J. For. Sci., 2022, 68(9):357-364 | DOI: 10.17221/110/2022-JFS

Growth analysis of the lower layer trees in forest stands under conversion in the Starohorské vrchy Mts.: A case studyOriginal Paper

Stanislav Kucbel*, Jaroslav Vencurik
Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry, Technical University in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

The case study analyses the structure and dynamics of the diameter growth on the example of two fir-spruce forest stands under conversion to a selection forest. In a series of 51 circular research plots (size 500 m2), the biometric characteristics (tree species, diameter at breast height, height) of all the stems with a diameter above 8 cm were registered. From the selected stems, we collected 51 cross-sections and 178 tree cores in total and performed age and growth analyses. In addition, for the lower layer trees, we assessed the competition by the neighbouring stand quantified by the competition index. The results confirmed the differences in the age structure, despite the similar diameter distributions in the investigated stands, as well as the differences in the growth dynamics of the spruce and fir in the lower tree layer. Nevertheless, the competition of the neighbouring stand was not proven as a significant factor for the diameter growth of the lower layer trees.

Keywords: competition; diameter increment; fir; selection forest; spruce; transformation

Published: September 29, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kucbel S, Vencurik J. Growth analysis of the lower layer trees in forest stands under conversion in the Starohorské vrchy Mts.: A case study. J. For. Sci. 2022;68(9):357-364. doi: 10.17221/110/2022-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ammer C., Ziegler C., Knoke T. (2005): Zur Beurteilung von intra- und interspezifischer Konkurrenz von Laubbaumbeständen im Dickungsstadium. Allgemeine Forstund Jagdzeitung, 176: 85-94. (in German)
    2. Bauhus J., Puettmann K.J., Kühne C. (2013): Close-to-nature forest management in Europe: does it support complexity and adaptability of forest ecosystems? In: Messier C., Puettmann K.J., Coates K.D. (eds): Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems. London, Routledge: 187-213.
    3. Biging G.S., Dobbertin M. (1995): Evaluation of competition indices in individual tree growth models. Forest Science, 41: 360-377. Go to original source...
    4. Boden S., Kahle H.P., von Wilpert K., Spiecker H. (2014): Resilience of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst) growth to changing climatic conditions in Southwest Germany. Forest Ecology and Management, 315: 12-21. Go to original source...
    5. Boncina A., Diaci J., Cencic L. (2002): Comparison of the two main types of selection forests in Slovenia: Distribution, site conditions, stand structure, regeneration and management. Forestry, 75: 365-373. Go to original source...
    6. Brang P., Spathelf P., Larsen J.B., Bauhus J., Boncčina A., Chauvin C., Drössler L., García-Güemes C., Heiri C., Kerr G., Lexer M.J., Mason B., Mohren F., Mühlethaler U., Nocentini S., Svoboda M. (2014): Suitability of close-tonature silviculture for adapting temperate European forests to climate change. Forestry, 87: 492-503. Go to original source...
    7. Burschel P., Huss J. (1997): Grundriß des Waldbaus. Berlin, Parey: 487. (in German)
    8. Campioli M., Vincke C., Jonard M., Kint V., Demarée G., Ponette Q. (2012): Current status and predicted impact of climate change on forest production and biogeochemistry in the temperate oceanic European zone: Review and prospects for Belgium as a case study. Journal of Forest Research, 17: 1-18. Go to original source...
    9. Dănescu A., Kohnle U., Bauhus J., Weiskittel A., Albrecht A.T. (2018): Long-term development of natural regeneration in irregular, mixed stands of silver fir and Norway spruce. Forest Ecology Management, 430: 105-116. Go to original source...
    10. Diaci J. (2002): Regeneration dynamics in a Norway spruce plantation on a silver fir-beech forest in the Slovenian Alps. Forest Ecology and Management, 161: 27-38. Go to original source...
    11. Diaci J., Firm D. (2011): Long-term dynamics of a mixed conifer stand in Slovenia managed with a farmer selection system. Forest Ecology and Management, 262: 931-939. Go to original source...
    12. Duchesneau R., Lesage I., Messier C., Morin H. (2001): Effects of light and intraspecific competition on growth and crown morphology of two size classes of understory balsam fir saplings. Forest Ecology and Management, 140: 215-225. Go to original source...
    13. Elliott K.J., Vose J.M. (1995): Evaluation of the competitive environment for white pine (Pinus strobus L.) seedlings planted on prescribed burn sites in the southern Appalachians. Forest Science, 41: 513-530. Go to original source...
    14. Gamborg C., Larsen J.B. (2003): 'Back to nature' ‒ A sustainable future for forestry? Forest Ecology and Management, 179: 559-571. Go to original source...
    15. Givnish T.J. (1988): Adaptation to sun and shade: A wholeplant perspective. Australian Journal of Plant Physiology, 15: 63-92. Go to original source...
    16. Grassi G., Giannini R. (2005): Influence of light and competition on crown and shoot morphological parameters of Norway spruce and silver fir saplings. Annals of Forest Science, 62: 269-274. Go to original source...
    17. Gspaltl M., Bauerle W., Binkley D., Sterba H. (2013): Leaf area and light use efficiency patterns of Norway spruce under different thinning regimes and age classes. Forest Ecology and Management, 288: 49-59. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Hanewinkel M., Kuhn T., Bugmann H., Lanz A., Brang P. (2014): Vulnerability of uneven-aged forests to storm damage. Forestry, 87: 525-534. Go to original source...
