J. For. Sci., 2023, 69(10):451-462 | DOI: 10.17221/65/2023-JFS

Forest as a source of renewable material to reduce the environmental impact of buildingsOriginal Paper

Hana Svobodová, Petra Hlaváčková ORCID...
Department of Forest and Wood Product Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

Construction sector has high environmental impact throughout entire life cycle of buildings. One way to reduce the impact is to use building materials with the lowest possible environmental impact – such as wood. The use of wood-based building materials can improve the overall environmental balance of buildings. Compared to other materials, wood probably has the best environmental performance. These findings are particularly significant in the context of the environmental and legislative situation in Europe and the Czech Republic and may be one of the reasons for the increasing number of new wood-based buildings. The main reason for the research is to highlight the potential of wood as an ecological renewable material with multiple applications in all sectors of the national economy, especially in the construction industry. This paper aims to deepen the knowledge of the environmental specifications of building materials, especially wood, highlight its benefits and verify that building with natural and eco-friendly materials is less costly with lower environmental impacts. To illustrate the environmental impact of the construction industry, a case study comparing house variants was conducted to find the most suitable combinations of materials in terms of economic, environmental, and social aspects. It was found that from a sustainable development perspective, building with green materials generally means lower environmental impacts measured by e.g. global warming potential and embodied energy. This is particularly evident in the case of wood, which is not only a renewable material with advantageous thermo-technical and construction properties despite its low weight, but also stores carbon as it grows. The findings show that wood in the structure can reduce the cumulative environmental impact of the whole structure.

Keywords: circular economy; forestry; eco-design; life cycle assessment; timber supply chain; wood-based construction; wood utilisation

