J. For. Sci., 2024, 70(2):91-101 | DOI: 10.17221/114/2023-JFS

Water content in soil afforested with a mixture of broadleaves or Scots pineOriginal Paper

Jan Vopravil1,2, Pavel Formánek1, Tomáš Khel1, Karel Jacko3
1 Research Institute for Soil and Water Conservation, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Land Use and Improvement, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Agrio, s.r.o., Hovorčovice, Czech Republic

Afforestation of agriculturally used land has many benefits which are described in different publications. As stated in these publications, afforestation of agricultural land can influence soil water content because of rainfall interception and concentration, transpiration, and properties of forest floor layer and soil; also, hydraulic lift may occur. In this study, we attempted to find changes in volumetric soil water content values (at depths of 20 cm, 40 cm, and 60 cm) on agriculturally used land afforested with a mixture of forest tree species (Quercus robur L., Quercus rubra L., and Acer platanoides L.) or Pinus sylvestris L. in the year 2011 (and on agriculturally used land = control). This study was performed in the period from the end of March 2021 to the beginning of April 2022. In this study, we proved our hypothesis on the reduction of volumetric soil water content after afforestation; it is probably because of higher rainfall interception and evapotranspiration as described in different studies. Concerning the afforestation, the average volumetric water content was higher on the plot afforested with broadleaves compared with Scots pine. It was especially in the period after defoliation when the proportion of throughfall (and stemflow) increased on the plot with broadleaves. Our results indicate a higher water-storage capacity of forests compared with agriculturally used land. During the leafless period, this capacity was found to be higher after afforestation with Scots pine.

