forest policy: Testing, combining or building? Forest Policy and Economics, 16: 102-108. Go to original source...
  110. Weingart P., Engels A., Pansegrau P. (2000): Risks of communication: Discourses on climate change in science, politics, and the mass media. Public Understanding of Science, 9: 261. Go to original source...
  111. Wilkes-Alleman J., Deuffic P., Jandl R., Westin K., Lieberherr E., Foldal C., Lidestav G., Weiss G., Zabel A., Živojinović I., Pecurul-Botines M., Koller N., Haltia E., Sarvašová Z., Sarvaš M., Curman M., Riedl M., Jarský V. (2021): Communication campaigns to engage (non-traditional) forest owners: A European perspective. Forest Policy and Economics, 133: 102621. Go to original source...
  112. Winkel G., Sotirov M. (2011): An obituary for national forest programmes? Analyzing and learning from the strategic use of "new modes of governance" in Germany and Bulgaria. Forest Policy and Economics, 13: 143-154. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.