J. For. Sci., 2022, 68(2):61-71 | DOI: 10.17221/128/2021-JFS

What does the mandible say about wild boar: Ontogenetic development, sexual dimorphism and habitat preferencesOriginal Paper

Klára Košinová ORCID...*, Richard Policht, Ondřej Matějka, Vladimír Hanzal, Miloš Ježek, Tomáš Kušta, Vlastimil Hart
Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) is one of the most discussed game species, distributed across Europe, therefore the management of this species is considered important. This management should be based on data presented, population quality and preferences and craniometric dimensions show the development of the individual and its prosperity. A sample of 148 male and 153 female wild boar mandibles was studied to compare differences in craniometric measurements, especially to find out wild boar environmental demands and population trends. The width of the caput mandibulae and angle of the mandible showed significant difference between males and females. Measurements analysed with forest area size and other data also showed that larger craniometric dimensions were reached in hunting areas with at least 200 ha of forested area, which may be due to the wild boar's need for safety and vegetative cover in the first months of piglet development with respect to its home range. The development of young wild boar is dependent on rest and shelter in the first months of life. A forest cover of at least 200 ha appears to be sufficient in this respect. Information on habitat preferences and individual development can lead to improvements in wild boar management.

Keywords: home range; wildlife management; growth; craniometry; spatial ecology

Published: February 21, 2022  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Košinová K, Policht R, Matějka O, Hanzal V, Ježek M, Kušta T, Hart V. What does the mandible say about wild boar: Ontogenetic development, sexual dimorphism and habitat preferences. J. For. Sci. 2022;68(2):61-71. doi: 10.17221/128/2021-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Anezaki T., Yamazaki K., Hongo H., Sugawara H. (2008): Chronospatial variation of dental size of Holocene Japanese wild pigs (Sus scrofa leucomystax). The Quaternary Research, 47: 29-38. Go to original source...
    2. Attuquayefio D.K., Gorman M.L., Wolton R.J. (1986): Home range sizes in the wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus: Habitat, sex and seasonal differences. Journal of Zoology, 210: 45-53. Go to original source...
    3. Baubet E., Ropert-Coudert Y., Brandt S. (2003): Seasonal and annual variations in earthworm consumption by wild boar (Sus scrofa scrofa L.). Wildlife Research, 30: 179-186. Go to original source...
    4. Black J.L., Mullan B.P., Lorschy M.L., Giles L.R. (1993): Lactation in sows during heat stress. Livestock Production Science, 35: 153-170. Go to original source...
    5. Boitani L., Mattei L., Nonis D., Corsi F. (1994): Spatial and activity patterns of wild boars in Tuscany, Italy. Journal of Mammalogy, 75: 600-612. Go to original source...
    6. Brajon S., Ringgenberg N., Torrey S., Bergeron R., Devilliers N. (2017): Impact of prenatal stress and environmental enrichment prior to weaning on activity and social behaviour of piglets (Sus scrofa). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 197: 15-23. Go to original source...
    7. Briedermann L. (1990): Schwarzwild. 2nd Ed. Berlin, VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag: 524. (in German)
    8. Brudnicki W. (2005): Comparison of craniometric features and cranial cavity volume in domestic pig (Sus scrofa forma domestica) and wild boar (Sus scrofa) in view of development. Folia Biologica (Kraków), 53: 25-30. Go to original source...
    9. Calenge C., Maillard D., Vassant J., Brandt S. (2002): Summer and hunting season home ranges of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in two habitats in France. Game and Wildlife Science, 19: 281-301.
    10. Calenge C., Maillard D., Fournier P., Fouque C. (2004): Efficiency of spreading maize in the garrigues to reduce European Journal of Wildlife Research, 50: 112-120. cek Z., Kunca T., Havránek F. (2020): Wild boar deathbed choice in relation to ASF: Are there any differences between positive and negative carcasses? Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 177: 104943. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. D'Andrea L., Durio P., Perrone A., Pirone S. (1995): Preliminary data of the wild boar (Sus scrofa) space use in mountain environment. IBEX Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 117-121.
