J. For. Sci., 2017, 63(3):126-135 | DOI: 10.17221/58/2016-JFS

Ecological functions of vegetation as potentials of ecosystem services (floodplain alder forest in the Tríbeč microregion)Original Paper

Pavol ELIÁŠ, Patrícia MARINIČOVÁ*
Department of Ecology, Faculty of European Studies and Regional Development, Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Nitra, Slovak Republic

Ecological functions of a black alder riparian forest (Aegopodio-Alnetum glutinosae) as capacities for the provision of ecosystem services were analysed and indicated by an inductive (bottom-up) approach. In July 2015, species richness and diversity of the forest stand were analysed in Hlboká valley, near Husárka water reservoir, Tríbeč Mountains, western Slovakia, by phytocoenological relevé, aboveground biomass of the herb layer and litter mass were estimated by a harvest method. The quantitative data obtained for the forest vegetation were used for estimation of capacities (potentials) of the floodplain forest to provide non-market ecosystem services. The forage, melliferous and therapeutic potential were estimated and calculated by Jurko's methods of ecological and socio-economic evaluations of vegetation. Aboveground biomass (production potential) of the forest understorey community was relatively high (seasonal maximum standing crop 59.03 g.m-2 in dry mass). The result of evaluation of the forage potential of the alder forest was higher than 50%, it means medium forage quality community. The melliferous potential was evaluated close to 190% (= high potential). The share of medicinal plants in the studied plant community was higher than 30%, referred to as extremely rich therapeutic potential. The analyses confirmed that the forest community represents high potentials for providing production ecosystem services.

Keywords: biomass; black alder forest; herbaceous understorey; provisioning and production services; western Slovakia

