J. For. Sci., 2024, 70(6):317-334 | DOI: 10.17221/24/2024-JFS

Forest carbon and a regional perspective on the effectiveness of financial instruments within the forest bioeconomyOriginal Paper

Michaela Perunová1, Jarmila Zimmermannová2, Tereza Schovánková2
1 Department of Forestry and Wood Economics, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Science and Research Centre, Faculty of Health Sciences, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic

The forest bioeconomy links to a climate-neutral economy for which effective economic and financial promotion is essential to sustainable development. The main purpose of this study was to examine the effects of financial support on the development of the forest bioeconomy in the Czech Republic in the period 2000–2021. Research objectives were met by applying literature review, time series analysis, spatial data analysis, cartogram and cartodiagram method, correlation analysis, and regression analysis. Firstly, regional divergences in financial flows were observed. Owing to the bark beetle calamity, the peak of the financial support was detected in the Vysočina Region (CZK 4 658/EUR 190 per ha), and the Olomouc Region (CZK 2 780/EUR 113 per ha) in 2020. An upward trend – more than 6-fold growth of financial flows to forestry was found. Secondly, the forest carbon model was discovered and tested. Financial contribution for reforestation, establishment, and tending of forest stands increases net carbon sinks while financial contribution for green and environmentally friendly technologies increases net carbon sources. Regional carbon reservoirs offer the potential to contribute to climate targets and achieve sustainable progress.

Keywords: circular economy; Czech Republic; financial support; forestry; regional analysis; spatial analysis

Received: March 11, 2024; Revised: April 18, 2024; Accepted: April 26, 2024; Published: June 25, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Perunová M, Zimmermannová J, Schovánková T. Forest carbon and a regional perspective on the effectiveness of financial instruments within the forest bioeconomy. J. For. Sci. 2024;70(6):317-334. doi: 10.17221/24/2024-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Allen C.D., Macalady A.K., Chenchouni H., Bachelet D., McDowell N.G., Vennetier M., Kitzberger T., Rigling A., Breshears D.D., Hogg E.H., Gonzalez P., Fensham R.J., Zhang Z., Castro J., Demidova N., Lim J., Allard G., Running S.W., Semerci A., Cobb N.S. (2010): A global overview of drought and heat-induced tree mortality reveals emerging climate change risks for forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 259: 660-684. Go to original source...
    2. Antonelli M., Donelli D., Carlone L., Maggini V., Firenzuoli F., Bedeschi E. (2022): Effects of forest bathing (shinrin-yoku) on individual well-being: An umbrella review. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 32: 1842-1867. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Aoyagi S., Managi S. (2004): The impact of subsidies on efficiency and production: Empirical test of forestry in Japan. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 3: 216-230. Go to original source...
    4. Börner J., Baylis K., Corbera E., Ezzine-de-Blas D., Honey-Rosés J., Persson U.M., Wunder S. (2017): The effectiveness of payments for environmental services. World Development, 96: 359-374. Go to original source...
    5. Boscolo M., Dijk K.V., Savenije H. (2010): Financing sustainable small-scale forestry: Lessons from developing national forest financing strategies in Latin America. Forests, 1: 230-249. Go to original source...
    6. Bowditch E., Santopuoli G., Neroj B., Svetlik J., Tominlson M., Pohl V., Avdagić A., del Rio M., Zlatanov T., Maria H., Jamnická G., Serengil Y., Sarginci M., Brynleifsdóttir S.J., Lesinki J., Azevedo J.C. (2022): Application of climate-smart forestry - Forest manager response to the relevance of European definition and indicators. Trees, Forests and People, 9: 1-33. Go to original source...
    7. Brázdil R., Zahradník P., Szabó P., Chromá K., Dobrovolný P., Dolák L., Trnka M., Řehoř J., Suchánková S. (2022): Meteorological and climatological triggers of notable past and present bark beetle outbreaks in the Czech Republic. Climate of the Past, 18: 2155-2180. Go to original source...
