J. For. Sci., 2024, 70(6):265-280 | DOI: 10.17221/20/2024-JFS

Integrating indigenous knowledge and culture in sustainable forest management via global environmental policiesReview

Scholastica Akalibey1, Petra Hlaváčková ORCID...2, Jiří Schneider3, Jitka Fialová1, Samuel Darkwah4, Albert Ahenkan5
1 Department of Landscape Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Department of Forest and Wood Product Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
3 Department of Environmental Science and Natural Resources, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
4 Department of Area Studies, Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
5 Department of Public Administration, University of Ghana Business School, Accra, Ghana

This research investigates the intricate connection between indigenous knowledge and sustainable forest management, with two main objectives. It seeks to explore and outline indigenous knowledge, elements, and practices that support sustainable forest management (SFM). It aims to uncover the invaluable traditional insights and practices that have helped preserve and ensure the responsible use of forest ecosystems. Also, it investigated global environmental policies that support indigenous knowledge since the inception of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). A narrative review method was employed to review and analyse peer-reviewed contents and reports to deduce ancestral or traditional wisdom, knowledge, practices, and beliefs from existing studies. The paper extracted data from existing literature from scholarly peer-reviewed journals. It aims to provide useful information for policy-makers, forest managers, and indigenous communities, to promote SFM and the sustainable development goals related to a sustainable environment. The study found that indigenous knowledge (IK) which includes ethnobotanical knowledge and plant selection, mixed land use, seed banks, and cultural beliefs such as sacred groves and taboos are some traditional practices, beliefs, and cultural knowledge that support SFM and can be integrated into international and national environmental management policies which the two-eyed seeing framework (TESF) seeks to promote. The framework highlights the potential of implementing IK into SFM. Also, the Akwé: Kon Guidelines, the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP), and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES), are some global environment policies that recognise traditional people and indigenous knowledge since the commencement of the CBD in the nineties. The paper recommends, for a future study, investigating the applicability of the Akwé: Kon Guidelines in international and national projects and programs that impact traditional sacred lands, forests and rivers, and indigenous people. Also, the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) and the Paris Agreement need to fully acknowledge the supporting role of indigenous knowledge and people in climate change mitigation and adaptation solutions, especially in Africa, since the majority of the world's population constitutes indigenous people who inhabit healthy standing forests and ecosystems.

Keywords: ecological knowledge; ecosystem services; environmental management; forestry; human well-being

Received: March 1, 2024; Revised: April 14, 2024; Accepted: April 15, 2024; Prepublished online: June 12, 2024; Published: June 25, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Akalibey S, Hlaváčková P, Schneider J, Fialová J, Darkwah S, Ahenkan A. Integrating indigenous knowledge and culture in sustainable forest management via global environmental policies. J. For. Sci. 2024;70(6):265-280. doi: 10.17221/20/2024-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Ahoyo C.C., Houéhanou T.D., Yaoitcha A.S., Akpi B.P., Natta A., Houinato M.R.B. (2024): How do plant demographic and ecological traits combined with social dynamics and human traits affect woody plant selection for medicinal uses in Benin (West Africa)? Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 20: 1-13. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Alule J.R., Nuwategeka E., Oriangi G., Lajul W. (2023): Relevance of indigenous knowledge in sustainable management of forest resources in the 21st century Uganda. East African Journal of Environment and Natural Resources, 6: 277-296. Go to original source...
  3. Anderegg W.R.L., Trugman A.T., Badgley G., Anderson C.M., Bartuska A., Ciais P., Cullenward D., Field C.B., Freeman J., Goetz S.J., Hicke J.A., Huntzinger D., Jackson R.B., Nickerson J., Pacala S., Randerson J.T. (2020): Climate-driven risks to the climate mitigation potential of forests. Science, 368: eaaz7005. Go to original source...
  4. Angelstam P., Elbakidze M., Axelsson R., Khoroshev A., Pedroli B., Tysiachniouk M., Zabubenin E. (2019): Model forests in Russia as landscape approach: Demonstration projects or initiatives for learning towards sustainable forest management? Forest Policy and Economics, 101: 96-110. Go to original source...
  5. Antwi J.K. (2020): Indigenous ecological knowledge and the environment: The Akan perspective. Journal of Mother-Tongue Biblical Hermeneutics and Theology, 2: 58-69. Go to original source...
