J. For. Sci., 2025, 71(11):555-564 | DOI: 10.17221/84/2025-JFS

Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) establishment success under climate change: Effect of site, stock type and planting timeOriginal Paper

Anna Plačková1, Zdeněk Vacek1, Stanislav Vacek1, Jan Cukor1,2, Josef Gallo1, Jakub Černý2,3
1 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Jíloviště-Strnady, Czech Republic
3 Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) is one of the most widespread and economically important coniferous species in the Northern Hemisphere. However, its regeneration success has recently been increasingly affected by global climate change (GCC), particularly through increasing mortality. This research aimed to evaluate the early establishment success of 30 400 bare-root and containerised Scots pine seedlings and saplings of different height classes, planted at various times on acidic and gleyed sites (479–610 m a.s.l.) across four locations in the Czech Republic. On acidic sites, seedlings exhibited 16% higher height growth and 11% lower mortality compared to gleyed sites. Containerised planting stock achieved significantly (P < 0.05) greater height growth (by 83%) and lower mortality (by 36%) than bare-root stock. For containerised material, spring plantings showed superior growth and vitality compared to autumn plantings. Planting stock height class had a stronger influence on height growth than on mortality. Based on the results, planting containerised saplings of 26–35 cm or 36–50 cm height in April is recommended for optimal establishment success of Scots pine under GCC.

Keywords: artificial regeneration; bare-rooted and containerised seedlings, saplings; climate stress; Czech Republic; growth potential; mortality

Received: November 11, 2025; Revised: November 19, 2025; Accepted: November 19, 2025; Published: November 28, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Plačková A, Vacek Z, Vacek S, Cukor J, Gallo J, Černý J. Scots Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) establishment success under climate change: Effect of site, stock type and planting time. J. For. Sci. 2025;71(11):555-564. doi: 10.17221/84/2025-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aguadé D., Poyatos R., Gómez M., Oliva J., Martínez-Vilalta J. (2015): The role of defoliation and root rot pathogen infection in driving the mode of drought-related physiological decline in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Tree Physiology, 35: 229-242. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Albrektson A., Elfving B., Lundqvist L., Valinger E. (2012): Skogsskötselns grunder och samband. Skogsskötselserien 1. Jönköping, Skogsstyrelsen: 88. (in Swedish)
  3. Aleksandrowicz-Trzcińska M., Drozdowski S., Wołczyk Z., Bielak K., Żybura H. (2017): Effects of reforestation and site preparation methods on early growth and survival of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in south-eastern Poland. Forests, 8: 428. Go to original source...
  4. Barzdajn W. (2006): Wpływ technologii produkcji i pory sadzenia jednolatek sosnowych (Pinus sylvestris L.) na udatność i początkowy wzrost uprawy. Sylwan, 150: 38-51. (in Polish)
  5. Barzdajn W. (2010): Wzrost uprawy sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus sylvestris L.) założonej przy użyciu sadzonek z bryłką i z nagim korzeniem w różnych terminach sadzenia. Sylwan, 154: 312-322. (in Polish)
  6. Barzdajn W., Kowalkowski W. (2016): Wpływ pory sadzenia i technologii produkcji sadzonek na wzrost sosny zwyczajnej w doświadczeniu w Nadleśnictwie Oleśnica. Sylwan, 160: 127-134. (in Polish)
  7. Bedford L., Sutton R.F. (2000): Site preparation for establishing lodgepole pine in the sub-boreal spruce zone of interior British Columbia: The Bednesti trial, 10-year results. Forest Ecology and Management, 126: 227-238. Go to original source...
  8. Bilodeau-Gauthier S., Paré D., Messier C., Bélanger N. (2011): Juvenile growth of hybrid poplars on acid boreal soil determined by environmental effects of soil preparation, vegetation control, and fertilization. Forest Ecology and Management, 261: 620-629. Go to original source...