    8. CENIA (2022): Zpráva o životním prostředí České republiky 2021. Prague, Česká informační agentura životního prostředí: 121. Available at: https://www.cenia.cz/publikace/zpravy-o-zp/ (accessed Jan 12, 2023; in Czech).
    9. ČNB (2023): Kurzy devizového trhu. Prague, Česká národní banka. Available at: https://www.cnb.cz/cs/financni-trhy/devizovy-trh/kurzy-devizoveho-trhu/kurzy-devizoveho-trhu/ (in Czech).
    10. Cramer W., Guiot J., Fader M., Garrabou J., Gattuso J.P., Iglesias A., Lange M.A., Lionello P., Llasat M.C., Paz S., Peñuelas J., Snoussi M., Toreti A., Tsimplis M.N., Xoplaki E. (2018): Climate change and interconnected risks to sustainable development in the Mediterranean. Nature Climate Change, 8: 972-980. Go to original source...
    11. CZSO (2023): Česká republika od roku 1989 v číslech. Prague, Czech Statistical Office. Available at: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/ceska-republika-od-roku-1989-v-cislech-aktualizovano-12122023 (in Czech).
    12. Danley B. (2019): Forest owner objectives typologies: Instruments for each owner type or instruments for most owner types? Forest Policy and Economics, 105: 72-82. Go to original source...
    13. De Groot M., Diaci J., Ogris N. (2019): Forest management history is an important factor in bark beetle outbreaks: Lessons for the future. Forest Ecology and Management, 433: 467-474. Go to original source...
    14. España F., Arriagada R., Melo O., Foster W. (2022): Forest plantation subsidies: Impact evaluation of the Chilean case. Forest Policy and Economics, 137: 1-9. Go to original source...
    15. European Commission (2018a): Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources (recast). European Commission. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2018/2001/oj
    16. European Commission (2018b): A Sustainable Bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the Connection between Economy, Society and the Environment; Update Bioeconomy Strategy. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: 107.
    17. European Commission (2019): The European Green Deal, COM/2019/640 Final, Document 52019DC0640. Brussels, European Commission: 24.
    18. European Commission (2021a): Brief on the Role of the Forest-based Bioeconomy in Mitigating Climate Change Through Carbon Storage and Material Substitution. Brussels, European Commission: 16.
    19. European Commission (2021b): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions New EU Forest Strategy for 2030, COM/2021/572 final. Brussels, European Commission: 28.
    20. European Commission (2021c): Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions 'Fit for 55': Delivering the EU's 2030 Climate Target on the Way to Climate Neutrality, COM/2021/550 Final. Brussels, European Commission: 14.
    21. European Commission (2022): Annex IIa to Regulation (EU) 2018/841. The Union Target and the National Targets of the Member States of Net Greenhouse Gas Removals Pursuant Article 4(2) to be Achieved in 2030. Brussels, European Commission: 25. Available at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R0841
    22. European Commission (2023): Guidance to Member States in improving the contribution of land-use, forestry and agriculture to enhance climate, energy and environment ambition. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: 198. Available at: https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a21ad24a-eaff-11ed-a05c-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
    23. Eurostat (2023): NUTS-Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics. Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/gisco/geodata/statistical-units/territorial-units-statistics (accessed Jan 12, 2023).