  6. Arsenault R., Diver S., McGregor D., Witham A., Bourassa C. (2018): Shifting the framework of Canadian water governance through indigenous research methods: Acknowledging the past with an eye on the future. Water, 10: 49. Go to original source...
  7. Asselin H. (2015): Indigenous forest knowledge. In: Peh K.S.H., Corlett R.T., Bergeron Y. (eds): Routledge Handbook of Forest Ecology. London, Routledge: 586-596.
  8. Berkes F., Colding J., Folke C. (2000): Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10: 1251-1262. Go to original source...
  9. Boafo Y.A., Saito O., Kato S., Kamiyama C., Takeuchi K., Nakahara M. (2016): The role of traditional ecological knowledge in ecosystem services management: The case of four rural communities in Northern Ghana, International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 12: 24-38. Go to original source...
  10. Boles Fassler A.M. (2017): Effects of Eastern hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) decline on forest floor characteristics and macrofungal communities at two sites in western Massachusetts. [BA Thesis.] Northampton, Smith College.
  11. Bongmba E., Talla T.R. (2020): Environmental sustenance and indigenous hunting practices amongst the Wimbum people, North West Region, Cameroon. In: Green M.C., Haron M.: Law, Religion and the Environment in Africa. Stellenbosch, African Sun Media: 243-257. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341906056_Environmental_sustenance_and_indigenous_hunting_practices_amongst_the_Wimbum_people_North_West_Region_Cameroon Go to original source...
  12. Chukwuone N.A., Adeosun K.P., Chukwuone C.A. (2020): Socioeconomic factors affecting households' use of indigenous forest management practices in managing non-wood forest products: Evidence from forest communities in Nigeria derived savannah. Heliyon, 6: e05281. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Cimatti M., Chaplin-Kramer R., Di Marco M. (2023): The role of high-biodiversity regions in preserving Nature's Contributions to People. Nature Sustainability, 6: 1385-1393. Go to original source...
  14. Comberti C., Thornton T., Korodimou M., Shea M., Riamit K.O. (2016): Adaptation and resilience at the margins: Addressing indigenous peoples' marginalisation at international climate negotiations. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 61: 14-30. Go to original source...
  15. Daniel R.A., Wilhelm T.A., Case-Scott H., Goldman G., Hinzman L. (2022): What is 'Indigenous Knowledge' and Why Does It Matter? Integrating Ancestral Wisdom and Approaches into Federal Decision-Making. Washington, D.C., The White House. Available at: https://www.whitehouse.gov/ostp/news-updates/2022/12/02/what-is-indigenous-knowledge-and-why-does-it-matter-integrating-ancestral-wisdom-and-approaches-into-federal-decision-making/
  16. Davis S.H. (2021): The World Bank and indigenous peoples. In: Koch-Weser M., Guggenheim S. (eds): Social Development in the World Bank. Cham, Springer: 191-204. Available at: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-57426-0_13 Go to original source...
  17. De Frenne P., Lenoir J., Luoto M., Scheffers B.R., Zellweger F., Aalto J., Ashcroft M.B., Christiansen D.M., Decocq G., De Pauw K., Govaert S., Greiser C., Gril E., Hampe A., Jucker T., Klinges D.H., Koelemeijer I.A., Lembrechts J.J., Marrec R., Meeussen C., Ogée J., Tyystjärvi V., Vangansbeke P., Hylander K. (2021): Forest microclimates and climate change: Importance, drivers and future research agenda. Global Change Biology, 27: 2279-2297. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Dong L., Huang Z. (2023): Some evidence and new insights for feedback loops of human-nature interactions from a holistic Earth perspective. Journal of Cleaner Production, 432: 139667. Go to original source...
  19. Dubale S., Abdissa N., Kebebe D., Debella A., Zeynudin A., Suleman S. (2023): Ethnomedical review of plants and associated indigenous knowledge for the treatment of different infectious diseases in Ethiopia. Journal of Herbal Medicine, 40: 100669. Go to original source...
  20. FAO/FAOLEX (1995): Ghana's National Environmental Policy. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: 30. Available at: https://leap.unep.org/countries/gh/national-legislation/national-environmental-policy
  21. Ford J.D., King N., Galappaththi E.K., Pearce T., McDowell G., Harper S.L. (2020): The resilience of Indigenous peoples to environmental change. One Earth, 2: 532-543. Go to original source...
