J. For. Sci., 2018, 64(7):303-312 | DOI: 10.17221/20/2018-JFS

Comparison of results of visitor arrival monitoring using regression analysisOriginal Paper

Petra HLAVÁČKOVÁ, Hana SLOVÁČKOVÁ*, David BŘEZINA, Jakub MICHAL
Department of Forest and Wood Products Economics and Policy, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

Monitoring of visitor arrivals is one of the tools which help to ensure good-quality and suitable management of the respective area. This paper is aimed at the monitoring of visitor arrivals when the visitors are counted automatically using a field counting device, namely a pyroelectric sensor. In 2015, visitor arrival monitoring using a pyro sensor was conducted on the selected forest roads in the Křtiny Training Forest Enterprise of Masaryk Forest. Since this method should be employed in another project, it was necessary to find out whether the pyroelectric sensor is a reliable tool and whether it can be used for further research. The aim of this paper is to perform a regression analysis of the data collected at the selected site in order to determine whether the pyroelectric sensor provides relevant information. Two data sets acquired during the first week of the monitoring of visitor arrivals at the single site will be compared. The one set includes data obtained by automatic monitoring using the pyro sensor, the other set contains data gained by means of manual counting by students of the Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology. Two directions of visitor flows were monitored - in and out. The data were statistically processed using the ADSTAT software. Results of the regression analysis show that the results of the visitor arrival monitoring carried out using a pyro sensor differ just slightly from those gained by manual counting.

