J. For. Sci., 2017, 63(7):300-312 | DOI: 10.17221/137/2016-JFS

Estimation of the value of forest ecosystem services to develop conservational strategy management (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats)Original Paper

Komeil JAHANIFAR1, Hamid AMIRNEJAD*,2, Zahra ABEDI3, Alireza VAFAEINEJAD4
1 Department of Environmental Management, Faculty of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agricultural Engineering, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran
3 Department of Environmental Economics, Faculty of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
4 Department of Remote Sensing & GIS, Faculty of Environment and Energy, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

Forests ecosystems provide several undisputable benefits which policy-makers blink since these values do not record in conventional markets or are difficult to measure. This paper indicates that the annual value of the ecosystem services such as water conservation, soil protection, carbon fixation, nutrient cycling, water purification, air pollution absorption and recreation provided by forests is not only worth millions of dollars, but also in per hectare terms much more than hitherto known. After estimating the value of ecosystem services, results are available to policy-makers and experts at a brainstorming and by using SWOT, conservational strategies for long-term management based on strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats were developed. Ecosystem services value for the Mazandaran Forest Reserve ranged from 14.2 to 14.8 million USD or about 6,676.9-6,785.6 USD.ha-1. Given these results, raising the society awareness of the negative impact of forest land use changes based on the functional value were proposed as conservational strategies to prevent the forest land use change. If these are accounted for, then governments and societies faced with the development versus conservation dilemma can create more understanding decisions and policies that will assist to conserve forests and the ecosystem services they provide, and thereby promulgate human well-being and sustainable development.

Keywords: economic valuation; sustainable development; SWOT; Mazandaran Forest Reserve; Iran

