J. For. Sci., 2020, 66(2):63-69 | DOI: 10.17221/146/2019-JFS

Analysis of wood chipping capacity of the Bandit 990XP chipper - case studyOriginal Paper

Mariusz Kormanek ORCID...
Department of Forest Work Mechanization, Institute of Forest Utilization and Forest Technology, Faculty of Forestry, University of Agriculture in Krakow, Krakow, Poland

According to the data of the Central Statistical Office, there has been an increase in forest cover in Poland from 27.8% to 29.6% over the last 25 years. This increase contributed to an increase in the possibility of wood obtaining and processing for energy purposes. The aim of the study was to analyse the efficiency of a chipping machine manufactured by the American Company Bandit Industries (Bandit 990XP chipper) based on the working day chronometer. The study was carried out in specific conditions related to the place of the chipper application because the machine was used to process the material obtained from standing trees in the framework of park maintenance. As it was shown during the analysed working day, the effective capacity W1 in the work cycle of the Bandit 990XP machine was 9.2 m3∙h-1 chips. Specific working conditions made it impossible to organize the work smoothly. Ongoing obtaining of the material for chipping from standing trees resulted in low productivity during the exploitation time of the shift W08 on the level of 1.3 m3∙h-1 chips.

Keywords: chipper; wood chips; efficiency; dendromass

Published: February 29, 2020  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kormanek M. Analysis of wood chipping capacity of the Bandit 990XP chipper - case study. J. For. Sci. 2020;66(2):63-69. doi: 10.17221/146/2019-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Bandit Inc. (2017): Bandit Industries, Inc., Remus, Michigan. Available at http://banditchippers.pl/produkt/ofertabandit-model-990xp
  2. Central Statistical Office (2011): Forestry. Warsaw, GUS: 335.
  3. Central Statistical Office (2017): Forestry. Warsaw, GUS: 370.
  4. CILP (2017): Forests in Poland. Warsaw, State Forests Information Center (CILP): 64.
  5. Francescato V., Antonini E., Begomi L.Z. (2008): Wood Fuels Handbook. Legarno, Biomass Trade Center: 73.
  6. Ghaffariyan M.R., Sessions J., Brown M. (2012): Evaluating productivity, cost, chip quality and biomass recovery for a mobile chipper in Australian roadside chipping operations. Journal of Forest Science, 58: 530-535. Go to original source...
  7. Golos P., Kaliszewski A. (2015): Selected aspects of the use of wood biomass for energy purposes. Forest Research Works, 76: 78-87. Go to original source...
  8. IUFRO (1995): Forest work study. Nomenclature. Test edition valid 1995-2000. Garpenberg, Swedish University of Agriculture Science: 22.
  9. Kováč J., Krilek J., J. Mikleš M. (2011): Energy consumption of chipper coupled to a universal wheel skidder in the process of chipping wood. Journal of Forest Science, 57: 34-40. Go to original source...
  10. Parzych S. (2015). The potential opportunities for using wood biomass in energy production. Forest Research Works, 76: 256-264. Go to original source...
  11. Pecyna M., Stoma M., Maj G., Pierkarski W. (2014): Logistics systems for obtaining wood biomass from forests. Logistics, 6: 284-289.
  12. Röser D., Mola-Yudego B., Prinz R., Emer B., Sikanen L. (2012): Chipping operations and efficiency in different operational environments. Silva Fennica, 46: 275-286. Go to original source...
  13. Różański H., Jabłoński K. (2015): Possibilities of obtaining forest biomass for energy purposes in Poland. Journal of Civil Engineering of the Environment and Architecture 62: 351-358. Go to original source...
  14. Sadowski J., Moskalik T., Zastocki D., Wrona T. (2012): Selected economic and natural aspects of management of logging residues, Studies and Materials CEPL in Rogów: 246-253.
  15. Spinelli R., Cavallo E., Eliasson L., Facello A. (2013): Comparing the efficiency of drum and disc chippers. Silva Fennica, 47: 1-11. Go to original source...
  16. Spinelli R., Magagnotti N., Paletto G., Preti C. (2011): Determining the impact of some wood characteristics on the performance of a mobile chipper, Silva Fennica, 45: 85-95 Go to original source...
  17. Szewczyk G. (2014): Structural model of work variability dynamics on selected workplaces in logging and skidding. Krakow, University of Agriculture in Krakow: 176.
  18. Tylek P., Pietrzykowski M., Walczyk J., Juliszewski T., Kwaśniewski D. (2017): Root biomass and morphological characterization of energy willow stumps. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 38: 47-54.
  19. Teknamotor Inc. (2019): Teknamotor Sp. z o.o. Świętokrzyski, Poland. Available at http://www.teknamotor.pl/
  20. Webster P. (2005): Chipper review, Project Ref:500S/35/04. Ae Village, Dumfries Scotland UK, The research Agency of the Forestry Commission, Internal project information note 06/05: 25.
  21. Więsik J. (2015): Technical Equipment In Forestry Production. Warsaw, SGGW Publishing house: 591.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.