  22. Frechette A., Reytar K., Saini S., Walker W. (2016): Toward a Global Baseline of Carbon Storage in Collective Lands. Washington, D.C., Rights and Resources Initiative: 12. Available at: https://rightsandresources.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Toward-a-Global-Baseline-of-Carbon-Storage-in-Collective-Lands-November-2016-RRI-WHRC-WRI-report.pdf
  23. FSC (1996): FSC International Standard. FSC Principles and Criteria for Forest Stewardship. FSC-STD-01-001 EN (version 4-0). Bonn, Forest Stewardship Council: 13. Available at: https://open.fsc.org/items/30d33ec2-c6e4-4404-a8c1-4a6c941b1714
  24. FSC (2024): The FSC Forest Stewardship Standard for the Czech Republic. FSC-STD-CZE-02-2024 EN. Bonn, Forest Stewardship Council: 113. Available at: https://open.fsc.org/server/api/core/bitstreams/42e21075-4979-4029-8880-f1b773943327/content
  25. Gómez-Baggethun E. (2022): Is there a future for indigenous and local knowledge? The Journal of Peasant Studies, 49: 1139-1157. Go to original source...
  26. Guegan J.F., de Thoisy B., Gomez-Gallego M., Jactel H. (2023): World forests, global change, and emerging pests and pathogens. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 61: 101266. Go to original source...
  27. Hallberg-Sramek I., Nordström E.M., Priebe J., Reimerson E., Mårald E., Nordin A. (2023): Combining scientific and local knowledge improves evaluating future scenarios of forest ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 60: 101512. Go to original source...
  28. Heilmayr R., Echeverría C., Lambin E.F. (2020): Impacts of Chilean forest subsidies on forest cover, carbon and biodiversity. Nature Sustainability, 3: 701-709. Go to original source...
  29. Innes J.L. (2016): Sustainable forest management: From concept to practice. In: Innes J.L. (ed.): Sustainable Forest Management. London, Routledge: 21-52. Go to original source...
  30. IPCC (2022): Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. In: Pörtner H.Ö., Roberts D.C., Tignor M., Poloczanska E.S., Mintenbeck K., Alegría A., Craig M., Langsdorf S., Löschke S., Möller V., Okem A., Rama B. (eds): Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 3056.
  31. Jaryan V., Uniyal S.K., Gopichand Singh R.D., Lal B., Kumar A., Sharma V. (2010): Role of traditional conservation practice: Highlighting the importance of Shivbari sacred grove in biodiversity conservation. The Environmentalist, 30: 101-110. Go to original source...
  32. Jhariya M.K., Yadav D.K., Banerjee A., Raj A., Meena R.S. (2019): Sustainable forestry under changing climate. In: Jhariya M., Banerjee A., Meena R., Yadav D. (eds): Sustainable Agriculture, Forest, and Environmental Management. Singapore, Springer: 285-326. Go to original source...
  33. Kakiso T. (2023): Endangered indigenous knowledge: Assessing locally adopted tree conservation practices in Aleta Wondo district, Sidama regional state, Ethiopia. Heliyon, 9: e15401. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Kok M.T., Kok K., Peterson G.D., Hill R., Agard J., Carpenter S.R. (2017): Biodiversity and ecosystem services require IPBES to take novel approach to scenarios. Sustainability Science, 12: 177-181. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  35. Krause T. (2019): Why indigenous hunting is essential to forest sustainability. The Revelator. Available at: https://therevelator.org/indigenous-hunting-forest-sustainability/
  36. Laakkonen A., Hujala T., Pykäläinen J. (2019): Integrating intangible resources enables creating new types of forest services-developing forest leasing value network in Finland. Forest Policy and Economics, 99: 157-168. Go to original source...
  37. Lazdinis M., Angelstam P., Pülzl H. (2019): Towards sustainable forest management in the European Union through polycentric forest governance and an integrated landscape approach. Landscape Ecology, 34: 1737-1749. Go to original source...
  38. Löfmarck E., Lidskog R. (2017): Bumping against the boundary: IPBES and the knowledge divide. Environmental Science and Policy, 69: 22-28. Go to original source...
  39. Ludwig D., El-Hani C.N. (2020): Philosophy of ethnobiology: Understanding knowledge integration and its limitations. Journal of Ethnobiology, 40: 3-20. Go to original source...
  40. MacFarlane D.W., Kinzer A.T., Banks J.E. (2015): Coupled human-natural regeneration of indigenous coastal dry forest in Kenya. Forest Ecology and Management, 354: 149-159. Go to original source...
