J. For. Sci., 2015, 61(8):359-368 | DOI: 10.17221/16/2015-JFS

Forest certification as a tool to support sustainable development in forest managementOriginal Paper

A. Mikulková, M. Hájek, M. Štěpánková, M. Ševčík
Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The concept of sustainable development is currently known and used in many contexts across a wide range of industries. Nevertheless, specific approaches to achieving the strategy of sustainability can be found in the individual sectors. The beginnings of sustainable management in forestry go back to the mid-18th century. Currently, certification systems contribute to sustainable behaviour in forests. In the Czech Republic, this concerns in particular PEFC and FSC certification systems. Both these certification systems include two different processes, forest management certification and chain of custody certification, i.e. including the wood-processing companies, where only certified wood must strictly be used. This article aims to evaluate the importance of certification for sustainable development in forestry. Given the clear superiority of the PEFC system in the Czech Republic, this paper focuses on the potential benefits for PEFC certificate holders. To determine the benefits of PEFC certification for sustainable development, a questionnaire survey was chosen. Assessment of the benefits for sustainable development depends on the subjective assessment of certification holders. The results suggest that the beneficial effect on sustainable development in forest management is clear in the forest property area of over 500 ha.

Keywords: PEFC; FSC; social aspects; sustainabilty; benefits of the certification

Published: August 31, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Mikulková A, Hájek M, Štěpánková M, Ševčík M. Forest certification as a tool to support sustainable development in forest management. J. For. Sci. 2015;61(8):359-368. doi: 10.17221/16/2015-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bloomfield M.J. (2012): Is forest certification a hegemonic force? Journal of Environment & Development, 21: 391-413. Go to original source...
    2. Bowers J. (2005): Instrument choice for sustainable development: an application to the forestry sector. Forest Policy and Economics, 7: 97-107. Go to original source...
    3. Brundtland G.H. (1991): Naše společná budoucnost. Zpráva Světové komise pro životní prostředí a rozvoj. Praha, Academia: 297.
    4. Cashore B., Auld G.A., Newsom D. (2004): Governing Through Markets: Forest Certification and the Emergence of Non-state Authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. 327.
    5. Cashore B., Van Kooten G.C., Vertinsky I., Aulda G.A., Affolderbach J. (2005): Private or self-regulation? A comparative study of forest certification choices in Canada, the United States and Germany. Forest Policy and Economics, 7: 53-69. Go to original source...
    6. Chen J.A., Innes J.L. (2013): The implications of new forest tenure reforms and forestry property markets for sustainable forest management and forest certification in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 129: 206-215. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Chráska M. (2007): Metody pedagogického výzkumu. Praha, Grada: 55.
    8. Cubbage F., Diaz D., Yapura P.A., Dube F. (2010): Impacts of forest management certification in Argentina and Chile. Forest Policy and Economics, 12: 497-504. Go to original source...
    9. Dimitrov R.S. (2005): Hostage to norms: states, institutions and global forest politics. Global Environmental Politics, 5: 1-24. Go to original source...
    10. Ebner D., Baumgartner R. (2006): The Relationship between Sustainable Development and Corporate Social Responsibility. In: Corporate Responsibility Research Conference, Dublin, Sept 4-5, 2006: 1-17.
    11. FSC (2009): FSC Česká republika. Available at http://www.czechfsc.cz/o-fsc.html (accessed Feb 04, 2015).
    12. Georgiadis N.M.A., Cooper R.J. (2007): Development of a forest certification standard compatible with PEFC and FSC>s management requirements. A case study from Greece. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 80: 113-135. Go to original source...
    13. Glavič P., Lukman R. (2007): Review of sustainability terms and their definitions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15: 1875-1885. Go to original source...
    14. Gulbrandsen L.H. (2005): The effectiveness of non-state governance schemes: a comparative study of forest certification in Norway and Sweden. International Environmental Agreements, 5: 125-149. Go to original source...
    15. Hasenauer H. (2006): Sustainable Forest Management. Berlin, Heidelberg, Springer: 94. Go to original source...
    16. Johansson J.A., Lidestav G. (2011): Can voluntary standards regulate forestry? - Assessing the environmental impacts of forest certification in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 13: 191-198. Go to original source...
    17. Klein J. (2001): A Critique of Competitive Advantage. Available at http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/ejrot/cmsconference/2001/Papers/Strategy/Klein-ACritiqueofCompetitiveAdvantage.pdf (accessed Apr 24, 2014).
    18. Lele S.M. (1991): Sustainable development: a critical review. World Development, 19: 607-621. Go to original source...
    19. Maletz O.A., Tysiachniouk M. (2009): The effect of expertise on the quality of forest standards implementation: The case of FSC forest certification in Russia. Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 422-428. Go to original source...
    20. Overdevest C. (2010): Comparing forest certification schemes: the case of ratcheting standards in the forest sector. Socio-Economic Review, 8: 47-76. Go to original source...
    21. PEFC (2014): PEFC International. Available at http://www.pefc.cz/o-nas/pefc-international.html (accessed Feb 04, 2015).
    22. PEFC (2015): PEFC: Caring for Our Forests Globally. Available at http://pefc.org/about-pefc/who-we-are/missionvision (accessed Feb 04, 2015).
    23. Redclift M. (2005): Sustainable development (1987-2005): an oxymoron comes of age. Sustainable Development, 13: 212-227. Go to original source...
    24. Řeháková B. (1979): Statistické ovĕřování reprezentativity: testy dobré shody. Sociologický Časopis, 15: 615-629.
    25. Schaltegger S., Wagner M. (2006): Managing and measuring the business case for sustainability. In: Schaltegger S., Wagner M. (eds): Managing the Business Case for Sustainability. The Integration of Social, Environmental and Economic Performance. 1st Ed. Sheffield, Greenleaf Publishing Ltd: 4. Go to original source...
    26. Schlyter P., Stjernquist I., Bäckstrand K. (2009): Not seeing the forest for the trees? The environmental effectiveness of forest certification in Sweden. Forest Policy and Economics, 11: 375-382. Go to original source...
    27. Sverdrup-Thygeson A., Borg P., Bergsaker E. (2008): A comparison of biodiversity values in boreal forest regeneration areas before and after forest certification. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 23: 236-243. Go to original source...
    28. Van Kooten G.C., Nelson H.W.A, Vertinsky I. (2005): Certification of sustainable forest management practices: a global perspective on why countries certify. Forest Policy and Economics, 7: 857-867. Go to original source...
    29. Zázvorka P. (2007): Udržitelný rozvoj z hlediska historie. Available at http://www.casopisstavebnictvi.cz/clanek.php?detail=464 (accessed Mar 15, 2014).

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content