J. For. Sci., 2022, 68(8):318-328 | DOI: 10.17221/63/2022-JFS

Managed vs. unmanaged Fagus orientalis Lipsky forests: Structure and diversity of natural regeneration in northern IranOriginal Paper

Pejman Parhizkar*, Mohammad Hossein Sadeghzadeh Hallaj, Majid Hassani
Forest Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

The predominant natural disturbance regime within an old-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forest has been imitated in order to continue the forest cover. It is unclear how much the silvicultural characteristics of regeneration in a managed forest differ from those in an unmanaged old-growth forest subject only to natural dynamics. In this study, we compared important quantitative (e.g. height, collar diameter, crown width, length of spring shoot on the main stem and length of the uppermost internodes) and qualitative (e.g. healthy, mode of branching and stem form) silvicultural characteristics of beech saplings within the gaps between an unmanaged old-growth Oriental beech compartment and a managed forest in the northern Iran ten years after a single harvest entry using a single-tree selection. Canopy gaps larger than 100 m2 with visible remnants of gapmakers (i.e. stumps) were included in this study. The saplings' characteristics of both compartments were within typical ranges for an old-growth beech forest. Small, but important differences were also observed. The value of beech saplings' density in the managed compartment (4.9 ± 0.7 SE) was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than the unmanaged one (3.4 ± 0.6 SE). Conversely, the value of the Menhinick Richness index in the unmanaged one (0.96 ± 0.05 SE) was significantly (P < 0.01) higher than the managed compartment (0.80 ± 0.04 SE). The sapling spring shoot length in the unmanaged compartment (13.3 ± 1.7 SE) was also significantly (P < 0.01) higher than the managed one (7.3 ± 0.7 SE). Relying on beech trees in a managed compartment will hamper the stability of future forest stands. The imitation of the old growth forest must be complete. To increase the resistance of the forest stands to adverse conditions, pay attention to the tree species richness at the time of marking.

Keywords: close-to-nature; forest gap; plagiotropy; richness; silviculture

Published: August 26, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Parhizkar P, Sadeghzadeh Hallaj MH, Hassani M. Managed vs. unmanaged Fagus orientalis Lipsky forests: Structure and diversity of natural regeneration in northern Iran. J. For. Sci. 2022;68(8):318-328. doi: 10.17221/63/2022-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Amiri M., Rahmani R., Sagheb-Talebi K.H. (2015): Canopy gaps characteristics and structural dynamics in a natural unmanaged oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stand in the north of Iran. Caspian Journal of Environmental Science, 13: 259-274.
    2. Anonymous (2010): Forestry Plan of District Nine in Razah Region, Watershed Number 9. Shafarood, Rasht Natural Resources Office: 450. (in Persian)
    3. Antos J.A. (2009): Understory plants in temperate forests. Forests and Forest Plants, 1: 262-279.
    4. Anderson C.S., Meikle D.B. (2006): Annual changes in structural complexity of understory vegetation and relative abundance of Peromyscus leucopus in fragmented habitats. Acta Theriologica, 51: 43-51. Go to original source...
    5. Augusto L., Dupouey J.L., Ranger J. (2003): Effects of tree species on understory vegetation and environmental conditions in temperate forests. Annals of Forest Science, 60: 823-831. Go to original source...
    6. Barnes B.V., Zak D.R., Denton S.R., Spurr S.H. (1998): Forest Ecology. New York, John Wiley and Sons: 774.
    7. Berger A.L., Puettmann, K.J. (2000): Overstory composition and stand structure influence herbaceous plant diversity in the mixed aspen forest of northern Minnesota. The American Midland Naturalist, 143: 111-125. Go to original source...
    8. Bihamta M.R., Zare Chahouki M.A. (2008): Principles of Statistics for the Natural Resources Science. Tehran, University of Tehran Press: 300. (in Persian)
    9. Buluąek D., Vacek Z., Vacek S., Král J., Bílek L., Králíček I. (2016): Spatial pattern of relict beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forests in the Sudetes of the Czech Republic and Poland. Journal of Forest Science, 62: 293-305. Go to original source...
    10. Čater M., Levanič T. (2013): Response of Fagus sylvatica L. and Abies alba Mill. in different silvicultural systems of the high Dinaric karst. Forest Ecology and Management, 289: 278-288. Go to original source...
