J. For. Sci., 2025, 71(10):501-515 | DOI: 10.17221/53/2025-JFS

The use of LiDAR for the documentation and modelling of cultural heritage sites hidden by the forest canopyOriginal Paper

Nikola Žižlavská ORCID..., Stanislav Herber ORCID...
Department of Forest Management and Applied Geoinformatics, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

The large number of charcoal kiln sites (CHKS) preserved as cultural heritage monuments demonstrates how extensive forest management for charcoal production has influenced the present forest dynamics and contributed to industrial expansion. Therefore, it is necessary not only to have a reliable methodology for detecting and documenting individual kiln sites for management and protection purposes but also to present the results in a meaningful way to the public. The aim is to optimise the data processing workflow from airborne laser scanning (ALS) point cloud to printable model (from LAS format to STL), determine the influence of vegetation cover at the time of data collection on the quality of the resulting model, verify the quality of printed models using photogrammetry, and finally, produce printed models of CHKS as cultural heritage objects in a form that can be effectively presented to the public. After comparison of different ground filtering methods, we conclude that the most accurate method for creating a precise ground representation for our area of interest was the Cloth Simulation Filtering (CSF) algorithm. From the filtered point cloud, a high-resolution raster surface was generated, which served as the basis for CHKS detection. Using our proposed methodology – combining the topographic position index (TPI) with a 0–5% slope threshold – we achieved a significant improvement in detection performance compared to using a zero-slope threshold alone, with the F1 score increasing from 0.667 to 1.000. Subsequently, the most representative kiln site was selected, which was then processed and optimised using various software tools, resulting in an exchangeable STL file suitable for dissemination and 3D printing. The accuracy of the printable model was then evaluated. We conclude that point cloud from the winter flight campaign achieved higher accuracy. The average height differences were similar; however, the spatial distribution varied between the two clouds. The model from the winter flight campaign had more evenly distributed deviations and overall was better for modelling the CHKS.