    24. European Parliament (2023a): Parliament adopts new carbon sinks goal that increases EU 2030 climate ambition. Press release 14-03-2023 12:23. 20230310IPR77223. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20230310IPR77223/parliament-adopts-new-carbon-sinks-goal-that-increases-eu-2030-climate-ambition
    25. European Parliament (2023b): Carbon removals: Parliament wants EU certification scheme to boost uptake. Press release 21-11-2023 12:46. 20231117IPR12212. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20231117IPR12212/carbon-removals-parliament-wants-eu-certification-scheme-to-boost-uptake
    26. European Parliament (2023c): Carbon Removals: MEPs adopt a new EU certification scheme. Press release 10-04-2024 18:11. 20240408IPR20306. Available at: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/press-room/20240408IPR20306/carbon-removals-meps-adopt-a-new-eu-certification-scheme
    27. Evans W.N. (2023): Durbin-Watson Significance Tables. Notre Dame, University of Notre Dame: 11.
    28. Falcone P.M., Tani A., Tartiu V.E., Imbriani C. (2020): Towards a sustainable forest-based bioeconomy in Italy: Findings from a SWOT analysis. Forest Policy and Economics, 110: 1-10. Go to original source...
    29. Farkic J., Isailovic G., Taylor S. (2021): Forest bathing as a mindful tourism practice. Annals of Tourism Research Empirical Insights, 2: 1-9. Go to original source...
    30. FISE (2023): Forests and climate. Forest Information System for Europe. Available at: https://forest.eea.europa.eu/topics/forest-and-climate/introduction (accessed Dec 8, 2023).
    31. Ford J.D., Bolton K., Shirley J., Pearce T., Tremblay M., Westlake M. (2012): Mapping human dimensions of climate change research in the Canadian Arctic. AMBIO, 41: 808-822. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Geoportál ČÚZK (2019): Data200. Prague, ČÚZK. Available at: https://geoportal.cuzk.cz/(S(stfrmrrqlpcqrjyzoobsvdyh))/Default.aspx?mode=TextMeta&side=mapy_data200&text­=dSady_mapyData200&head_tab=sekce-02-gp&menu=229
    33. Giuntoli J., Ramcilovic-Suominen S., Kallis G., Monbiot G., Oliver T. (2023): Exploring New Visions for a Sustainable Bioeconomy. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union: 57. Available at: https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2760/79421
    34. Hájek M., Holecová M., Smolová H., Jeřábek L., Frébort I. (2021): Current state and future directions of bioeconomy in the Czech Republic. New Biotechnology, 61: 1-8. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. He Y.P., Ren Y.Y. (2023): Can carbon sink insurance and financial subsidies improve the carbon sequestration capacity of forestry? Journal of Cleaner Production, 397: 1-13. Go to original source...
    36. Hlásny T., Barka I., Kulla L., Bucha T., Sedmák R., Trombik J. (2017): Sustainable forest management in a mountain region in the Central Western Carpathians, northeastern Slovakia: The role of climate change. Regional Environmental Change, 17: 65-77. Go to original source...
    37. Hlásny T., Zimová S., Merganicová K., Štěpánek P., Modlinger R., Turčáni M. (2021): Devastating outbreak of bark beetles in the Czech Republic: Drivers, impacts, and management implications. Forest Ecology and Management, 490: 1-13. Go to original source...
    38. IPCC (2023): Synthesis Report of the IPCC Sixth Assessment Report (AR6). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change: 85. Available at: https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6syr/pdf/IPCC_AR6_SYR_LongerReport.pdf (accessed Mar 10, 2023).
    39. IUFRO (2014a): Research Letter: Forest and Climate Change. Vienna, International Union of Forest Research Organizations: 6. Available at: https://www.iufro.org/download/file/20166/5575/research-letters-forests-climate-change.pdf
    40. IUFRO (2014b): Research Letter: On Forest Bioenergy. Vienna, International Union of Forest Research Organizations: 6. Available at: https://www.iufro.org/uploads/media/research-letters-forest-bioenergy.pdf
    41. Jinggang G., Peichen G. (2017): The potential and cost of increasing forest carbon sequestration in Sweden. Journal of Forest Economics, 29: 78-86. Go to original source...
    42. Karppinen H., Hänninen M., Valsta L. (2018): Forest owners' views on storing carbon in their forests. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 708-715. Go to original source...
