J. For. Sci., 2017, 63(5):227-238 | DOI: 10.17221/135/2016-JFS

Modelling individual tree diameter growth for Norway spruce in the Czech Republic using a generalized algebraic difference approachOriginal Paper

Ram P. SHARMA*,1, Zdeněk VACEK1, Stanislav VACEK1, Václav JANSA2, Miloš KUČERA3
1 Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Nature Conservation, Krkonoše Mountains National Park Administration, Vrchlabí, Czech Republic
3 Forest Management Institute, Brandýs nad Labem, Czech Republic

Individual tree-based growth models precisely describe the growth of individual trees irrespective of stand complexity. These models are more useful than the stand-based growth models for effective management of forests. We developed an individual tree diameter growth model for Norway spruce (Picea abies /Linnaeus/ H. Karsten) using permanent research plot data collected from Krkonoše National Park in the Czech Republic. The model was tested against a part of the Czech National Forest Inventory (NFI) data that originated from the western region of the country. Among various models derived by a generalized algebraic difference approach (GADA), the GADA model derived from the Chapman-Richards function best suited to our data. Tree-specific parameters unique to each growth series, which describe tree-specific growth conditions, were estimated simultaneously with global parameters common to all growth series using the iterative nested regressions. The model described most of the variations in diameter growth for model calibration data (R2adj = 0.9901, RMSE = 0.5962), leaving no significant trends in the residuals. A test against NFI data also confirms that the model is precise enough for predictions of diameter growth for ranges of site quality, tree size, age, and growth condition. The model also possesses biologically desirable properties because it produces the curves with growth rates and asymptotes that increase with increasing site quality. The GADA model is path-invariant and therefore applicable for both forward and backward predictions, meaning that the model can precisely predict diameter growth at any past ages of the trees.

Keywords: base-age invariant approach; Chapman-Richards function; global parameters; tree-specific parameters;iterative nested regression; National Forest Inventory