    12. De Crombrugghe S., Bertouille S., Berthet P. (1989): Masse coporelle et développement du maxillaire inférieur des faons du cerf (Cervus elaphus L.) comme bioindicateurs des relations "Cerf-Milieu". Gibier Faune Sauvage, 6: 261-277. (in French)
    13. Diong C.H. (1982): Population biology and management of the feral pig (Sus scrofa L.) in Kipahulu Valley, Maui. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Honolulu, University of Hawaii.
    14. Endo H., Hayashi Y., Yamazaki K., Motokawa M., Pei J.C. K., Lin L.K., Chou C.H., Oshida T. (2002): Geographical variation of mandible size and shape in the wild pig (Sus scrofa) from Taiwan and Japan. Zoological Studies, 41: 452-460.
    15. Fattebert J., Baubet E., Slotow R., Fischer C. (2017): Landscape effects on wild boar home range size under contrasting harvest regimes in a human-dominated agro-ecosystem. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 63: 32. Go to original source...
    16. Feichtner B. (1998): Ursachen der Streckenschwankungen beim Schwarzwild im Saarland. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft, 44: 140-150. (in German) Go to original source...
    17. Feldhamer G.A., McCann B.E. (2004): Dental anomalies in wild and domestic Sus scrofa in Illinois. Acta Theriologica, 49: 139. Go to original source...
    18. Friebel B.A., Jodice P.G. (2009): Home range and habitat use of feral hogs in Congaree National Park, South Carolina. Human-Wildlife Conflicts, 3: 49-63.
    19. Gabor T.M., Hellgren E.C., Van Den Bussche R.A., Silvy N.J. (1999): Demography, sociospatial behaviour and genetics of feral pigs (Sus scrofa) in a semi-arid environment. Journal of Zoology, 247: 311-322. Go to original source...
    20. Gaston W., Armstron J.B., Arjo W., Stribling H.L. (2008): Feral pig (Sus scrofa) survival, home range, and habitat use at Lowndes County Wildlife Management Area, Alabama. In: Vantassel S.M. (ed.): 2008 National Conference on Feral Hogs, St. Louis, April 13-15, 2008: 1-17.
    21. Geisser H. (2000): Das Wildschwein (Sus scrofa) im Kanton Thurgau-Analyse der Populationsdynamik, der Habitatansprüche und der Feldschäden einer Huftierart in einem anthropogen beeinflussten Lebensraum. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Zürich, University Zürich. (in German)
    22. Geisser H., Reyer H.U. (2004): Efficacy of hunting, feeding, and fencing to reduce crop damage by wild boars. Journal of Wildlife Management, 68: 939-946. Go to original source...
    23. Genov P., Massei G., Nikolov H. (1995): Morphometrical analysis of two Mediterranean wild boar populations. IBEX Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 69-70.
    24. Gethöffer F., Sodeikat G., Pohlmeyer K. (2007): Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 53: 287-297. Go to original source...
    25. Gómez J.M., García D., Zamora R. (2003): Impact of vertebrate acorn- and seedling-predators on a Mediterranean Quercus pyrenaica forest. Forest Ecology and Management. 180: 125-134. Go to original source...
    26. Groves C.P., Grubb P. (1993): The suborder Suiformes. In: Oliver W.L.R. (ed.). Pigs, Peccaries, and Hippos: Status Survey and Conservation Action Plan. Gland, International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources: 1-4.
    27. Hamel S., Gaillard J.M., Yoccoz N.G., Albon S., Côté S.D., Craine J.M., Festa-Bianchet M., Garel M., Lee P., Moss C., Nussey D.H., Pelletier F., Stien A., Tveraa T. (2016): Cohort variation in individual body mass dissipates with age in large herbivores. Ecological Monographs, 86: 517-543. Go to original source...
    28. Hennig R. (1981): Schwarzwild: Biologie, Verhalt- en, Hege und Jagd. Munich, BLV Verlagsgesellschaft: 221. (in German)
    29. Herbst C.E., Keuling O. (2014). Habitat use of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in an agricultural area - A problem? In: 88th Annual Meeting of the German Society for Mammalian Biology. Giessen, Sept 1-4, 2014: 10.
