J. For. Sci., 2023, 69(6):229-243 | DOI: 10.17221/8/2023-JFS

Road network designing in a forested watershed using network connectivity indicesOriginal Paper

Mohsen Mostafa ORCID...1, Shaban Shataee Jouibary2, Majid Lotfalian3, Amir Sadoddin4
1 Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, Agricultural Research,Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Sari, Iran
2 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran
3 Department of Forest Engineering, Faculty of Natural Resources, Sari University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Sari, Iran
4 Department of Watershed Management, Faculty of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

Designing and constructing a road network is one of the most critical steps of the development process in managing natural resources. The current research is going to investigate the application of network connectivity indices to the analysis of road networks in the forested watershed. First, the road network suitability map (RNSM) was created to emphasize the technical and physiographic criteria and integrated management scenarios using a weighted linear combination (WLC) and analytic network process (ANP). Subsequently, three road network alternatives (RNA) were assigned based on the priorities in the RNSM. In order to try to determine the appropriate alternative, the network connectivity of the designed alternatives looked into the forest and non-forest land uses, as well as the whole study area, using the values of alpha (α), beta (β), gamma (γ), eta (η), network density (ND) and detour indices (DI) in the context of the graph theory. Results show that the road density of the RNA2 variant (11.56 m·ha–1) is shorter than the other alternatives and the existing road network (ERN). In addition, dealing with the whole study area, we realized that the index values which are related to the number two reflect a better status than the other alternatives of alpha, beta, gamma, eta and detour index, in which they were identified to be 0.44, 1.34, 1.16, 0.45 and 0.83, respectively. RNA2 is chosen as the appropriate road network according to the network connectivity, technical and physiographical criteria, along with integrated management scenarios. Further control measures and field surveys are recommended to achieve more relevant results.

Keywords: graph theory; indexes; network alternative; road network suitability map (RNAM)

