J. For. Sci., 2024, 70(11):593-601 | DOI: 10.17221/54/2024-JFS

The effect of mechanical site preparation on sandy soil properties in Scots pine plantationsOriginal Paper

Ján ®idó ORCID..., Milan Kaąiar, Marián Homolák ORCID..., Erika Gömöryová ORCID...
Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

Sandy soils represent an extreme environment for tree growth. Traditionally, site preparation before planting involves removing logging residues (LRR) and ploughing. An alternative method is incorporating logging residues (LRI) into the topsoil which may enhance tree regeneration and seedling growth. The aim of this study was to assess whether and how different site preparation techniques affect soil physico-chemical and microbial properties over the long term. The study was performed in the Záhorská níľina lowland (Slovakia) in September 2020. Soil samples were taken in two 25-year-old Pinus sylvestris (L.) plantations along five soil profiles in each stand, down to a depth of 30 cm. Results showed a significant increase in carbon and nitrogen concentration and soil moisture in the LRI plot. However, soil pH and phosphorus content significantly decreased. No significant differences were observed in calcium, magnesium, and potassium concentrations between the differently treated plots. The LRI plot also exhibited a significant increase in microbial biomass carbon, N-mineralisation, and catalase activity. The results indicate that different mechanical site preparation methods may impact soil properties over the long term, likely through improved seedling survival and tree growth.

Keywords: logging residues; microbial properties; physico-chemical properties; Pinus sylvestris (L.); soil preparation

