J. For. Sci., 2022, 68(11):452-458 | DOI: 10.17221/98/2022-JFS

Estimation of ungulate population density in Kazakhstan: Case study from foothill ecosystemsOriginal Paper

Jan Cukor ORCID...*,1,2, František Havránek1, Sergei Sokolov3, Vlastimil Skoták1,4, Lucie Hambálková1, Richard Ševčík1, Zdeněk Vacek2, Daniyar Nurseitov5
1 Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, v.v.i., Jíloviště-Strnady, Czech Republic
2 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Republican Union of Hunters and Fishers in Kazakhstan, Almaty, Kazakhstan
4 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
5 KMG Engineering, Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan

Data on wildlife abundance is an important indicator both for the species concerned and the stability of entire ecosystems as well as for sustainable game management. Therefore, the abundance of ungulate game was verified in a foothill region of Kazakhstan. The methods of thermal imagery and faecal pellet group (FPG) census on transects were compared. The results obtained by the FPG counting method for moose (Alces alces, 0.34 individuals per 100 ha) and maral deer (Cervus elaphus sibiricus, 0.04 individuals per 100 ha) were relatively consistent with the data reported by the hunting ground tenants. Only one moose was detected by the thermal imaging transect count method. The results show that deer and moose abundance in Kazakhstan is significantly lower than in Central and Eastern Europe. Thus, for Kazakhstan, the method of FPG counting is well applicable for both routine and control counts. Detailed data on game populations can be obtained using the camera trap counting method, which has not been verified in Kazakhstan as yet.

Keywords: Alces alces; Cervus elaphus sibiricus; counting methods; wildlife management

