J. For. Sci., 2022, 68(7):263-276 | DOI: 10.17221/27/2022-JFS

Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) applied to evaluating the forest management approachesOriginal Paper

Mohsen Mostafa ORCID...*,1, Nishtman Hatami2, Kambiz Espahbodi1, Farhad Asadi1
1 Natural Resources Department, Mazandaran Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Sari, Iran
2 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Gorgan University of Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources, Gorgan, Iran

The study mainly aims at looking into the disparities in beneficiary's socio-economic status between the areas without implementation of forestry plans and the areas where forestry plans had initially been available even though they have recently been terminated as well. Babol Roud forestry plan is located in Lafoor forest area in the Babol County, the Mazandaran Province, Northeast Iran. This research was divided into three steps: first of all, by making use of Cochran's formula, we identified the number of participants. Later on, the Delphi method was employed in order to determine criteria and subcriteria through the questionnaires. From then on, Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) was used to quantify the criteria that were weighted by experts' viewpoints through the planned questionnaires. By adopting the Fuzzy Forests method, we found out that the economic, environmental, social and managerial criteria are most prominent. Forestry project staff's income was in the highest relative weight (0.23) based on participant's viewpoint. Most of the participants in the study did not give their consent to the forestry plan suspension due to the inevitably forthcoming economic and environmental problems ahead. Instead, they strongly underlined the need to go into immediate action such as revising the former plans as well as constant stream of close attention to the plan execution details of the ongoing process. Eventually, developing a new policy and using alternative forest management strategies that would meet the needs of all various stakeholders have been recommended.

