J. For. Sci., 2015, 61(5):189-192 | DOI: 10.17221/95/2014-JFS

Comparison of the bond strength of oak (Quercus L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) wood glued with different adhesives considering various hydrothermal exposuresOriginal Paper

P. Král, P. Klímek, D. Děcký
Department of Wood Science, Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

The investigation of the hydrothermal exposure effect on the glue-line strength is obvious when outdoor application of wood products is in option. In our research the bonding quality of oak (Quercus L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) wood was tested in different conditions according to EN 205. After each exposure the lap joint test specified the shear strength of wood bonded with PVAC and PU adhesive. In our research different behaviour concerning both types of adhesives and selected wood species was observed. The most significant decrease (-80%) of the shear strength was found when the PVAC was used to bond oak wood. Therefore the PVAC adhesive is most likely less suitable for the bonding of the block board in outdoor conditions. On the contrary, the best results in the same conditions were obtained by the oak when the polyurethane adhesive was used. It indicates that the PU adhesive is more suitable for the bonding of oak wood. Considering results of beech wood, there were not found this interaction.

Keywords: adhesion of wood; hydrothermal exposure; oak; beech

Published: May 31, 2015  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Král P, Klímek P, Děcký D. Comparison of the bond strength of oak (Quercus L.) and beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) wood glued with different adhesives considering various hydrothermal exposures. J. For. Sci. 2015;61(5):189-192. doi: 10.17221/95/2014-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aicher S., Ohnesorge D. (2011): Shear strength of glued laminated timber made from european beech timber. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 69: 143-154 Go to original source...
  2. Brandmair A., Jans N., Clauß S., Haß P., Niemz P. (2012): Verklebung von Laubhölzern mit 1K-PUR-Klebstoffen für den Holzbau. Bazphysik, 34: 210-216. Go to original source...
  3. Clauß S., Gabriel J., Niemz P. (2011): Improving the thermal stability of one-component polyurethane adhesives by adding filler material. Wood Science and Technology, 45: 383-388. Go to original source...
  4. Custódio J., Broughton J., Cruz H. (2009): A review of factors influencing the durability of structural bonded timber joints. International Journal of Adhesion and Adhesives, 29: 173-185. Go to original source...
  5. Dilik T., Kurto A., Hiziroglu S. (2007): Effect of adhesive types on some of the properties of laminated window profiles. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 189: 320-324. Go to original source...
  6. Follrich J., Vay O., Veigel S., Muller U. (2010): Bond strength of end-grain joints and its dependence on surface roughness and adhesive spread. Journal of Wood Science, 56: 429-434. Go to original source...
  7. Frihart CH.R. (2009): Adhesive groups and how they relate to the durability of bonded wood. Journal of Adhesion Science and Technology, 23: 601-617. Go to original source...
  8. Hass P., Wittel F.K., Miller M., Herrmann H.S., Niemz P. (2012): Adhesive penetration in beech wood: experiments. Wood Science and Technology, 46: 243-256. Go to original source...
  9. Kläusler O., Hass P., Amen C., Schlegel S., Niemz P. (2014): Improvement of tensile shear strength and wood failure percentage of 1C PUR bonded wooden joints at wet stage by means of DMF priming. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 72: 343-354. Go to original source...
  10. Konnerth J., Gindl W., Harm M. (2006): Comparing dry bond strength of spruce and beech wood glued with different adhesives by means of scarf- and lap joint testing method. Holz als Roh- und Werkstoff, 4: 269-271. Go to original source...
  11. Král P., Klímek P., Mishra P. K. (2014): Bonding strength of thermally treated spruce (Picea abies) and oak wood. Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, 62: 539-42. Go to original source...
  12. Mendoza M., Hass P., Wittel F.K., Niemz P., Herrmann H.J. (2012): Adhesive penetration of hardwood: a generic penetration model. Wood Science and Technology, 46: 529-549. Go to original source...
  13. Minelga D., Ukvalbergienė K., Baltrušaitis A., Balčiūnas G. (2013): Adhesion properties between polyvinyl acetate dispersion and ammonia modified oak wood. Materials Science, 19: 1-5. Go to original source...
  14. Plötze M., Niemz P. (2010): Porosity and pore size distribution of different wood types as determined by mercury intrusion porosimetry. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products, 69: 649-657. Go to original source...
  15. Schmidt M. (2010): Glueing european hardwoods for load bearing timber structures. In: PTF BPI 2010, Kuchl, Oct 7, 2010, 38-42.
  16. Uysal B., Özçifçi A. (2006): Bond strength and durabilty behavior of polyurethane-based Desmodur-VTKA adhesives used for building materials after being exposed to water-resistance test. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 100: 3943-3947. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.