Published: May 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
SHARMA RP, VACEK Z, VACEK S, JANSA V, KUČERA M. Modelling individual tree diameter growth for Norway spruce in the Czech Republic using a generalized algebraic difference approach. J. For. Sci. 2017;63(5):227-238. doi: 10.17221/135/2016-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Adame P., Hynynen J., Cañellas I., del Río M. (2008): Individual-tree diameter growth model for rebollo oak (Quercus pyrenaica Willd.) coppices. Forest Ecology and Management, 255: 1011-1022. Go to original source...
    2. Amaro A., Reed D., Soares P. (2003): Modelling Forest Systems. 1st Ed. Wallingford, CABI Publishing: 432.
    3. Andreassen K., Tomter S.M. (2003): Basal area growth models for individual trees of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. Forest Ecology and Management, 180: 11-24. Go to original source...
    4. Bailey R.L., Clutter J.L. (1974): Base-age invariant polymorphic site curves. Forest Science, 20: 155-159.
    5. Banerjee S., Carlin B.P., Gelfand A.E. (2014): Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data. 2nd Ed. Boca Raton, Chapman and Hall/CRC: 584. Go to original source...
    6. Barrio Anta M., Castedo Dorado F., Diéguez-Aranda U., Álvarez González J.G., Parresol B.R., Rodríguez Soalleiro R. (2006): Development of a basal area growth system for maritime pine in northwestern Spain using the generalized algebraic difference approach. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 1461-1474. Go to original source...
    7. Biging G.S., Dobbertin M. (1992): Comparison of distancedependent competition measures for height and basal area growth of individual conifer trees. Forest Science, 38: 695-720. Go to original source...
    8. Bollandsås O.M., Naesset E. (2009): Weibull models for single-tree increment of Norway spruce, Scots pine, birch and other broadleaves in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 24: 54-66. Go to original source...
    9. Castedo Dorado F., Diéguez-Aranda U., Barrio Anta M., Álvarez González J.G. (2007): Modelling stand basal area growth for radiata pine plantations in northwestern Spain using the GADA. Annals of Forest Science, 64: 609-619. Go to original source...
    10. Chapman D.G. (1961): Statistical problems in dynamics of exploited fisheries populations. In: Neyman J. (ed.): Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, Berkeley, June 20-July 30, 1960: 153-168.
    11. Cieszewski C.J. (2001): Three methods of deriving advanced dynamic site equations demonstrated on inland Douglasfir site curves. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31: 165-173. Go to original source...
    12. Cieszewski C.J. (2002): Comparing fixed- and variable-baseage site equations having single versus multiple asymptotes. Forest Science, 48: 7-23. Go to original source...
    13. Cieszewski C.J. (2003): Developing a well-behaved dynamic site equation using a modified Hossfeld IV function Y 3 = (axm)/ (c + xm-1), a simplified mixed-model and scant subalpine fir data. Forest Science, 49: 539-554. Go to original source...
    14. Cieszewski C.J., Bailey R.L. (2000): Generalized algebraic difference approach: Theory based derivation of dynamic site equations with polymorphism and variable asymptotes. Forest Science, 46: 116-126. Go to original source...
    15. Cieszewski C.J., Strub M. (2008): Generalized algebraic difference approach derivation of dynamic site equations with polymorphism and variable asymptotes from exponential and logarithmic functions. Forest Science, 54: 303-315. Go to original source...
    16. Cieszewski C.J., Harrison M., Martin S.W. (2000): Practical Methods for Estimating Non-biased Parameters in Selfreferencing Growth and Yield Models. Plantation Management Research Cooperative (PMRC) Technical Report 2000-7. Athens, University of Georgia: 11.
    17. Cieszewski C.J., Strub M., Zasada M. (2007): New dynamic site equation that fits best the Schwappach data for Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 243: 83-93. Go to original source...
    18. Crecente-Campo F., Soares P., Tomé M., Diéguez-Aranda U. (2010): Modelling annual individual-tree growth and mortality of Scots pine with data obtained at irregular measurement intervals and containing missing observations. Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 1965-1974. Go to original source...
    19. Diéguez-Aranda U., Burkhart H.E., Rodríguez Soalleiro R. (2005): Modeling dominant height growth of radiata pine (Pinus radiata D. Don) plantations in north-western Spain. Forest Ecology and Management, 215: 271-284. Go to original source...
    20. FMI (2003): Inventarizace lesů, metodika venkovního sběru dat. Brandýs nad Labem, Forest Management Institute: 136.
    21. García O. (1994): The state-space approach in growth modeling. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 24: 1894-1903. Go to original source...
    22. García O. (2005): Comparing and combining stem analysis and permanent sample plot data in site index models. Forest Science, 51: 277-283. Go to original source...
    23. Hasenauer H.E. (2006): Sustainable Forest Management: Growth Models for Europe. Berlin, Heidelberg, SpringerVerlag: 388. Go to original source...
    24. Huang S.M., Titus S.J. (1995): An individual tree diameter increment model for white spruce in Alberta. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25: 1455-1465. Go to original source...
    25. Huuskonen S., Miina J. (2007): Stand-level growth models for young Scots pine stands in Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 241: 49-61. Go to original source...
    26. IFER (2016): Field-map Software and Hardware Catalogue. Jílové u Prahy, Institute of Forest Ecosystem Research - Monitoring and Mapping Solutions, Ltd.: 50.
    27. Kozak A., Kozak R. (2003): Does cross validation provide additional information in the evaluation of regression models? Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 976-987. Go to original source...
    28. Krumland B., Eng H. (2005): Site Index Systems for Major Young-growth Forest and Woodland Species in Northern California. Sacramento, California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: 219.
    29. Kučera M. (2015): Národní inventarizace lesů České republiky. In: Vašíček J., Skála V. (eds): XVIII. Sněm lesníků. Národní inventarizace lesů, Hradec Králové, Nov 10, 2015: 7-13.
