J. For. Sci., 2011, 57(3):89-95 | DOI: 10.17221/35/2010-JFS

Environmental risk assessment based on semi-quantitative analysis of forest management data

L. Kulla1, R. Marušák2
1 Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, National Forest Centre, Zvolen, Slovakia
2 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper deals with environmental risk assessment in prevailingly unnatural spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) forests in three regions with different patterns of forest damage in the Slovak part of the West Carpathians. Logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of 7 site-related, 5 stand-related and 2 anthropogenic factors on the probability that critical forest damage will occur. The results show that regression models can describe cause-effect relationships in regions with different regimes of forest decline. Stand age, proportion of spruce, and distance from the focus of biotic agent activity predicted decline in two regions with generally lower elevation in northern Slovakia (Kysuce and Orava). In a mountain region (Low Tatras), the importance of factors contributing to the static stability of trees and position towards dangerous winds increased significantly. The quality of the derived models and prospects for their usefulness in risk assessment are discussed.

Keywords: ecological factors; forest damage; forest management; logistic regression; Norway spruce; risk assessment

Published: March 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kulla L, Marušák R. Environmental risk assessment based on semi-quantitative analysis of forest management data. J. For. Sci. 2011;57(3):89-95. doi: 10.17221/35/2010-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. B M., L N., S-B H., L B.V. (2001): Risk appraisal for forest management with respect to site quality and environmental changes. In: G K.V. (ed.): Managing Forest Ecosystems 2: Risk Analysis in Forest Management. Dordrecht/Boston/ London, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 21-48. Go to original source...
  2. B A., L J. (2000): Geobiocenology II. Brno, MZLU: 249. (in Czech)
  3. Č P., J L., C P. (2004): Risk evaluation of the climatic change impact on secondary Norway spruce stands as exemplified by the Křtiny training forest enterprise. Journal of Forest Science 50: 256-262. Go to original source...
  4. DM A. (1992): Logit modeling: Practical applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Series: Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 106: 87.
  5. H L. (1972): Forest Types of Slovakia. Bratislava, Príroda: 307. (in Slovak)
  6. H M. (2002): Climatic Hazards and their Consequences for Forest Management. In: A M., B Y., C J.M. (eds): Risk Management and Sustainable Forestry. EFI Proceedings, 45: 21-28.
  7. H C. (2000): Woody plant mortality algorithms: description, problems and progress. Ecological Modelling, 126: 225-248. Go to original source...
  8. H T., K L., B I., T M., S Z., K M. (2009): The proposal of biotic hazard zones in selected spruce dominated regions in Slovakia. Journal of Forest Science 56: 236-242. Go to original source...
  9. H J., H M. (2006): A forest management risk insurance model and its application to coniferous stands in southwest Germany. Forest Policy and Economics, 8: 161-174. Go to original source...
  10. H D.W., L S. (2000): Applied Logistic Regression. 2nd Ed. New York, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 392.
  11. J R. (1998): Types of bark beetle (Coleoptera, Scolytidae) infestation in spruce forest stands affected by air pollution, bark beetle outbreak and honey fungus (Armillaria mellea). Anzeiger für Schadlingskunde, Pflantzenschutz, Umweltschutz, 73: 41-49. Go to original source...
  12. J A., M U. (2000): Logistic regression models for wind and snow damage in Northern Finland based on the National Forest Inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management, 135: 315-330. Go to original source...
  13. K J. (1989): Theory of normal forest following random processes, probability of salvage cuttings, and forest production. Lesnictví, 36: 925-944. (in Czech)
  14. K J., K B., R R., N C. (2008): Dangerous directions of winds in Slovakia. Lesnícke štúdie 60, NLC-LVÚ Zvolen: 81. (in Slovak)
  15. K L., H T. (2008): Multi factorial hazard assessment as a support for conversion priority rating in declining spruce forests. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 54: 43-52.
  16. M M., M J., H M. (2005): PC-Based Analysis of Multidimensional Data in Excercises. Praha, Academia: 449. (in Czech)
  17. N U., N S., E O., F E. (2001): Parameters for the assessment of the predisposition of Spruce-dominated forests to various disturbing factors with special regard to 8-toothed Spruce bark beetle (Ips typographus L.). In: F A., L O., K T. (eds): Criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management at the forest management unit level. EFI Proceedings, 38: 99-108.
  18. S D.L. (2001): Application of artificial intelligence to risk analysis for forest ecosystems. In: G K.V. (ed.): Managing Forest Ecosystems 2: Risk Analysis in Forest Management. Dordrecht/Boston/London, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 49-74. Go to original source...
  19. S T. (1971): Forest Transition as a Stochastic Process. Wien, Mitteilungen der Forstlichen Bundesversuchsanstalt (FBVA), Heft 91: 137-150.
  20. V E., F J. (1999): Models to asses the risk of snow and wind damage in pine, spruce and birch forests in Sweden. Environmental Management, 24: 209-217. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  21. Z A. (1976): Forest Phytocenology. Praha, SZN: 495. (in Czech)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.