Keywords: 3D mesh; 3D objects; 3D printing; charcoal kiln sites; photogrammetry

Received: July 15, 2025; Revised: September 5, 2025; Accepted: September 17, 2025; Published: October 30, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Žižlavská N, Herber S. The use of LiDAR for the documentation and modelling of cultural heritage sites hidden by the forest canopy. J. For. Sci. 2025;71(10):501-515. doi: 10.17221/53/2025-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aspinall A., Gaffney C., Schmidt A. (2008): Magnetometry for Archaeologists. Lanham, Altamira Press: 208. Available at: https://archive.org/details/magnetometryfora0000aspi (accessed Apr 3, 2025).
  2. Bajer A., Novák J. (2022): Cultural heritage monuments in forests, their protection and their possible use in tourism. In: Fialová J. (ed.): Public Recreation and Landscape Protection - With Environment Hand in Hand… Proceedings of the 13th Conference, Křtiny, May 9-10, 2022: 74-78. Go to original source...
  3. Ballarin M., Balletti C., Vernier P. (2018): Replicas in cultural heritage: 3D printing and the museum experience. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 42: 55-62. Go to original source...
  4. Comes R., Neamțu C.G.D., Grec C., Buna Z.L., Găzdac C., Mateescu-Suciu L. (2022): Digital reconstruction of fragmented cultural heritage assets: The case study of the Dacian embossed disk from Piatra Roșie. Applied Sciences, 12: 8131. Go to original source...
  5. Dell'Unto N. (2016): Using 3D GIS platforms to analyse and interpret the past. In: Forte M., Campana S. (eds): Digital Methods and Remote Sensing in Archaeology: Archaeology in the Age of Sensing. Cham, Springer: 305-322. Go to original source...
  6. Evans J.S., Hudak A.T. (2007): A multiscale curvature algorithm for classifying discrete return LiDAR in forested environments. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45: 1029-1038. Go to original source...
  7. Guo Q., Li W., Yu H., Alvarez O. (2010): Effects of topographic variability and LiDAR sampling density on several DEM interpolation methods. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 76: 701-712. Go to original source...
  8. Guttry L., Olow I.A., Paron P., Bolognesi M., Leonardi U., Stendardi L., Argenti G., Moriondo M., Dibari C. (2025): A multi-sensor remote sensing approach to monitor illegal charcoal production sites in Somalia's forests. In: EGU General Assembly 2025, Vienna, Apr 27 - May 2, 2025: EGU25-17735. Go to original source...
  9. Kolte A., Bhaskaran V., Hoyle C. (2024): Optimizing 3D printing process parameters to minimize surface roughness using Bayesian optimization. In: Proceedings of the ASME 2024 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference. Volume 2A: 44th Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (CIE), Washington, DC, Aug 25-28, 2024. Go to original source...
  10. Kučera A., Holík L., Knott R., Adamec Z., Volánek J., Bajer A. (2023): The soil environment of abandoned charcoal kiln platforms in a low-altitude Central European forest. Forests, 14: 29. Go to original source...
  11. Lee H., Slatton K.C., Roth B.E., Cropper W.P. (2010): Adaptive clustering of airborne LiDAR data to segment individual tree crowns in managed pine forests. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 31: 117-139. Go to original source...
  12. Lim C.K., Tan K.L., Ahmed M.F. (2023): Conservation of culture heritage tourism: A case study in Langkawi Kubang Badak remnant charcoal kilns. Sustainability, 15: 6554. Go to original source...
  13. Ludemann T., Michiels H.G., Nölken W. (2004): Spatial patterns of past wood exploitation, natural wood supply and growth conditions: Indications of natural tree species distribution by anthracological studies of charcoal-burning remains. European Journal of Forest Research, 123: 283-292. Go to original source...
  14. Markiewicz J.S., Podlasiak P., Zawieska D. (2015): Attempts to automate the process of generation of orthoimages of objects of cultural heritage. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, XL-5/W4: 393-400. Go to original source...
  15. Mastrolonardo G., Francioso O., Certini G. (2018): Relic charcoal hearth soils: A neglected carbon reservoir. Case study at Marsiliana forest, Central Italy. Geoderma, 315: 88-95. Go to original source...
  16. Meng X., Currit N., Zhao K. (2010): Ground filtering algorithms for airborne LiDAR data: A review of critical issues. Remote Sensing, 2: 833-860. Go to original source...
  17. Mokroš M., Mikita T., Singh A., Tomaštík J., Chudá J., Wężyk P., Kuželka K., Surový P., Klimánek M., Zięba-Kulawik K., Bobrowski R., Liang X. (2021): Novel low-cost mobile mapping systems for forest inventories as terrestrial laser scanning alternatives. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 104: 102512. Go to original source...
  18. Musselman K.N., Margulis S.A., Molotch N.P. (2013): Estimation of solar direct beam transmittance of conifer canopies from airborne LiDAR. Remote Sensing of Environment, 136: 402-415. Go to original source...
  19. Nygren T., Foka A., Buckland P. (2014): The Status Quo of Digital Humanities in Sweden: Past, Present and Future of Digital History. Berlin, H-Soz-Kult: 18.
  20. Oliveira C., Aravecchia S., Pradalier C., Robin V., Devin S. (2021): The use of remote sensing tools for accurate charcoal kilns' inventory and distribution analysis: Comparative assessment and prospective. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 105: 102641. Go to original source...
  21. Paradise T.R. (2019): Cultural heritage management and GIS in Petra, Jordan. ArcNews. Available at: https://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/summer12articles/cultural-heritage-management-and-gis-in-petra-jordan.html?utm_source=chatgpt.com
  22. Schmidt M., Mölder A., Schönfelder E., Engel F., Fortmann-Valtink W. (2016): Charcoal kiln sites, associated landscape attributes and historic forest conditions: DTM-based investigations in Hesse (Germany). Forest Ecosystems, 3: 8. Go to original source...
  23. Schneider A., Bonhage A., Raab A., Hirsch F., Raab T. (2020): Large-scale mapping of anthropogenic relief features - Legacies of past forest use in two historical charcoal production areas in Germany. Geoarchaeology, 35: 545-561. Go to original source...
  24. Štular B., Kokalj Ž., Oštir K., Nuninger L. (2012): Visualization of lidar-derived relief models for detection of archaeological features. Journal of Archaeological Science, 39: 3354-3360. Go to original source...
  25. Tarolli P., Cao W., Sofia G., Evans D., Ellis E.C. (2019): From features to fingerprints: A general diagnostic framework for anthropogenic geomorphology. Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment, 43: 95-128. Go to original source...
  26. Verhegghen A., Martinez-Sanchez L., Bolognesi M., Meroni M., Rembold F., Vojnović P., Van der Velde M. (2023): Automatic detection of charcoal kilns on Very High Resolution images with a computer vision approach in Somalia. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 125: 103524. Go to original source...
  27. Vinci G., Vanzani F., Fontana A., Campana S. (2024): LiDAR applications in archaeology: A systematic review. Archaeological Prospection, 32: 81-101. Go to original source...
  28. Wilson P.F., Stott J., Warnett J.M., Attridge A., Smith M.P., Williams M.A. (2017): Evaluation of touchable 3D-printed replicas in museums. Curator, 60: 445-465. Go to original source...
  29. Zhang K., Chen S.C., Whitman D., Shyu M.L., Yan J., Zhang C. (2003): A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LiDAR data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 41: 872-882. Go to original source...
  30. Zhang W., Qi J., Wan P., Wang H., Xie D., Wang X., Yan G. (2016): An easy-to-use airborne LiDAR data filtering method based on cloth simulation. Remote Sensing, 8: 501. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.