    11. Čater M., Levanič T. (2019): Beech and silver fir's response along the Balkan's latitudinal gradient. Scientific Reports, 9: 16269. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Denslow J.S. (1987): Tropical rainforest gaps and tree species diversity. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 18: 431-451. Go to original source...
    13. Dröβler L. (2006): Structure and dynamics of two primeval beech forests in Slovakia. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Göttingen, GeorgAugust-University. (in German)
    14. Fahey R.T., Puettmann K.J. (2007): Ground-layer disturbance and initial conditions influence gap partitioning of understorey vegetation. Journal of Ecology, 95: 1098-1109. Go to original source...
    15. Feldmann E., Drößler L., Hauck M., Kucbel S., Pichler V., Leuschner C. (2018): Canopy gap dynamics and tree understory release in a virgin beech forest, Slovakian Carpathians. Forest Ecology and Management, 415: 38-46. Go to original source...
    16. Feldmann E., Glatthorn J., Ammer C., Leuschner C. (2020): Regeneration dynamics following the formation of understory gaps in a Slovakian beech virgin forest. Forests, 11: 585. Go to original source...
    17. Forrester J.A., Lorimer C.G., Dyer J.H., Gower S.T., Mladenoff D.J. (2014): Response of tree regeneration to experimental gap creation and deer herbivory in north temperate forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 329: 137-147. Go to original source...
    18. Gálhidy L., Mihók B., Hagyó A., Rajkai K., Standovár T. (2006): Effects of gap size and associated changes in light and soil moisture on the understorey vegetation of a Hungarian beech forest. Plant Ecology, 183: 133-145. Go to original source...
    19. Harvey B.D., Leduc A., Gauthier S., Bergeron Y. (2002): Stand-landscape integration in natural disturbance-based management of the southern boreal forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 155: 369-385. Go to original source...
    20. Helms J.A. (1998): The Dictionary of Forestry. Bethesda, Society of American Foresters: 210.
    21. Hinsley S., Hill R., Fuller R., Bellamy P., Rothery P. (2009): Bird species distributions across woodland canopy structure gradients. Community Ecology, 10: 99-110. Go to original source...
    22. Kern C.C., Reich P.B., Montgomery R.A., Strong T.F. (2012): Do deer and shrubs override canopy gap size effects on growth and survival of yellow birch, northern red oak, eastern white pine, and eastern hemlock seedlings? Forest Ecology and Management, 267: 134-143. Go to original source...
    23. Kimmins J.P. (2004): Forest Ecology: A Foundation for Sustainable Forest Management and Environmental Ethics in Forestry. Upper Saddle River, Prentice Hall: 611. Go to original source...
    24. Kukkonen M., Rita H., Hohnwald S., Nygren A. (2008): Treefall gaps of certified, conventionally managed and natural forests as regeneration sites for Neotropical timber trees in northern Honduras. Forest Ecology and Management, 255: 2163-2176. Go to original source...
    25. Luoma V., Saarinen N., Wulder M.A., White J.C., Vastaranta M., Holopainen M., Hyyppä J. (2017): Assessing precision in conventional field measurements of individual tree attributes. Forests, 8: 38. Go to original source...
    26. Madsen P., Hahn K. (2008): Natural regeneration in a beechdominated forest managed by close-to-nature principles - A gap cutting based experiment. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38: 1716-1729. Go to original source...
    27. Marvie Mohadjer M.R. (1975): The study of relation between morphological parameters of beech tree and site. Tehran University. Journal of Natural Resources College, 32: 15-29.
    28. Marvie Mohadjer M.R. (1976): Study of beech forest qualitative characteristics in north of Iran. Tehran University. Journal of Natural Resources College, 34: 77-96.
    29. Mohammadi L., Mohadjer M.R., Etemad V., Sefidi K., Nasiri N. (2019): Natural regeneration within natural and man-made canopy gaps in Caspian natural beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forest, Northern Iran. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 39: 61-75. Go to original source...
    30. Mountford E.P., Savill P.S., Bebber D.P. (2006): Patterns of regeneration and ground vegetation associated with canopy gaps in a managed beechwood in southern England. Forestry, 79: 389-408. Go to original source...
    31. Müller J., Sagheb-Talebi K., Thorn S. (2017): Protect Iran's ancient forest from logging. Science, 355: 919. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    32. Nagaike T., Kamitani T., Nakashizuka T. (2005): Effects of different forest management systems on plant species diversity in a Fagus crenata forested landscape of central Japan. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35: 2832-2840. Go to original source...
