J. For. Sci., 2015, 61(9):406-415 | DOI: 10.17221/53/2015-JFS

Root system development in naturally regenerated Douglas-fir saplings as influenced by canopy closure and crowdingShort Communication

Ch. Kuehne1, Ch. Karrié1, D.I. Forrester1, U. Kohnle2, J. Bauhus1
1 School of Environment and Natural Resources, Freiburg University, Freiburg, Germany
2 Forest Research Institute Baden-Württemberg, Freiburg, Germany

Documented information on the growth dynamics and related silvicultural manipulation of naturally regenerat­ed Douglas-fir beneath a canopy shelter is scarce. We hypothesized that long regeneration phases creating dense cohorts of Douglas-fir advanced regeneration beneath a closed canopy of mature trees have a negative impact on the formation of a stable root system. We therefore studied the influence of shading and competition on root system characteristics of 28 naturally regenerated, ca 3 m tall Douglas-fir saplings growing either without immediate competitors or in dense neighbourhoods, and these situations were located either beneath a closed canopy or in large canopy openings. Both canopy shelter and neighbourhood crowding limited sapling growth and root system development. Saplings from groups located beneath the canopy, although significantly older than the saplings growing in the open, exhibited lower root-to-shoot ratios. When growing in the open, maximum width, total length, and total biomass of root systems was much lower for saplings with than without competitors. In contrast, reductions in root development owing to competition within the sapling cohort were less pronounced under closed canopy conditions. Our results suggest that irrespective of the level of canopy closure, high sapling densities in naturally regenerated young Douglas-fir stands should be reduced early to improve root system development and hence physical stability.

Keywords: natural regeneration; competition; shading; physical tree stability; carbon allocation; root-to-shoot ratio

