J. For. Sci., 2005, 51(2):47-59 | DOI: 10.17221/4543-JFS

Semivariogram analysis of Landsat 5 TM textural data for loblolly pine forests

J. Zawadzki, Ch.J. Cieszewski, M. Zasada

The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of Landsat 5 TM images for analysing the textural information on pine forest stands in western Georgia, United States. Analysing spatial correlations between pixels measured by semivariances and cross-semivariances (cross-correlation between two radiometric bands) calculated from transects of Landsat TM images, we explored differences between semivariances associated with images of stands of various ages, origins (natural vs. planted) and species (loblolly pine - Pinus taeda L. - versus longleaf pine - Pinus palustris Mill.). We analysed both ground measurements and the satellite images using the visible, the near infrared, and the middle-infrared bands. We also analysed semivariances and cross-semivariances calculated from the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index and the Ratio Vegetation Index. The results showed that in spite of the relatively low Landsat TM spatial resolution (30m) the semivariograms and cross-semivariograms provided potentially useful information about the above-mentioned classes. The semivariances and cross-semivariances calculated from Landsat TM images of loblolly pine stands depend both on the age and the stand origin. In particular, large differences exist in semivariance and cross-semivariance sills. Significant differences also exist between semivariances calculated from stands of loblolly and longleaf pine.

Keywords: semivariance; textural classification; remote sensing; loblolly pine; Landsat TM