    33. Nagel T.A., Zenner E.K., Brang P. (2013): Research in oldgrowth forests and forest reserves: Implications for integrated forest management. In: Kraus D., Krumm F. (eds): Integrative Approaches as an Opportunity for the Conservation of Forest Biodiversity. Freiburg, European Forest Institute: 44-51.
    34. Nagel T.A., Svoboda M., Rugani T., Diaci J. (2010): Gap regeneration and replacement patterns in an old-growth Fagus-Abies forest of Bosnia-Herzegovina. Plant Ecology, 208: 307-318. Go to original source...
    35. Nasiri N., Marvie Mohadjer M.R., Etemad V., Sefidi K., Mohammadi L., Gharehaghaji M. (2017): Natural regeneration of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) trees in canopy gaps and under closed canopy in a forest in northern Iran. Journal of Forestry Research, 29: 1075-1081. Go to original source...
    36. Parhizkar P., Sagheb-Talebi K., Mataji A., Namiranian M. (2011a): Influence of gap size and development stages on the silvicultural characteristics of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) regeneration. Caspian Journal of Environmental Science, 9: 55-65.
    37. Parhizkar P., Sagheb-Talebi K., Mataji A., Nyland R., Namiranian M. (2011b): Silvicultural characteristics of Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) regeneration under different RLI and positions within gaps. Forestry, 84: 177-185. Go to original source...
    38. Parhizkar P., Sagheb-Talebi K., Zenner E.K., Hassani M., Sadeghzadeh Hallaj M.H. (2021): Gap and stand structural characteristics in a managed and an unmanaged old-growth oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) forest. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 94: 691-703. Go to original source...
    39. Petritan A.M., Von Lüpke B., Petritan I.C. (2007): Effects of shade on growth and mortality of maple (Acer pseudoplatanus), ash (Fraxinus excelsior) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) saplings. Forestry, 80: 397-412. Go to original source...
    40. Petriţan A.M., Von Lüpke B., Petriţan, I.C. (2009): Influence of light availability on growth, leaf morphology and plant architecture of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), maple (Acer pseudoplatanus L.) and ash (Fraxinus excelsior L.) saplings. European Journal of Forest Research, 128: 61-74. Go to original source...
    41. Petritan A.M., Nuske R.S., Petritan I.C., Tudose N.C. (2013): Gap disturbance patterns in an old-growth sessile oak (Quercus petraea L.)-European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) forest remnant in the Carpathian Mountains, Romania. Forest Ecology and Management, 308: 67-75. Go to original source...
    42. Promis A., Schindler D., Reif A., Cruz G. (2009): Solar radiation transmission in and around canopy gaps in an unevenaged Nothofagus betuloides forest. International Journal of Biometeorology, 53: 355-367. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    43. Raymond P., Royo A.A., Prévost M., Dumais D. (2018): Assessing the single-tree and small group selection cutting system as intermediate disturbance to promote regeneration and diversity in temperate mixedwood stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 430: 21-32. Go to original source...
    44. Ritter E., Dalsgaard L., Einhorn K.S. (2005): Light, temperature and soil moisture regimes following gap formation in a semi-natural beech-dominated forest in Denmark. Forest Ecology and Management, 206: 15-33. Go to original source...
    45. Roloff A. (1986): Morphologische Untersuchungen zum Wachstum und Verzweigungssystem der Rotbuche (Fagus sylvatica L.). Mitteilungen der Deutschen Gendrologischen Gesellschaft, 76: 5-47. (in German)
    46. Runkle J.R. (1981): Gap regeneration in some old-growth forests of the eastern United States. Ecology, 62: 1041-1051. Go to original source...
    47. Runkle J.R. (1992): Guidelines and Sample Protocol for Sampling Forest Gaps. Portland, US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station: 43. Go to original source...
    48. Sagheb-Talebi K. (1995): Quantitative und qualitative Merkmale von Buchenjungwüchsen (Fagus sylvatica L.) unter dem Einfluss des Lichtes und anderer Standortsfaktoren. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Zurich, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich. (in German)
    49. Sagheb-Talebi K., Sajedi T., Pourhashemi M. (2014): Forests of Iran: A Treasure from the Past, a Hope for the Future. Dordrecht, Springer: 152. Go to original source...
    50. Schliemann S.A., Bockheim J.G. (2011): Methods for studying treefall gaps: A review. Forest Ecology and Management, 261: 1143-1151. Go to original source...
