J. For. Sci., 2016, 62(4):153-162 | DOI: 10.17221/106/2015-JFS

Mid-rotation response to fertilizer by Pinus radiata D. Don at three contrasting sitesOriginal Paper

M.V. Ramírez Alzate1,2, R.A. Rubilar1, C. Montes3, H.L. Allen4, T.R. Fox5, E. Sanfuentes1
1 Departamento de Silvicultura, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
2 Bioforest S.A., Concepción, Chile
3 Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, USA
4 Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, College of Natural Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA
5 Department of Forest Resources and Environmental Conservation, College of Natural Resources and Environment, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, USA

Mid-rotation responses to fertilization of Pinus radiata D. Don plantations after the first or second thinning have been observed in research experiments in many regions where the species is grown. The practice is not however common in commercial plantations. This is probably because the effects of soil-site conditions on the magnitude and duration of tree and stand growth responses are not well understood. The effects of nitrogen (150 and 300 kg N.ha-1) and phosphorus (0, 20 and 40 kg P.ha-1) including common base fertilization of boron (8 kg B.ha-1) and potassium (65 kg K.ha-1) were evaluated in three mid-rotation P. radiata plantations after thinning. The plantations were located on sites with contrasting nutrient and water availability, sandy, granitic and red-clay sites, in south-central Chile. The magnitude and duration of growth response was site specific. After 8 years, the growth response to the highest dose of fertilization relative to the control was 57 m3.ha-1 (16%) at the granitic and 24 m3.ha-1 (14%) at the sandy site. No response to either nitrogen or phosphorus fertilizer was observed at the red-clay site. Nitrogen and phosphorus were limiting at both granitic and sandy sites, and high fertilization doses considering 300 kg N.ha-1 plus 40 kg P.ha-1 would ameliorate nutrient resource limitations and yield a cost-effective increment in stand volume.

Keywords: forest fertilization; sustained response; volume increment; stand growth; foliar nitrogen

