J. For. Sci., 2021, 67(7):318-327 | DOI: 10.17221/209/2020-JFS

Semi-empirical estimation of log taper using stem profile equationsOriginal Paper

Andrii Bilous ORCID..., Viktor Myroniuk ORCID..., Viktor Svynchuk ORCID..., Oleksandr Soshenskyi ORCID...*, Oleksandr Lesnik, Yaroslav Kovbasa
National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine

In January 2019 the forest industry in Ukraine adopted European standards for measuring and grading of round wood based on mid-point diameters, which caused major discrepancies from traditionally used estimates of timber volume using top diameters. To compare methods of merchantable wood volume estimation, we investigated the stem form inside bark for two dominant tree species in Ukraine, i.e. Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and common oak (Quercus robur L.). We used tree stem measurements to fit stem profile equations, whereas simulation was applied to derive log taper. We found that Newnham's (1992) variable-exponent taper equation performed well for predicting stem taper for both tree species. Then, we simulated the structure of harvested wood, so that it replicated annual distribution of logs by their length and diameters. As a result, the average log taper was estimated at 0.836 / 0.855 cm.m-1 and 1.180 / 0.121 cm.m-1 for pine and oak, respectively. The study also indicated that log taper varied along stems. The higher rates of diameter decrease were found for butt logs, for which the taper was 2.5-3.5 times higher than its average for the whole stem. The results of our study ensure the stacked round wood volume conversion between estimates obtained using top and mid-point diameters.

Keywords: stem profile modelling; log taper; mid-point diameter; top diameter; Scots pine; common oak

Published: July 20, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Bilous A, Myroniuk V, Svynchuk V, Soshenskyi O, Lesnik O, Kovbasa Y. Semi-empirical estimation of log taper using stem profile equations. J. For. Sci. 2021;67(7):318-327. doi: 10.17221/209/2020-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    Supplementary files:

