J. For. Sci., 2018, 64(6):251-259 | DOI: 10.17221/18/2018-JFS

Evaluation of animal logging in the mixed broadleaved mountain forest: Economic and environmental impactsOriginal Paper

Aysan BADRAGHI*,1, Jörn ERLER1, Seyed Ata Ollah HOSSEINI2, Robert LANG1
1 Department of Forest Technology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Technical University Dresden, Tharandt, Germany
2 Department of Forestry and Forest Economics, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran

This investigation assessed the economic and environmental impacts of small-scale wood logging by mules in the mixed broadleaved mountain forest. To develop a time prediction model, all measurements of time are replaced by their decadic logarithms. Unit cost was calculated by two methods: (i) as usual, division of the system cost by average productivity per hour, (ii) on the basis of the developed logarithmic models. To investigate the residual damage a 100% inventory method was employed in pre- and post-hauling, alongside the mule trail. A core sampling technique of bulk density was used for determining the degree of soil compaction, and soil disturbed widths were measured at a 5-m interval in the mule hauling direction. In this research, computed unit cost was 17.2 EUR.m-3 and estimated unit cost by the logarithmic model was 16.2 EUR.m-3. This result highlights the time consumption which estimated by the developed model was at a close ratio with real time (average at 95%). In terms of environmental impact, the results indicated that 5.7% of regenerations and 0% of trees were damaged. Also we found that the increased bulk density was not significant (P = 0.903) and only about 0.2% of the total area was disturbed.