Published: November 15, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Cukor J, Havránek F, Sokolov S, Skoták V, Hambálková L, Ševčík R, et al.. Estimation of ungulate population density in Kazakhstan: Case study from foothill ecosystems. J. For. Sci. 2022;68(11):452-458. doi: 10.17221/98/2022-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Apollonio M., Andersen R., Putman R. (2010): European Ungulates and Their Management in the 21st Century. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 604.
    2. Arnett E.B., Southwick R. (2015): Economic and social benefits of hunting in North America. International Journal of Environmental Studies, 72: 734-745. Go to original source...
    3. Blank D., Li Y. (2021): Sustainable use of wildlife resources in Central Asia. Regional Sustainability, 2: 144-155. Go to original source...
    4. Boyce M.S., Baxter P.W., Possingham H.P. (2012): Managing moose harvests by the seat of your pants. Theoretical Population Biology, 82: 340-347. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Burton A.C., Neilson E., Moreira D., Ladle A., Steenweg R., Fisher J.T., Bayne E., Boutin S. (2015): Wildlife camera trapping: A review and recommendations for linking surveys to ecological processes. Journal of Applied Ecology, 52: 675-685. Go to original source...
    6. Campbell D., Swanson G.M., Sales J. (2004): Methodological insights: Comparing the precision and cost-effectiveness of faecal pellet group count methods. Journal of Applied Ecology, 41: 1185-1196. Go to original source...
    7. Caravaggi A., Banks P.B., Burton A.C., Finlay C.M.V., Haswell P.M., Hayward M.W., Rowcliffe M.J., Wood M.D. (2017): A review of camera trapping for conservation behaviour research. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 3: 109-122. Go to original source...
    8. Carpio A.J., Apollonio M., Acevedo P. (2021): Wild ungulate overabundance in Europe: Contexts, causes, monitoring and management recommendations. Mammal Review, 51: 95-108. Go to original source...
    9. Chervonny V.V. (1975): Raspredeleniye, plotnost' naseleniya i dinamika chislennosti losya v yevropeyskoy chasti RSFSR. Tr. Okskogo zapovednika, 11: 255-288. (in Russian)
    10. Cromigt J.P.G.M., van Rensburg S.J., Etienne R.S., Olff H. (2009): Monitoring large herbivore diversity at different scale: Comparing direct and indirect methods. Biodiversity and Conservation, 18: 1219-1231. Go to original source...
    11. Cukor J., Havránek F., Rohla J., Bukovjan K. (2017): Estimation of red deer density in the west part of the Ore Mts. (Czech Republic). Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 62: 288-295.
    12. Cukor J., Vacek Z., Linda R., Vacek S., Šimůnek V., Macháček Z., Brichta J., Prokůpková A. (2022): Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) demonstrates a high resistance against bark stripping. Forest Ecology and Management, 513: 120182. Go to original source...
    13. Eurasianet (2021): Kazakhstan: Endangered antelope bounces back. Available at: https://eurasianet.org/kazakhstan-endangered-antelope-bounces-back (accessed May 28, 2022).
    14. Gortázar C., Fernandez-de-Simon J. (2022): One tool in the box: The role of hunters in mitigating the damages associated to abundant wildlife. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 68: 28. Go to original source...
    15. Gortázar C., Acevedo P., Ruiz-Fons F., Vicente J. (2006): Disease risks and overabundance of game species. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 52: 81-87. Go to original source...
    16. Havránek F., Cukor J., Linda R., Beranová J., Holá Š. (2019): Modeling the impact of wildlife and hunting management on the environment using new methods on the example of model areas. Final Report - Grant Agency of Czech State Forest. Available at: https://lesycr.cz/grantova-sluzba-projekt/modelovani-vlivu-zvere-a-mysliveckeho-managementuna-prostredi-s-pouzitim-novych-nebo-nadstandardnichmetodik-na-prikladu-modelovych-oblasti/ (in Czech).
    17. Heinze E., Boch S., Fischer M., Hessenmöller D., Klenk B., Müller J., Prati D., Schulze E.D., Seele C., Socher S., Halle S. (2011): Habitat use of large ungulates in northeastern Germany in relation to forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 261: 288-296. Go to original source...
    18. Jingfors K. (2015): Sustainable Wildlife management in Kazakhstan: Opportunities and Threats. Research report. Almaty, Ministry of Agriculture, Republic of Kazakhstan: 38.
    19. Jensen W.F., Rea R.V., Penner C.E., Smith J.R., Bragina E.V., Razenkova E., Balciauskas L., Bao H., Bystiansky S., Csányi S., Chovanova Z., Done G., Hackländer K., Heurich M., Jiang G., Kazarez A., Pusenius J., Solberg E.J., Veeroja R., Widemo F. (2020): A review of circumpolar moose populations with emphasis on Eurasian moose distributions and densities. Alces: A Journal Devoted to the Biology and Management of Moose, 56: 63-78.
    20. Le Moullec M., Pedersen Å.Ø., Yoccoz N.G., Aanes R., Tufto J., Hansen B.B. (2017): Ungulate population monitoring in an open tundra landscape: Distance sampling versus total counts. Wildlife Biology, 2017: wlb.00299. Go to original source...
    21. Macaulay L.T., Sollmann R., Barrett R.H. (2020): Estimating deer populations using camera traps and natural marks. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 84: 301-310. Go to original source...