  9. Bose A. K., Gessler A., Büntgen U., Rigling A. (2024): Tamm review: Drought-induced Scots pine mortality - Trends, contributing factors, and mechanisms. Forest Ecology and Management, 561: 121873. Go to original source...
  10. Brichta J., Vacek S., Vacek Z., Cukor J., Mikeska M., Bílek L., Šimůnek M., Gallo J., Brabec P. (2023): Importance and potential of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in 21st century. Central European Forestry Journal, 69: 3-20. Go to original source...
  11. Brichta J., Šimůnek V., Bílek L., Vacek Z., Gallo J., Drozdowski S., Bravo-Fernández J.A., Mason B., Roig Gomez S., Hájek V., Vacek S., Štícha V., Brabec P., Fuchs Z. (2024): Effects of climate change on Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) growth across Europe: Decrease of tree-ring fluctuation and amplification of climate stress. Forests, 15: 91. Go to original source...
  12. Bułaj B. (2006): Fizjologia i długość życia drobnych korzeni w populacjach sosny zwyczajnej (Pinus sylvestris L.) z różnych szerokości geograficznych w Europie. [Ph.D. Thesis] Poznań, University of Life Sciences in Poznań. (in Polish)
  13. Buras A., Schunk C., Zeiträg C., Herrmann C., Kaiser L., Lemme H., Menzel A. (2018): Are Scots pine forest edges particularly prone to drought-induced mortality? Environmental Research Letters, 13: 025001. Go to original source...
  14. Collet C., Moguedec G. (2007): Individual seedling mortality as a function of size, growth and competition in naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Forestry, 80: 359-370. Go to original source...
  15. Dobbertin M., Wermelinger B., Bigler C., Bürgi M., Carron M., Forster B., Rigling A. (2007): Linking increasing drought stress to Scots pine mortality and bark beetle infestations. The Scientific World Journal, 7: 231-239. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Furdyna R. (2008): Ocena żywotności sadzonek sosny zwyczajnej, dębu szypułkowego i olszy czarnej w szkółce i na uprawie leśnej. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Poznań University of Life Sciences. (in Polish)
  17. Gao Y., Markkanen T., Aurela M., Mammarella I., Thum T., Tsuruta A., Yang H., Aalto T. (2017): Response of water use efficiency to summer drought in a boreal Scots pine forest in Finland. Biogeosciences, 14: 4409-4422. Go to original source...
  18. Häggström B., Domevscik M., Öhlund J., Nordin A. (2021): Survival and growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) seedlings in north Sweden: Effects of planting position and arginine phosphate addition. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 423-433. Go to original source...
  19. Häggström B., Gundale M.J., Nordin A. (2024): Environmental controls on seedling establishment in a boreal forest: Implications for Scots pine regeneration in continuous cover forestry. European Journal of Forest Research, 143: 95-106. Go to original source...
  20. Hansson L.J., Ring E., Franko M.A., Gärdenäs A.I. (2018): Soil temperature and water content dynamics after disc trenching a sub-xeric Scots pine clearcut in central Sweden. Geoderma, 327: 85-96. Go to original source...
  21. Heiskanen J., Rikala R. (2006): Root growth and nutrient uptake of Norway spruce container seedlings planted in mounded boreal forest soil. Forest Ecology and Management, 222: 410-417. Go to original source...
  22. Hejtmánek J., Stejskal J., Provazník D., Čepl J. (2023): Understanding the role of ecotypic factors in the early growth of Pinus sylvestris L. Journal of Forest Science, 69: 539-549. Go to original source...
  23. Holmström E., Gålnander H., Petersson M. (2019): Within-site variation in seedling survival in Norway spruce plantations. Forests, 10: 181. Go to original source...