Received: January 20, 2023; Revised: April 24, 2023; Accepted: April 28, 2023; Prepublished online: June 7, 2023; Published: June 30, 2023  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mostafa M, Shataee Jouibary S, Lotfalian M, Sadoddin A. Road network designing in a forested watershed using network connectivity indices. J. For. Sci. 2023;69(6):229-243. doi: 10.17221/8/2023-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Abbas A.M., Hashidu R.B. (2019): Transportation network analysis, connectivity accessibility indices in North East, Nigeria. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 7: 60-66.
  2. Abdi E., Majnounian B., Darvishsefat A., Mashayekhi Z., Sessions J. (2009): A GIS-MCE based model for forest road planning. Journal of Forest Science, 55: 171-176. Go to original source...
  3. Akay A.E., Aruga K., Bettinger P., Sessions J. (2013): Using optimization techniques in designing forest roads and road networks. Bartin Orman Fakültesi Dergisi, 1-2: 1-15
  4. Akay A.O., Akgula M., Demir M., Acarb H.H. (2020): Analysis of factors associated with the amount of forest road reconstruction activity in Turkey: Autoregressive distributed lag modelling approach. Forest Ecology and Management, 458: 117800. Go to original source...
  5. Al-dami H.A.N. (2015): Measuring the accessibility of road networks: Diwaniya/Iraq as case study. International Journal of Current Research and Academic Review, 3: 173-182.
  6. Arienti M.C., Cumming S.G., Krawchuk M.A., Boutin S. (2009): Road network density correlated with increased lightning fire incidence in the Canadian western boreal forest. Internal. Journal of Wildland Fire, 18: 970-982. Go to original source...
  7. Ayo-Odifiri O.S., Fasakin J.O., Henshaw F. (2017): Road connectivity approach to eased traffic congestion on market roads in Benin Metropolis, Nigeria. American Journal of Engineering Research, 6: 41-48.
  8. Dinda S., Ghosh S., Chatterjee N.D. (2019): An analysis of transport suitability, modal choice and trip pattern using accessibility and network approach: A study of Jamshedpur city, India. Spatial Information Research, 27: 169-186. Go to original source...
  9. Edwards P.J., Williard K.W., Schoonover J.E. (2015): Fundamentals of watershed hydrology. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education, 154: 3-20. Go to original source...
  10. Gastner M.T., Newman M.E. (2006): The spatial structure of networks. The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 49: 247-252. Go to original source...
  11. Hayati H., Majnounian B., Abdi E., Sessions J., Makhdoum M. (2013): An expert-based approach to forest road network planning by combining Delphi and spatial multi-criteria evaluation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185: 1767-1776. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  12. Hosseini S.A., Mazrae M.R., Lotfalian M., Parsakhoo A. (2012): Designing an optimal forest road network by consideration of environmental impacts in GIS. Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, 20: 58-66. Go to original source...
  13. Jourgholami M., Abdi E., Chung W. (2012): Decision making in forest road planning considering both skidding and road costs: A case study in the Hyrcanian Forest in Iran. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 6: 59-64. Go to original source...
  14. Levinson D., Huang A. (2012): A positive theory of network connectivity. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39: 308-325. Go to original source...
  15. Loro M., Ortega E., Arce M.R., Geneletti D. (2015): Ecological connectivity analysis to reduce the barrier effect of roads. An innovative graph-theory approach to define wildlife corridors with multiple paths and without bottlenecks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 139: 149-162. Go to original source...
  16. Lyimo N.N., Shao Z., Ally A.M., Twumasi N.Y.D., Altan O., Sanga C.A. (2020): A fuzzy logic-based approach for modelling uncertainty in open geospatial data on landfill suitability analysis. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 9: 737. Go to original source...
  17. Nagne A.D., Vibhute A.D., Gawali B.W., Mehrota S.C. (2013): Spatial analysis of transportation network for town planning of Auragabad City by using Geographic Information System. International Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 4: 2588-2595.
  18. Olawale T.N., Adesina K.I. (2013): An assessment of the relationship between Road Network Connectivity and tourists' patronage in Lokoja Metropolis, Kogi State. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 3: 1-11.
  19. Patarasuk R. (2013): Road network connectivity and land-cover dynamics in Lop Buri province, Thailand. Journal of Transport Geography, 28: 111-123. Go to original source...
  20. Pentek T., Neveèeøel H., Pièman D., Por¹insky T. (2007): Forest road network in the Republic of Croatia - Status and perspectives. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering: Journal for Theory and Application of Forestry Engineering, 28: 93-106.
  21. Ramos-Scharrón C.E., Alicea-Díaz E.E., Figueroa-Sánchez Y.A., Viqueira-Ríos R. (2022): Road cutslope erosion and control treatments in an actively-cultivated tropical montane setting. Catena, 209: 105814. Go to original source...
  22. Reggiani A., Bucci P., Russo G. (2011): Accessibility and impedance forms: Empirical applications to the German commuting network. International Regional Science Review, 34: 230-252. Go to original source...
  23. Rodrigue J., Comtois C., Slack B. (2009): The Geography of Transport Systems, New York, Routledge: 440.
  24. Sarkar T., Sarkar D., Mondal P. (2020): Road network accessibility analysis using graph theory and GIS technology: A study of the villages of English Bazar Block, India. Spatial Information Research, 29: 405-415. Go to original source...
  25. Sreelekha M.G., Krishnamurthy K., Anjaneyulu M.V.L.R. (2016): Interaction between road network connectivity and spatial pattern. Procedia Technology, 24: 131-139. Go to original source...
  26. Tsai W.H., Hung S.J. (2009): A fuzzy goal programming approach for green supply chain optimisation under activity-based costing and performance evaluation with a value chain structure. International Journal of Production Research, 47: 4991-5017. Go to original source...
  27. Zhao Q., Wang A., Yu Z., Yu J., Liu Y., Zhang G., Liu G., Wang P., Ding S. (2021): Factors contributing to rill erosion of forest roads in a mountainous watershed. Journal of Environmental Management, 326: 116829. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.