    30. Herrero J., García-Serrano A., Couto S., Ortuño V.M., GarcíaGonzález R. (2006): Diet of wild boar Sus scrofa L. and crop damage in an intensive agroecosystem. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 52: 245-250. Go to original source...
    31. Herring S.W. (1972): The role of canine morphology in the evolutionary divergence of pigs and peccaries. Journal of Mammalogy, 53: 500-512. Go to original source...
    32. Hespeler B., Krewer B. (2007): Mladý nebo starý? Určování věku spárkaté zvěře. Praha, Grada Publishing, a.s.: 130. (in Czech)
    33. Hewison A.J.M., Vincent J.P., Bideau E., Angibault J.M., Putman R.J. (1996): Variation in cohort mandible size as an index of roe deer densities and population trends. Journal of Zoology, 239: 573-581. Go to original source...
    34. Janeau G., Spitz F. (1984): L'espace chez le sanglier (Sus scrofa): Occupation et mode d'utilisation journalier. Gibier Faune Sauvage, 1: 73-89. (in French)
    35. Jánoska F., Farkas A., Marosán M., Fodor J.T. (2018): Wild boar (Sus scrofa) home range and habitat use in two Romanian habitats. Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 14: 51-63. Go to original source...
    36. Keuling O., Stier N., Roth M. (2008): Annual and seasonal space use of different age classes of female wild boar Sus scrofa L. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54: 403-412. Go to original source...
    37. Keuling O., Lauterbach K., Stier N., Roth M. (2010): Hunter feedback of individually marked wild boar Sus scrofa L.: Dispersal and efficiency of hunting in northeastern Germany. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 56: 159-167. Go to original source...
    38. Knyazev S.P., Tikhonov V.N., Suzuki S., Kurosawa Y., Tanaka K. (1985): Genetic peculiarities of domestic and wild pigs of Eurasia by serum polymorphicsystems: I. Immunogenetic polymorphism by allotypes. Zoologicheskiy Zhurnal, 64: 1563-1568.
    39. Kolář Z. (2002): Odhad věku hlavních druhů spárkaté zvěře. Hradec Králové, Vega: 127. (in Czech)
    40. Lemel J., Truvé J., Söderberg B. (2003): Variation in ranging and activity behaviour of European wild boar Sus scrofa in Sweden. Wildlife Biology, 9: 29-36. Go to original source...
    41. Lentle R.G., Stafford K.J., Potter M.A., Springett B.P., Dunning D.W. (2000): An analysis of a recreational hunter's red deer tallies in the Tararua Ranges, North Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Ecology, 24: 11-18.
    42. Litvaitis J.A., Sherburne J.A., Bissonette J.A. (1986): Bobcat habitat use and home range size in relation to prey density. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 50: 110-117. Go to original source...
    43. Maillard D., Fournier P. (1995): Effect of shooting with hounds on home range size of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) groups in Mediterranean habitat. IBEX Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 102-107.
    44. Maillard D., Fournier L. (2004): Timing and synchrony of births in the wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758) in a Mediterrean habitat: The effect of food availability. Galemys, 16: 67-74. Go to original source...
    45. McClure M.L., Burdett C.L., Farnsworth M.L., Lutman M.W., Theobald D.M., Riggs P.D., Grear D.A., Miller R.S. (2015): Modeling and mapping the probability of occurrence of invasive wild pigs across the contiguous United States. PLoS One, 10: e0133771. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    46. Melis C., Szafrańska P.A., Jędrzejewska B., Bartoń K. (2006): Biogeographical variation in the population density of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in western Eurasia. Journal of Biogeography, 33: 803-811. Go to original source...
    47. Metcalfe N.B., Monaghan P. (2001): Compensation for a bad start: Grow now, pay later? Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 16: 254-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Mitchell B., Brown D. (1974): The effects of age and body size on fertility in fame red deer (Cervus elaphus L.). In: Proceedings of the XI. Congress of the International Union of Game Biologists. Stockholm, Sept 5-6, 1973: 89-98.