Keywords: productivity and cost; logarithm; mule; residual damage; soil damage

Published: June 30, 2018  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
BADRAGHI A, ERLER J, HOSSEINI SAO, LANG R. Evaluation of animal logging in the mixed broadleaved mountain forest: Economic and environmental impacts. J. For. Sci. 2018;64(6):251-259. doi: 10.17221/18/2018-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Ahmadi H. (1996): Study of logging damages on forest stand [MSc Thesis.]. Tehran, University of Tehran: 148.
  2. Akay A.E. (2005): Determining cost and productivity of using animals in forest harvesting operations. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 1: 190-195.
  3. Borz S.A., Ciobanu V. (2013): Efficiency of motor-manual felling and horse logging in small-scale firewood production. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 8: 3126-3135.
  4. Engel A.M., Wegener J., Lange M. (2012): Greenhouse gas emissions of two mechanised wood harvesting methods in comparison with the use of draft horses for logging. European Journal of Forest Research, 131: 1139-1149. Go to original source...
  5. Erler J. (1984): Leistungsstreuung und Mittelwertsautomatik. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Göttingen, Göttingen University: 70.
  6. Erler J. (2012): Wissenschaftliches Arbeiten. Band: Zumutbare Vorgabezeiten. Reihe: Forstliches Technikmanagement. Tharandt, Fachinstitut für Waldarbeit: 50.
  7. Eroglu H., Öztürk U.O., Sönmez T., Tilki T., Akkuzu E. (2009): The impacts of timber harvesting techniques on residual trees, seedlings, and timber products in natural oriental spruce forests. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 4: 220-224.
  8. Ficklin R., Dwyer P.J., Cutter B.E., Drapper T. (1997): Residual tree damage during selection cuts using two skidding systems in the Missouri Ozarks. In: Pallardy S.G., Cecich R.A., Garret H.H., Johnson P.S. (eds): Proceedings of the 11th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, Columbia, March 23-26, 1997: 36-46.
  9. Ghaffariyan M.R. (2008): Selecting the best skidding system using AHP: A case study in Northern Iran. Forest Science, Sofia, 44: 77-86.
  10. Ghaffariyan M.R., Sobhani H., Mohajer M.R. (2003): A study of site damages (soil and seedling) by traditional logging method. Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, 58: 812-820. (in Persian)
  11. Ghaffariyan M.R., Durstone T., Sobhani H., Mohajer M.R. (2009): Mule logging in northern forests of Iran: A study of productivity, cost and damage to soil and seedlings. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 30: 67-75.
  12. Gilanpour N. (2010): Investigation of productivity and cost of ground base operation and animal skiding for determining the best composition. [MSc Thesis.] Nour, University of Tarbiat Modares: 71.
  13. Gillespie W.H. (2001): Residual stand damage can be a serious logging problem. Available at http://www.wvfa.org/pdf/factsheets/FACT%20SHEET%20No.%2031.pdf
  14. Han S.K. (2006): Impacts on soils from cut-to-length and whole tree harvesting. [MSc Thesis.] Moscow, University of Idaho: 43.
  15. Hejazian M., Lotfalian M., Hosseini S.A., Fallah A. (2013): Analysis and evaluation of ground skidding costs of two stands with respect to production per hour and log quality. Bulletin of Environment, Pharmacology and Life Sciences, 2: 24-29.
  16. Jourgholami M. (2012): Small-scale timber harvesting: Mule logging in Hyrcanian forest. Small-scale Forestry, 11: 255-262. Go to original source...
  17. Jourgholami M., Majnounian B. (2010): Traditional logging method in Hyrcanian forest, impacts to forest stand and soil (case study: Kheyrud forest). Iranian Journal of Forest, 2: 221-229. (in Persian)
  18. Jourgholami M., Majnounian B., Feghhi J., Visser R.J.M. (2010): Timber extraction with mules: A case study in the Hyrcanian forest. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 5: 3108-3115.
  19. Magagnotti N., Spinelli R. (2011a): Integrating animal and mechanical operations in protected areas. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 32: 489-499.
  20. Magagnotti N., Spinelli R. (2011b): Financial and energy cost of low-impact wood extraction in environmentally sensitive areas. Ecological Engineering, 37: 601-606. Go to original source...
  21. Malatinszky A., Ficsor C. (2016): Frequency and advantages of animal-powered logging for timber harvesting in Hungarian nature conservation areas. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 37: 279-286.
  22. Mousavi Mirkala S.R., Nikooy M., Naghdi R., Ghaznavi N., Karamzade S. (2015): Productivity and cost study of mule logging in Astara watershed forests. Journal of Wood & Forest Science and Technology, 21: 161-174.
  23. Naghdi R., Lotfalian M., Bagheri I., Moradmand Jalili A. (2009): Damages of skidder and animal logging to forest soils and natural regeneration. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 30: 141-149.
  24. Nikooy M., Rashidi R., Kocheki G. (2010): Residual trees injury after selective cutting in broadleaf forest in Shafaroud. Caspian Journal of Environment Science, 8: 173-179.
  25. Nurminen T., Korpunen H., Uusitalo J. (2006): Time consumption analysis of the mechanized cut-to-length harvesting system. Silva Fennica, 40: 335-363. Go to original source...
  26. Rasti R. (2008): Comparaison wood production and cost during planned and unplanned mule logging in Kheiroudkenar forest. [MSc Thesis.] Tehran, University of Tehran: 98.
  27. Sachs L. (1984): Applied Statistics. A Handbook of Techniques. New York, Springer-Verlag: 716. Go to original source...
  28. Shrestha S.P., Lanford B.L. (2001): Utilization and cost for animal logging operations. In: Wang J., Wolford M., McNeel J. (eds): Proceedings of the 24th Annual Council on Forest Engineering (COFE) Meeting, Snowshoe, July 15-19, 2001: 148-154.
  29. Spinelli R., Lombardini C., Magagnotti N. (2012): Salvaging windthrown trees with animal and machine systems in protected areas. Ecological Engineering, 53: 61-67. Go to original source...
  30. Toms C.W., Dubois M.R., Bliss J.C., Wilhoit J.H., Rummer R.B. (2001): A survey of animal-powered logging in Alabama. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 25: 17-24. Go to original source...
  31. Villarreal-Calderon R. (2008): Chopping logs: A look at the history and uses of logarithms. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 5: 337-344. Go to original source...
  32. Wang L. (1997): Assessment of animal skidding and ground machine skidding under mountain condition. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 8: 57-64.
  33. Zobeiry M. (2000): Forest Inventory (Measurement of Tree and Stand). Tehran, University of Tehran Press: 401. (in Persian)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.