J. For. Sci., 2006, 52(8):337-347 | DOI: 10.17221/4516-JFS
Comparison of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.), Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and European larch (Larix decidua Mill.) stem shape by means of geometrical methods
- 1 Faculty of Forestry and Environment, Czech University of Agriculture in Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
- 2 National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic
In this article the stem shape is compared in three coniferous tree species: Norway spruce, Scots pine and European larch. Stem is investigated by means of geometrical methods. Simplified Bookstein coordinates (stem shape diameters) and Procrustes coordinates were used for variability investigation. The material, originating from the Czech and Slovak territories, involved in total 3,346 spruce stems, 3,082 pine stems and 1,403 larch stems. The accordance of mean stem vectors was assessed by means of Hotelling's T2 two-sample test. For stem shape diameters and Procrustes tangent coordinates, the variability was examined using the method of principal components analysis. The three most important principal components were diagrammatized and described. The relationship between the stem shape and its size was also investigated, and inflection points of morphological stem curve were described for all three tree species.
Keywords: Norway spruce; Scots pine; European larch; stem shape; stem shape diameters; Procrustes coordinates; principal components analysis
Published: August 31, 2006 Show citation
ACS | AIP | APA | ASA | Harvard | Chicago | Chicago Notes | IEEE | ISO690 | MLA | NLM | Turabian | Vancouver |
References
- Allen P. J., 1993. Average relative stem profile comparisons for three size classes of Caribbean pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23: 2594-2598.
Go to original source...
- Demaerschalk J.P., Kozak A., 1977. The whole bole system: A conditioned dual-equation system for precise prediction of tree profiles. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 7: 488-497.
Go to original source...
- DRYDEN I.L., MARDIA K.V., 1998. Statistical Shape Analysis. Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, John Wiley & Sons: 345.
- DRYDEN I.L., 2000. Statistical shape routines. University of Nottingham. http://www.maths.nottingham.ac.uk/personal/ild/Shape-R/Shap.
- KŘEPELA M., SEQUENS J., ZAHRADNÍK D., 2001. Dendrometric evaluation of stand structure and stem forms on Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) sample plots Doubravčice 1, 2, 3. Journal of Forest Science, 47: 419-427.
- KŘEPELA M., 2002. Point distribution form model for spruce stems (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Journal of Forest Science, 48: 150-155.
Go to original source...
- KŘEPELA M., SEQUENS J., ZAHRADNÍK D., 2004. A contribution to the knowledge of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris [L.]) stem shape. Journal of Forest Science, 50: 211-218.
Go to original source...
- KŘEPELA M., ZAHRADNÍK D., SEQUENS J., 2005. Possible methods of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) stem shape description. Journal of Forest Science, 51: 244-255.
Go to original source...
- MELOUN M., MILITKÝ J., 1998. Statistické zpracování experimentálních dat. Praha, East Publishing: 839.
- Perez D.N., Burkhart H.E., Stiff C.T., 1990. Avariableform taper function for Pinus oocarpa Schiede in Central Honduras. Forestry Science, 36: 186-191.
Go to original source...
- PETR ÁŠ R., 1989. Matematický model tvaru kmeňa ihličnatých drevín. Lesnictví, 35: 867-878.
- Rencher A.C., 2002. Methods of Multivariate Analysis. Chichester, New York, Weinheim, Brisbane, Singapore, Toronto, John Wiley & Sons: 708.
- ŠMELKO Š., 2000. Dendrometria. Zvolen, TU: 399.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.