Published: September 30, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kuehne C, Karrié C, Forrester DI, Kohnle U, Bauhus J. Root system development in naturally regenerated Douglas-fir saplings as influenced by canopy closure and crowding. J. For. Sci. 2015;61(9):406-415. doi: 10.17221/53/2015-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Albrecht A., Kohnle A., Hanewinkel M., Bauhus J. (2013): Storm damage of Douglas-fir unexpectedly high compared to Norway spruce. Annals of Forest Science, 70: 195-207. Go to original source...
    2. Bauhus J., Puettmann K.J., Kühne C. (2013): Is close-to-nature forest management in Europe compatible with managing forests as complex ecosystems? In: Messier C., Puettmann K., Coates K.D. (eds): Managing Forests as Complex Adaptive Systems. Building resilience to the challenge of global change. Oxon, Routledge: 187-213.
    3. Beaudet M., Messier C. (1998) Growth and morphological responses of yellow birch, sugar maple, and beech seedlings growing under a natural light gradient. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 28: 1007-1015. Go to original source...
    4. Briggs N., Kuehne C., Kohnle, U., Bauhus J. (2012): Root system response of naturally regenerated Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) after complete overstory removal. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 42: 1858-1864. Go to original source...
    5. Buermeyer K.R., Harrington C.A. (2002): Fate of overstory trees and patterns of regeneration 12 years after clearcutting with reserve trees in southwest Washington. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 17: 78-85. Go to original source...
    6. Carter R.E., Klinka K. (1992): Variation in shade tolerance of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and western red cedar in coastal British Columbia. Forest Ecology and Management 55: 87-105. Go to original source...
    7. Chan S.S., Radosevich S.R., Grotta A.T. (2003): Effects of contrasting light and soil moisture availability on the growth and biomass allocation of Douglas-fir and red alder. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 106-117. Go to original source...
    8. Chen H.Y.H. (1997): Interspecific responses of planted seedlings to light availability in interior British Columbia: survival, growth, allometric patterns, and specific leaf area. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27: 1383-1393. Go to original source...
    9. Churchill D.J. (2005): Factors Influencing Understory Douglas-fir Vigor in Multi-cohort Prairie Colonization Stands at Fort Lewis, Washington. [MSc Thesis.] Washington, University of Washington: 70.
    10. Cole E.C., Newton M. (1987): Fifth-year responses of Douglas-fir to crowding and nonconiferous competition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 17: 181-186. Go to original source...
    11. Curtis R.O. (1998): Selective cutting in Douglas-fir. Journal of Forestry, 96: 40-46. Go to original source...
    12. Devine W.D., Harrington T.B. (2008): Belowground competition influences growth of natural regeneration in thinned Douglas-fir stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 38, 3085-3097. Go to original source...
    13. Diaci J. (ed.) (2006): Nature-based Forestry in Central Europe: Alternatives to Industrial Forestry and Strict Preservation. Studia Forestalia Slovenica 126. Ljubljana, University of Ljubljana: 178.
    14. Drever C.R., Lertzman K.P. (2003): Effects of a wide gradient of retained tree structure on understory light in coastal Douglas-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 137-146. Go to original source...
    15. Drew A.P., Ferrell W.K. (1977): Morphological acclimation to light intensity in Douglas-fir seedlings. Canadian Joural of Botany, 55: 2033-2042. Go to original source...
    16. Eisenhauer D.R., Sonnemann S. (2009): Waldbaustrategien unter sich ändernden Umweltbedingungen - Leitbilder, Zielsystem und Waldentwicklungstypen. Waldökologie, Landschaftsforschung und Naturschutz, 8: 71-88.
    17. Emmingham W.H. (2002): Status of uneven-aged management in the Pacific Northwest, USA. Forestry, 75: 433-436. Go to original source...
    18. Emmingham B., Chan S., Mikowski D., Owston P., Bishaw B. (2000): Silviculture practices for riparian forests in the Oregon coast range. Research Contribution 24. Corvallis, Forest Research Laboratory, Oregon State University: 34.
    19. Fairbairn W.A., Neustein S.A. (1970): Study of response of certain coniferous species to light intensity. Forestry, 43: 57-71. Go to original source...
    20. Forrester D., Vanclay J., Forrester R. (2011): The balance between facilitation and competition in mixtures of Eucalyptus and Acacia changes as stands develop. Oecologia, 166: 265-272. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    21. Gardiner B.A., Stacey G.R., Belcher R.E., Wood C.J. (1997): Field and wind-tunnel assessment of the implications of respacing and thinning on tree stability. Forestry, 70: 33-252. Go to original source...
    22. Gauer J., Aldinger E. (2005): Waldökologische Naturräume Deutschlands. Braunschweig, Bundesforschungsinstitut für Ländliche Räume, Wald und Fischerei: 48.
    23. Gower S.T., Norman J.M. (1991): Rapid estimation of leaf area index in conifer and broad-leaf plantations. Ecology, 72: 1896-1900. Go to original source...
    24. Groth O. (1927): Die Wurzelbildung der Douglasie und ihr Einfluss auf die Strum- und Schneefestigkeit dieser Holzart. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 103: 186-205, 268-285.