    22. Marada P., Cukor J., Linda R., Vacek Z., Vacek S., Havránek F. (2019): Extensive orchards in the agricultural landscape: Effective protection against fraying damage caused by roe deer. Sustainability, 11: 3738. Go to original source...
    23. Marques F.F., Buckland S.T., Goffin D., Dixon C.E., Borchers D.L., Mayle B.A., Peace A.J. (2001): Estimating deer abundance from line transect surveys of dung: Sika deer in southern Scotland. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38: 349-363. Go to original source...
    24. Mayle B.A., Peace A.J., Gill R.M.A. (1999): How Many Deer? A Field Guide to Estimating Deer Population Size. Edinbourgh, Forestry Commission: 96.
    25. Mikulka O., Homolka M., Drimaj J., Kamler J. (2020): European beaver (Castor fiber) in open agricultural landscape: Crop grazing and the potential for economic damage. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 66: 101. Go to original source...
    26. Milner J.M., Bonenfant C., Mysterud A., Gaillard J.M., Csányi S., Stenseth N.C. (2006): Temporal and spatial development of red deer harvesting in Europe: Biological and cultural factors. Journal of Applied Ecology, 43: 721-734. Go to original source...
    27. Newston S.E., Johnston A., Renwick A.R., Baillie S.R., Fuller R.J. (2012): Modelling large-scale relationships between changes in woodland deer and bird populations. Journal of Applied Ecology, 49: 278-286. Go to original source...
    28. Niedziałkowska M., Hayward M.W., Borowik T., Jędrzejewski W., Jędrzejewska B. (2019): A meta-analysis of ungulate predation and prey selection by the brown bear Ursus arctos in Eurasia. Mammal Research, 64: 1-9. Go to original source...
    29. Noon B.R., Bailey L.L., Sisk T.D., McKelvey K.S. (2012): Efficient species-level monitoring at the landscape scale. Conservation Biology, 26: 432-441. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    30. Palencia P., Vicente J., Barroso P., Barasona J.Á., Soriguer R.C., Acevedo P. (2019): Estimating day range from camera-trap data: The animals' behaviour as a key pattern. Journal of Zoology, 309: 182-190. Go to original source...
    31. Pfeffer S.E., Spitzer R., Allen A.M., Hofmeester T.R., Ericsson G., Widemo F., Singh N.J., Cromsigt J.P.G.M. (2018): Pictures or pellets? Comparing camera trapping and dung counts as methods for estimating population densities of ungulates. Remote Sensing in Ecology and Conservation, 4: 173-183. Go to original source...
    32. Piekutin J., Kłapeć B., Orzechowski M. (2015): Density of forest road network - Economic point of view. Sylwan, 159: 179-187.
    33. Putman R., Watson P., Langbein J. (2011): Assessing deer densities and impacts at the appropriate level for management: A review of methodologies for use beyond the site scale. Mammal Review, 41: 197-219. Go to original source...
    34. Robinson S., Milner-Gulland E.J. (2003): Political change and factors limiting numbers of wild and domestic ungulates in Kazakhstan. Human Ecology, 31: 87-110. Go to original source...
    35. Rönnegård L., Sand H., Andrén H., Månsson J., Pehrson Å. (2008): Evaluation of four methods used to estimate population density of moose Alces alces. Wildlife Biology, 14: 358-371. Go to original source...
    36. Semenov-Tyan-Shansky O.I. (1948): Los' na Kol'skom poluostrove. Tr. La-plandskogo zapovednika, 2: 92-162. (in Russian)
    37. Smart J.C., Ward A.I., White P.C. (2004): Monitoring woodland deer populations in the UK: An imprecise science. Mammal Review, 34: 99-114. Go to original source...
    38. Tack J. (2018): Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) Population in Europe: A Scientific Review of Population Trends and Implications for Management. Brussels, European Landowners' Organization: 56.
    39. Thompson W., White G.C., Gowan C. (1998): Monitoring Vertebrate Population. San Diego, Academic Press: 365.
    40. Vala Z., Ernst M. (2011): Red deer density in the air-polluted area of forest ecosystems in the Krušné hory Mts. - Klášterec nad Ohří Forest District. Journal of Forest Science, 57: 59-63. Go to original source...
    41. Vacek Z., Cukor J., Linda R., Vacek S., Šimůnek V., Brichta J., Gallo J., Prokůpková A. (2020): Bark stripping, the crucial factor affecting stem rot development and timber production of Norway spruce forests in Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 474: 118360. Go to original source...
    42. Valente A.M., Acevedo P., Figueiredo A.M., Fonseca C., Torres R.T. (2020): Overabundant wild ungulate populations in Europe: management with consideration of socioecological consequences. Mammal Review, 50: 353-366. Go to original source...
    43. Weinbaum K.Z., Brashares J.S., Golden C.D., Getz W.M. (2013): Searching for sustainability: Are assessments of wildlife harvests behind the times? Ecological Letters, 16: 99-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    44. Witmer G.W. (2005): Wildlife population monitoring: Some practical considerations. Wildlife Research, 32: 259-263. Go to original source...
    45. WWF (World Wildlife Fund) (2007): Bukhara deer reintroduced in Kazakhstan. Available at: https://wwf.panda.org/wwf_news/?94380/Bukhara-deer-reintroduced-inKazakhstan (accessed June 21, 2022).

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content