J. For. Sci., 2019, 65(2):61-69 | DOI: 10.17221/86/2018-JFS

Forest landscape aesthetic quality model (FLAQM): A comparative study on landscape modelling using regression analysis and artificial neural networksOriginal Paper

Ali Jahani*
Department of Natural Environment and Biodiversity, College of Environment, University of Environment, Karaj, Iran

Today, the landscape aesthetic quality assessment is more technical and quantitative in environmental management. We aimed at developing artificial neural network (ANN) modelling and multiple regression (MLR) analysis approaches to predict the perceptional aesthetic quality of forest landscapes. The methodology, followed in this paper, can be divided into six distinct parts: (i) selection of representative study sites, (ii) mapping of landscape units, (iii) quantification of naturalness indicators, (iv) visibility analysis, (v) assessment of human perceptions, (vi) ANN and MLR modelling and sensitivity analysis. The results of ANN modelling, especially its high accuracy (R2 = 0.871) in comparison with MLR results (R2 = 0.782), introduced the forest landscape aesthetic quality model (FLAQM) as a comparative model for an assessment of forest landscape aesthetic quality. According to sensitivity analysis, the values of livestock density, tree harvesting, virgin forest, animal grazing, and tree richness were identified as the most significant variables which influence FLAQM. FLAQM can be used to compare the classes of aesthetic quality of forests.

Keywords: ANN; landscape unit; multiple regression; assessment; sensitivity analysis; environmental management

Published: February 28, 2019  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jahani A. Forest landscape aesthetic quality model (FLAQM): A comparative study on landscape modelling using regression analysis and artificial neural networks. J. For. Sci. 2019;65(2):61-69. doi: 10.17221/86/2018-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Boillereaux L., Cadet C., Le Bail A. (2003): Thermal properties estimation during thawing via real-time neural network learning. Journal of Food Engineering, 57: 17-23. Go to original source...
    2. Carvalho-Ribeiro S.M., Lovett A. (2011): Is an attractive forest also considered well managed? Public preferences for forest cover and stand structure across a rural/urban gradient in northern Portugal. Forest Policy and Economics, 13: 46-54. Go to original source...
    3. Carvalho-Ribeiro S., Ramos I.L., Madeira L., Barroso F., Menezes H., Pinto Correia T. (2013): Is land cover an important asset for addressing the subjective landscape dimensions? Land Use Policy, 35: 50-60. Go to original source...
    4. Chopra P., Sharma R.K., Kumar M. (2014): Regression models for the prediction of compressive strength of concrete with & without fly ash. International Journal of Latest Trends in Engineering and Technology, 3: 400-406.
    5. De La Fuente De Val G., Mühlhauser S.H. (2014): Visual quality: An examination of a South American Mediterranean landscape, Andean foothills east of Santiago (Chile). Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13: 261-271. Go to original source...
    6. de Vries S., De Groot M., Boers J. (2012): Eyesores in sight: Quantifying the impact of man-made elements on the scenic beauty of Dutch landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 105: 118-127. Go to original source...
    7. Dramstad W.E., Sundli Tveit M., Fjellstad W.J., Fry G.L.A. (2006): Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78: 465-474. Go to original source...
    8. Flott L.W. (2012): Using the scatter diagram tool to compare data, show relationship. Metal Finishing, 110: 33-35. Go to original source...
    9. Franco D., Franco D., Mannino I., Zanetto G. (2003): The impact of agroforestry networks on scenic beauty estimation: The role of a landscape ecological network on a socio-cultural process. Landscape and Urban Planning, 62: 119-138. Go to original source...
    10. Groot J.C.J., Jellema A., Rossing A.H. (2010): Designing a hedgerow network in a multifunctional agricultural landscape: Balancing trade-offs among ecological quality, landscape character and implementation costs. European Journal of Agronomy, 32: 112-119. Go to original source...
    11. Intharathirat R., Abdul Salam P., Kumar S., Untong A. (2015): Forecasting of municipal solid waste quantity in a developing country using multivariate grey models. Waste Management, 39: 3-14. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    12. Jahani A. (2019): Sycamore failure hazard classification model (SFHCM): An environmental decision support system (EDSS) in urban green spaces. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16: 955-964. Go to original source...
    13. Jahani A., Feghhi J., Makhdoum M.F., Omid M. (2016): Optimized forest degradation model (OFDM): An environmental decision support system for environmental impact assessment using an artificial neural network. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59: 222-244. Go to original source...
    14. Nuruddin M.F., Ullah Khan S., Shafiq N., Ayub T. (2015): Strength prediction models for PVA fiber-reinforced highstrength concrete. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 27: 2-16. Go to original source...
    15. Plexida S.G., Sfougaris A.I., Ispikoudis I.P., Papanastasis V.P. (2014): Selecting landscape metrics as indicators of spatial heterogeneity - a comparison among Greek landscapes. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 26: 26-35. Go to original source...
    16. Ribe R.G. (2009): In-stand scenic beauty of variable retention harvests and mature forests in the U.S. Pacific Northwest: The effects of basal area, density, retention pattern and down wood. Journal of Environmental Management, 91: 245-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content