J. For. Sci., 2017, 63(4):173-181 | DOI: 10.17221/117/2016-JFS

Crown development of beech crop trees under different thinning regimesOriginal Paper

Igor ŠTEFANČÍK*
Forest Research Institute, National Forest Centre, Zvolen, Slovak Republic

Crop trees are the main bearers of qualitative and value production of the stands. Although the number and production of the mentioned trees are affected by various factors, crown development by means of the thinning regime can be considered as very significant. The paper aims at the comparison of crop trees in homogeneous beech (Fagus sylvatica Linnaeus) stands, which were managed by three different management or thinning regimes for a long period (ca. 50 years): (i) heavy thinning from below (C grade according to the German forest research institutes released in 1902), (ii) Štefančík's free crown thinning, (iii) without interventions (control). Selection of crop trees was carried out at the beginning of research using the best stem quality, diameter and height dimension and regular spacing). In this paper only the last assessment of crop trees aged from 83 to 105 years including 23 subplots established across the Slovakian territory was analysed. The highest number of crop trees has been reached in forests where Štefančík's free crown thinning was applied. The proportion of these trees on subplots with the mentioned type of crown thinning was 61% out of the basal area at stand age of 100 years. A much lower proportion was found on subplots managed by thinning from below (32%) and on control ones (20%). Crown parameters (crown width, crown ratio, crown projection area, crown surface area and volume) showed the most appropriate values on subplots where Štefančík's free crown thinning was used. It was: 8.36 m (crown width), 0.50 (crown ratio), 56.84 m2 (crown projection area), 289.56 m2 (crown surface area), and 481.75 m3 (volume). Based on the results obtained after almost 50 years of systematic investigations, the mentioned thinning method was recommended for beech forests.