Received: August 5, 2024; Revised: October 18, 2024; Accepted: October 30, 2024; Prepublished online: November 22, 2024; Published: November 25, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
®idó J, Kaąiar M, Homolák M, Gömöryová E. The effect of mechanical site preparation on sandy soil properties in Scots pine plantations. J. For. Sci. 2024;70(11):593-601. doi: 10.17221/54/2024-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alef K. (1991): Methodenhandbuch Bodenmikrobiologie: Aktivitäten, Biomasse, Differenzierung. Landsberg, Ecomed: 284. (in German)
    2. Bray R.H., Kurtz L.T. (1945): Determination of total, organic, and available forms of phosphorus in soils. Soil Science, 59: 39-46. Go to original source...
    3. Bruand A., Hartmann C., Lesturgez G. (2005): Physical properties of tropical sandy soils: A large range of behaviours. In: Management of Tropical Sandy Soils for Sustainable Agriculture: A Holistic Approach for Sustainable Development of Problem Soils in the Tropics. Bangkok, FAO: 148-158.
    4. Burgess-Conforti J.R., Moore P.A., Owens P.R., Miller D.M., Ashworth A.J., Hays P.D., Evans-White M., Anderson K.R. (2019): Are soils beneath coniferous tree stands more acidic than soils beneath deciduous tree stands? Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26: 14920-14929. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Campbell C., Chapman S.J., Cameron C.M., Davidson M.S., Potts J.M. (2003): A rapid microtiter plate method to measure carbon dioxide evolved from carbon substrate amendments so as to determine the physiological profiles of soil microbial communities by using whole soil. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69: 3593-3599. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Diers M., Weigel R., Culmsee H., Leuschner C. (2021): Soil carbon and nutrient stocks under Scots pine plantations in comparison to European beech forests: A paired-plot study across forests with different management history and precipitation regimes. Forest Ecosystems, 8: 1-16. Go to original source...
    7. Foote J.A., Boutton T.W., Scott D.A. (2015): Soil C and N storage and microbial biomass in US southern pine forests: Influence of forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 355: 48-57. Go to original source...
    8. Hendrickson O.Q., Chatarpaul L., Robinson J.B. (1985): Effects of two methods of timber harvesting on microbial processes in forest soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 49: 739-746. Go to original source...
    9. Hill M.O. (1973): Diversity and evenness: A unifying notation and its consequences. Ecology, 54: 427-432. Go to original source...
    10. Hou L., Zhang Y., Li Z., Shao G., Song L., Sun Q. (2021): Comparison of soil properties, understory vegetation species diversities and soil microbial diversities between Chinese fir plantation and close-to-natural forest. Forests, 12: 632. Go to original source...
    11. Insam H. (1997): A new set of substrates proposed for community characterization in environmental samples. In: Insam H., Rangger A. (eds): Microbial Communities: Functional versus Structural Approaches. Heidelberg, Springer: 260-261. Go to original source...
    12. Islam K.R., Weil R.R. (1998): Microwave irradiation of soil for routine measurement of microbial biomass carbon. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 27: 408-416. Go to original source...
    13. Jing Z., Cheng J., Su J., Bai Y., Jin J. (2014): Changes in plant community composition and soil properties under 3-decade grazing exclusion in semiarid grassland. Ecological Engineering, 64: 171-178. Go to original source...
    14. Johansson M.B. (1995): The chemical composition of needle and leaf litter from Scots pine, Norway spruce and white birch in Scandinavian forests. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 68: 49-62. Go to original source...
    15. Kacálek D., Novák J., Duąek D., Slodičák M. (2018): Litter fall and forest floor under conifer stands: Silviculture consequences - A review. In: Gonçalves A.C. (ed.): Conifers. London, IntechOpen: 77-90. Go to original source...
    16. Kandeler E. (1993): Bestimmung der N-Mineralisation im anaeroben Brutversuch. In: Schinner F., Öhlinger R., Kandeler E., Margesin R. (eds): Bodenbiologische Arbeitsmethoden. Berlin, Springer: 160-161. (in German)
    17. Karlsson K., Tamminen P. (2013): Long-term effects of stump harvesting on soil properties and tree growth in Scots pine and Norway spruce stands. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 28: 550-558. Go to original source...
    18. Khaziev F.K. (1976): Fermentativnaja aktivnost' počv. Metodičeskoje Posobje. Moscow, Nauka Moskva: 262. (in Russian)
    19. Konôpka J., Greppel E., Lipták J. (2012): Natural or artificial regeneration of pine stands in Záhorie. Forestry Journal, 58: 100-110.
    20. Mäkipää R., Abramoff R., Adamczyk B., Baldy V., Biryol C., Bosela M., Casals P., Yuste J.C., Dondini M., Filipek S., Garcia-Pausas J., Gros R., Gömöryová E., Hashimoto S., Hassegawa M., Immonen P., Laiho R., Li H., Li Q., Luyssaertl S., Menival C., Mori T., Naudts K., Santonja M., Smolander A., Toriyama J., Tupek B., Ubeda X., Verkerk P.J., Lehtonen A. (2023): How does management affect soil C sequestration and greenhouse gas fluxes in boreal and temperate forests? - A review. Forest Ecology and Management, 529: 120637. Go to original source...
    21. Moffat A., Nisbet T., Nicoll B. (2011): Environmental effects of stump and root harvesting. In: Research Note - Forestry Commission Bulletin. Edinburgh, Forestry Commission: 12.
    22. Novotný R., Fadrhonsová V., Kulhavý J., Lorencová H., Matějíček J., Menąík L., Peąková V., ©rámek V. (2011): Vliv drcení klestu na půdu a na růst sazenic smrku, buku a jedle v podmínkách LS Ledeč. Výzkumný projekt grantové sluľby LČR - Závěrečná zpráva. Hradec Králové, Lesy České republiky: 51. (in Czech)
    23. Ouro G., Pérez-Batallón P., Merino A. (2001): Effects of sylvicultural practices on nutrient status in a Pinus radiata plantation: Nutrient export by tree removal and nutrient dynamics in decomposing logging residues. Annals of Forest Science, 58: 411-422. Go to original source...
    24. Pérez-Batallón P., Ouro G., Macías F., Merino A. (2001): Initial mineralization of organic matter in a forest plantation soil following different logging residue management techniques. Annals of Forest Science, 58: 807-818. Go to original source...
    25. Ross D.J., Sparling G.P., Burke C.M., Smith C.T. (1995): Microbial biomass C and N, and mineralizable-N, in litter and mineral soil under Pinus radiata on a coastal sand: Influence of stand age and harvest management. Plant Soil, 175: 167-177. Go to original source...
    26. Sanchez F.G., Carter E.A., Klepac J.F. (2003): Enhancing the soil organic matter pool through biomass incorporation. Biomass and Bioenergy, 24: 337-349. Go to original source...
    27. Sanchez F.G., Carter E.A., Leggett Z.H. (2009): Loblolly pine growth and soil nutrient stocks eight years after forest slash incorporation. Forest Ecology and Management, 257: 1413-1419. Go to original source...
    28. ©urda P., Lichner Ą., Kollár J., Zvala A., Igaz D. (2021): Evaluation of soil properties in variously aged Scots pine plantations established on sandy soil. Journal of Hydrology and Hydromechanics, 69: 347-355. Go to original source...
    29. Węgiel A., Jakubowski J., Molińska-Glura M., Polowy K., Węgiel J., Gornowicz R. (2023): Effect of logging residue removal and mechanical site preparation on productivity of the subsequent Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands. Annals of Forest Science, 80: 5. Go to original source...
    30. Wu S.H., Huang B.H., Huang C.L., Li G., Liao P.C. (2017): The aboveground vegetation type and underground soil property mediate the divergence of soil microbiomes and the biological interactions. Microbial Ecology, 75: 434-446. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    31. Zachar D. (1965): Zalesňovanie nelesných pôd. Lesníctvo a poµovníctvo. Bratislava, Slovenské vydavateµstvo pôdohospodárskej literatúry: 229. (in Slovak)

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content