Keywords: criteria; Delphi method; forestry plan; questionnaires

Published: July 26, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mostafa M, Hatami N, Espahbodi K, Asadi F. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) applied to evaluating the forest management approaches. J. For. Sci. 2022;68(7):263-276. doi: 10.17221/27/2022-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Chang D.Y. (1996): Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. European Journal of Operational Research, 95: 649-655. Go to original source...
  2. Chiu R.H., Lin L.H.,Ting S.C. (2014): Evaluation of green port factors and performance: A fuzzy AHP analysis. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014: 802976. Go to original source...
  3. Chukwuone N.A., Adeosun K.P., Chukwuone C.A. (2020): Socioeconomic factors affecting households' use of indigenous forest management practices in managing nonwood forest products: Evidence from forest communities in Nigeria derived savannah. Heliyon, 6: e0521. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Corona P., Scotti R. (2011): Systemic silviculture, adaptive management and forest monitoring perspectives. L'Italia Forestale e Montana, 66: 219-224. Go to original source...
  5. Dos Santos A.R., Araújo F.E., Barros Q.S., Fernandes M.M., de Moura Fernandes M.R., Moreira T.R., de Souza K.B., da Silva E.F., Martins Silva J.P., Silva Santos J., Billo D., Silva R.F., Pedroso Nascimento G.S., da Silva Gandine S.M., Pinheiro A.A., Ribeiro W.R., Gonçalves M.S., da Silva S.F., Senhorelo A.P., Heitor F.D., Berude L.C., de Almeida Telles L.A. (2020): Fuzzy concept applied in determining potential forest fragments for deployment of a network of ecological corridors in the Brazilian Atlantic Forest. Ecological Indicators, 115: 106423. Go to original source...
  6. Etemad S.S., Mohammadi Limaei S., Olsson L., Yousefpour R. (2019): Forest management decision-making using goal programming and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process approaches (Case study: Hyrcanian forests of Iran). Journal of Forest Science, 65: 368-379. Go to original source...
  7. Ezquerro M., Pardos M., Diaz-Balteiro L. (2019): Integrating variable retention systems into strategic forest management to deal with conservation biodiversity objectives. Forest Ecology and Management, 433: 585-593. Go to original source...
  8. Filyushkina A., Strange A., Löf M., Ezebilo E.E., Boman M. (2018): Applying the Delphi method to assess impacts of forest management on biodiversity and habitat preservation. Forest Ecology and Management, 409: 179-189. Go to original source...
  9. Friedman G. (2009): The Next 100 Years: A Forecast for the 21st Century. New York, Anchor Books: 253.
  10. Haidari M., Karamdoost Maryan B. (2017): The study and policy cessation of forest utilization or forest logging in hyrcanian forests (Case study: Shafarood forests). Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 24: 724-736. (in Persian)
  11. Geng Y., Sun S., Yeo-Chang Y. (2021): Impact of forest logging ban on the welfare of local communities in northeast China. Forests, 12: 3. Go to original source...
  12. Goméz T., Hernández M., León M.A., Caballero R. (2006): A forest planning problem solved via a linear fractional goal-programming model. Forest Ecology and Management, 227: 79-88. Go to original source...
  13. Gong Z., Gu L., Yao S., Deng Y. (2020): Effects of bio-physical, economic and ecological policy on forest transition for sustainability of resource and socioeconomics development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 243: 118571. Go to original source...
  14. Grumbine R.E. (1994): What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology, 8: 27-38. Go to original source...
  15. Güngöroğlu C. (2017): Determination of forest fire risk with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its mapping with the application of GIS: The case of Turkey/Çakirlar. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal, 23: 388-406. Go to original source...
  16. Hasson F., Keeney S., McKenna H. (2000): Research guidelines for the Delphi survey technique. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 34: 1008-1015. Go to original source...
  17. Kangas A., Kangas J., Laukkanen S. (2006): Fuzzy multicriteria approval method and its application to two forest planning problems. Forest Science, 52: 232-242. Go to original source...
  18. Keeney S., Hasson F., McKenna H. (2011): The Delphi Technique in Nursing and Health Research. London, WileyBlackwell: 198. Go to original source...
  19. Kotwalm P.C., Omprakash M.D., Gairola S., Dugaya D. (2008): Ecological indicators: Imperative to sustainable forest management. Ecological Indicators, 8: 104-107. Go to original source...
  20. Li L., Shi Z.H., Yin W., Zhu D., Ng S.L., Cai C.F., Lei A.L. (2009): A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach to eco-environmental vulnerability assessment for the Danjiangkou Reservoir Area, China. Ecological Modelling, 220: 3439-3447. Go to original source...
  21. Lin C.N. (2020): A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process-based analysis of the dynamic sustainable management index in leisure agriculture. Sustainability, 12: 5395. Go to original source...
  22. Linser L., Wolfslehner B., Asmar F., Bridge S.R.J., Gritten D., Guadalupe V., Jafari M., Johnson S., Laclau P., Robertson G. (2018): 25 years of criteria and indicators for sustainable forest management: Why some intergovernmental C&I processes fourished while others faded. Forests, 9: 515. Go to original source...
  23. Liang J., He X., Zeng G., Zhong M., Gao X., Li X., Li X., Wu H., Feng C., Xing W., Fang Y., Mo D. (2018): Integrating priority areas and ecological corridors into national network for conservation planning in China. Science of the Total Environment, 626: 22-29. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Martini M. (2012): Causes of corruption in Indonesia, U4 expert answer, cases of corruption, Transparency International 338. Available at: http://www.transparency.org/whatwedo/answer/causes_of_corruption_in_indonesia
  25. Mendoza G.A., Prabhu R. (2001): A fuzzy analytic hierarchy process for assessing biodiversity conservation. In: Schmoldt D.L., Kangas J., Mendoza G.A., Pesonen M. (eds): The Analytic Hierarchy Process in Natural Resource and Environmental Decision Making. Dordrecht, Springer Dordrecht: 219-233. Go to original source...
  26. Mostafa M., Espahbodi K., Hatami N., Asadi F. (2020): Policy managment investigation of implementation and non-implementation of forestry plan in Babol Roud, Iran. Iranian Journal of Forest and Poplar Research, 28: 180-191. (in Persian)
  27. Nocentini S., Buttoud G., Ciancio O., Corona P. (2017): Managing forests in a changing world: the need for a systemic approach. A review. Forest Systems, 26: 1-15. Go to original source...
  28. Parrotta J., Yeo-Chang Y., Camacho L.D. (2016): Traditional knowledge for sustainable forest management and provision of ecosystem services. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 12: 1-4. Go to original source...
  29. Peng J., Yang Y., Liu Y., Hu Y., Du Y., Meersmans J., Qiu S. (2018): Linking ecosystem services and circuit theory to identify ecological security patterns. Science of the Total Environment, 644: 781-790. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  30. Saaty T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process. Maidenhead, McGraw-Hill: 287. Go to original source...
  31. Salehnasab A., Feghi J., Danekar A., Soosani J., Dastranj A. (2016): Forest park site selection based on a Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process framework (Case study: the Galegol Basin, Lorestan province, Iran). Journal of Forest Science, 62: 253-263. Go to original source...
  32. Sotoudeh Foumani B., Rostami Shahraji T., Mohammadi Limaei S. (2017): Role of political power in forest administration policy of Iran. Caspian Journal of Environment Science. 15: 181-199.
  33. Schütz J.P., Saniga M., Diaci J., Vrška T. (2016): Comparing close-to-nature silviculture with processes in pristine forests: Lessons from Central Europe. Annals of Forest Science, 73: 911-921. Go to original source...
  34. Shaverdi M., Heshmati M.R., Ramezani I. (2014): Application of fuzzy AHP approach for financial performance evaluation of Iranian petrochemical sector. Procedia Computer Science, 31: 995-1004. Go to original source...
  35. Shirzadi Laskookalayeh S., Amirnejad H., Hosseini S. (2021): Investigating the economic and social consequences of the forest logging prohibition of eastern forests of Mazandaran Province. Ecology of Iranian Forests, 9: 219-227. Go to original source...
  36. Stirn L.Z. (2006): Integrating the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with dynamic programming approach for determining the optimal forest management decisions. Ecological Modelling, 194: 296-305. Go to original source...
  37. Sunderlin W.D., Angelsen A., Belcher P., Burgers P., Nasi R., Santoso L., Wunder S. (2005): Livelihoods, forests and conservation in developing countries. World Development, 33: 1383-1402. Go to original source...
  38. Tiryaki F., Ahlatcioglu B. (2009): Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Information Sciences, 179: 53-69. Go to original source...
  39. Tu J.C., Hu C.L. (2015): Applying the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to construct the product innovative service system of wedding photography apparel. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2015: 171204. Go to original source...
  40. Waldron K., Lussier J.M., Thiffault N., Bujold F., Ruel J.C., St-Onge B. (2016): The Delphi method as an alternative to standard committee meetings to identify ecological issues for forest ecosystem-based management: A case study. The Forestry Chronicle, 92: 453-464. Go to original source...
  41. Wang L., Chu J., Wu J. (2007): Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics, 107: 151-163. Go to original source...
  42. Zadeh L.A. (1965): Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8: 338-353. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.