    43. Keegan D., Kretschmer B., Elbsersen B., Panoutsou C. (2013): Review: Cascading the use of biomass. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 7: 193-206. Go to original source...
    44. Keeling C.D., Piper S., Whorf T.P., Keeling R.F. (2011): Evolution of natural and anthropogenic fluxes of atmospheric CO2 from 1957 to 2003. Tellus B: Chemical and Physical Meteorology, 63: 1-22. Go to original source...
    45. Kilgore M.A., Greene J.L., Jacobson M.G., Straka T.J., Daniels S.E. (2007): The influence of financial incentive programs in promoting sustainable forestry on the nation's family forests. Journal of Forestry, 105: 184-191.
    46. Kotecký V. (2015): Contribution of afforestation subsidies policy to climate change adaptation in the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy, 47: 112-120. Go to original source...
    47. Larsen J.B., Angelstam P., Bauhus J., Carvalho J.F., Diaci J., Dobrowolska D., Gazda A., Gustafsson L., Krumm F., Knoke T., Konczal A., Kuuluvainen T., Mason B., Motta R., Pötzelsberger E., Rigling A., Schuck A. (2022): Closer-to-Nature Forest Management: From Science to Policy 12. Joensuu, European Forest Institute: 54. Go to original source...
    48. Lee D.-H., Kim D., Kim S. (2018): Characteristics of forest carbon credit transactions in the voluntary carbon market. Climate Policy, 18: 235-245. Go to original source...
    49. Leoussis J., Brzezicka P. (2017): Access-to-finance Conditions for Investments in Bio-Based Industries and the Blue Economy. Luxembourg, Innovation Finance Advisory and European Investment Bank: 126.
    50. Liagre L., Pettenella D., Pra A., Carazo Ortiz F., Arguedas A.G., Chien C.N. (2021): How can national forest funds catalyse the provision of ecosystem services? Lessons learned from Costa Rica, Vietnam, and Morocco. Ecosystem Services, 47: 1-9. Go to original source...
    51. Liski J., Perruchoud D., Karjalainen T. (2002): Increasing carbon stocks in the forest soils of Western Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 169: 159-175. Go to original source...
    52. Lojda J., Ventrubová K. (2015): The grant policy of the forestry sector in the Czech Republic after 2013. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 60: 64-72.
    53. Mao G.X., Lan X.G., Cao Y.B., Chen Z.M., He Z.H., Lv Y.D., Wang Y.Z., Hu X.L., Wang G.F., Yan J. (2012): Effects of short-term forest bathing on human health in a broad-leaved evergreen forest in Zhejiang province, China. Biomedical and Environmental Sciences, 25: 317-324.
    54. Masiero M., Franceschinis C., Mattea S., Thiene M., Pettenella D., Scarpa R. (2018): Ecosystem services' values and improved revenue collection for regional protected areas. Ecosystem Services, 34: 136-153. Go to original source...
    55. Matthews H.D., Landry J.S., Partanen A.I. (2017): Estimating carbon budgets for ambitious climate targets. Current Climate Change Reports, 3: 69-77. Go to original source...
    56. Mattioli W., Ferrara C., Colonico M., Gentile C., Lombardo E., Presutti Saba E., Portoghesi L. (2024): Assessing forest accessibility for the multifunctional management of protected areas in central Italy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 67: 197-216. Go to original source...
    57. Merlo M., Croitoru L. (2005): Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Towards Total Economic Value. Wallingford, CABI: 406. Go to original source...
    58. Michalec J., Sloup R., Lípa J. (2020): The sale of bark beetle-affected sawmill timber from the Czech Republic to the People's Republic of China: Review. Reports of Forestry Research, 65: 57-64.
    59. Miller K.A., Snyder S.A., Kilgore M.A. (2012): An assessment of forest landowner interest in selling forest carbon credits in the Lake States, USA. Forest Policy and Economics, 25: 113-122. Go to original source...