    30. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D., Schabenberger O. (2006): SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd Ed. Cary, SAS Institute: 814.
    31. Mäkinen H., Isomäki A. (2004): Thinning intensity and growth of Norway spruce stands in Finland. Forestry, 77: 349-364. Go to original source...
    32. Martín-Benito D., Gea-Izquierdo G., del Río M., Canellas I. (2008): Long-term trends in dominant-height growth of black pine using dynamic models. Forest Ecology and Management, 256: 1230-1238. Go to original source...
    33. Montgomery D.C., Peck E.A., Vining G.G. (2001): Introduction to Linear Regression Analysis. 3rd Ed. New York, Wiley: 641.
    34. Nigh G. (2015): Engelmann spruce site index models: A comparison of model functions and parameterizations. PLoS ONE, 10: e0124079. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    35. Nord-Larsen T. (2006): Developing dynamic site index curves for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in Denmark. Forest Science, 52: 173-181. Go to original source...
    36. Nord-Larsen T., Meilby H., Skovsgaard J.P. (2009): Sitespecific height growth models for six common tree species in Denmark. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 24: 194-204. Go to original source...
    37. Pienaar L.V., Rheney J.W. (1995): Modeling stand level growth and yield response to silvicultural treatments. Forest Science, 41: 629-638. Go to original source...
    38. Pinheiro J.C, Bates D.M. (2000): Mixed-effects Models in S and S-PLUS. New York, Springer-Verlag: 528. Go to original source...
    39. Porte A., Bartelink H.H. (2002): Modelling mixed forest growth: A review of models for forest management. Ecological Modelling, 150: 141-188. Go to original source...
    40. Pretzsch H. (2009): Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield: From Measurement to Model. Berlin, Springer-Verlag: 664. Go to original source...
    41. Pretzsch H., Biber P., Ďurský J. (2002): The single tree-based stand simulator SILVA: Construction, application and evaluation. Forest Ecology and Management, 162: 3-21. Go to original source...
    42. Richards F.J. (1959): A flexible growth function for empirical use. Journal of Experimental Botany, 10: 290-300. Go to original source...
    43. SAS Institute, Inc. (2013): Base SAS 9.4 Procedure Guide: Statistical Procedures. 2nd Ed. Cary, SAS Institute, Inc.: 556.
    44. Sharma R.P., Brunner A. (2016): Modelling individual tree height growth of Norway spruce and Scots pine from national forest inventory data in Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research (in press). doi: 10.1080/02827581.2016.1269944 Go to original source...
    45. Sharma R.P., Vacek Z., Vacek S. (2016): Individual tree crown width models for Norway spruce and European beech in Czech Republic. Forest Ecology and Management, 366: 208-220. Go to original source...
    46. Sharma R.P., Brunner A., Eid T., Øyen B.H. (2011): Modelling dominant height growth from national forest inventory individual tree data with short time-series and large age errors. Forest Ecology and Management, 262: 2162-2175. Go to original source...
    47. Subedi N., Sharma M. (2011): Individual-tree diameter growth models for black spruce and jack pine plantations in northern Ontario. Forest Ecology and Management, 261: 2140-2148. Go to original source...
    48. Tang X., Fehrmann L., Guan F., Forrester D.I., Guisasola R., Pérez-Cruzado C., Vor T., Lu Y., Álvarez González J.G., Kleinn C. (2017): A generalized algebraic difference approach allows an improved estimation of aboveground biomass dynamics of Cunninghamia lanceolata and Castanopsis sclerophylla forests. Annals of Forest Science, 74: 12. Go to original source...
    49. Uzoh F.C.C., Oliver W.W. (2008): Individual tree diameter increment model for managed even-aged stands of ponderosa pine throughout the western United States using a multilevel linear mixed effects model. Forest Ecology and Management, 256: 438-445. Go to original source...
    50. Vacek S., Hejcman M. (2012): Natural layering, foliation, fertility and plant species composition of a Fagus sylvatica stand above the alpine timberline in the Giant (Krkonoše) Mts., Czech Republic. European Journal of Forest Research, 131: 799-810. Go to original source...
    51. Vacek Z., Vacek S., Bílek L., Remeš J., Štefančík I. (2015): Changes in horizontal structure of natural beech forests on an altitudinal gradient in the Sudetes. Dendrobiology, 73: 33-45. Go to original source...
    52. Vanclay J.K. (1994): Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests. Wallingford, CABI: 312.
    53. von Gadow K., Hui G.Y. (1999): Modelling Forest Development. Dordrecht, Kluwer: 213. Go to original source...
    54. Vonesh E.F., Chinchilli V.M. (1996): Linear and Nonlinear Models for the Analysis of Repeated Measurements. Boca Raton, CRC Press: 560. Go to original source...
    55. Vospernik S., Monserud R.A., Sterba H. (2015): Comparing individual-tree growth models using principles of stand growth for Norway spruce, Scots pine, and European beech. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 45: 1006-1018. Go to original source...
    56. Wykoff W.R. (1990): A basal area increment model for individual conifers in the Northern Rocky Mountain. Forest Science, 36: 1077-1104. Go to original source...
    57. Yue C., Kahle H.P., Kohnle U., Zhang Q., Kang X. (2014): Detecting trends in diameter growth of Norway spruce on long-term forest research plots using linear mixed-effects models. European Journal of Forest Research, 133: 783-792. Go to original source...
    58. Yang Y.Q., Huang S.M. (2011a): Comparison of different methods for fitting nonlinear mixed forest models and for making predictions. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 41: 1671-1686. Go to original source...
    59. Yang Y.Q., Huang S.M. (2011b): Estimating a multilevel dominant height-age model from nested data with generalized errors. Forest Science, 57: 102-116. Go to original source...
    60. Yang Y.Q., Monserud R.A., Huang S.M. (2004): An evaluation of diagnostic tests and their roles in validating forest biometric models. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34: 619-629. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content