Published: July 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
JAHANIFAR K, AMIRNEJAD H, ABEDI Z, VAFAEINEJAD A. Estimation of the value of forest ecosystem services to develop conservational strategy management (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats). J. For. Sci. 2017;63(7):300-312. doi: 10.17221/137/2016-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abbasi A., Mohammadzadeh S. (2001): Investigation of world experiences for local participation on forest resources management and utilization of successful experiences in Iran. In: National Proceedings of North Forests Management and Sustainable Development. Vol. 2, Tehran, Sept 22, 2001: 411-432. (in Persian)
    2. Agheli K.L. (2003): Green GNP calculation and sustainable degree of national income in Iran. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Tehran, Tarbiat Modares University: 260.
    3. Amirnejad H., Khalilian S., Assareh M.H., Ahmadian M. (2006): Estimating the existence value of north forests of Iran by using a contingent valuation method. Ecological Economics, 58: 665-675. Go to original source...
    4. Beukering P.J.H., Cesar H.S.J., Janssen M.A. (2003): Economic valuation of the Leuser National Park on Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecological Economics, 44: 43-62. Go to original source...
    5. Biao Z., Wenhua L., Gaodi X., Yu X. (2010): Water conservation of forest ecosystem in Beijing and its value. Ecological Economics, 69: 1416-1426. Go to original source...
    6. Braat L.C., de Groot S. (2012): The ecosystem services agenda: Bridging the worlds of natural science and economics, conservation and development, and public and private policy. Ecosystem Services, 1: 4-15. Go to original source...
    7. Chicoine D.L. (1981): Farmland values at the urban fringe: An analysis of sale prices. Land Economics, 57: 353-362. Go to original source...
    8. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van den Belt M. (1997): The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387: 253-260. Go to original source...
    9. Daily G. (1997): Nature's Services. Washington, D.C., Island Press: 173.
    10. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J. (2002): A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem function, goods and services. Ecological Economics, 41: 393-408. Go to original source...
    11. FAO (1989): Community Forestry: Participatory Assessment, Monitoring and Evaluation. Rome, FAO: 181.
    12. FAO (2010): Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010. Rome, FAO: 340.
    13. Frankhauser S. (1994): Evaluating the social costs of greenhouse gas emission. The Energy Journal, 15: 157-184. Go to original source...
    14. Gao X., Asami Y. (2007): Effect of urban landscapes on land prices in two Japanese cities. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81: 155-166. Go to original source...
    15. Harrison S.R. (2002): Socio-economic research techniques in tropical forestry. In: Harrison S.R., Herbohn J.L., Mangaoang E.O., Vanclay J. (eds): Socio-economic Research Methods in Forestry: A Training Manual. Cairns, Rainforest CRC: 5-14.
    16. Hidano N. (2002): Environmental cost-benefit analysis using the hedonic price method. In: The Economic Valuation of the Environment and Public Policy: A Hedonic Approach. Cheltenham, Northampton, Edward Elgar Publishing: 102-124. Go to original source...
    17. Jim C.Y., Chen W.P. (2008): Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou (China). Journal of Environmental Management, 88: 665-676. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    18. Johnson L.T., Hope C. (2012): The social cost of carbon in U.S. regulatory impact analyses: An introduction and critique. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 2: 205-221. Go to original source...
    19. Kaiser B., Roumasset J. (2002): Valuing indirect ecosystem services: The case of tropical watersheds. Environment and Development Economics, 7: 701-714. Go to original source...
    20. Komatsu H., Tanaka N., Kume T. (2007): Do coniferous forests evaporate more water than broadleaved forests in Japan? Journal of Hydrology, 336: 361-375. Go to original source...
    21. Kotler P. (1994): Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice Hall: 801.
    22. Kramer R.A., Richter D.D., Pattanayak S., Sharma N.A. (1997): Ecological and economic analysis of watershed protection in Eastern Madagascar. Journal of Environmental Management, 49: 277-295. Go to original source...
    23. Learned E.P., Christensen C.R., Andrews K.E., Guth W.D. (1965): Business Policy: Text and Cases. Homewood, Richard D. Irwin, Inc.: 1068.
    24. Luyssaert S., Detlef Shulze E., Borner A., Knohl A., Hessenmoller D., Law B.E., Ciais P., Grace J. (2008): Old-growth forests as global carbon sinks. Nature, 455: 213-215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    25. Mashayekhi Z., Panahi M., Karami M., Khalighi S., Malekian A. (2010): Economic valuation of water storage function of forest ecosystems (case study: Zagros Forests, Iran). Journal of Forestry Research, 21: 293-300. Go to original source...
    26. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005): Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, D.C., Island Press: 137.
    27. Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture (2012): Annual reports of land use changes in farms, forests and rangelands. Available at http://amar.maj.ir/portal/Home/Default.aspx?CategoryID=c49deefd-edaf-4bb0-af25-f1dad641e34d (in Persian)
    28. Mohammadian S.M. (2001): The role of public participation in natural resources. In: National Proceedings of North Forests Management and Sustainable Development. Vol. 2, Tehran, Sept 22, 2001: 769-774. (in Persian)
    29. Nadkarni M.V. (1989): The Political Economy of Forest Use and Management. New Delhi, Sage Publications: 182.
    30. Nahuelhual L., Donoso P., Lara A., Núñez D., Oyarzún C., Neira E. (2007): Valuing ecosystem services of Chilean temperate rainforests. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 9: 481-499. Go to original source...
    31. Ninan K.N. (1996): Forest Use and Management in Japan and India: A Comparative Study. VRF Series No. 286. Tokyo, Institute of Developing Economies: 123.
    32. Ninan K.N. (2001): Social cost-benefit analysis of a watershed development project in Karnataka, India. Ambio: A Journal of the Human Environment, 30: 157-161. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    33. Ninan K.N. (2007): The Economics of Biodiversity Conservation: Valuation in Tropical Forest Ecosystems. London, Earthscan Publications Ltd.: 264.
    34. Ninan K.N. (2011): Introduction: Biodiversity, ecosystem services and human well-being. In: Ninan K.N. (ed.): Conserving and Valuing Ecosystem Services and Biodiversity: Economic, Institutional and Social Challenges. London, Washington, D.C., Earthscan Publications Ltd.: 28-33. Go to original source...
    35. Ninan K.N., Inoue M. (2013): Valuing forest ecosystem services: Case study of a forest reserve in Japan. Ecosystem Services, 5: 78-87. Go to original source...
    36. Pearce D.W. (1994): The environment: Assessing the social rate of return from investment in temperate zone forestry. In: Layard R., Glaister S. (eds): Cost-Benefit Analysis. 2nd Ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 464-490. Go to original source...
    37. Pearce D.W. (2001): The economic value of forest ecosystems. Ecosystem Health, 7: 284-296. Go to original source...
    38. Saaty R.W. (1987): The analytic hierarchy process and SWOT analysis - what it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modeling, 9: 161-178. Go to original source...
    39. Snyder S.A., Kilgore M.A., Hudson R., Donnay J. (2008): Influence of purchaser perceptions and intentions on price for forest land parcels: A hedonic pricing approach. Journal of Forest Economics, 14: 47-72. Go to original source...
    40. Suh J., Emtage N.F. (2005): Identification of strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of the community-based forest management program. Annals of Tropical Research, 27: 55-66.
    41. van der Werf G.R., Mortan D.C., DeFries R.S., Olivier J.G.J., Kasibhatta P.S., Jackson R.B., Collatz G.J., Randerson J.T. (2009): CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nature Geoscience 2: 737-738. Go to original source...
    42. Xue D., Tisdell C. (2001): Valuing ecological functions of biodiversity in Changbaishan Mountain Biosphere Reserve in Northeast China. Biodiversity & Conservation, 10: 467-481. Go to original source...
    43. Xue L., Xue D., Luo S. (2001): Seasonal dynamics of litter fall and nutrient concentrations in leaf litter in scenic forests of Nagoya. Acta Phytoecologica Sinica, 25: 359-365.
    44. Yoshida K. (2001): An Economic Evaluation of Multifunctional Roles of Agriculture and Rural Areas in Japan. Tokyo, Food and Fertilizer Technology Center: 9.
    45. Yüksel I., Dagdeviren M. (2007): Using the analytic network process (ANP) in a SWOT analysis - a case study for a textile firm. Information Sciences, 177: 3364-3382. Go to original source...
    46. Zhou G., Liu S., Li S., Zhang D., Tang X., Zhou C., Yan J., Mo J. (2006): Old-growth forests can accumulate carbon in soils. Science, 314: 1417. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content