Keywords: chernozem; conifer; oak; potato; precipitation; temperature

Received: October 20, 2023; Revised: December 7, 2023; Accepted: December 11, 2023; Prepublished online: February 26, 2024; Published: February 28, 2024  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vopravil J, Formánek P, Khel T, Jacko K. Water content in soil afforested with a mixture of broadleaves or Scots pine. J. For. Sci. 2024;70(2):91-101. doi: 10.17221/114/2023-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bello J., Vallet P., Perot T., Balandier P., Seigner V., Perret S., Couteau C., Korboulewsky N. (2019): How do mixing tree species and stand density affect seasonal radial growth during drought events? Forest Ecology and Management, 432: 436-445. Go to original source...
    2. Caldwell M.M., Dawson T.E., Richards J.H. (1998): Hydraulic lift: Consequences of water efflux from the roots of plants. Oecologia, 113: 151-161. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    3. Chen C.R., Condron L.M., Davis M.R., Sherlock R.R. (2003): Seasonal changes in soil phosphorus and associated microbial properties under adjacent grassland and forest in New Zealand. Forest Ecology and Management, 177: 539-557. Go to original source...
    4. Chen S., Cao T., Tanaka N., Gao T., Zhu L., Zou C.B. (2018): Hydrological properties of litter layers in mixed forests in Mt. Qinling, China. iForest, 11: 243-250. Go to original source...
    5. Cukor J., Vacek Z., Linda R., Bílek L. (2017): Carbon sequestration in soil following afforestation of former agricultural land in the Czech Republic. Central European Forestry Journal, 63: 97-104. Go to original source...
    6. Emerman S.H., Dawson T.E. (1996): Hydraulic lift and its influence on the water content of the rhizosphere: An example from sugar maple, Acer saccharum. Oecologia, 108: 273-278. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Floriancic M.G., Allen S.T., Meier R., Truniger L., Kirchner J.W., Molnar P. (2023): Potential for significant precipitation cycling by forest-floor litter and deadwood. Ecohydrology, 16: 1-16. Go to original source...
    8. Geris J., Tetzlaff D., McDonnell J., Anderson J., Paton G., Soulsby C. (2015): Ecohydrological separation in wet, low energy northern environments? A preliminary assessment using different soil water extraction techniques. Hydrological Processes, 29: 5139-5152. Go to original source...
    9. Gobin R., Korboulewsky N., Dumas Y., Balandier P. (2015): Transpiration of four common understorey plant species according to drought intensity in temperate forests. Annals of Forest Science, 72: 1053-1064. Go to original source...
    10. Gömöryová E., Vass D., Pichler V., Gömöry D. (2009): Effect of alginite amendment on microbial activity and soil water content in forest soils. Biologia, 64: 585-588. Go to original source...
    11. Gomyo M., Kuraji K. (2016): Effect of the litter layer on runoff and evapotranspiration using the paired watershed method. Journal of Forest Research, 21: 306-313. Go to original source...
    12. Hiltbrunner D., Zimmermann S., Hagedorn F. (2013): Afforestation with Norway spruce on a subalpine pasture alters carbon dynamics but only moderately affects soil carbon storage. Biogeochemistry, 115: 251-266. Go to original source...
    13. Hughes A.O., Davies-Colley R., Bellingham M., van Assema G. (2020): The stream hydrology response of converting a headwater pasture catchment to Pinus radiata plantation. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 54: 308-328. Go to original source...
    14. Ilek A., Szostek M., Kucza J., Stanek-Tarkowska J., Witek W. (2019): The water absorbability of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and fir (Abies alba Mill.) organic matter in the forest floor. Annals of Forest Research, 62: 21-32. Go to original source...
    15. IUSS Working Group WRB (2015): World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2014. International soil classification system for naming soils and creating legends for soil maps. Update 2015. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: 192.
    16. Johnson-Maynard J.L., Graham R.C., Wu L., Shouse P.J. (2002): Modification of soil structural and hydraulic properties after 50 years of imposed chaparral and pine vegetation. Geoderma, 110: 227-240. Go to original source...
    17. Keleş S. (2019): An assessment of hydrological functions of forest ecosystems to support sustainable forest management. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 38: 305-326. Go to original source...
    18. Kupka I., Podrázský V. (2010): Vliv druhového složení porostů na zalesněné zemědělské půdě na pedofyzikální vlastnosti a poutání uhlíku v povrchových horizontech. In: Knott R., Peňáz J., Vaněk P. (eds): Pěstování lesů v nižších vegetačních stupních. Brno, Mendel University in Brno: 71-76. (in Czech)
    19. Levia Jr. D.F., Frost E.E. (2003): A review and evaluation of stemflow literature in the hydrologic and biogeochemical cycles of forested and agricultural ecosystems. Journal of Hydrology, 274: 1-29. Go to original source...
    20. Mei X., Ma L. (2022): Effect of afforestation on soil water dynamics and water uptake under different rainfall types on the Loess hillslope. Catena, 213: 106216. Go to original source...
    21. Michelsen-Correa S., Scull P. (2005): The impact of reforestation on soil temperature. Middle States Geographer, 38: 39-44.
    22. Muñoz M R., Squeo F.A., León M.F., Tracol Y., Gutiérrez J.R. (2008): Hydraulic lift in three shrub species from the Chilean coastal desert. Journal of Arid Environments, 72: 624-632. Go to original source...
    23. Nazari M., Sadeghi S.M.M., Van Stan J.T., Chaichi M.R. (2020): Rainfall interception and redistribution by maize farmland in central Iran. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 27: 100656. Go to original source...
    24. Neary D.G., Ice G.G., Jackson C.R. (2009): Linkages between forest soils and water quality and quantity. Forest Ecology and Management, 258: 2269-2281. Go to original source...