    51. Schmitt H.P., Mertens B., Lüpke, B.V. (1995): Buchenvoranbau im Stadtwald Meschede. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift, 20: 1071-1075. (in German)
    52. Schnitzer S.A., Carson W.P. (2001): Treefall gaps and the maintenance of species diversity in a tropical forest. Ecology, 82: 913-919. Go to original source...
    53. Sefidi K., Mohadjer M.R.M., Mosandl R., Copenheaver C.A. (2011): Canopy gaps and regeneration in old-growth Oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) stands, northern Iran. Forest Ecology and Management, 262: 1094-1099. Go to original source...
    54. Spies T.A., Franklin J.F. (1991): The structure of natural young, mature, and old-growth Douglas-fir forests in Oregon and Washington. In: Ruggeiro L., Aubry K.B., Carey A.B., Brookes M.H., Agee J.K. (eds): Wildlife and Vegetation of Unmanaged Douglas-fir Forests. Portland, USDA Forest Service: 91-110.
    55. Stancioiu P.T., O'Hara K.L. (2006): Morphological plasticity of regeneration subject to different levels of canopy cover in mixed-species, multiaged forests of the Romanian Carpathians. Trees, 20: 196-209. Go to original source...
    56. Sullivan T.P., Sullivan D.S., Lindgren P.M. (2001): Stand structure and small mammals in young lodgepole pine forest: 10-year results after thinning. Ecological Applications, 11: 1151-1173. Go to original source...
    57. Tabari M., Fayaz P., Espahbodi K., Staelens J., Nachtergale L. (2005): Response of oriental beech (Fagus orientalis Lipsky) seedlings to canopy gap size. Forestry, 78: 443-450. Go to original source...
    58. Thomas S.C., Halpern C.B., Falk D.A., Liguori D.A., Austin K.A. (1999): Plant diversity in managed forests: Understory responses to thinning and fertilization. Ecological Applications, 9: 864-879. Go to original source...
    59. Torimaru T., Itaya A., Yamamoto S.I. (2012): Quantification of repeated gap formation events and their spatial patterns in three types of old-growth forests: Analysis of long-term canopy dynamics using aerial photographs and digital surface models. Forest Ecology and Management, 284: 1-11. Go to original source...
    60. Vacek Z., Vacek S., Podrázský V., Bílek L., ©tefančík I., Moser W.K., Buluąek D., Král J., Remeą J., Králíček I. (2015): Effect of tree layer and microsite on the variability of natural regeneration in autochthonous beech forests. Polish Journal of Ecology, 63: 233-246. Go to original source...
    61. Vacek Z., Vacek S., Eşen D., Yildiz O., Král J., Gallo J. (2020): Effect of invasive Rhododendron ponticum L. on natural regeneration and structure of Fagus orientalis Lipsky forests in the Black Sea region. Forests, 11: 603. Go to original source...
    62. Vilhar U., Roľenbergar D., Simončič P., Diaci J. (2015): Variation in irradiance, soil features and regeneration patterns in experimental forest canopy gaps. Annals of Forest Science, 72: 253-266. Go to original source...
    63. Wagner S. (1999): Ökologische Untersuchungen zur Initialphase der Naturverjüngung in Eschen-Buchen-Mischbeständen. Schriften aus der Forstlichen Fakultät der Universität Göttingen und der Niedersächsischen Forstlichen Versuchsanstalt. Göttingen, Sauerländer: 262. (in German)
    64. Wang G., Liu F. (2011): The influence of gap creation on the regeneration of Pinus tabuliformis planted forest and its role in the near-natural cultivation strategy for planted forest management. Forest Ecology and Management, 262: 413-423. Go to original source...
    65. Weber T.A., Hart J.L., Schweitzer C.J., Dey D.C. (2014): Influence of gap-scale disturbance on developmental and successional pathways in Quercus-Pinus stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 331: 60-70. Go to original source...
    66. Yamamoto S.I. (1989): Gap dynamics in climaxFagus crenata forests. The Botanical Magazine, 102: 93-114. Go to original source...
    67. Zang C., Biondi F. (2015): treeclim: an R package for the numerical calibration of proxy-climate relationships. Ecography, 38: 431-436. Go to original source...
    68. Zarrinkafsh M.K. (2002): Forest Soils. Tehran, Research Institute of Forest and Rangelands: 361. (in Persian)

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content