  24. Jurásek A., Mauer O. (2016): Zásady manipulace se sadebním materiálem lesních dřevin před výsadbou včetně optimalizace postupů přímých výsevů do porostů a výsadeb. In: Sušková M. (ed.): Lesné semenárstvo, škôlkarstvo a umelá obnova lesa 2016. Snina, Združenie lesných škôlkarov Slovenskej republiky: 46-52. (in Czech)
  25. Jurásek A., Martincová J., Leugner J. (2010): Manipulace se sadebním materiálem lesních dřevin od vyzvednutí ve školce až po výsadbu. Lesnický průvodce 5/2010. Strnady, Forestry and Game Management Research Institute: 34. (in Czech)
  26. Kerr G. (1994): A comparison of cell grown and bare-rooted oak and beech seedlings one season after outplanting. Forestry, 67: 297-311. Go to original source...
  27. Krakau U.K., Liesebach M., Aronen T., Lelu-Walter M.A., Schneck V. (2013): Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). In: Pâques L. (ed.): Forest tree breeding in Europe. Dordrecht, Springer: 267-323. Go to original source...
  28. Löf M., Gemmel U., Nilsson U., Welander N.T. (1998): The influence of site preparation on growth in Quercus robur L. seedlings in a southern Sweden clear-cut and shelterwood. Forest Ecology and Management, 109: 241-249. Go to original source...
  29. Lundqvist L., Aahlström M.A., Axelsson E.P., Mörling T., Valinger E. (2019): Multi-layered Scots pine forests in boreal Sweden result from mass regeneration and size stratification. Forest Ecology and Management, 441: 176-181. Go to original source...
  30. Luoranen J., Saksa T., Lappi J. (2018): Seedling, planting site and weather factors affecting the success of autumn plantings in Norway spruce and Scots pine seedlings. Forest Ecology and Management, 419-420: 79-90. Go to original source...
  31. McKay H.M. (1998): Root electrolyte leakage and root growth potential as indicators of spruce and larch establishment. Silva Fennica, 32: 241-252. Go to original source...
  32. Mutlu S., Osma E., Ilhan V., Turkoglu H.I., Atici O. (2016): Mistletoe (Viscum album) reduces the growth of Scots pine by accumulating essential nutrient elements in its structure as a trap. Trees, 30: 815-824. Go to original source...
  33. Nordborg F., Nilsson U. (2003): Growth, damage and net nitrogen uptake in Picea abies (L.) Karst. seedlings, effects of site preparation and fertilization. Annals of Forest Science, 60: 657-666. Go to original source...
  34. Nordborg F., Nilsson U., Gemmel P., Örlander G. (2006): Carbon and nitrogen stocks in soil, trees and field vegetation in conifer plantations 10 years after deep soil cultivation and patch scarification. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 21: 356-363. Go to original source...
  35. Nordin P., Olofsson E., Hjelm K. (2023): Within-site adaptation: Growth and mortality of Norway spruce, Scots pine and silver birch seedlings in different planting positions across a soil moisture gradient. Silva Fennica, 57: 23004. Go to original source...
  36. Örlander G., Gemmel P., Hunt J. (1990): Site Preparation: A Swedish Overview. FRDA Report 105. Victoria, BC Ministry of Forests: 62.
  37. Peel M.C., Finlayson B.L., McMahon T.A. (2007): Updated world map of the Köppen-Geiger climate classification. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 11: 1633-1644. Go to original source...
  38. Persson M., Trubins R., Eriksson L.O., Bergh J., Sonesson J., Holmström E. (2022): Precision thinning - A comparison of optimal stand-level and pixel-level thinning. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 37: 99-108. Go to original source...