  41. Makondo C.C., Thomas D.S. (2018): Climate change adaptation: Linking indigenous knowledge with western science for effective adaptation. Environmental Science and Policy, 88: 83-91. Go to original source...
  42. Mansourian S., Parrotta J., Balaji P., Bellwood-Howard I., Bhasme S., Bixler R.P., Boedhihartono A.K., Carmenta R., Jedd T., de Jong W., Lake F.K., Latawiec A., Lippe M., Rai N.D., Sayer J., Van Dexter K., Vira B., Visseren-Hamakers I., Wyborn C., Yang A. (2020): Putting the pieces together: Integration for forest landscape restoration implementation. Land Degradation and Development, 31: 419-429. Go to original source...
  43. Marshall A., Bartlett C. (2004): Two-Eyed Seeing for Environmental Sustainability. Sydney, Integrative Science: 85.
  44. Mavhura E., Mushure S. (2019): Forest and wildlife resource-conservation efforts based on indigenous knowledge: The case of Nharira community in Chikomba district, Zimbabwe. Forest Policy and Economics, 105: 83-90. Go to original source...
  45. McKeon M. (2012): Two-eyed seeing into environmental education: Revealing its 'natural' readiness to indigenize. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 17: 131-147.
  46. Messerschmidt D.A. (2019): Conservation and society in Nepal: Traditional forest management and innovative development. In: Little P.D., Horowitz M., Nyerges A.E. (eds): Lands at Risk in the Third World: Local-Level Perspectives. New York, Routledge: 373-397. Go to original source...
  47. Moloise S.D., Matamanda A.R., Bhanye J.I. (2024): Traditional ecological knowledge and practices for ecosystem conservation and management: The case of savanna ecosystem services in Limpopo, South Africa. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 31: 29-42. Go to original source...
  48. Mullen J.L.L. (2022): The (in)ability to develop indigenous protected and conserved areas in Canada: A literature review. [MSc. Thesis.] Saskatoon, University of Saskatchewan. Available at: https://harvest.usask.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/dd2713c7-5565-4f4e-afba-affaf01839dc/content
  49. Muriithi J.K. (2022): Role of conservancy-based tourism in the management of natural ecosystem services in the Maasai Mara, Kenya. In: Gowreesunkar V.G.B., Maingi S.W., Mogambi Ming'ate F.L. (eds): Management of Tourism Ecosystem Services in a Post Pandemic Context. London, Routledge: 11-29. Available at: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/b23145/management-tourism-ecosystem-services-post-pandemic-context?refId=1c2754cf-2d50-4cae-af1f-ba1cf3bf0d84&context=ubx Go to original source...
  50. Olowo S.F., Omotayo A.O., Lawal I.O., Ndhlovu P.T., Aremu A.O. (2022): Ethnobotanical use-pattern for indigenous fruits and vegetables among selected communities in Ondo State, Nigeria. South African Journal of Botany, 145: 501-511. Go to original source...
  51. Osei-Tutu P. (2017): Taboos as informal institutions of local resource management in Ghana: Why they are complied with or not. Forest Policy and Economics, 85: 114-123. Go to original source...
  52. Pattiselanno F., Yohana D.A., Arobaya S. (2011): Subsistence indigenous hunting in Papua: Does it sustainable? Media Konservasi, 16: 95-100. Available at: https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/297827655.pdf
  53. Rakatama A., Pandit R. (2020): Reviewing social forestry schemes in Indonesia: Opportunities and challenges. Forest Policy and Economics, 111: 102052. Go to original source...
  54. Recio E., Hestad D. (2022): Indigenous Peoples: Defending an Environment for All. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, Policy Brief: 10. Winnipeg, International Institute for Sustainable Development: 10. Available at: https://www.iisd.org/articles/deep-dive/indigenous-peoples-defending-environment-all
  55. Richmond E.S. (2021): Engaging ecological narratives: An inquiry into place-based knowledge and disaster risk reduction in Gozo, Malta. [BA Thesis.] Portland, Portland State University. Available at: https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses/1045/
  56. Robinson J.M., Breed A.C., Camargo A., Redvers N., Breed M.F. (2024): Biodiversity and human health: A scoping review and examples of underrepresented linkages. Environmental Research, 246: 118115. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  57. Schabus N. (2017): Traditional knowledge. In: Morgera E., Razzaque J. (eds): Biodiversity and Nature Protection Law. Cheltenham, Edwards Elgar Publishing: 264-279. Go to original source...
