J. For. Sci., 2021, 67(5):242-246 | DOI: 10.17221/203/2020-JFS

Mechanized tree planting in Nordic forestry: simulating a machine concept for continuously advancing site preparation and plantingShort Communication

Jussi Manner ORCID...1,*, Back Tomas Ersson ORCID...2
1 Skogforsk, Uppsala, Sweden
2 School of Forest Management, SLU, Skinnskatteberg, Sweden

As labour for manual tree planting becomes scarcer, regeneration costs are steadily increasing in Nordic forestry. Today's intermittently advancing tree planting machines provide excellent silvicultural results, but are expensive to operate because of poor productivity. In contrast, continuously advancing planting machines, thanks to high productivities, are increasingly being regarded as a solution to these runaway regeneration costs. The Silva Nova was a historical, continuously advancing tree planting machine with high productivity. However, Silva Nova's weaknesses included high labour costs (it required two operators) and the random nature of how it chose planting spots. In contrast, SuperSilva, a purely conceptual modernisation of Silva Nova, involves both automation and microsite identification to make the machine more efficient. We used discrete-event simulation to analyse the stocking rate and spatial distribution of tree planting with SuperSilva. The simulation results showed that introducing sensors for identifying suitable microsites will allow continuously advancing planting machines (like SuperSilva) to plant seedlings in a numerically and spatially adequate manner on moraine soils. Hence, these sensors will increase the competitiveness and versatility of tree planting machines. Unfortunately, such reliable and robust sensor technology (unaffected by a wide variety of operating conditions) is not yet commercially available.

Keywords: tree planting machine; disc trenching; discrete-event simulation; reforestation; silviculture; microsite

Published: May 12, 2021  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Manner J, Ersson BT. Mechanized tree planting in Nordic forestry: simulating a machine concept for continuously advancing site preparation and planting. J. For. Sci. 2021;67(5):242-246. doi: 10.17221/203/2020-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Andersson P.-O., Berglund H., Bäckström P.-O. (1977): Simulering av maskinella planteringsorgans arbete. Redogörelse nr 7. Kista, Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten: 28. (in Swedish)
  2. Bjurulf A., Westerberg D. (1992): Alternativa förband: utredning av prestationer, kostnader och konsekvenser. Uppsala, Skogforsk: 21. (in Swedish)
  3. Davidsson A. (2002): Utvärdering av granplantering i rektangelförband jämfört med kvadratförband. [MSc. Thesis.]. Umeå, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: 22. (in Swedish)
  4. Ersson B.T. (2010): Possible Concepts for Mechanized Tree Planting in Southern Sweden - An Introductory Essay on Forest Technology. Arbetsrapport 269. Umeå, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: 51.
  5. Ersson B.T. (2014): Concepts for Mechanized Tree Planting in Southern Sweden. [PhD. Thesis.] Umeå, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences: 78.
  6. Ersson B.T., Cormier D., St-Amour M., Guay J. (2017): The impact of disc settings and slash characteristics on the Bracke three-row disc trencher's performance. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 28: 1-9. Go to original source...
  7. Ersson B.T., Laine T., Saksa T. (2018): Mechanized tree planting in Sweden and Finland: current state and key factors for future growth. Forests, 9: 370. Go to original source...
  8. Hallonborg U., von Hofsten H., Mattson S., Hagberg J., Thorsén Å., Nyström C., Arvidsson H. (1995): Maskinell plantering med Silva Nova: nuvarande status samt utvecklingsmöjligheter i jämförelse med manuell plantering. Redogörelse nr 6. Uppsala, Skogforsk: 96. (in Swedish)
  9. Hallongren H., Laine T., Rantala J., Saarinen V.-M., Strandström M., Hämäläinen J., Poikela A. (2014): Competitiveness of mechanized tree planting in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29: 144-151. Go to original source...
  10. Jonsson M., Bengtsson J., Gamfeldt L., Moen J., Snäll T. (2019): Levels of forest ecosystem services depend on specific mixtures of commercial tree species. Nature Plants, 5: 141-147. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  11. Krekula B., Bergqvist J., Fries C., Gällerspång J., Reisek J., Ringagård J., Sollander E., Svensson L., Wågström K. (2018): Föreskrifter för anläggning av skog. Rapport 2018/13. Jönköping, Luleå, Skogsstyrelsen: 161. (in Swedish)
  12. Larsson T. (1976): Blockförekomst i skogsmark. Ekonomi nr 4. Kista, Forskningsstiftelsen Skogsarbeten: 2. (in Swedish)
  13. Lindholm E.-L., Berg S. (2005): Energy use in Swedish forestry in 1972 and 1997. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 16: 27-37. Go to original source...
  14. Lundqvist L., Elfving B. (2010): Influence of biomechanics and growing space on tree growth in young Pinus sylvestris stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 2143-2147. Go to original source...
  15. Ramantswana M., Guerra S.P.S., Ersson B.T. (2020): Advances in the mechanization of regenerating plantation forests: A review. Current Forestry Reports, 6: 143-158. Go to original source...
  16. Rantala J., Harstela P., Saarinen V.-M., Tervo L. (2009): A techno-economic evaluation of Bracke and M-Planter tree planting devices. Silva Fennica, 43: 659-667. Go to original source...
  17. Ringdahl O., Lindroos O., Hellström T., Bergström D., Athanassiadis D., Nordfjell T. (2011): Path tracking in forest terrain by an autonomous forwarder. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 26: 350-359. Go to original source...
  18. Salminen H., Varmola M. (1993): Influence of initial spacing and planting design on the development of young Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) stands. Silva Fennica, 27: 21-28. Go to original source...
  19. von Hofsten H. (1993): Hög kvalitet även på högkvaliteten med Öje-Planter. Resultat nr 3. Uppsala, Skogforsk: 4. (in Swedish).
  20. Wallertz K., Björklund N., Hjelm K., Petersson M., Sundblad L.-G. (2018): Comparison of different site preparation techniques: quality of planting spots, seedling growth and pine weevil damage. New Forests, 49: 705-722. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.