Received: June 5, 2023; Revised: August 15, 2023; Accepted: August 18, 2023; Published: October 30, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Svobodová H, Hlaváčková P. Forest as a source of renewable material to reduce the environmental impact of buildings. J. For. Sci. 2023;69(10):451-462. doi: 10.17221/65/2023-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abeles A.T., Howe L.C., Krosnick J.A., Macinnis B. (2019): Perception of public opinion on global warming and the role of opinion deviance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63: 118-129. Go to original source...
    2. Adams K.T., Osmani M., Thorpe T., Thornback J. (2017): Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management, 170: 15-24. Go to original source...
    3. Barnosky A.D., Hadly E.A., Bascompte J., Berlow E.L., Brown J.H., Fortelius M., Getz W.M., Harte J., Hastings A., Marquet P.A., Martinez N.D., Mooers A., Roopnarine P., Vermeij G., Williams J.W., Gillespie R., Kitzes J., Marshall C., Matzke N., Mindell D.P., Revilla E., Smith A.B (2011): Approaching a state shift in Earth's biosphere. Nature, 486: 52-58. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    4. Baubook (2023): Deklaration Zentrale. Vienna, Baubook GmbH. Available at: https://www.baubook.at/zentrale/ (in German).
    5. Canadell J.G., Raupach M.R. (2008): Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science, 320: 1456-1457. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    6. Carter N. (2007): The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy. 2nd Ed. New York, Cambridge University Press: 410. Go to original source...
    7. Centrum pasivního domu (2021): Přísnější požadavky na výstavbu nových budov od 1. ledna 2022. Stavebnictví, Informační centrum ČKAIT. Available at: https://www.casopisstavebnictvi.cz/clanky-prisnejsi-pozadavky-na-vystavbu-novych-budov-od-1.-ledna-2022.html (in Czech).
    8. EN 15978 (2011): Sustainability of construction works - Assessment of environmental performance of buildings - Calculation method. Brussels, European Committee for Standardization: 60.
    9. Envimat (2013): První český katalog stavebních produktů a dopadů jejich výroby na životní prostředí. Praha, ČVUT v Praze. Available at: http://www.envimat.cz/ (in Czech).
    10. Espinoza O., Buehlmann U., Smith B. (2012): Forest certification and green building standards: Overview and use in the U.S. hardwood industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 33: 30-41. Go to original source...
    11. European Commission (2019): The European Green Deal. COM(2019) 640 Final. Brussels, European Commission: 28.
    12. European Commission (2021): New EU Forest Strategy for 2030. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, COM(2021) 572 Final. Brussels, European Commission: 30.
    13. Gan V.J.L., Lo I.M.C., Ma J., Tse K.T., Cheng J.C.P., Chan C.M. (2020): Simulation optimisation towards energy efficient green buildings: Current status and future trends. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254: 120012. Go to original source...
    14. Guardigli L. (2014): Comparing the environmental impact of reinforced concrete and wooden structures. In: Pacheco-Torgal F., Cabeza L.F., Labrincha J., de Magalhães A. (eds): Eco-efficient Construction and Building Materials. Cambridge, Elsevier: 407-433. Go to original source...
    15. Hafner A., Rueter S. (2018): Method for assessing the national implications of environmental impacts from timber buildings - An exemplary study for residential buildings in Germany. Wood and Fiber Science, 50: 139-154. Go to original source...
    16. Harris J. (2005): Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: A Contemporary Approach. 2nd Ed. Boston, Houghton Mifflin: 528.
    17. Hildebrandt J., Hagemann N., Thrän D. (2017): The contribution of wood-based construction materials for leveraging a low carbon building sector in Europe. Sustainable Cities and Society, 34: 405-418. Go to original source...
    18. Hlásny T., König L., Krokene P., Lindner M., Montagné-Huck C., Müller J., Qin H., Raffa K.F., Schelhaas M.J., Svoboda M., Viiri H., Seidl R. (2021): Bark beetle outbreaks in Europe: State of knowledge and ways forward for management. Current Forestry Reports, 7: 138-165. Go to original source...
    19. Hodková J., Lupíšek A., Mančík Š., Vochoc L., Žďára T. (2012): National platform for LCA data on building elements in the context of the Czech Republic. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 3: 277-284. Go to original source...
    20. Hurmekoski E., Pykäläinen J., Hetemäki L. (2018): Long-term targets for green building: Explorative Delphi backcasting study on wood-frame multi-story construction in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172: 3644-3654. Go to original source...
    21. Hwang B.G., Tan J.S. (2012): Green building project management: Obstacles and solutions for sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 20: 335-349. Go to original source...
    22. IPCC (2007): Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 976. Available at: https://www.ipcc.ch/site/assets/uploads/2018/03/ar4_wg2_full_report.pdf
    23. Jing S., Nishizawa H. (2022): Experimental study on the structural behavior of the oldest timber frame in China. Buildings, 12: 1860. Go to original source...
    24. Khoshnava S.M., Rostami R., Mohamad Zin R., Štreimikienė D., Mardani A., Ismail M. (2020): The role of green building materials in reducing environmental and human health impacts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17: 2589. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Klien M. (2023): A perfect storm for European construction? Vienna, EUROCONSTRUCT, WIFO - Austrian Institute of Economic Research. Available at: https://www.euroconstruct.org/news/2023_01_at/
    26. Kromoser B., Reichenbach S., Hellmayr R., Myna R., Wimmer R. (2022): Circular economy in wood construction - Additive manufacturing of fully recyclable walls made from renewables: Proof of concept and preliminary data. Construction and Building Materials, 344: 128219. Go to original source...