Keywords: target trees; crown parameters; Fagus sylvatica Linnaeus; tending

Published: April 30, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ŠTEFANČÍK I. Crown development of beech crop trees under different thinning regimes. J. For. Sci. 2017;63(4):173-181. doi: 10.17221/117/2016-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Assmann E. (1968): Náuka o výnose lesa. Bratislava, Príroda: 488.
  2. Barbeito I., Collet C., Ningre F. (2014): Crown responses to neighbour density and species identity in a young mixed deciduous stand. Trees, 28: 1751-1765. Go to original source...
  3. Bartelink H.H. (1997): Allometric relationships for biomass and leaf area of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Annales des Sciences Forestières, 54: 39-50. Go to original source...
  4. Bosela M., Štefančík I., Petráš R., Vacek S. (2016): The effects of climate warming on the growth of European beech forests depend critically on thinning strategy and site productivity. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 222: 21-31. Go to original source...
  5. Burger H. (1940): Holz, Blattmenge und Zuwachs. IV Mitteilung: Ein 80 jahriger Buchenbestand. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Anstalt für das Forstliche Versuchswesen, 21: 307-348.
  6. Chroust L. (1972): Pěstebně výnosový význam velikosti a tvaru korun v mladých dubových porostech. Práce VÚLHM, 41: 79-102.
  7. Dassot M., Constant T., Ningre F., Fournier M. (2015): Impact of stand density on tree morphology and growth stresses in young beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stands. Trees, 29: 583-591. Go to original source...
  8. Dhôte J.F. (1997): Effets des éclaircies sur le diamètre dominant dans des futaies régulières de Hêtre ou de Chêne sessile. Revue Forestière Française, 49: 557-578. Go to original source...
  9. Dieler J., Pretzsch H. (2013): Morphological plasticity of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in pure and mixed-species stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 295: 97-108. Go to original source...
  10. Dudzinska T.R., Tomusiak R. (2000): Comparison of slenderness in beech and oak stands. Sylwan, 144: 45-52.
  11. Fichtner A., Sturm K., Rickert C., von Oheimb G., Härdtle W. (2013): Crown size-growth relationships of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) are driven by the interplay of disturbance intensity and inter-specific competition. Forest Ecology and Management, 302: 178-184. Go to original source...
  12. Gömöry D., Hynek V., Paule L. (1998): Delineation of seed zones for European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in the Czech Republic based on isozyme gene markers. Annales des Sciences Forestières, 55: 425-436. Go to original source...
  13. Grossmann H. (1963): Untersuchungen über die Zuwachsleistung von Kiefer und Buche, getrennt nach Standortsformen und Durchmesserstufen unter Berücksichtigung der Kronengüte. Archiv für Forstwessen, 12: 249-278.
  14. Guericke M. (2002): Studies of growth dynamics of beech. Forst und Holz, 57: 331-337.
  15. Hasenauer H., Monserud R.A. (1996): A crown ratio model for Austrian forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 84: 49-60. Go to original source...
  16. Hemery G.E., Savill P.S., Pryor S.N. (2005): Application of the crown diameter - stem diameter relationship for different species of broadleaved trees. Forest Ecology and Management, 215: 285-294. Go to original source...
  17. Korhonen L., Korhonen K.T., Rautiainen M., Stenberg P. (2006): Estimation of forest canopy cover: A comparison of field measurement techniques. Silva Fennica, 40: 577-588. Go to original source...
  18. Kraft G. (1884): Beiträge zur Lehre von Durchforstungen, Schlagstellungen und Lichtungshieben. Hannover, Klindsworth's Verlag: 147.
  19. Kramer H. (1988): Waldwachstumslehre: Ökologische und anthropogene Einflüsse auf das Wachstum des Waldes, seine Massen- und Wertleistung und die Bestandessicherheit. Hamburg, Berlin, Verlag Paul Parey: 374.
  20. Kupka K. (2008): QC.Expert, ADSTAT. User's Manual. Pardubice, TryloByte, Ltd.: 168.
  21. Kuuluvainen T. (1988): Crown architecture and stemwood production on Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Tree Physiology, 4: 337-346. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  22. Lang A.C., Härdtle W., Bruelheide H., Geiβler C., Nadrowski K., Schuldt A. (2010): Tree morphology responds to neighbourhood competition and slope in species-rich forests of subtropical China. Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 1708-1715. Go to original source...
  23. Longuetaud F., Piboule A., Wernsdörfer H., Collet C. (2013): Crown plasticity reduces inter-tree competition in a mixed broadleaved forest. European Journal of Forest Research, 132: 621-634. Go to original source...
  24. Magin R. (1959): Kronengrösse und Zuwachs in mehrschichtigen Mischbeständen. Forst- und Holzwirtschaft, 14: 186-189.
  25. Monserud R.A., Sterba H. (1999): Modelling individual tree mortality for Austrian forest species. Forest Ecology and Management, 113: 109-123. Go to original source...
  26. Oliver C.D., Larson B.C. (1996): Forest Stand Dynamics. New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.: 520.
  27. Peltola H., Gardiner B., Kellomäki S., Kolström T., Lässig R., Moore J., Quine C., Ruel J.C. (2000): Wind and other abiotic risks to forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 135: 1-2. Go to original source...
  28. Podlaski R. (2006): Suitability of the selected statistical distributions for fitting diameter data in distinguished development stages and phases of near-natural mixed forests in the Świętokrzyski National Park (Poland). Forest Ecology and Management, 236: 393-402. Go to original source...
  29. Poleno Z. (1984): Vztah přírůstu k velikosti koruny. Práce VÚLHM, 64: 117-165.
  30. Pouderoux S., Deleuze C., Dhôte J.F. (2001): Analysis of crown efficiency in a common beech thinning trial using a process-based model. Annals of Forest Science, 58: 261-275. Go to original source...
  31. Pretzsch H. (2009): Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield: From Measurement to Model. Berlin, Heidelberg, SpringerVerlag: 617. Go to original source...
  32. Pretzsch H. (2014): Canopy space filling and tree crown morphology in mixed-species stands compared with monocultures. Forest Ecology and Management, 327: 251-264. Go to original source...
  33. Pretzsch H., Schütze G. (2005): Crown allometry and growing space efficiency of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in pure and mixed stands. Plant Biology, 7: 628-639. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  34. Pretzsch H., Schütze G. (2009): Transgressive over yielding in mixed compared with pure stands of Norway spruce and European beech in Central Europe: Evidence on stand level and explanation on individual tree level. European Journal of Forest Research, 128: 183-204. Go to original source...
  35. Račko V., Čunderlík I. (2011): Vplyv veku stromu na frekvenciu výskytu a veľkosť nepravého jadra buka (Fagus sylvatica L.). Acta Facultatis Xylologiae Zvolen, 53: 5-14.
  36. Schröter M., Härdtle W., von Oheimb G. (2012): Crown plasticity and neighbourhood interactions of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in an oldgrowth forest. European Journal of Forest Research, 131: 787-798. Go to original source...
  37. Sharma R.P., Vacek Z., Vacek S. (2016): Individual tree crown width models for Norway spruce and European beech in Czech Republic. Forest Ecology and Management, 366: 208-220. Go to original source...
  38. Slodičák M., Novák J. (2006): Silvicultural measures to increase the mechanical stability of pure secondary Norway spruce stands before conversion. Forest Ecology and Management, 224: 252-257. Go to original source...
  39. Štefančík L. (1984): Freie Hochdurchforstung in ungepflegten Buchenstangenhölzern. Allgemeine Forstzeitung, 95: 106-110.
  40. Štefančík I. (2015): Rast, štruktúra a produkcia bukových porastov s rozdielnym režimom výchovy. Zvolen, Národné lesnícke centrum: 148.
  41. Sterba H. (1999): 20 Jahre Zielstärkennutzung in der "Hirschlacke", Stift Schlägl. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 170: 170-175.
  42. Suri S.K. (1975): Correlation studies between bole diameter and crown projection area as an aid to thinning. Indian Forester, 101: 539-554.
  43. Thorpe H.C., Astrup R., Trowbridge A., Coates K.D. (2010): Competition and tree crowns: A neighbourhood analysis of three boreal tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 259: 1586-1596. Go to original source...
  44. Utschig H. (2002): Analysis of single tree productivity and growing space on long-term trial plots - methods, program development and initial results. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 121: 335-348. Go to original source...
  45. Utschig H., Küsters E. (2003): Growth reactions of common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) related to thinning - 130 years observation of the thinning experiment Elmstein 20. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 122: 389-409. Go to original source...
  46. Vacek S. (1987): Morfologická proměnlivost buku lesního v Krkonoších. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 32: 1-6.
  47. Vacek Z., Vacek S., Remeš J., Štefančík I., Bulušek D., Bílek L. (2013): Struktura a modelový vývoj lesních porostů v NPR Trčkov - CHKO Orlické hory, Česká republika. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 59: 248-263. Go to original source...
  48. Vincent G., Harja D. (2007): Exploring ecological significance of tree crown plasticity through three-dimensional modelling. Annals of Botany, 101: 1221-1231. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  49. Vospernik S., Monserud R.A., Sterba H. (2010): Do individual-tree growth models correctly represent height:diameter ratios of Norway spruce and Scots pine? Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 1735-1753. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  50. Woodcock H., Vollenweider P., Dubs R., Hofer R.M. (1995): Crown alterations induced by decline: A study of relationships between growth rate and crown morphology in beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Trees, 9: 279-288. Go to original source...
  51. Zlatník A. (1976): Lesnická fytocenologie. Prague, SZN: 495.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.