  58. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2004): Akwé: Kon Voluntary Guidelines for the Conduct of Cultural, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Regarding Developments Proposed to Take Place on, or which are Likely to Impact on, Sacred Sites and on Lands and Waters Traditionally Occupied or Used by Indigenous and Local Communities. Montreal, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity: 25.
  59. Shrestha S., Medley K.E. (2017): Integrating ecological and ethnobotanical knowledge to promote collaborative conservation planning in the Nepal Himalaya. Mountain Research and Development, 37: 97-107. Go to original source...
  60. Sinthumule N.I., Mashau M.L. (2020): Traditional ecological knowledge and practices for forest conservation in Thathe Vondo in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Global Ecology and Conservation, 22: e00910. Go to original source...
  61. Soe K.T., Yeo-Chang Y. (2019): Perceptions of forest-dependent communities toward participation in forest conservation: A case study in Bago Yoma, south-central Myanmar. Forest Policy and Economics, 100: 129-141. Go to original source...
  62. Tamene S., Negash M., Makonda F.B., Chiwona-Karltun L., Kibret K.S. (2023): Ethnobotanical study on medicinal plant knowledge among three ethnic groups in peri-urban areas of south-central Ethiopia. Journal of Ethnobiology and Ethnomedicine, 19: 55. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  63. Tauli-Corpuz V., Alcorn J., Molnar A., Healy C., Barrow E. (2020): Cornered by PAs: Adopting rights-based approaches to enable cost-effective conservation and climate action. World Development, 130: 104923. Go to original source...
  64. Tiu S.A. (2007): The role of indigenous knowledge in biodiversity conservation: Implications for conservation education in Papua New Guinea. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Hamilton, The University of Waikato.
  65. Tong X., Brandt M., Yue Y., Ciais P., Rudbeck Jepsen M., Penuelas J., Wigneron J.P., Xiao X., Song X.P., Horion S., Rasmussen K., Saatchi S., Fan L., Wang K., Zhang B., Chen Z., Wang Y., Li X., Fensholt R. (2020): Forest management in southern China generates short term extensive carbon sequestration. Nature Communications, 11: 129. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  66. UNDP (2015): UNDP and Indigenous Peoples: A Policy of Engagement. New York, United Nations Development Programme: 12. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/publications/UNDP_Policy_of_Engagement_with_Indigenous_Peoples.pdf
  67. UNDP (2021): Nashulai Maasai Conservancy, Republic of Kenya. Equator Initiative Case Study Series. New York, United Nations Development Programme: 12. Available at: https://www.equatorinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Nashulai-Case-Study-English-FNL.pdf
  68. UNDRIP (2007): United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples: Resolution Adopted by the General Assembly on 13 September 2007. New York, United Nations: 30. Available at: https://www.un.org/development/desa/indigenouspeoples/wp-content/uploads/sites/19/2018/11/UNDRIP_E_web.pdf
  69. UNESCO (2018): UNESCO Policy on Engaging with Indigenous Peoples. Paris, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: 37. Available at: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000262748
  70. Van Kooten G.C., Nijnik M., Bradford K. (2019): Can carbon accounting promote economic development in forest-dependent, indigenous communities? Forest Policy and Economics, 100: 68-74. Go to original source...
  71. Verkerk P.J., Costanza R., Hetemäki L., Kubiszewski I., Leskinen P., Nabuurs G.J., Potočnik J., Palahí M. (2020): Climate-smart forestry: The missing link. Forest Policy and Economics, 115: 102164. Go to original source...
  72. Verkerk P.J., Delacote P., Hurmekoski E., Kunttu J., Matthews R., Mäkipää R., Mosley F., Perugini L., Reyer C.P.O., Roe S., Trømborg E. (2022): Forest-based climate change mitigation and adaptation in Europe. From Science to Policy 14. Yliopistokatu, European Forest Institute: 77. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10138/351975 Go to original source...
  73. Wangchuk J., Choden K., Sears R.R., Baral H., Yoezer D., Tamang K.T.D., Choden T., Wangdi N., Dorji S., Dukpa D., Tshering K., Thinley C., Dhendup T. (2021): Community perception of ecosystem services from commercially managed forests in Bhutan. Ecosystem Services, 50: 101335. Go to original source...
  74. Wright A.L., Gabel C., Ballantyne M., Jack S.M., Wahoush O. (2019): Using two-eyed seeing in research with indigenous people: An integrative review. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18: 1609406919869695. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.