J. For. Sci., 2018, 64(4):187-197 | DOI: 10.17221/151/2017-JFS

Evaluation of four methods of fitting Johnson's SBB for height and volume predictionsOriginal Paper

Friday Nwabueze OGANA*
Department of Social and Environmental Forestry, Faculty of Renewable Natural Resources, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria

Johnson's SBB is the most commonly used bivariate distribution model in forestry. There are different methods of fitting Johnson's distribution, and their accuracies differ. In this article, the method of conditional maximum likelihood (CML), moments, mode and Knoebel and Burkart (KB) were used to fit Johnson's SBB distribution. A total of 4,237 diameter and height data obtained from 90 sample plots of Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnhardt were used. Evaluation was based on tree height and volume predictions. The predicted and observed tree heights and volumes were compared using the paired sample t-test. The average relative (%) bias and root mean square error of heights and volumes were computed for the four methods. The results showed that CML- and moments-based methods were more suitable than KB and mode methods for predicting tree height and volume. The level of significance and percentage bias were much lower in CML and moments. The mode-based method had the worst performance. The ranking order was: CML ≈ moments > KB > mode.

Keywords: conditional maximum likelihood; moments; mode; Knoebel and Burkhart; Eucalyptus camaldulensis

Published: April 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
OGANA FN. Evaluation of four methods of fitting Johnson's SBB for height and volume predictions. J. For. Sci. 2018;64(4):187-197. doi: 10.17221/151/2017-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Fonseca T.F., Marques C.P., Parresol B.R. (2009): Describing maritime pine diameter distributions with Johnson's SB distribution using a new all-parameter recovery approach. Forest Science, 55: 367-373. Go to original source...
    2. Gorgoso J.J., Rojo A., Camara-Obregon A., Dieguez-Aranda U. (2012): A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull, Johnson's SB and beta functions to Pinus pinaster, Pinus radiata and Pinus sylvestris stands in northwest Spain. Forest Systems, 21: 446-459. Go to original source...
    3. Gorgoso-Varela J.J., Rojo-Alboreca A. (2014): A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson's SB functions to pedunculate oak (Quercus robur) and birch (Betula pubescens) stands in northwest Spain. Forest Systems, 23: 500-505. Go to original source...
    4. Hafley W.L., Buford M.A. (1985): A bivariate model for growth and yield prediction. Forest Science, 31: 237-247.
    5. Johnson N.L. (1949a): Systems of frequency curves generated by methods of translation. Biometrika, 36: 149-176. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Johnson N.L. (1949b): Bivariate distributions based on simple translation systems. Biometrika, 36: 297-304. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Knoebel B.R., Burkhart H.E. (1991): A bivariate distribution approach to modeling forest diameter distributions at two points in time. Biometrics, 47: 241-253. Go to original source...
    8. Li F., Zhang L., Davis C.J. (2002): Modeling the joint distribution of tree diameters and heights by bivariate generalized beta distribution. Forest Science, 48: 47-58. Go to original source...
    9. Mønness E. (2015): The bivariate power-normal distribution and the bivariate Johnson system bounded distribution in forestry, including height curves. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45: 307-313. Go to original source...
    10. Nanang D.M. (2002): Statistical distributions for modelling stand structure of neem (Azadirachta indica) plantations. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 14: 456-473.
    11. Ogana F.N., Itam E.S., Osho J.S.A. (2017): Modeling diameter distributions of Gmelina arborea plantation in Omo Forest Reserve, Nigeria with Johnson's SB. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 36: 121-133. Go to original source...
    12. Ogana F.N., Osho J.S.A., Gorgoso-Varela J.J. (2018): An approach to modeling the joint distribution of tree diameter and height data. Journal of Sustainable Forestry (in press). https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2017.1422434 Go to original source...
    13. Omule S.A.Y. (1984): Fitting Height-diameter Curves. Research Report RR84008-HQ. Victoria, British Columbia Ministry of Forests: 19.
    14. Petráš R., Mecko J., Nociar V. (2010): Diameter structure of the stands of poplar clones. Journal of Forest Science, 56: 165-170. Go to original source...
    15. Rupšys P., Petrauskas E. (2010): The bivariate Gompertz diffusion model for tree diameter and height distribution. Forest Science, 56: 271-280. Go to original source...
    16. Schreuder H.T., Hafley W.L. (1977): A useful bivariate distribution for describing stand structure of tree heights and diameters. Biometrics, 33: 471-478. Go to original source...
    17. Tewari V.P., von Gadow K. (1999): Modelling the relationship between tree diameters and heights using SBB distribution. Forest Ecology and Management, 119: 171-176. Go to original source...
    18. Wang M., Rennolls K. (2007): Bivariate distribution modeling with tree diameter and height data. Forest Science, 53: 16-24. Go to original source...
    19. Zhang L., Packard K.C., Liu C. (2003): A comparison of estimation methods for fitting Weibull and Johnson's SB distributions to mixed spruce-fir stands in northeastern North America. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 1340-1347. Go to original source...
    20. Zhou B., McTague J.P. (1996): Comparison and evaluation of five methods of estimation of the Johnson system parameters. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 26: 928-935. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content