Published: April 30, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ramírez Alzate MV, Rubilar RA, Montes C, Allen HL, Fox TR, Sanfuentes E. Mid-rotation response to fertilizer by Pinus radiata D. Don at three contrasting sites. J. For. Sci. 2016;62(4):153-162. doi: 10.17221/106/2015-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Albaugh T., Alvarez J., Rubilar R., Fox T., Allen H., Stape J., Mardones O. (2015): Long-term Pinus radiata productivity gains from tillage, vegetation control, and fertilization. Forest Science, 61: 800-808. Go to original source...
    2. Albaugh T., Rubilar R., Alvarez J., Allen H. (2004): Radiata pine response to tillage, fertilization and weed control in Chile. Bosque, 25: 5-15. Go to original source...
    3. Albaugh T., Stape J., Fox T., Rubilar R., Allen H. (2012): Midrotation vegetation control and fertilization response in Pinus taeda and Pinus elliottii across the southeastern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 36: 44-53. Go to original source...
    4. Álvarez J., Allen H., Albaugh T., Stape J., Bullock B., Song C. (2013): Factors influencing the growth of radiata pine plantations in Chile. Forestry, 86: 13-26. Go to original source...
    5. Allen H., Dougherty P., Campbell R. (1990). Manipulation of water and nutrients; practice and opportunity in southern US pine forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 30: 437-453. Go to original source...
    6. Bennett J., Blevins L., Barker J., Blevins D., Prescott C. (2003). Increases in tree growth and nutrient supply still apparent 10 to 13 years following fertilization and vegetation control of salal-dominated cedar hemlock stands on Vancouver Island. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 1516-1524. Go to original source...
    7. Benson M., Myers B., Raison R. (1992): Dynamics of stem growth of Pinus radiata as affected by water and nitrogen supply. Forest Ecology and Management, 52: 117-137. Go to original source...
    8. Blevins L., Prescott C., Van Niejenhuis A. (2006): The roles of nitrogen and phosphorus in increasing productivity of western hemlock and western redcedar plantations on northern Vancouver Island. Forest Ecology and Management, 234: 116-122. Go to original source...
    9. Bradley R., Titus B., Preston C., Bennett J. (2000): Improvement of nutritional site quality 13 years after single application of fertiliser N and P on regenerating cedar-hemlock cutovers on northern Vancouver Island, BC. Plant and Soil, 223: 197-208. Go to original source...
    10. Carlyle J. (1995): Nutrient management in a Pinus radiata plantation after thinning: The effect of nitrogen fertilizer on soil nitrogen fluxes and tree growth. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 25: 1673-1683. Go to original source...
    11. Carlyle J. (1998): Relationships between nitrogen uptake, leaf area, water status and growth in an 11-year-old Pinus radiata plantation in response to thinning, thinning residue, and nitrogen fertiliser. Forest Ecology and Management, 108: 41-55. Go to original source...
    12. Carlyle J., Nambiar E. (2001): Relationships between net nitrogen mineralization, properties of the forest floor and mineral soil, and wood production in Pinus radiata plantations. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 31: 889-898. Go to original source...
    13. Côté L., Brown S., Paré D., Fyles J., Bauhus J. (2000): Dynamics of carbon and nitrogen mineralization in relation to stand type, stand age and soil texture in the boreal mixedwood. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32: 1079-1090. Go to original source...
    14. Cubbage F., Mac Donagh P., Júnior J., Rubilar R., Donoso P., Ferreira A., Hoeflich V., Olmos V., Ferreira G., Balmelli G. (2007): Timber investment returns for selected plantations and native forests in South America and the Southern United States. New Forests, 33: 237-255. Go to original source...
    15. Fife D.N., Nambiar E.K.S. (1995): Effect of nitrogen on growth and water relations of radiata pine families. Plant and Soil, 168-169: 279-285. Go to original source...
    16. Fife D.N., Nambiar E.K.S. (1997): Changes in the canopy and growth of Pinus radiata in response to nitrogen supply. Forest Ecology and Management, 93: 137-152. Go to original source...
    17. Fisher R., Garbett W. (1980): Response of semimature slash and loblolly pine plantations to fertilization with nitrogen and phosphorus. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 44: 850-854. Go to original source...
    18. Fox T., Allen H., Albaugh T., Rubilar R., Carlson C. (2006): Forest fertilization in southern pine plantations. Better Crops, 90: 12-15.
    19. Fox T., Allen H., Albaugh T., Rubilar R., Carlson C. (2007): Tree nutrition and forest fertilization of pine plantations in the southern United States. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 31: 5-11. Go to original source...
    20. Gent J., Allen H., Campbell R., Wells C. (1986): Magnitude, duration, and economic analysis of loblolly pine growth response following bedding and phosphorus fertilization. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 10: 124-128. Go to original source...
    21. Gower S.T., Gholz H.L., Nakane K., Baldwin V.C. (1994): Production and carbon allocation patterns of pine forests. In: Gholz H.L., Linder S., McMurtrie R.E. (eds): Environmental Constraints on The Structure and Productivity of Pine Forest Ecosystems: A Comparative Analysis. Ecological Bulletins, No. 43. Lund, Oikos Editorial Office: 115-135.
    22. Hopmans P., Collett N.C., Smith I.W., Elms S.R. (2008): Growth and nutrition of Pinus radiata in response to fertilizer applied after thinning and interaction with defoliation associated with Essigella californica. Forest Ecology and Management, 255: 2118-2128. Go to original source...