    60. MoA (2019): Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2018. Prague, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic: 41. (in Czech)
    61. MoA (2020): The Concept of State Forestry Policy until 2035. Prague, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic: 32.
    62. MoA (2022): Zpráva o stavu lesa a lesního hospodářství České republiky v roce 2021. Prague, Ministry of Agriculture of the Czech Republic: 144. (in Czech)
    63. Moser R.L., Windmuller-Campione M.A., Russell M.B. (2022): Natural resource manager perceptions of forest carbon management and carbon market participation in Minnesota. Forests, 13: 1-12. Go to original source...
    64. Nabuurs G.J., Delacote P., Ellison D., Hanewinkel M., Hetemäki L., Lindner M. (2017): By 2050 the mitigation effects of EU forests could nearly double through climate smart forestry. Forests, 8: 1-14. Go to original source...
    65. Ohmura T., Creutzburg L. (2021): Guarding the For(es)t: Sustainable economy conflicts and stakeholder preference of policy instruments. Forest Policy and Economics, 131: 1-12. Go to original source...
    66. Perunová M., Zimmermannová J. (2022): Analysis of forestry employment within the bioeconomy labour market in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 68: 385-394. Go to original source...
    67. Perunová M., Zimmermannová J. (2023): Economic and financial instruments of forest management in the Czech Republic. Frontiers in Forest and Global Change, 6: 1-15. Go to original source...
    68. Pilli R., Fiorese G., Grassi G. (2015): EU mitigation potential of harvested wood products. Carbon Balance Management, 10: 1-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    69. Porfirio L.L., Steffen W., Barrett D.J. (2010): The net ecosystem carbon exchange of human-modified environments in the Australian Capital Region. Regional Environmental Change, 10: 1-12. Go to original source...
    70. Pukkala T. (2020): At what carbon price forest cutting should stop. Journal of Forestry Research, 31: 713-727. Go to original source...
    71. Putra R.R.F.A., Veridianti D.D., Nathalia E., Brilliant D., Rosellinny G., Suarez C.G., Sumarpo A. (2018): Immunostimulant effect from phytoncide of forest bathing to prevent the development of cancer. Advanced Science Letters, 24: 6653-6659. Go to original source...
    72. Rae J.W.B., Zhang Y.G., Liu X., Foster G.L., Stoll H.M., Whiteford R.D.M. (2021): Atmospheric CO2 over the past 66 million years from marine archives. Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences, 49: 609-641. Go to original source...
    73. Rivas-Martínez S., Penas A., Díaz T.E. (2004): Bioclimatic Map of Europe. León, University of León, Cartographic Service: 36. (in Spanish)
    74. Rockström J., Gaffney O., Rogelj J., Meinshausen M., Nakicenovic N., Schellnhuber N.J. (2017): A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science, 355: 1269-1271. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    75. Ronzon T., Santini F., M'Barek R. (2015): The Bioeconomy in the European Union in Numbers - Facts and Figures on Biomass, Turnover and Employment. Brussels, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies: 4. Available at: https://joint-research-centre.ec.europa.eu/document/download/2812b179-a1d0-43c8-bd50-eb509eba6a45_en
    76. Ronzon T., Piotrowski S., M'Barek R., Carus M. (2017): A systematic approach to understanding and quantifying the EU's bioeconomy. Bio-Based and Applied Economics Journal, 6: 1-17.
    77. Šafařík D., Březina D., Michal J., Hlaváčková P. (2022): State of the raw wood growing stocks and prediction of further development of cutting in the context of coniferous stands calamity in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 68: 423-435. Go to original source...
    78. Scinocca J.F., Kharin V.V., Jiao Y., Qian M.W., Lazare M., Solheim L., Flato G.M., Biner S., Desgagne M., Dugas B. (2016): Coordinated global and regional climate modeling. Journal of Climate, 29: 17-35. Go to original source...