Keywords: recreation; forest roads; economy; statistical processing; pyro sensor

Published: July 31, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
HLAVÁČKOVÁ P, SLOVÁČKOVÁ H, BŘEZINA D, MICHAL J. Comparison of results of visitor arrival monitoring using regression analysis. J. For. Sci. 2018;64(7):303-312. doi: 10.17221/20/2018-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Banaš M. (2006): Sustainable Tourism in European Mountain Protected Areas - Report about a Project Supported by Alfred Toepfer Natural Heritage Scholarship and EUROPARC Federation. Hradec Králové, University of Hradec Králové: 44.
  2. Barros A., Gonnet J., Pickering C. (2013): Impacts of informal trails on vegetation and soils in the highest protected area in the Southern Hemisphere. Journal of Environmental Management, 127: 50-60. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Beunen R., Regnerus H.D., Jaarsma C.F. (2008): Gateway as a means of visitor management in national parks and protected areas. Tourism Management, 20: 138-145. Go to original source...
  4. Bláha P. (2010): Výsledky monitorování a jejich využití v praxi - Liberecký kraj. Ochrana přírody 2010 - 2.8.2010, special issue. Available at http://www.casopis.ochranaprirody.cz/zvlastni-cislo/vysledky-monitorovani-a-jejich-vyuziti-vpraxi-liberecky-kraj/ (accessed July 18, 2017).
  5. Cessford G., Muhar A. (2003): Monitoring options for visitor numbers in national parks and natural areas. Journal for Nature Conservation, 11: 240-250. Go to original source...
  6. Cole D.N. (1989): Wilderness Campsite Monitoring Methods: A Sourcebook (General Technical Report, INT-259). Ogden, USDA Forest Service Intermountain Research Station: 25. Go to original source...
  7. Daldeniz B., Hampton M.P. (2013): Dive tourism and local communities: Active participation or subject to impacts? Case studies from Malaysia. International Journal of Tourism Research, 15: 507-520. Go to original source...
  8. Fagiolo G., Moneta A., Windrum P. (2007). A critical guide to empirical validation of agent-based models in economics: Methodologies, procedures, and open problems. Computational Economics, 30: 195-226. Go to original source...
  9. Hall D., Mitchel M., Roberts L. (2005): Tourism and the countryside: Dynamic relationship. In: Hall D., Roberts L., Mitchell M. (eds): New Directions in Rural Tourism. Aldershort, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.: 3-18.
  10. Ivanov S.H., Webster C. (2013): Tourism's contribution to economic growth: A global analysis for the first decade of the millennium. Tourism Economics, 19: 477-508. Go to original source...
  11. Kala L., Salov T. (2010): Výsledky monitorování a jejich využití v praxi - České Švýcarsko. Ochrana přírody 2010 - 2.8.2010, special issue. Available at http://www.casopis.ochranaprirody.cz/zvlastni-cislo/vysledky-monitorovania-jejich-vyuziti-v-praxi-ceske-svycarsko/ (accessed July 20, 2017).
  12. Kettler D. (1970): Die Erholungsnachfrage in stadtnahen Wäldern: dargelegt am Beispiel der Räume Stuttgart, Karlsruhe, Heidelberg und Mannheim (mit Ergänzungen bei Freiburg, Baden-Baden und im Schönbuch): ein Beitrag zum Europäischen Naturschutzjahr. Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Württembergischen Forstlichen Versuchs- und Forschungsanstalt: 170.
  13. Kos J. (2010): Výsledky monitorování a jejich využití v praxi - Národní park Podyjí. Ochrana přírody 2010 - 2.8.2010, special issue. Available at http://www.casopis.ochranaprirody.cz/zvlastni-cislo/vysledky-monitorovania-jejich-vyuziti-v-praxi-narodni-park-podyji/ (accessed July 22, 2010).
  14. Lama W.B., Sattar N. (2002): Mountain tourism and the conservation of biological and cultural diversity. In: Global Mountain Summit, Bishkek, Apr 23-28, 2002: 1-32.
  15. Manning R.E. (2002): How much is too much? Carrying capacity of national parks and protected areas. In: Arnberger A., Brandeburg C., Muhar A. (eds): Proceedings of the Monitoring and Management of Visitor Flows in Recreational and Protected Areas Conference, Vienna, Jan 30-Feb 2, 2002: 306-313.
  16. Meloun M., Militký J. (2012): Kompendium statistického zpracování dat. Prague, Karolinum: 985.
  17. Michopoulou E., Buhalis D. (2013): Information for challenging markets: The case of the accessibility requiring market in the context of tourism. Information and Management, 50: 229-239. Go to original source...
  18. Miller A.B., Leung Y.F., Kays R. (2017): Coupling visitor and wildlife monitoring in protected areas using camera traps. Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism, 17: 44-53. Go to original source...
  19. Muhar A., Arnberger A., Brandeburg C. (2005): Monitoring of visitor flows and visitor needs as a basic for protected area management. In: Bauch K. (ed.): Proceedings of the 3 rd Symposion of the Hohe Tauern National Park for Research in Protected Areas, Kaprun, Sept 15-17, 2005: 153-157.
  20. Riley C.M., Rosanske T.W. (eds) (1996): Development and Validation of Analytical Methods. Oxford, Elsevier: 352.
  21. Tang C.F., Abosedra S. (2014): The impacts of tourism, energy consumption and political instability on economic growth in the MENA countries. Energy Policy, 68: 458-464. Go to original source...
  22. Telfer D.J. (2002): The evolution of tourism and development theory. In: Sharpley R., Telfer D.J. (eds): Tourism and Development. Concepts and Issues. Clevedon, Channel View Publications: 35-80.
  23. Volk H. (1992): Neue Entwicklungen bei der Walderholung in Südwestdeutschland. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 111: 282-292. Go to original source...
  24. von Janowsky D., Becker G. (2003): Characteristics and needs of different user groups in the urban forest of Stuttgart. Journal for Nature Conservation, 11: 251-259. Go to original source...
  25. Weaver D.B., Lawton L.J. (2017): A new visitation paradigm for protected areas. Tourism Management, 60: 140-146. Go to original source...
  26. Wolf I.D., Hagenloh G., Groft D.B. (2012): Visitor monitoring along roads and hiking trails: How to determine usage level in tourist sites. Tourism Management, 33: 16-28. Go to original source...
  27. Zahradník D., Banaš M., Jirásková E. (2012): Back and front of visitor monitoring - examples of good and less successful visitor monitoring in the Czech protected areas. In: Fialová J. (ed.): Proceedings of the Public Recreation and Landscape Protection - Hand in Hand Conference, Křtiny, May 2-4, 2012: 177-184.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.