J. For. Sci., 2016, 62(1):35-40 | DOI: 10.17221/99/2015-JFS

Needs of the local population related to development of forests for recreational purposes: example of south-eastern PolandOriginal Paper

T. Dudek
Faculty of Biology and Agriculture, University of Rzeszów, Rzeszów, Poland

Independent assessments of the local community's needs for recreational development of forests provide important information for forestry and forest administrations. The study was designed to identify the needs for recreational forest development expressed by residents of a selected European region in which forests constitute a dominating component of landscape and play an important role in the community's life. Additionally, the relationship between these preferences and the place of residence was examined. The author carried out the study in south-eastern Poland. The needs were identified by a survey conducted among 439 adults (≥ 18 years). There are statistically significant differences in the preferences related to recreational forest development depending on the place of residence: the larger the city, the greater the demand for forests adapted to recreational purposes. These are favoured as a destination for leisure by 15% of those living in rural areas, every fifth resident of small towns, 31% and 36% of those inhabiting medium-sized and large cities, respectively. The vast majority of the respondents, 62%, agree that forests designated for leisure should be provided with litter bins. A large group pointed out the need for trails designed for varied purposes - 52% of the respondents in total. The present findings suggest that it is necessary to intensify and diversify works aimed at recreational forest development. Some forests designated for recreation should be developed only discreetly, while those close to large cities should be provided with a wider range of amenities.

Keywords: forest recreation; forest use; Podkarpacie

Published: January 31, 2016  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dudek T. Needs of the local population related to development of forests for recreational purposes: example of south-eastern Poland. J. For. Sci. 2016;62(1):35-40. doi: 10.17221/99/2015-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Ballantyne M., Gudes O., Pickering C.M. (2014): Recreational trails are an important cause of fragmentation in endangered urban forests: A case-study from Australia. Landscape and Urban Planning, 130: 112-124. Go to original source...
  2. Bell S., Simpson M., Tyrväinen L., Sievänen T., Pröbstl U. (2009): European Forest Recreation and Tourism: A Handbook. London, Taylor & Francis: 237. Go to original source...
  3. De Meo I., Paletto A., Cantiani M.G. (2015): The attractiveness of forests: preferences and perceptions in a mountain community in Italy. Annals of Forest Research, 58: 145-156. Go to original source...
  4. Destan S., Bekirolu S. (2011): Evaluation of the territorial system of forest recreation by natural indicators: Belgrade forest example. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 6: 212-223.
  5. Dudek T. (2013): Ocena potencjału rekreacyjnego lasów w terenie o zróżnicowanej orografii na przykładzie Czarnorzecko-Strzyżowskiego Parku Krajobrazowego. Sylwan, 157: 775-779.
  6. Dudek T. (2014): Potencjał rekreacyjny Magurskiego Parku Narodowego a rzeczywista liczba zwiedzających. Sylwan, 158: 875-879.
  7. Dudek T., Szubart A. (2013): Koncepcja rekreacyjnego zagospodarowania terenów leśnych na przykładzie lasów podmiejskich Rzeszowa. Architektura Krajobrazu, 39: 110-119.
  8. Gołos P. (2013): Rekreacyjna funkcja lasów miejskich i podmiejskich Warszawy. Leśne Prace Badawcze, 74: 57-70.
  9. Hegetschweiler K.T., Rusterholz H.P., Baur B. (2007): Fire place preferences of forest visitors in northwestern Switzerland: Implications for the management of picnic sites. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6: 73-81. Go to original source...
  10. Janeczko E., Woźnicka M. (2009): Zagospodarowanie rekreacyjne lasów Warszawy w kontekście potrzeb i oczekiwań mieszkańców stolicy. Studia i Materiały CEPL, 23: 131-139.
  11. Kikulski J. (2008): Preferencje rekreacyjne i potrzeby zagospodarowania rekreacyjnego lasów nadleśnictw Iława i Dąbrowa (wyniki pierwszej części badań). Sylwan, 5: 60-71.
  12. Kikulski J. (2009): Model rekreacyjnego zagospodarowania lasów na terenach pojezierzy. Studia i Materiały CEPL, 23: 165-171.
  13. Łonkiewicz B., Głuch G. (1991): Wytyczne rekreacyjnego zagospodarowania lasów. Warszawa, Instytut Badawczy Leśnictwa: 70.
  14. Ma X.L., Ryan Ch., Bao J.G. (2009): Chinese national parks: Differences, resource use and tourism product portfolios. Tourism Management, 30: 21-30. Go to original source...
  15. Marzano M., Dandy N. (2012): Recreational Use of Forests and Disturbance of Wildlife. Edinburgh, Forestry Commission: 53.
  16. Młynarski W., Kaliszewski A. (2013): Stan i problemy zagospodarowania lasów w miastach województwa mazowieckiego. Leśne Prace Badawcze, 74: 315-321. Go to original source...
  17. Monz C.A., Cole D.N., Leung Y.F., Marion J.L. (2010): Sustaining visitor use in protected areas: Future opportunities in recreation ecology research based on the USA experience. Environmental Management, 45: 551-562. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  18. Moyle B. (2013): Managing outdoor recreation: case studies in the national park. Annals of Tourism Research, 41: 244-266. Go to original source...
  19. Obua J. (1997): Environmental impact of ecotourism in Kibale National Park, Uganda. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 5: 213-223. Go to original source...
  20. Park B.J., Tsunetsugu Y., Kasetani T., Morikawa T., Kagawa T., Miyazaki Y. (2009): Physiological effects of forest recreation in a young conifer forest in Hinokage Town, Japan. Silva Fennica, 43: 291-301. Go to original source...
  21. Sławski M., Sławska M. (2009): Las jako miejsce wypoczynku i rekreacji - analiza oczekiwań społecznych na przykładzie gminy Rogów. Studia i Materiały CEPL, 23: 140-150.
  22. Smailes P.J., Smith D.L. (2001): The growing recreational use of state forest lands in the Adelaide hills. Land Use Policy, 18: 137-152. Go to original source...
  23. Symmonds M.C., Hammitt W.E., Quisenberry V.L. (2000): Managing recreational trail environments for mountain bike user preferences. Environmental Management, 25: 549-564. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Šišák L. (2011): Forest visitors' opinions on the importance of forest operations, forest functions and sources of their financing. Journal of Forest Science, 57: 266-270. Go to original source...
  25. Ważyński B. (2011): Urządzanie i rekreacyjne zagospodarowanie lasu. Warszawa, Powszechne Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne: 264.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.