    79. Scripps Institution of Oceanography (2023): The Keeling Curve. San Diego, Scripps Institution of Oceanography. Available at: https://keelingcurve.ucsd.edu/
    80. Seidl R., Turner M.G. (2022): Post-disturbance reorganization of forest ecosystems in a changing world. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119: 1-10. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    81. Sevinç V. (2022): Analysis of the relations between forestry financial supports and forest crimes. Environmental Management, 71: 704-717. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    82. Šišák L. (2006): Importance of non-wood forest product collection and use for inhabitants in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 52: 417-426. Go to original source...
    83. Šišák L. (2007): Analýza financování lesního hospodářství z veřejných zdrojů. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 52: 265-271. (in Czech)
    84. Šišák L. (2013): Financing of forestry from public sources in the Czech Republic. Journal of Forest Science, 59: 22-27. Go to original source...
    85. Šišák L., Pulkrab K. (2002): Nature and structure of financial means supporting the forestry sector in the Czech Republic - Instruments of the Czech state forest policy. In: Ottitsch A., Tikkanen I., Riera P. (eds): Financial Instruments of Forest Policy. European Forest Institute Proceedings, 42: 151-157.
    86. Sotirov M., Arts B. (2018): Integrated forest governance in Europe: An introduction to the special issue on forest policy integration and integrated forest management. Land Use Policy, 79: 960-967. Go to original source...
    87. Thrippleton T., Temperli C., Krumm F., Mey R., Zell J., Stroheker S., Gossner M.M., Bebi P., Thürig E., Schweier J. (2023): Balancing disturbance risk and ecosystem service provisioning in Swiss mountain forests: An increasing challenge under climate change. Regional Environmental Change, 23: 1-16. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    88. Toth D., Maitah M., Maitah K., Jarolínová V. (2020): The impacts of calamity logging on the development of spruce wood prices in Czech forestry. Forests, 11: 1-15. Go to original source...
    89. Turner M.G., Seidl R. (2023): Novel disturbance regimes and ecological responses. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 54: 63-83. Go to original source...
    90. Tyson P., Steffen W., Mitra A. (2001): The earth system: Regional-global linkages. Regional Environmental Change, 2: 128-140. Go to original source...
    91. UN (2016): The Paris Agreement. Bonn, United Nations: 60. Available at: https://unfccc.int/sites/default/files/resource/parisagreement_publication.pdf (accessed Nov 25, 2022).
    92. UN Department of Economic and Social Affairs, and UN Forum on Forests Secretariat (2021): The Global Forest Goals Report 2021. New York, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs: 114.
    93. UNFCCC (2023): National Inventory Submissions 2023. United Nations Climate Change. Available at: https://unfccc.int/ghg-inventories-annex-i-parties/2023 (accessed Jan 12, 2023).
    94. Wesche S.D., Armitage D.R. (2014): Using qualitative scenarios to understand regional environmental change in the Canadian North. Regional Environmental Change, 14: 1095-1108. Go to original source...
    95. Winkel G., Lovrić M., Muys B., Katila P., Lundhede T., Pecurul M., Pettenella D., Pipart N., Plieninger T., Prokofieva I., Parra C., Pülzl H., Roitsch D., Roux J.L., Jellesmark Thorsen B., Tyrväinen L., Torralba M., Vacik H., Weiss G., Wunder S. (2022): Governing Europe's forests for multiple ecosystem services: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options. Forest Policy and Economics, 145: 1-15. Go to original source...
    96. Zald H.S.J., Spies T.A., Harmon M.E., Twery M.J. (2016): Forest carbon calculators: A review for managers, policymakers, and educators. Journal of Forestry, 114: 134-143. Go to original source...
    97. Zimmermannová J. (2009): Dopady zdanění elektřiny, zemního plynu a pevných paliv na odvětví OKEČ v České republice. Politická ekonomie, 2009: 213-231. (in Czech) Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content