J. For. Sci., 2025, 71(7):336-346 | DOI: 10.17221/31/2025-JFS

Forest as a biological asset – An accounting and tax perspective in the Czech RepublicOriginal Paper

Petra Hlaváčková ORCID...1, Jitka Fialová ORCID...2, Jiří Schneider ORCID...3
1 Department of Forest and Wood Product Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Landscape Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
3 Department of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

This paper analyses the accounting and tax treatment of forests as biological assets in the Czech Republic under Act No. 563/1991 Coll., on Accounting, and its implementing regulations. It compares national approaches with the International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS), focusing on the International Accounting Standard IAS 41 – Agriculture. A comparative-analytical method was used to identify key differences in classification, valuation, and reporting practices. Czech legislation values forests at historical cost and classifies them as non-depreciable land, whereas IFRS requires fair value measurement, capturing biological transformation and the economic potential of forest ecosystems. The findings show that while the Czech framework ensures legal clarity and tax alignment, it lacks integration with environmental accounting frameworks such as the United Nations System of Integrated Environmental Economic Accounts (SEEA) and does not reflect ecosystem services or ESG (environmental, social, governance) reporting needs. In contrast, IFRS provides a dynamic representation of forest assets, supporting transparency and comparability in international contexts. The study contributes to the ongoing harmonisation debate by offering recommendations to improve the alignment of Czech accounting with international standards, thus supporting sustainable forest management and enhancing investment credibility. Its originality lies in combining legislative analysis with international practice review, highlighting the gap between ecological value and financial reporting in forestry.

Keywords: Czech Accounting Standards; environmental sustainability; forest management; International Financial Reporting Standards; taxation