    19. Hegyi F. (1974): A simulation model for managing jack-pine stands. In: Fries J. (ed.): Growth Models for Tree and Stand Simulation. Stockholm, Royal College of Forest: 74-90.
    20. Korpeľ Š., Saniga M. (1993): Výberný hospodársky spôsob. Písek, Matice lesnická: 127. (in Slovak)
    21. Korpeľ Š., Saniga M. (1994): Prírode blízke pestovanie lesa. Zvolen, Technická univerzita vo Zvolene: 158. (in Slovak)
    22. Lin C.J., Laiho O., Lähde E. (2012): Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) regeneration and growth of understory trees under single-tree selection silviculture in Finland. European Journal of Forest Research, 131: 683-691. Go to original source...
    23. Lundqvist L., Nilson K. (2007): Regeneration dynamics in an uneven-aged virgin Norway spruce forest in northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22: 304-309. Go to original source...
    24. Lüpke B., Ammer C., Bruciamacchie M., Brunner A., Ceitel J., Collet C., Deuleuze C., Di Placido J., Huss J., Jankovič J., Kantor P., Larsen J.B., Lexer M., Löf M., Longauer R., Madsen P., Modrzyński J., Mosandl R., Pampe A., Pommerening A., Štefančík I., Tesař V., Thompson R., Zientarski J. (2004): Silvicultural strategies for conversion. In: Spiecker H., Hansen J., Klimo E., Skovsgaard J.P., Sterba H., von Teuffel K. (eds): Norway Spruce Conversion - Options and Consequences. Leiden, Brill: 121-164. Go to original source...
    25. Mezei P., Grodzki W., Blaženec M., Jakuš R. (2014): Factors influencing the wind-bark beetles' disturbance system in the course of an Ips typographus outbreak in the Tatra Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, 312: 67-77. Go to original source...
    26. Nothdurft A., Wolf T., Ringeler A., Böhner J., Saborowski, J. (2012): Spatio-temporal prediction of site index based on forest inventories and climate change scenarios. Forest Ecology and Management, 279: 97-111. Go to original source...
    27. Parent S., Messier C. (1995): Effects of a light gradient on height growth and crown morphology of balsam fir natural regeneration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25: 878-885. Go to original source...
    28. Petráš R., Pajtík J. (1991): Sústava československých objemových tabuliek drevín. Lesnícky časopis, 37: 49-56. (in Slovak)
    29. Reininger H. (2000): Das Plenterprinzip oder die Überführung des Altersklassenwaldes. Graz, Leopold Stocker Verlag: 238. (in German)
    30. Robakowski P., Wyka T., Samardakiewicz S., Kierzkowski D. (2004): Growth, photosynthesis, and needle structure of silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) seedlings under different canopies. Forest Ecology and Management, 201: 211-227. Go to original source...
    31. Röhrig E., Bartsch N., Lüpke B. (2006): Waldbau auf ökologischer Grundlage. Stuttgart, Ulmer: 479. (in German)
    32. Saniga M., Dendys P. (2015): Rekonštrukcie smrekových porastov (Poznatky a praktické skúsenosti). Zvolen, Technická univerzita vo Zvolene: 36. (in Slovak)
    33. Saniga M., Vencurik J. (2007): Dynamika štruktúry a regeneračné procesy lesov v rôznej fáze prebudovy na výberkový les v LHC Korytnica. Zvolen, Technická univerzita vo Zvolene: 82. (in Slovak)
    34. Schütz J.P. (1969): Etude des phénomènes de la croissance en hauteur et en diamètre du sapin (Abies alba Mill.) et de l'epicéa (Picea abies Karst) dans deux peuplements jardinés et une foret vierge. Beiheft zu den Zeitschriften des Schweizerischen Forstvereins, 44: 115. (in French)
    35. Schütz J.P. (1989): Der Plenterbetrieb. Zürich, ETH: 54. (in German)
    36. Schütz J.P. (2001a): Der Plenterwald und weitere Formen strukturierter und gemischter Wälder. Berlin, Parey Buchverlag: 220. (in German)
    37. Schütz J.P. (2001b): Opportunities and strategies of transforming regular forests to irregular forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 151: 87-94. Go to original source...
    38. Schütz J.P. (2002): Silvicultural tools to develop irregular and diverse forest structures. Forestry, 75: 329-337. Go to original source...
    39. Schütz J.P. (2006): Modelling the demographic sustainability of pure beech plenter forests in Eastern Germany. Annals of Forest Science, 63: 93-100. Go to original source...
    40. Schütz J.P., Götz M., Schmid W., Mandallaz D. (2006): Vulnerability of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest stands to storms and consequences for silviculture. European Journal of Forest Research, 125: 291-302. Go to original source...
    41. Smith D.M., Larson B.C., Kelty M.J., Ashton P.M.S. (1997): The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology. 9th Ed. New York, John Wiley and Sons: 537.
    42. Stancioiu P.T., O'Hara K.L. (2006): Regeneration growth in different light environments of mixed species, multiaged, mountainous forests of Romania. European Journal of Forest Research, 125: 151-162. Go to original source...
    43. Stokes M.A., Smiley T.L. (1996): An introduction to tree-ring dating. Tucson, University of Arizona Press: 73.
    44. Szymura T.H. (2005): Silver fir saplings bank in seminatural stand: Individuals architecture and vitality. Forest Ecology and Management, 212: 101-108. Go to original source...
    45. Vencurik J., Kucbel S., Saniga M., Jaloviar P. (2016): Štruktúra a výškový rast prirodzenej obnovy vo výberkových lesoch s rôznym zastúpením smreka. Zvolen, Technická univerzita vo Zvolene: 64. (in Slovak)
    46. Vencurik J., Kucbel S., Saniga M., Jaloviar P., Sedmáková D., Pittner J., Parobeková Z., Bosela M. (2019): Growth dynamics of the Norway spruce and silver fir understory in continuous cover forestry. iForest - Biogeosciences and Forestry, 13: 56-64. Go to original source...
    47. Zar J.H. (1999): Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall: 663.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content