    25. Gürth P. (1987): Zur Naturverjüngung der Douglasie im Südwest-Schwarzwald. Der Forst- und Holzwirt, 42: 59-63.
    26. Harrington T.B. (2006): Five-year growth responses of Douglas-fir, western hemlock, and western redcedar seedlings to manipulated levels of overstory and understory competition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 36: 2439-2453. Go to original source...
    27. Harrington T.B., Harrington C.A., DeBell D.S. (2009): Effects of planting spacing and site quality on 25-year growth and mortality relationships of Douglas-fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii var. menziesii). Forest Ecology and Management, 258: 18-25. Go to original source...
    28. Hegyi F. (1974): A simulation model for managing jack pine stands. In: Fries J. (ed.): Growth models for tree and stand simulation. Royal College of Forestry, Research Note 30: 74-90.
    29. Herman R., Lavender D. (1990): Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, Douglas-fir. In: Burns R., Honkala B. (eds): Silvics of North America. Vol. 1. Conifers. USDA Agricultural Handbook 654. Washington, DC, United States Department of Agriculture: 527-540.
    30. Kramer H., Smith J.H.G. (1985): Bestandesbegründung der Douglas-fir in Britisch-Kolumbien, Kanada. Forstarchiv, 56: 9-13.
    31. Kuehne C., Puettmann K.J. (2008): Natural regeneration in thinned Douglas-fir stands in western Oregon. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 27: 246-274. Go to original source...
    32. Kühne C., Bauhus J., Hörnig T., Oh S. (2011): Einfluss von Überschirmung, Dichtstand und Pflanzengröße auf die Wurzelentwicklung natürlich verjüngter Douglasien. Forstarchiv, 82: 184-194.
    33. Landesbetrieb Forst Baden-Württemberg (2014): Richtlinie landesweiter Waldentwicklungstypen. Stuttgart, Landesbetrieb Forst Baden-Württemberg: 118. Available at http://forstbw.de/fileadmin/forstbw_mediathek/forstbw_praxis/wet/ForstBW_Waldentwicklung_web.pdf
    34. Mailly D., Kimmins J.P. (1997): Growth of Pseudotsuga menziesii and Tsuga heterophylla seedlings along a light gradient: resource allocation and morphological acclimation. Canadian Journal of Botany, 75: 1424-1435. Go to original source...
    35. Maranto J.C., Ferguson D.E., Adams D.L. (2008): Response of Douglas-fir advance regeneration to overstory removal. Research Paper RMRS-RP-73. Fort Collins, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 17. Go to original source...
    36. Mason W.L., Edwards C., Hale S.E. (2004): Survival and early seedling growth of conifers with different shade tolerance in a Sitka spruce spacing trial and relationship to understorey light climate. Silva Fennica, 38: 357-370. Go to original source...
    37. Merkel E. (2009): Zur Ästigkeit von Douglasien unter Schirm. [Diploma Thesis.] Rottenburg University of Applied Forest Sciences: 55.
    38. Otto H.J. (1987): Skizze eines optimalen Douglasienanbaues in Nordwestdeutschland. Der Forst- und Holzwirt, 42: 515-522
    39. Petritan I.C., Lüpke v.B., Petritan A.M. (2010): Einfluss unterschiedlicher Hiebsformen auf das Wachstum junger Buchen und Douglasien aus Pflanzung. Forstarchiv, 81: 40-52.
    40. Petriþan I.C., von Lüpke B., Petriþan A.M. (2011): Effects of root trenching of overstorey Norway spruce (Picea abies) on growth and biomass of underplanted beech (Fagus sylvatica) and Douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesii) saplings. European Journal of Forest Research, 130: 813-828. Go to original source...
    41. Poorter H., Niklas K.J., Reich P.B., Oleksyn J., Poot P., Mommer L. (2012): Biomass allocation to leaves, stems and roots: meta-analyses of interspecific variation and environmental control. New Phytologist, 193: 30-50. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    42. R Development Core Team (2014): An introduction to R. Available at https://cran.r-project.org/doc/manuals/Rintro.pdf
    43. Reif A., Brucker U., Kratzer R., Schmiedinger A., Bauhus J. (2010): Waldbau und Baumartenwahl in Zeiten des Klimawandels aus Sicht des Naturschutzes. Bonn, Bundesamt für Naturschutz: 272
    44. Schülli L. (1984): Erfahrungen mit der Douglasie zwischen Oberrhein und Bodensee. Allgemeine Forstzeitung, 39: 436-437.
    45. Spellmann H., Caspari C.O., Michalewski R. (1984): Analyse von Schneeschäden in Kiefernbeständen unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Bestandesstruktur. Allgemeine Forstund Jagdzeitung, 155: 146-164.
    46. Talbert C., Marshall D. (2005): Plantation productivity in the Douglas-fir region under intensive silvicultural practices: Results from research and operations. Journal of Forestry, 103: 65-70. Go to original source...
    47. Tesch S.D., Mann J.W. (1991): Clearcut and Shelterwood Reproduction Methods for Regenerating Southwest Oregon Forests. Forest Research Lab Research Bulletin 72. Corvallis, Oregon State University: 45.
    48. Teuffel K.Frhr.v., Kastrup M. (1998): Die Douglasie in BadenWürttemberg. AFZ/Der Wald, 53: 283-287.
    49. Thünen-Institute (2014): Third National Forest Inventory - Results database. Available at: https://bwi.info/start.aspx
    50. Williams H., Messier C., Kneeshaw D.D. (1999): Effects of light availability and sapling size on the growth and crown morphology of understory Douglas-fir and lodgepole pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 29: 222-231. Go to original source...
    51. Wobst J., Becker G. (1997): Möglichkeiten zur Erweiterung des waldbaulichen Einflusses auf die Holzqualität der Douglasie. Forst und Holz, 52: 555-563.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content