    27. Liu Y., Guo H., Sun Ch., Chang W.S. (2016): Assessing cross laminated timber (CLT) as an alternative material for mid-rise residential buildings in cold regions in China - A life-cycle assessment approach. Sustainability, 8: 1047. Go to original source...
    28. Mahayuddin S.A., Pereira J.J., Badaruzzaman W.H.W., Mokhtar M.B. (2008): Construction waste management in a developing country: Case study of Ipoh, Malaysia. WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment, 109: 481-489. Go to original source...
    29. Matsumoto R., Kayo Ch., Kita S., Nakamura K., Lauk Ch., Funada R. (2022): Estimation of carbon stocks in wood products for private building companies. Scientific Reports, 12: 18112. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Morel J.C., Mesbah A., Oggero M., Walker P. (2001): Building houses with local materials: Means to drastically reduce the environmental impact of construction. Building and Environment, 36: 1119-1126. Go to original source...
    31. Nagapan S., Rahman I.A., Asmi A., Adnan N.F. (2013): Study of site's construction waste in Batu Pahat, Johor. Procedia Engineering, 53: 99-103. Go to original source...
    32. Oberthür S. (2010): The New Climate Policies of the European Union: Internal Legislation and Climate Diplomacy. No. 15. Brussels, Vubpress: 339.
    33. Ochrana F. (2009): Metodologie vědy: Úvod do problému. 1st Ed. Praha, Karolinum: 156. (in Czech)
    34. Ogunmakinde O.E., Egbelakin T., Sher W. (2022): Contributions of the circular economy to the UN sustainable development goals through sustainable construction. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 178: 106023. Go to original source...
    35. Ortiz O., Castells F., Sonnemann G. (2009): Sustainability in the construction industry: A review of recent developments based on LCA. Construction and Building Materials, 23: 28-39. Go to original source...
    36. Piccardo C., Gustavsson L. (2021): Implications of different modelling choices in primary energy and carbon emission analysis of buildings. Energy and Buildings, 247: 111145. Go to original source...
    37. Rees W.E. (2010): The built environment and the ecosphere: A global perspective. Building Research & Information, 27: 206-220. Go to original source...
    38. RTS (2023): Cenová soustava RTS DATA. Brno, RTS. Available at: http://www.cenovasoustava.cz/ (in Czech).
    39. Saidur R., Abdelaziz E.A., Demirbas A., Hossain M.S., Mekhilef S. (2011): A review on biomass as a fuel for boilers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15: 2262-2289. Go to original source...
    40. Sev A. (2009): How can the construction industry contribute to sustainable development? A conceptual framework. Sustainable Development, 17: 161-173. Go to original source...
    41. Sikkema R., Styles D., Jonsson R., Tobin B., Byrne K.A. (2023): A market inventory of construction wood for residential building in Europe - In the light of the Green Deal and new circular economy ambitions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 90: 104370. Go to original source...
    42. Spence R., Mulligan H. (1995): Sustainable development and the construction industry. Habitat International, 19: 279-292. Go to original source...
    43. Szilágyi K., Sand-Eriksen A. (2021): Medieval Norwegian wooden (stave) churches: Built heritage and places of memory. Hungarian Archaeology, 10: 30-40. Go to original source...
    44. Šimůnek V., Vacek Z., Vacek S. (2020): Solar cycles in salvage logging: National data from the Czech Republic confirm significant correlation. Forests, 11: 1-22. Go to original source...
    45. Takano A., Hafner A., Linkosalmi L., Ott S., Hughes M., Winter S. (2015): Life cycle assessment of wood construction according to the normative standards. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 73: 299-312. Go to original source...
    46. Toth D., Maitah M., Maitah K., Jarolínová V. (2020): The impacts of calamity logging on the development of spruce wood prices in Czech forestry. Forests, 11: 1-13. Go to original source...
    47. Tushar Q., Bhuiyan M.A., Zhang G., Maqsood T. (2021): An integrated approach of BIM-enabled LCA and energy simulation: The optimized solution towards sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289: 125622. Go to original source...
    48. UNDP (2013): Human Development Report 2013. The Rise of the South: Human Progress in a Diverse World. New York, United Nations Development Programme. Available at: https://hdr.undp.org/system/files/documents/global-report-document/hdr2013encompletepdf.pdf
    49. United Nations Environment Programme (2009): Buildings and Climate Change: Summary for Decision Makers. Available at: https://wedocs.unep.org/20.500.11822/32152
    50. Verheggen B., Strengers B., Cook J., Van Dorland R., Vringer K., Peters J., Visser H., Meyer L. (2014): Scientists' views about attribution of global warming. Environmental Science & Technology, 48: 8963-8971. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    51. Wang L., Toppinen A., Juslin H. (2014): Use of wood in green building: A study of expert perspectives from the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65: 350-361. Go to original source...
    52. Woodard A.C., Milner H.R. (2016): Sustainability of timber and wood in construction. In: Khatib J.M. (ed.): Sustainability of Construction Materials. Cambridge, Elsevier: 129-157. Go to original source...
    53. Yeheyis M., Hewage K., Alam M.S., Eskicioglu C., Sadiq R. (2013): An overview of construction and demolition waste management in Canada: A lifecycle analysis approach to sustainability. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 15: 81-91. Go to original source...
    54. Zastempowski M. (2023): Analysis and modeling of innovation factors to replace fossil fuels with renewable energy sources - Evidence from European Union enterprises. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 178: 113262. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content