Published: March 31, 2017  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
ELIÁŠ P, MARINIČOVÁ P. Ecological functions of vegetation as potentials of ecosystem services (floodplain alder forest in the Tríbeč microregion). J. For. Sci. 2017;63(3):126-135. doi: 10.17221/58/2016-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Alford L. (2007): The use of nettle stings for pain. Alternative Therapies in Health and Medicine, 13: 58. Go to PubMed...
    2. Daily G.C., Alexander S., Ehrlich P.R., Goulder L., Lubchenco J., Matson P.A., Mooney H.A., Postel S., Schneider S.H., Tilman D., Woodwell G.M. (2002): Ecosystem Services: Benefits Supplied to Human Society by Natural Ecosystems. Washington, D.C., Ecological Society of America: 20.
    3. de Groot R.S. (1995): Environmental functions: An analytical framework for integrating environmental and economic assessment. In: Sadler B., Manning E., Deny J. (eds): Balancing the Scale: Integrating Environmental and Economic Assessment. Don Mills, Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency and Foundation for International Training: 56-80.
    4. de Groot R.S., Brander L., van der Ploeg S., Constanza R., Bernard F., Braat L., Christie M., Crossmann N., Ghermandi A., Hein L., Hussain S., Kumar P., McVittie A., Portela R., Rodriguez L.C., ten Brink P., van Beukering P. (2012): Global estimates of the value of ecosystems and their services in monetary units. Ecosystem Services' 1: 50-61. Go to original source...
    5. Diviaková A. (2010): Nelesná drevinová vegetácia a hodnotenie jej prírodochrannej, biotickej a krajinnoekologickej významnosti (modelové územie kataster obce Žibritov, Štiavnické vrchy). Geographia Cassoviensis, IV: 48-52.
    6. Dykyjová D. et al. (1989): Metody studia ekosystémů. Prague, Academia: 690.
    7. Eliáš P. (1983): Ecological and social functions of vegetation. Ekológia (ČSSR), 2: 93-103.
    8. Eliáš P. (1989): What is the best measure of species importance in a community? Ekológia (ČSSR), 8: 75-80.
    9. Eliáš P. (1991): Prírodné zdroje liečivých rastlín na Slovensku, ich ochrana a racionálne využívanie. In: Pestovanie, zber a spracovanie liečivých rastlín: zborník referátov a posterov z medzinárodnej konferencie, Vysoké Tatry, June 4-7, 1991.
    10. Eliáš P. (2010): Od funkcií vegetácie k ekosystémovým službám. Životné prostredie, 44: 59-64.
    11. Eliáš P. (2013): Ecosystem services in rural landscape and their usability. Available at http://eventmobi.com/intecol2013/agenda/34843/182728
    12. Eliáš P. (2014): Identifikácia ekosystémových služieb vo vidieckej krajine. In: Černušáková L. (ed.): Venkovská krajina 2014. Sborník z 12. ročníku mezinárodní mezioborové konference, Hostětín, May 23-25, 2014: 20-27.
    13. Eliáš P. (2015a): Deductive and inductive approaches to identifying, mapping and valuation of ecosystem services in rural landscape. In: EEF Congress. Ecology at the Interface: Science-based Solutions for Human Well-being, Rome, Sept 21-25, 2015: 474.
    14. Eliáš P. (2015b): Funkcie a služby ekosystémov v krajine: od dedukcií k výskumu. In: Klikušovská Z., Sviček M. (eds): Environmentálne indexy, oblasti ekologického záujmu a ekosystémové služby v krajine. Zborník príspevkov z vedeckého seminára, Bratislava, Nov 27, 2015: 77-84.
    15. Eliáš P., Mariničová P. (2015): Kŕmny potenciál rastlinných spoločenstiev, jeho využitie jako ekosystémovej služby (na príklade vidieckeho mikroregiónu Tríbečsko). In: Černušáková L. (ed.): Venkovská krajina 2015. Sborník z 13. ročníku mezinárodní meziodborové konference, Hostětín, May 22-24, 2015: 34-43.
    16. Ellenberg H. (2009): Vegetation Ecology of Central Europe. 4th Ed. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 756.
    17. Ellenberg H., Weber H.E., Düll R., Wirth W., Werner W., Pauliβen D. (1992): Zeigerwerte von Pflanzen in Mitteleuropa. Scripta Geobotanica. Vol. 18. 2nd Ed. Göttingen, Goltze: 258.
    18. Faliński J.B. (1998): Invasive alien plants and vegetation dynamics. In: Starfinger U., Edwards K., Kowarik I., Williamson M. (eds): Plant Invasion: Ecological Mechanisms and Human Responses. Leiden, Blackhuys Publishers: 3-21.
    19. Godefroid S., Koedam N. (2010): Comparative ecology and coexistence of introduced and native congeneric forest herbs: Impatiens parviflora and I. noli-tangere. Plant Ecology and Evolution, 143: 119-127. Go to original source...
    20. Grunewald K., Bastian O. (eds) (2015): Ecosystem Services - Concept, Methods and Case Studies. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer-Verlag: 312. Go to original source...
    21. Gulcin I., Küfrevioglu O.I., Oktay M., Buyukokurglu M.E. (2004): Antioxidant, antimicrobioal, antiulcer and analgesic activities of nettle (Urtica dioica L.). Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 90: 205-215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    22. Haines-Young R., Potschin M. (2013): Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES): Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. Available at http://www.citeulike.org/group/15400/article/13902916 (accessed June 16, 2016).
    23. Hrivnák R., Koštál J., Slezák M., Petrášová A., Feszterová M. (2013): Black alder dominated forest vegetation in the western part of central Slovakia - species composition and ecology. Hacquetia, 12: 23-37. Go to original source...
    24. Jankovič J. (2000): Quantification of species diversity for the vegetation in forest ecosystems on an example of model territories in the Low Tatras and Strážovské Mts. Forestry Journal, 46: 129-144.
    25. Jonczak J. (2009): Leaf litterfall decomposition in age-differentiated stands of poplar clone Hybrid 275. Polish Journal of Soil Science, 42: 159-166.