    25. Nordén U. (1991): Acid deposition and throughfall fluxes of elements as related to tree species in deciduous forests of South Sweden. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution, 60: 209-230. Go to original source...
    26. Ozcelik M.S., Şengönül K. (2021): Transpiration of Anatolian black pine and sessile oak forest stands in a sub-humid region of Turkey. Annals of Forest Research, 64: 111-128. Go to original source...
    27. Özhan S., Gökbulak F., Serengil Y., Özcan M. (2010): Evapotranspiration from a mixed deciduous forest ecosystem. Water Resources Management, 24: 2353-2363. Go to original source...
    28. Podrázský V., Remeš J. (2008): Rapidity of forest soil character restoration of afforested localities of the Orlické hory Mts. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 53: 89-93. (in Czech)
    29. Podrázský V., Holubík O., Baláš M., Kupka I., Zvolánek J., Tužinský M., Gjurov V. (2014): Využití přípravků na bázi řas pro iniciální podporu výsadeb lesních dřevin. In: Štefančík I. (ed.): Proceedings of Central European Silviculture, Zvolen, Sept 8-10, 2014: 45-51. (in Czech)
    30. Poleno Z., Vacek S., Podrázský V., Remeš J., Mikeska M., Kobliha J., Bílek L., Baláš M. (2011): Pěstování lesů I. Ekologické základy pěstování lesů. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce: 320. (in Czech)
    31. Poyatos R., Llorens P., Gallart F. (2005): Transpiration of montane Pinus sylvestris L. and Quercus pubescens Willd. forest stands measured with sap flow sensors in NE Spain. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 9: 493-505. Go to original source...
    32. Putuhena W.M., Cordery I. (1996): Estimation of interception capacity of the forest floor. Journal of Hydrology, 180: 283-299. Go to original source...
    33. Reynolds E.R.C., Henderson C.S. (1967): Rainfall interception by beech, larch and Norway spruce. Forestry, 40: 165-184. Go to original source...
    34. Schreel J.D.M., von der Crone J.S., Kangur O., Steppe K. (2019): Influence of drought on foliar water uptake capacity of temperate tree species. Forests, 10: 562. Go to original source...
    35. Schwarz B., Dietrich C., Cesarz S., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Auge H., Schulz E., Eisenhauer N. (2015): Non-significant tree diversity but significant identity effects on earthworm communities in three tree diversity experiments. European Journal of Soil Biology, 67: 17-26. Go to original source...
    36. Sturm N., Reber S., Kessler A., Tenhunen J.D. (1996): Soil moisture variation and plant water stress at the Hartheim Scots pine plantation. Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 53: 123-33. Go to original source...
    37. Tu Z., Chen S., Ruan D., Chen Z., Huang Y., Chen J. (2022): Differential hydrological properties of forest litter layers in artificial afforestation of eroded areas of Latosol in China. Sustainability, 14: 1-12. Go to original source...
    38. Tužinský L. (2005): Temporal dynamics of soil water in oak forest stand of southern Slovakia. Ekológia, 24: 304-313.
    39. Vacek Z., Cukor J., Vacek S., Linda R., Prokůpková A., Podrázský V., Gallo J., Vacek O., Šimůnek V., Drábek O., Hájek V., Spasić M., Brichta J. (2021): Production potential, biodiversity and soil properties of forest reclamations: Opportunities or risk of introduced coniferous tree species under climate change? European Journal of Forest Research, 140: 1243-1266. Go to original source...
    40. van Dijk A.I.J.M., Keenan R.J. (2007): Planted forests and water in perspective. Forest Ecology and Management, 251: 1-9. Go to original source...
    41. Vincke C., Thiry Y. (2008): Water table is a relevant source for water uptake by a Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stand: Evidences from continuous evapotranspiration and water table monitoring. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 148: 1419-1432. Go to original source...
    42. Vincke C., Granier A., Breda N., Devillez F. (2005): Evapotranspiration of a declining Quercus robur (L.) stand from 1999 to 2001. II. Daily actual evapotranspiration and soil water reserve. Annals of Forest Science, 62: 615-623. Go to original source...
    43. Vopravil J., Formánek P., Heřmanovská D., Khel T., Jacko K. (2021): The impact of agricultural land afforestation on soil water content in Central Bohemia. Journal of Forest Science, 67: 512-521. Go to original source...
    44. Vopravil J., Formánek P., Heřmanovská D., Khel T., Jacko K. (2022): The impact of agricultural land afforestation on air temperatures near the surface. Journal of Forest Science, 68: 485-495. Go to original source...
    45. Walsh R.P.D., Voigt P.J. (1977): Vegetation litter: An underestimated variable in hydrology and geomorphology. Journal of Biogeography, 4: 253-274. Go to original source...
    46. Wasak K., Drewnik M. (2015): Land use effects on soil organic carbon sequestration in calcareous Leptosols in former pastureland - A case study from the Tatra Mountains (Poland). Solid Earth, 6: 1103-1115. Go to original source...
    47. Wieser G., Gruber A., Oberhuber W. (2018): Growing season water balance of an inner alpine Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) forest. iForest, 11: 469-475. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Yao Y., Wang X., Zeng Z., Liu Y., Peng S., Zhu Z., Piao S. (2016): The effect of afforestation on soil moisture content in Northeastern China. PLoS ONE, 11: e0160776. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    49. Zapater M., Hossann C., Bréda N., Bréchet C., Bonal D., Granier A. (2011): Evidence of hydraulic lift in a young beech and oak mixed forest using 18O soil water labelling. Trees, 25: 885-894. Go to original source...
    50. Zhou Q., Keith D. M., Zhou X., Cai M., Cui X., Wei X., Luo Y. (2018): Comparing the water-holding characteristics of broadleaved, coniferous, and mixed forest litter layers in a Karst Region. Mountain Research and Development, 38: 220-229. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content