    49. Mitchell B., McCowan D., Nicholson I.A. (1976): Annual cycles of body weight and condition in Scottish red deer, Cervus elaphus. Journal of Zoology, 180: 107-127. Go to original source...
    50. Moretti M. (1995): Biometric data and growth rates of a mountain population of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.), Ticino, Switzerland. IBEX Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 56-59.
    51. Mullan B.P., Brown W., Kerr M. (1992): The response of the lactating sow to ambient temperature. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society of Australia, 17: 215.
    52. Neet C.R. (1995): Population dynamics and management of Sus scrofa in western Switzerland: A statistical modelling approach. IBEX Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 188-191.
    53. Oberez A. (1996): Mandibular molar teeth and the development of mastication in the miniature pig (Sus scrofa). Cells Tissues Organs, 156: 99-111. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    54. Okarma H., Jedrzejewska B., Jedrzejewski W., Krasinski Z.A., Milkowski L. (1995): The roles of predation, snowcover, acorn crop, and man-related factors on ungulate mortality in Bialowieza Primeval Forest, Poland. Acta Theriologica, 40: 197-217. Go to original source...
    55. Ostfeld R.S. (1990): The ecology of territoriality in small mammals. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 5: 411-415. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    56. Ostfeld R.S., Keesing F. (2000): Pulsed resources and community dynamics of consumers in terrestrial ecosystems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution. 15: 232-237. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    57. Pérez-Barbería F.J., Gordon I.J., Pagel M. (2002): The origins of sexual dimorphism in body size in ungulates. Evolution, 56: 1276-1285. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    58. Podgórski T., Baś G., Jedrzejewska B., Sönnichsen L., Śniezko S., Jedrzejewski W., Okarma H. (2013): Spatiotemporal behavioral plasticity of wild boar (Sus scrofa) under contrasting conditions of human pressure: Primeval forest and metropolitan area. Journal of Mammalogy, 94: 109-119. Go to original source...
    59. Randi E., Apollonio M., Toso S. (1989): The systematics of some Italian populations of wild boar (Sus scrofa L.): A craniometric and electrophoretic analysis. Zeitschrift für Säugetierkunde, 54: 40-56.
    60. Sanderson G.C. (1966): The study of mammal movements: A review. Journal of Wildlife Management, 30: 215-235. Go to original source...
    61. Schley L., Dufrêne M., Krier A., Frantz A.C. (2008): Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 54: 589. Go to original source...
    62. Servanty S., Gaillard J.M., Toïgo C., Brandt S., Baubet E. (2009): Pulsed resources and climate-induced variation in the reproductive traits of wild boar under high hunting pressure. Journal of Animal Ecology, 78: 1278-1290. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    63. Singer F.J., Otto D.K., Tipton A.R., Hable C.P. (1981): Home ranges, movements and habitat use of European wild boar in Tennessee. Journal of Wildlife Management, 45: 343-353. Go to original source...
    64. Sprem N., Piria M., Florijančić T., Antunović B., Dumić T., Gutzmirtl H., Treer T., Curik I. (2011): Morphometrical analysis of reproduction traits for the wild boar (Sus scrofa L.) in Croatia. Agriculturae Conspectus Scientificus, 76: 263-265.
    65. Staines B.W. (1978): The dynamics and performance of a declining population of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology, 184: 403-419. Go to original source...
    66. Suttie J.M., Mitchell B. (1983): Jaw length and hind foot length as measures of skeletal development of red deer (Cervus elaphus). Journal of Zoology, 200: 431-434. Go to original source...
    67. Thenius E. (1989): Zähne und Gebiß der Säugetiere. Handbuch der Zoologie, Band 8, Teilband 56. Berlin, De Gruyter: 523. (in German) Go to original source...
    68. Tucker A., Sharpe P. (2004): The cutting-edge of mammalian development; how the embryo makes teeth. Nature Reviews Genetics, 5: 499-508. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    69. Wolf R. (1995): Rukověť chovu a lovu černé zvěře. Písek, Matice lesnická: 123. (in Czech)

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content