  39. Podrázský V., Trojan V., Vacek Z., Vacek S., Kupka I., Jůnová L., Plassová M., Černý J., Cukor J. (2025): Testing the growth potential of introduced tree species for future forestry in Central Europe: Insights from 16 tree species in the Truba Arboretum. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu/Reports of Forestry Research, 70: 93-101. (in Czech)
  40. Poleno Z., Vacek S., Podrázský V., Remeš J., Štefančík I., Mikeska M., Kobliha J., Kupka I., Malík V., Turčáni M., Dvořák J., Zatloukal V., Bílek L., Baláš M., Simon J. (2009): Pěstování lesů III: Praktické postupy pěstování lesů. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce: 952. (in Czech)
  41. Reddy A.R., Chaitanya K.V., Vivekanandan M. (2004): Drought-induced responses of photosynthesis and antioxidant metabolism in higher plants. Journal of Plant Physiology, 161: 1189-1202. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  42. Saksa T., Uusitalo J., Lindeman H., Häyrynen E., Kulju S., Huuskonen S. (2021): Decision support tool for tree species selection in forest regeneration based on harvester data. Forests, 12: 1329. Go to original source...
  43. Sharma R.P., Bílek L., Vacek Z., Vacek S. (2017): Modelling crown width-diameter relationship for Scots pine in central Europe. Trees, 31: 1875-1889. Go to original source...
  44. Skovsgaard J.P., Vanclay J.K. (2013): Forest site productivity: A review of spatial and temporal variability in natural site conditions. Forestry, 86: 305-315. Go to original source...
  45. Spinoni J., Vogt J.V., Naumann G., Barbosa P., Dosio A. (2018): Will drought events become more frequent and severe in Europe? International Journal of Climatology, 38: 1718-1736. Go to original source...
  46. Špulák O., Černý J. (2023): Scots pine potential under climate change conditions: Review. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu/Reports of Forestry Research, 68: 49-58. (in Czech) Go to original source...
  47. Sutton R. (1993): Mounding site preparation: A review of European and North American experience. New Forests, 7: 151-192. Go to original source...
  48. Szeligowski H. (2005): Potencjał wzrostowy korzeni sadzonek sosny zwyczajnej, świerka pospolitego i modrzewia europejskiego. Sylwan, 149: 28-34. (in Polish)
  49. Thiffault N., Jobidon R. (2006): How to shift unproductive Kalmia angustifolia - Rhododendron groenlandicum heath to productive conifer plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 2364-2376. Go to original source...
  50. Thiffault N., Jobidon R., Munson A.D. (2003): Performance and physiology of large containerized and bare-root spruce seedlings in relation to scarification and competition in Québec (Canada). Annals of Forest Science, 60: 645-655. Go to original source...
  51. Vacek S., Vacek Z., Bílek L., Simon J., Remeš J., Hůnová I., Král J., Putalová T., Mikeska M. (2016): Structure, regeneration and growth of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands with respect to changing climate and environmental pollution. Silva Fennica, 50: 1564. Go to original source...
  52. Vacek S., Vacek Z., Remeš J., Bílek L., Hůnová I., Bulušek D., Fuchs Z., Simon J. (2017): Sensitivity of unmanaged relict pine forest in the Czech Republic to climate change and air pollution. Trees, 31: 1599-1617. Go to original source...
  53. Vacek Z., Cukor J., Vacek S., Linda R., Prokůpková A., Podrázský V., Gallo, J., Vacek O., Šimůnek V., Drábek O., Hájek V., Spasić M., Brichta J. (2021): Production potential, biodiversity and soil properties of forest reclamations: Opportunities or risk of introduced coniferous tree species under climate change? European Journal of Forest Research, 140: 1243-1266. Go to original source...
  54. Vacek Z., Vacek S., Cukor J. (2023): European forests under global climate change: Review of tree growth processes, crises and management strategies. Journal of Environmental Management, 332: 117353. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  55. Viewegh J., Kusbach A., Mikeska M. (2003): Czech forest ecosystem classification. Journal of Forest Science, 49: 74-82. Go to original source...
  56. Vilà-Cabrera A., Martínez-Vilalta J., Galiano L., Retana J. (2013): Patterns of forest decline and regeneration across Scots pine populations. Ecosystems, 16: 323-335. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.