Received: April 1, 2025; Revised: May 24, 2025; Accepted: May 26, 2025; Prepublished online: July 15, 2025; Published: July 31, 2025  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hlaváčková P, Fialová J, Schneider J. Forest as a biological asset – An accounting and tax perspective in the Czech Republic. J. For. Sci. 2025;71(7):336-346. doi: 10.17221/31/2025-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Aziz K. (2015): Material Losses in Cost Accounting. Available at: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/material-losses-costaccounting-khalid-aziz
    2. Ball R. (2006): International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS): Pros and cons for investors. Accounting and Business Research, 36: 5-27. Go to original source...
    3. Barth M.E., Beaver W.H., Landsman W.R. (2001): The relevance of the value relevance literature effort financial accounting standard setting: Another view. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31: 77-104. Go to original source...
    4. Bohušová H., Svoboda P. (2016): Biological assets: In what way should be measured by SMEs? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 230: 62-69. Go to original source...
    5. Chamber of Auditors (2020): Metodická pomůcka pro audit společností připravujících účetní závěrku podle Mezinárodních standardů účetního výkaznictví (IFRS) dle stavu k 1. lednu 2020. Prague, Chamber of Auditors of the Czech Republic: 22. (in Czech)
    6. CAS (2024): České účetní standardy pro účetní jednotky, které účtují podle vyhlášky č. 500/2002 Sb., ve znění pozdějších předpisů. Prague, Ministry of Finance of the Czech Republic: 80. Available at: https://www.mfcr.cz/assets/cs/media/Ucetnictvi_2018_Ceske-ucetni-standardy-pro-500-2002_v02.pdf (in Czech)
    7. CSO (2023): Environmental Accounts. Prague, Czech Statistical Office. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/environmentalni-ucty
    8. Čermáková M. (2013): Comparison of forest cover representation in the corporate information system according to the legal norms of the Czech Republic and according to the approach of international financial reporting standards IFRS. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu/Reports of Forestry Research, 58: 78-84.
    9. Dickie I., Neupauer S. (2019): Natural capital accounts: Nations and organizations. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy, 8: 379-393. Go to original source...
    10. Drolet S., LeBel L. (2010): Forest harvesting entrepreneurs, perception of their business status and its influence on performance evaluation. Forest Policy and Economics, 12: 2087-298. Go to original source...
    11. Dušek J. (2015): Normy mank přirozených úbytků, úhynů zvířat a ztratného zásob: Praktický návod s podklady na jejich určení. Prague, Grada Publishing: 176. (in Czech)
    12. Dvořáková D. (2017): Finanční účetnictví a výkaznictví podle mezinárodních standardů IFRS. 5th Ed. Brno, Computer Press: 328. (in Czech)
    13. Elad C. (2004): Fair value accounting in the agricultural sector: Some implications for international accounting harmonization. European Accounting Review, 13: 621-641. Go to original source...
    14. FAO (2024): The State of the World's Forests 2024 - Forest-Sector Innovations Towards a More Sustainable Future. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: 104. Available at: https://openknowledge.fao.org/items/9c056c59-fa14-4887-967f-f64e460be56d
    15. Ferreira A., Moulang C., Hendro B. (2010): Environmental management accounting and innovation: An exploratory analysis. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 23: 920-948. Go to original source...
    16. Gonçalves R., Lopes P., Graig R. (2017): Value relevance of biological assets under IFRS. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 29: 118-126. Go to original source...
    17. Govigli V.M., Bruzzese S. (2023a): Assessing the emotional and spiritual dimension of forests: A review of existing participatory methods. Forest Policy and Economics; 153: 102990. Go to original source...
    18. Govigli V., Bruzzese L. (2023b): IFRS application to biological assets: Analysis and valuation issues. Accounting in Europe, 20: 55-74.
    19. Gray R. (2002): Thirty years of social accounting, auditing and reporting: What (if anything) have we learned? Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 19: 793-819. Go to original source...
    20. Hájek M. (2013): Problematika externalit při využití environmentálního manažerského účetnictví v lesním hospodářství. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu/Reports of Forestry Research, 58: 280-285. (in Czech)
    21. Hájek M., Pulkrab K., Hyršlová J. (2012): Forestry externalities in environmental management accounting system. Problems of Management in the 21th Century, 5: 31-45. Go to original source...
    22. Herbohn K., Herbohn J. (2006): International Accounting Standard (IAS) 41: What are the implications for reporting forest assets? Small-scale Forest Economics Management and Policy, 5: 175-189. Go to original source...
    23. Hinke J., Stárová M. (2014): The fair value model for the measurement of biological assets and agricultural produce in the Czech Republic. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12: 213-220. Go to original source...
    24. Hlaváčková P. (2008): Environmentální manažerské účetnictví jako nástroj managementu dřevozpracujícího podniku. In: Gejdoš P., Potkány M. (eds): Controlling and Quality Management in Enterprises. [CD-ROM]. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 166-173. (in Czech)
    25. Hlaváčková P. (2009): The impact of international accounting standards on forestry. In: Strouhal J. (ed.): Proceedings of the 9th Pedagogical Conference, Prague, Dec 5, 2009: 40-45.
    26. Hlaváčková P., Šafařík D. (2022): Accounting and tax aspects of losses on the quantity of harvested and traded timber. In: Controlling of Business and Production Processing in Forest Based Industry. Zagreb, WoodEMA: 37-45.
    27. Holécy J. (2019): Economics of Forestry. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen: 235.
    28. Holubová H. (2010): Biological assets - Accounting in compliance with IFRS and Czech accounting standards. [MSc. Thesis.] Prague, University of Economics in Prague. (in Czech)
    29. IAS 41 (2009): International Accounting Standard IAS 41 - Agriculture. Deloitte. Available at: https://www.iasplus.com/en/standards/ias/ias41
    30. Jasch C. (2006): EMA as the next step in the evolution of Management Accounting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14: 1190-1193. Go to original source...
    31. Kupčák V. (2003): Ekonomika lesního hospodářství. Brno, Mendel University in Brno: 257. (in Czech)
    32. Lee H., Kim J.H., Jung. H.S. (2025): ESG-KIBERT: A new paradigm in ESG evaluation using NLP and industry-specific customization. Decision Support Systems, 193: 114440. Go to original source...
    33. Mala R., Chand P. (2012): Effect of the global financial crisis on accounting convergence. Accounting and Finance, 52: 21-46. Go to original source...
    34. Mateş D., Grosu V. (2009): Evaluating and recognizing biological assets and agricultural activities according to IAS 41. Lucrări Ştiinţifice - Seria Agronomie, 51: 1-6.
    35. MoA (2023): Research, Development and Innovation Strategy of the Ministry of Agriculture for 2023-2032. Prague, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic: 174. Available at: https://eagri.cz/public/portal/-a30164---YZ5Q7CJN/anglicka-verze-koncepce-vyzkumu-vyvoje-a-inovaci-ministerstva-zemedelstvi-na-obdobi-2023
    36. Morávek Z. (2015): Manka a škody u zemědělských podnikatelů. Prague, DAUČ. Available at: https://www.dauc.cz/clanky/7157/manka-a-skody-u-zemedelskych-podnikatelu (in Czech)
    37. Orbán I., Dékán T., Kiss Á. (2015): Measurement of agricultural activities according to International Financial Reporting Standards. Procedia Economics and Finance, 32: 777-732. Go to original source...
    38. Pecenka R., Lenz H., Hering T. (2020): Options for optimizing the drying process and reducing dry matter losses in whole-tree storage of poplar from short-rotation coppices in Germany. Forests, 11: 374. Go to original source...
    39. Sedláček J. (2007): Harmonisation of agricultural accounting. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 55: 152-156. Go to original source...
    40. Schaltegger S., Hahn T., Burritt R. (2000): Environmental Management Accounting: Overview and Main Approaches. Lueneburg and Canberra, Center for Sustainability Management: 19.
    41. Stebbings E., Hooper T., Austen M.C., Papathanasoupoulou E., Xiaoyu Y. (2021): Accounting for benefits from natural capital: Applying a novel composite indicator framework to the marine environment. Ecosystem Services, 50: 101308. Go to original source...
    42. Šafařík D., Dudík R., Hlaváčková P. (2011): Accounting, financial and tax aspects of creating reserves and cultivation activities. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu/Reports of Forestry Research, 56: 150-153. (in Czech)
    43. Šafařík D., Hlaváčková P. (2015): Losses in the amount of produced and sold timber. Procedia Economics and Finance, 34: 51-57. Go to original source...
    44. Šafařík D., Hlaváčková P., Březina D. (2021): Determination of standards of raw timber natural losses due to shrinkage at long-term dry storage. Journal of Forest Science, 67: 195-203. Go to original source...
    45. Šafařík D., Hlaváčková P., Michal J. (2022): Potential of forest biomass resources for renewable energy production in the Czech Republic. Energies, 15: 47. Go to original source...
    46. Šišák L. (2001): Social and economic importance of the timber production in the Czech Republic. In: Holécy J., Klubica D. (eds): Generation and Measurement of Forest Value. Proceedings of a conference with international participation, Zvolen, Sept 13, 2001: 181-190.
    47. United Nations (2021a): System of Environmental-Economic Accounting: Ecosystem Accounting (SEEA EA). New York, United Nations: 409. Available at: https://seea.un.org/ecosystem-accounting
    48. United Nations (2021b): COVID-19 Impacts on the Forest Sector in Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia. Geneva, United Nations and the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: 27. Available at: https://unece.org/info/publications/pub/363314

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content