    23. Hunter I., Graham J., Prince J., Nicholson G. (1986): What site factors determine the 4-year basal area response of Pinus radiata to nitrogen fertilizer. New Zealand Journal of Forestry Science, 16: 30-40.
    24. Infor (2015): Chilean Statistical Yearbook of Forestry 2015. Santiago de Chile, Ministerio de Agricultura, Gobierno de Chile: 161.
    25. Jones J.B., Case V.W. (1990). Sampling, handling and analyzing plant tissue samples. In: Westerman R.L. (ed.): Soil Testing and Plant Analysis. 3rd Ed. Madison, Soil Science Society of America, Inc.: 389-428. Go to original source...
    26. Keay J., Turton A., Campbell N. (1968): Some effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilization of Pinus pinaster in Western Australia. Forest Science, 14: 408-417.
    27. Landsberg J., Sands P. (2010): Physiological Ecology of Forest Production: Principles, Processes and Models. San Diego,, Academic Press: 304.
    28. Linder S., Benson M., Myers B., Raison R. (1987): Canopy dynamics and growth of Pinus radiata.: I. Effects of irrigation and fertilization during a drought. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17: 1157-1165. Go to original source...
    29. Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., Wolfinger R.D., Schabenberger O. (2006): SAS for Mixed Models. 2nd Ed. Cary, SAS Institute Inc.: 814.
    30. Miller H. (1981): Forest fertilization: some guiding concepts. Forestry, 54: 157-167. Go to original source...
    31. Miller H., Cooper J. (1973): Changes in amount and distribution of stem growth in pole-stage corsican pine following application of nitrogen fertilizer. Forestry, 46: 157-190. Go to original source...
    32. Nilsson U., Allen H. (2003): Short-and long-term effects of site preparation, fertilization and vegetation control on growth and stand development of planted loblolly pine. Forest Ecology and Management, 175: 367-377. Go to original source...
    33. Richter D., Markewitz D., Heine P., Jin V., Raikes J., Tian K., Wells C. (2000): Legacies of agriculture and forest regrowth in the nitrogen of old-field soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 138: 233-248. Go to original source...
    34. Rivaie A.A., Tillman R.W. (2009): Growth response of secondrotation Pinus radiata on an orthic allophanic soil to P fertilizer and weed control. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 24: 11-24.
    35. Rojas J. (2005): Factors influencing responses of loblolly pine stands to fertilization. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Raleigh, North Carolina State University: 147.
    36. Rubilar R., Albaugh T., Allen H., Alvarez J., Fox T., Stape J. (2013): Foliage development and leaf area duration in Pinus radiata. Forest Ecology and Management, 304: 455-463. Go to original source...
    37. SAS (2009a): JMP® 8 User Guide. 2nd Ed. Cary, SAS Institute Inc.: 513.
    38. SAS (2009b): SAS/STAT® 9.2. User's Guide. 2nd Ed. Cary, SAS Institute Inc.: 7869.
    39. Smethurst P., Nambiar E. (1990): Distribution of carbon and nutrients and fluxes of mineral nitrogen after clear-felling a Pinus radiata plantation. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 20: 1490-1497. Go to original source...
    40. Snowdon P. (2002): Modeling Type 1 and Type 2 growth responses in plantations after application of fertilizer or other silvicultural treatments. Forest Ecology and Management, 163: 229-244. Go to original source...
    41. Snowdon P., Benson M. (1992): Effects of combinations of irrigation and fertilisation on the growth and above-ground biomass production of Pinus radiata. Forest Ecology and Management, 52: 87-116. Go to original source...
    42. Snowdon P., Waring H.D. (1984): Long-term nature of growth responses obtained to fertilizer and weed control applied at planting and their consequences for forest management. In: Grey D.C., Schonau A.P.G., Schutz C.J. (eds): Proceedings of the IUFRO Symposium on Site and Productivity of Fast Growing Plantations, Pretoria, Pietermaritzburg, Apr 30-May 11, 1984: 701-711.
    43. Turner J., Knott J.H., Lambert M. (1996): Fertilization of Pinus radiata plantations after thinning. I Productivity gains. Australian Forestry, 59: 7-21. Go to original source...
    44. Turner J., Lambert M.J. (1986): Nutrition and nutritional relationships of Pinus radiata. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 17: 325-350. Go to original source...
    45. Vose J., Allen H. (1988): Leaf area, stemwood growth, and nutrition relationships in loblolly pine. Forest Science, 34: 547-563. Go to original source...
    46. White J., Reddy K. (2000). Influence of phosphorus loading on organic nitrogen mineralization of Everglades soils. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64: 1525-1534. Go to original source...
    47. Will R., Markewitz D., Hendrick R., Meason D., Crocker T., Borders B. (2006): Nitrogen and phosphorus dynamics for 13-year-old loblolly pine stands receiving complete competition control and annual N fertilizer. Forest Ecology and Management, 227: 155-168. Go to original source...
    48. Woods P., Nambiar E., Smethurst P., (1992): Effect of annual weeds on water and nitrogen availability to Pinus radiata trees in a young plantation. Forest Ecology and Management, 48: 145-163. Go to original source...
    49. Zutter B., Miller J. (1998): Eleventh-year response of loblolly pine and competing vegetation to woody and herbaceous plant control on a Georgia flatwoods site. Southern Journal of Applied Forestry, 22: 88-95. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content