Published: February 28, 2005  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Zawadzki J, Cieszewski CJ, Zasada M. Semivariogram analysis of Landsat 5 TM textural data for loblolly pine forests. J. For. Sci. 2005;51(2):47-59. doi: 10.17221/4543-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. ADEGBIDI H.G., JOKELA E.J., COMERFORD N.B., BARROS N.F., 2002. Biomass development for intensively managed loblolly pine plantations growing on spodosols in the southeastern USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 167: 91-102. Go to original source...
    2. BAUER M.E., BURK T.E., EK A.R., COPPIN P.R., LIME S.D., WALSH T.A., WALTERS D.K., BEFORT W., HEIZEN D.F., 1994. Satellite Inventory of Minnesota Forest Resources. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 60: 287-298.
    3. BROCKHAUS J.A., KHORRAM S., 1992. A comparison of SPOT and Landsat-TM data for use in concluding inventories of forest resources. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13: 3035-3043. Go to original source...
    4. BROWN L., CHEN J.M., LEBLANC S.G., CHILLAR J., 2000. A short-wave infrared modification to the simple ratio for LAI retrieval in boreal forests: an image and model analysis. Remote Sensing of Environment, 71: 16-25. Go to original source...
    5. CAMPBELL J.B., 1994. Introduction to Remote Sensing. New York, Guilford Press: 1-20.
    6. CARR J.R., 1966. Spectral and textural classification of single and multiple band digital images. Computers & Geosciences, 22: 849-866. Go to original source...
    7. CHICA-OLMO M., ABARCA-HERNANDEZ F., 2000. Computing geostatistical image texture for remotely sensed data classification. Computers & Geosciences, 26: 373-383. Go to original source...
    8. COHEN W.B., SPIES T.A., BRADSHAW G.A., 1990. Semivariograms of digital imagery for analysis of conifer canopy structure. Remote Sensing of Environment, 34: 167-178. Go to original source...
    9. CURRAN P.J., 1988. The semivariances in remote sensing: an introduction. Remote Sensing of Environment, 24: 493-507. Go to original source...
    10. DE FRIES R.S., TOWNSHEND J.R.G., 1994. NDVI-derived land cover classifications at a global scale. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 15: 3567-3586. Go to original source...
    11. DE JONG S.M., 1994. Derivation of vegetative variables from a Landsat TM image for modelling soil erosion. Earth Surfaces and Landforms, 19: 165-178. Go to original source...
    12. DEUTCH C.V., JOURNEL A.G., 1998. GSLIB Geostatistical Software Library. Oxford, Oxford University Press: 43-62.
    13. ERDAS Field Guide, 1990. Fifth Edition. Atlanta, Georgia, Erdas Inc.: 101-106.
    14. EVANS D.L., 1994. Forest Cover from Landsat Thematic Mapper Data for Use in the Catahoula Ranger District Geographic Information System. Gen. Tech. Rep. SO-99. New Orleans, LA: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southern Forest Experiment Station: 14. Go to original source...
    15. HARMS W.R., 1984. Applying silviculture to stand management. In: KARR B.L., MONAGHAN T. (eds.), The Loblolly Pine Ecosystem (West Region) Proceedings, March 20-22, Jackson, MS. Mis. Coop. Extension Serv., Mississippi State, MS: 32-40.
    16. HERZFELD U.C., HIGGINSON C.A., 1996. Automated geostatistical seafloor classification - principles, feature vectors, and discrimination criteria. Computers & Geosciences, 22: 35-52. Go to original source...
    17. JAKOMULSKA A., CLARKE K., 2001. Semivariogram-derived measures of textural image classification. In: MONESTIEZ P., ALLARD D., FROIDEVAUX R. (eds.), Geostatistics for Environmental Applications. Dordrecht Hardbound, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 345-355. Go to original source...
    18. JORDAN C.F., 1969. Derivation of leaf area index from quality of light on the forest floor. Ecology, 50: 663-666. Go to original source...
    19. JOURNEL A.G., HUIBREGTS C.J., 1978. Mining Geostatistics. London, Academic Press: 26-95.
    20. JUPP D.L.B., STRAHLER A.H., WOODCOCK C.E., 1988. Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. I. Basic theory, IEEE Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 26: 467-473. Go to original source...
    21. JUPP D.L.B., STRAHLER A.H., WOODCOCK C.E., 1989. Autocorrelation and regularization in digital images. I. Simple image models. IEEE Geosciences and Remote Sensing, 27: 247-258. Go to original source...
    22. McBRATNEY A.B., WEBSTER R., 1986. Choosing function for semivariograms of soil properties and fitting them to sampling estimates. Journal of Soil Sciences, 37: 617-639. Go to original source...
    23. MIRANDA F., MAcDONALD J., CARR J.R., 1992. Application of the semivariogram textural classifier (STC) for vegetation discrimination using SIR-B data of Borneo. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 13: 2349-2354. Go to original source...
    24. MIRANDA F., FONESCA L., CARR J.R., TARANIK J., 1996. Analysis of JERS-1 (Fuyo-1) SAR data for vegetation discrimination in northwestern Brazil using the semivariogram textural classifier (STC). International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 3523-3529. Go to original source...
    25. NEMANI R., PIERCE L., RUNNING S., 1993. Forest ecosystem process at the watershed scale: Sensitivity to remotelysensed Leaf Area Index estimates. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 14: 2519-2539. Go to original source...
    26. PANNATIER Y., 1996. Variowin, Software for Spatial Data Analysis in 2D. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg, SpringerVerlag: 1-91.
    27. RAMSTEIN G., RAFFY M., 1989. Analysis of the structure of radiometric remotely-sensed images. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17: 3523-3529. Go to original source...
    28. ROBERTSON G.P., 1998. GS+ user's guide: geostatistics for the environmental sciences, version 3.1 for Windows. Gamma Design Software, Plainwell, MI.
    29. ROUSE J.W., HAAS R.H., SCHELL J.A., DEERING D.W., 1973. Monitoring vegetation systems in the great plains with ERTS. In: Proceedings, Third ERTS Symposium, NASA SP-351, NASA, Washington, DC, 1: 309-317.
    30. SHEFFIELD R.M., KNIGHTS H.A., 1982. Loblolly pine resources - South-east region. In: Proceedings, Symposium on the Loblolly Pine Ecosystem (East Region). School of Forest Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC: 7-24.
    31. SONG C., WOODCOCK C.E., 2002. The spatial manifestation of forest succession in optical imagery. The potential of multiresolution imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 82: 271-284. Go to original source...
    32. STRAHLER A.H., WOODCOCK C.E., SMITH J.A., 1986. On the nature of models in remote sensing. Remote Sensing of Environment, 20: 121-139. Go to original source...
    33. ST-ONGE B.A., CAVAYAS F., 1995. Estimating forest stand structure from high resolution imagery using the directional semivariogram. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 16: 1999-2001. Go to original source...
    34. TUCKER C.J., FUNG I.Y., KEELING C.D., GAMMON R.H., 1986. Relationship between atmospheric CO2 variations and a satellite-derived vegetation index. Nature, 319: 195-199. Go to original source...
    35. TREITZ P., HOWARTH P., 2000. High spatial remote sensing data for forest ecosystem classification: an examination of spatial scale. Remote Sensing of Environment, 72: 268-289. Go to original source...
    36. VOGELMANN J.E., SOHL T.L., CAMPELL P.V., SHAW D.M., 1998. Regional land cover characterization using Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 51: 415-428. Go to original source...
    37. WALLACE C.S.A., WATTS J.M., YOOL S.R., 2000. Characterizing the spatial structure of vegetation communities in the Mojave Desert using geostatistical techniques. Computers & Geostatistics, 26: 397-410. Go to original source...
    38. WOODCOCK C.E., STRAHLER A.H., JUPP D.L.B., 1988a. The use of semivariograms in remote sensing: I. Scene models and simulated images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 25: 323-348. Go to original source...
    39. WOODCOCK C.E., STRAHLER A.H., JUPP D.L.B., 1988b. The use of semivariograms in remote sensing: II. Real digital images. Remote Sensing of Environment, 25: 349-379. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content