    Download file209-2020-Bilous ESM.pdf

    File size: 131.28 kB

    References

    1. Adamec Z., Adolt R., Drápela K., Závodský J. (2019): Evaluation of different calibration approaches for merchantable volume predictions of Norway spruce using nonlinear mixed effects model. Forests, 10: 1104. Go to original source...
    2. Anonymous (1987): Materials for Forest Estimation of Ukraine and Moldova (1987). Kiev, Urozhay: 560. (in Russian)
    3. Anonymous (2012): Reference book of forest resources of Ukraine: according to state forest records as of 01.01.2011 (2012). Irpin, PA Ukrderzhlisproekt. (in Ukrainian)
    4. Arias-Rodil M., Castedo-Dorado F., Cámara-Obregón A., Diéguez-Aranda U. (2015): Fitting and calibrating a multilevel mixed-effects stem taper model for maritime pine in NW Spain. PLoS One, 10: e0143521. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Beltran H.A., Chauchard L., Iaconis A., Pastur G.M. (2017): Volume and taper equations for commercial stems of Nothofagus obliqua and N. alpina. CERNE, 23: 299-309. Go to original source...
    6. Burkhart H.E., Tomé M. (2012): Modeling Forest Trees and Stands. Dordrecht, Springer Netherlands: 458. Go to original source...
    7. Clark A., Souter R.A., Schlaegel B.E. (1991): Stem Profile Equations for Southern Tree Species. Asheville, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station: 117. Go to original source...
    8. Clutter J.L. (1980): Development of taper functions from variable-top merchantable volume equations. Forest Science, 26: 117-120.
    9. David H.C., Veiga Miranda R.O., Welker J., Fiorentin L.D., Ebling Â.A., Belavenutti Martins da Silva P.H. (2016): Strategies for stem measurement sampling: A statistical approach of modelling individual tree volume. CERNE, 22: 249-259. Go to original source...
    10. Duan A., Zhang S., Zhang X., Zhang J. (2016): Development of a stem taper equation and modelling the effect of stand density on taper for Chinese fir plantations in Southern China. PeerJ, 4: e1929. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    11. Fonweban J., Gardiner B., Macdonald E., Auty D. (2011): Taper functions for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Sitka spruce (Picea sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.) in Northern Britain. Forestry, 84: 49-60. Go to original source...
    12. Gómez-García E., Crecente-Campo F., Diéguez-Aranda U. (2013): Selection of mixed-effects parameters in a variable- exponent taper equation for birch trees in northwestern Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 70: 707-715. Go to original source...
    13. Kershaw J.A., Ducey M.J., Beers T., Hush B. (2016): Forest Mensuration. 5th Ed. Chichester, Hoboken, WileyBlackwell: 630. Go to original source...
    14. Kozak A. (1997): Effects of multicollinearity and autocorrelation on the variable-exponent taper functions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research. 27: 619-629. Go to original source...
    15. Kozak A. (1998): Effects of upper stem measurements on the predictive ability of a variable-exponent taper equation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28: 1078-1083. Go to original source...
    16. Kozak A. (2004): My last words on taper equations. The Forestry Chronicle, 80: 507-515. Go to original source...
    17. Kozak A., Munro D.D., Smith J.H.G. (1969): Taper functions and their application in forest inventory. The Forestry Chronicle, 45: 278-283. Go to original source...
    18. Kozak A., Smith J.H.G. (1993): Standards for evaluating taper estimating systems. The Forestry Chronicle, 69: 438-444. Go to original source...
    19. Larsen D.R. (2017): Simple taper: Taper equations for the field forester. In: Kabrick J.M., Dey D.C., Knapp B.O., Larsen D.R., Shifley S.R., Stelzer H.E. (eds): Proceedings of the 20th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, Columbia, March 28-April 1, 2016: 265-278.
    20. Larson P.R. (1963): Stem form development of forest trees. Forest Science, 9: a0001-42. Go to original source...
    21. Lee W.K, Seo J.H, Son Y.M., Lee K.H., Von Gadow K. (2003): Modeling stem profiles for Pinus densiflora in Korea. Forest Ecology and Management, 172: 69-77. Go to original source...
    22. Leites L.P., Robinson A.P. (2004): Improving taper equations of loblolly pine with crown dimensions in a mixed-effects modeling framework. Forest Science, 50: 204-212.
    23. Li R., Weiskittel A.R. (2010): Comparison of model forms for estimating stem taper and volume in the primary conifer species of the North American Acadian Region. Annals of Forest Science, 67: 302. Go to original source...
    24. Max T.A., Burkhart H.E. (1976): Segmented polynomial regression applied to taper equations. Forest Science, 22: 283-289.
    25. Menendéz-Miguélez M., Canga E., Álvarez-Álvarez P., Majada J. (2014): Stem taper function for sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) coppice stands in northwest Spain. Annals of Forest Science, 71: 761-770. Go to original source...
    26. Monness E. (2015): The bivariate power-normal distribution and the bivariate Johnson system bounded distribution in forestry, including height curves. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45: 307-313. Go to original source...
    27. Newberry J.D., Burkhart H.E. (1986): Variable form stem profile models for loblolly pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 16: 109-114. Go to original source...
    28. Newnham R.M. (1992): Variable-form taper functions for four Alberta tree species. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 22: 210-223. Go to original source...
    29. Rojo A., Perales X., Sanchez-Rodriguez F., Alvarez-Gonzalez J.G., Von Gadow K. (2005): Stem taper functions for maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.) in Galicia (Northwestern Spain). European Journal of Forest Research, 124: 177-186. Go to original source...
    30. Sharma M., Oderwald R.G. (2001): Dimensionally compatible volume and taper equations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31: 797-803. Go to original source...
    31. SSSU (State Statistics Service of Ukraine) (2019): Statistical Yearbook of Ukraine for 2018: Kyiv, State Statistics Service of Ukraine: 481. Available at http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/druk/publicat/kat_u/2019/zb/11/zb_yearbook_2018.pdf (in Ukrainian).
    32. Svynchuk V., Kashpor S., Myroniuk V. (2014): Model of round wood volumes based on top diameter and length of logs. Scientific Bulletin of the National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 1: 58-64. (in Ukrainian)
    33. West P.W. (2015): Tree and Forest Measurement. 3rd Ed. Berlin, Springer: 214. Go to original source...
    34. Yang Y., Huang S., Meng S.X. (2009): Development of a treespecific stem profile model for white spruce: A nonlinear mixed model approach with a generalized covariance structure. Forestry, 82: 541-555. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content