    26. Jurko A. (1986): Forage values of vegetation: an important potential for herbivores in landscape ecology. Ekológia (ČSSR), 5: 345-357.
    27. Jurko A. (1990): Ekologické a socioekonomické hodnotenie vegetácie. Bratislava, Príroda: 195.
    28. Karpáti V., Karpáti I., Jurko A. (1963): Bachbegleitende Erlenauen im eukarpatischen und pannonischen Mittelgebirge. Biologia, 18: 97-120.
    29. Kollár J., Kubíček F., Šimonovič V., Kanka R., Balkovič J. (2010): Production-ecological analysis of the broad-leaved forest ecosystem herb layer biomass in Žalostínska vrchovina upland and Zámčisko (western Slovakia). Ekológia, 29: 113-122. Go to original source...
    30. Konôpka J., Hell P., Kaštier P., Bučko J., Slamečka J. (2005): Optimalizácia manažmentu a zlepšovanie biotopu raticovej zveri. Poľovnícke štúdie, 11: 197.
    31. Kostúrová E., Diviaková A. (2012): Interpretácie vybraných významností nelesnej drevinovej vegetácie pre potreby ÚSES (modelové územie: kataster obce Brusno). Acta Facultatis Ecologiae, 26: 21-28.
    32. Kotrla M. (2007): Significance of floodplain forests vegetation from the point of their socio-economic functions in the alluvium of the river Váh. Acta Regionalia et Environmentalica, 4: 13-16.
    33. Kotrla M. (2009): Krajinno-ekologická významnosť fragmentov lužných lesov. In: Teťák F. (ed.): Prvá interaktívna konferencia mladých vedcov: zborník abstraktov, Námestovo, May 12-15, 2009: 54.
    34. Kubíček F., Jurko A. (1975): Estimation of the above-ground biomass of the herb layer in forest communities. Folia Geobotanica & Phytotaxonomica, 10: 113-129. Go to original source...
    35. Kumar S., Tewari L.M. (2014): Pattern on litter fall and litter decomposition in a Quercus leucotrichophora A. Camus forest in Kumaun Himalaya. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation, 6: 108-114. Go to original source...
    36. Lohmeyer W. (1957): Der Hainmieren-Schwarzerlenwald (Stellario-Alnetum glutinosae (Kästner 1938)). Mitteilungen der Floristisch-soziologischen Arbeitsgemeinschaft N. F., 6-7: 247-257.
    37. Marhold K., Hindák F. (eds) (1998): Checklist of Non-vascular and Vascular Plants of Slovakia. Bratislava, Veda: 688.
    38. Michalko J., Berta J., Magic D. (1986): Geobotanická mapa ČSSR. Slovenská socialistická republika. Textová časť a mapy. Bratislava, Veda: 162.
    39. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003): Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment. Washington, D.C., Island Press: 245.
    40. Moravec J., Blažková D., Hejný S. (1994): Fytocenologie. Prague, Akademia: 403.
    41. Novák J. (2008): Pasienky, lúky, trávniky. Prievidza, Partia I., spol. s.r.o.: 708.
    42. Obidziński T., Symonides E. (2000): The influence of the groundlayer structure on the invasion of small balsam (Impatiens parviflora DC.) to natural and degraded forests. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 69: 1-8. Go to original source...
    43. Papánek F. (1978): Teória a prax funkčne integrovaného lesného hospodárstva. Lesnícke štúdie 29. Zvolen, VÚLH, Bratislava, Príroda: 218. Go to original source...
    44. Randall C., Meethan K., Randall H., Dobbs F. (1999): Nettle sting of Urtica dioica for joint pain - an exploratory study of this complementary therapy. Complementary Therapies in Medicine, 7: 126-131. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    45. Šalomon I., Taylorová B. (2013): Využitie a návrh manažmentu lúk v Levočských vrchoch ako zdroj liečivej rastliny ľubovníka škvrnitého (Hypericum maculatum Crantz). Prešov, Grafotlač Prešov, s.r.o.: 169.
    46. Sandhu H., Porter J., Wratten S. (2013): Experimental assessment of ecosystem services in agriculture. In: Wratten S., Sandhu H., Cullen R., Constanza R. (eds): Ecosystem Services in Agriculture and Urban Landscapes. Oxford, Wiley-Blackwell: 121-135. Go to original source...
    47. Sati S.C., Sati N., Sati O.P. (2011): Bioactive constituents and medicinal importance of genus Alnus. Pharmacognosy Review, 5: 174-183. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Slezák M., Hrivnák R., Petrášová A., Dítě D. (2013): Variability of alder-dominated forest vegetation along latitudinal gradient in Slovakia. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 82: 25-35. Go to original source...
    49. Šomšák L. (1961): Jelšové porasty Spišsko-gemerského rudohoria. Acta Facultatis Rerum Naturalium Universitatis Comenianae. Botanica, 6: 407-459.
    50. Sotáková S. (1982): Organická hmota a úrodnosť pôdy. 1st Ed. Bratislava, Príroda: 234.
    51. Szmorad F. (2011): The riparian alder forest of Sopron Hills. Acta Silvatica Lingnaria Hungarica, 7: 109-124. Go to original source...
    52. Tóthová A., Halada Ľ. (2015): Ecological evaluation of grassland in the Hodrušská hornatina highlands (the first results). In: Boltižiar M., Bača A. (eds): Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium. Landscape and Landscape Ecology, Nitra, May 27-29, 2015: 61-62.
    53. Uherčíková E., Eliáš P. (1987): Standing crop, dominance, and species diversity of tall-herb communities in the Male Karpaty Mts., western Slovakia. Ekológia (ČSSR), 6: 147-163.
    54. Weis M. (1967): The vegetation of alluvium Hlboká brook. [MSc Thesis.] Bratislava, Comenius University in Bratislava: 135.
    55. Whittaker R.H. (1965): Dominance and diversity in land plant communities. Science, 147: 250-260. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    56. Ziyyat A., Legssyer A., Mekhfi H., Dassouli A., Serhrouchni M., Benielloun W. (1997): Phytotherapy of hypertension anddiabetes in oriental Morocco. Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 58: 45-54. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content