J. For. Sci., 2016, 62(1):41-46 | DOI: 10.17221/71/2015-JFS

Influence of agricultural crops adjacent to forest on woody species browsing: Is it advantageous to have a tasty neighbour?Original Paper

J. Kamler1, M. Homolka2
1 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic

Preference of biotopes and selection of food by wild herbivores are more complicated in a cultural landscape used for agriculture than in natural conditions. Agricultural management significantly affects the feeding as well as cover conditions of the environment and changes in quality and accessibility of food sources occur throughout the year. We studied the consumption of agricultural crops and impact on tree shoots by herbivores in a mosaic landscape. Large herbivores utilized the food supply on the lands outside the forest environment during winter and early spring and in summer. In summer the cereal grains were preferred by herbivores and accounted for a significant share in their diet. The intensity of shoot browsing differed between the localities and between the studied woody species but was not lower due to the presence of attractive crops near the forest. The utilization of food outside the forest may help the animals to survive the winter but the potential of this food for reducing tree browsing in the forest is low.

Keywords: browsing; diet selection; impact; large herbivores

Published: January 31, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kamler J, Homolka M. Influence of agricultural crops adjacent to forest on woody species browsing: Is it advantageous to have a tasty neighbour? J. For. Sci. 2016;62(1):41-46. doi: 10.17221/71/2015-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Augustine D.J., Decalesta D. (2003): Defining deer overabundance and threats to forest communities: From individual plants to landscape structure. Ecoscience, 10: 472-486. Go to original source...
  2. Abbas F., Morellet N., Hewison A.J.M., Merlet J., Cargnelutti B., Lourtet B., Angibault J.M., Daufresne T., Aulagnier S., Verheyden H. (2011): Landscape fragmentation generates spatial variation of diet composition and quality in a generalist herbivore. Oecologia, 167: 401-411. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  3. Berteaux D., Crete M., Huot J., Maltais J., Ouellet J.P. (1998): Food choice by white-tailed deer in relation to protein and energy content of the diet: a field experiment. Oecologia, 115: 84-92. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  4. Bleier N., Lehoczki R., Ujvary D., Szemethy L., Csanyi S. (2012): Relationships between wild ungulates density and crop damage in Hungary. Acta Theriologica, 57: 351-359. Go to original source...
  5. Brinkman T.J., Deperno C.S., Jenks J.A., Haroldson B.S., Osborn R.G. (2005): Movement of female white-tailed deer: Effects of climate and intensive row-crop agriculture. Journal of Wildlife Management, 69: 1099-1111. Go to original source...
  6. Christianson D.A., Creel S. (2007): A review of environmental factors affecting elk winter diets. Journal of Wildlife Management, 71: 164-176. Go to original source...
  7. Ford G. (1983): Home range in a patchy invironment: Optimal foraging predictions. American Zoologist, 23: 315-326. Go to original source...
  8. Gill R.M.A. (1992): A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 3. Impact on trees and forests. Forestry, 65: 363-388. Go to original source...
  9. Heuze P., Schnitzler A., Klein F. (2005): Consequences of increased deer browsing winter on silver fir and spruce regeneration in the Southern Vosges mountains: Implications for forest management. Annals of Forest Science, 62: 175-181. Go to original source...
  10. Hodder D.P., Rea R.V., Crowley S. (2013): Diet content and overlap of sympatric mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus), moose (Alces alces), and elk (Cervus elaphus) during a deep snow winter in north-central British Columbia, Canada. Canadian Wildlife Biology and Management, 2: 43-50.
  11. Homolka M., Heroldová M. (1990): Vegetation as the food supply for game in a forest near Hostěnice. Acta Scientiarum Naturalium Brno, 24: 1-40.
  12. Homolka M., Heroldová M. (1992): Similarity of the results of stomach and fecal contents analyses in studies of the ungulate diet. Folia Zoologica, 41: 193-208.
  13. Homolka M., Heroldová M. (2003): Impact of large herbivores on mountain forest stands in the Beskydy Mountains. Forest Ecology and Management, 181: 119-129. Go to original source...
  14. Jiang Z., Hudson R.J. (1994): Seasonal energy requirements of wapiti (Cervus elaphus) for maintenance and growth. Canadian Journal Animal Science, 74: 97-102. Go to original source...
  15. Johnson C.J., Parker K.L., Heard D.C. (2001): Foraging across a variable landscape: behavioral decisions made by woodland caribou at multiple spatial scales. Oecologia, 127: 590-602. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  16. Kamler J., Homolka M. (2005): Faecal nitrogen: a potential indicator of red and roe deer diet quality in forest habitats. Folia Zoologica, 54: 89-98.
  17. Kay S. (1993): Factors affecting severity of deer browsing damage within coppiced woodlands in the south of England. Biological Conservation, 63: 217-222. Go to original source...
  18. Matrai K., Szemethy L., Toth L., Kantona K., Szekely J. (2004): Resource use by red deer in lowland nonnative forests. Hungary Journal of Wildlife Management, 68: 879-888. Go to original source...
  19. Mautz W.W. (1978): Sledding on a bushy hillside: the fat cycle in deer. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 62: 88-90.
  20. McShea W.J., Schwede G. (1993): Variable acorn crops - responses of white-tailed deer and other mast consumers. Journal of Mammalogy, 74: 999-1006. Go to original source...
  21. Moen A.N. (1968): Energy exchange of white-tailed deer, Western Minnesota. Ecology, 49: 676-682. Go to original source...
  22. Osborn R.G., Jenks J.A. (1998): Assessing dietary quality of white-tailed deer using fecal indices: effects of supplemental feeding and area. Journal of Mammalogy, 79: 437-447. Go to original source...
  23. Palmer S.C.F., Truscott A.M. (2003): Seasonal habitat use and browsing by deer in Caledonian pinewoods. Forest Ecology and Management, 174: 149-166. Go to original source...
  24. Parker K.L., Gillingham M.P., Hanley T.A., Robbins C.T. (1996): Foraging efficiency: Energy expenditure versus energy gain in free-ranging black-tailed deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 74: 442-450. Go to original source...
  25. Putman R.J. (1986): Foraging by roe deer in agricultural areas and impact on arable crops. Journal of Applied Ecology, 23: 91-99. Go to original source...
  26. Roguet C., Dumont B., Prache S. (1998): Selection and use of feeding sites and feeding stations by herbivores: a review. Annales de Zootechnie, 47: 225-244. Go to original source...
  27. Rosenzweig M.L. (1981): A theory o habitat selection. Ecology, 62: 327-335. Go to original source...
  28. Suttie J.M., Goodall E.D., Pennie K., Kaya R.N.B. (1983): Winter food restriction and summer compensation in red deer stags (Cervus elaphus). British Journal of Nutrition, 50: 737-747. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  29. Szemethy L., Matrai K., Biro Z., Kantona K. (2003a): Seasonal home range shift of red deer in a forest-agriculture area in southern Hungary. Acta Theriologica, 48: 547-556. Go to original source...
  30. Szemethy L., Matrai K., Kantona K., Orosz S. (2003b): Seasonal home range shift of red deer hinds, Cervus elaphus: are there feeding reasons? Folia Zoologica, 52: 249-258.
  31. Thirgood S.J. (1995): The effects of sex season and habitat availability on patterns of habitat use by fallow deer (Dama dama). Journal of Zoology, 235: 645-659. Go to original source...
  32. Welch D., Staines B.W., Catt D.C., Scott D. (1990): Habitat use by red (Cervus elaphus) and roe (Capreolus capreolus) deerin a Scottish Sitka spruce plantation. Journal of Zoology, 221: 453-476. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.