J. For. Sci., 2014, 60(12):526-533 | DOI: 10.17221/89/2014-JFS

Impact of forest biomass for energy harvesting on soil compaction - Irish case studyOriginal Paper

J. Pohořalý1, R. Klvač1, T. Kent2, M. Kleibl1, E. Coates2, B. Horgan2
1 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology,Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Waterford Institute of Technology, Waterford, Ireland

An assessment of soil compaction caused by machinery used in stump and/or logging residue extraction for energy on soils typical of Ireland. We determined unaffected soil conditions and to find the compaction grade after timber harvesting and bundling activities, and to compare those results with stands where timber harvesting was followed by stump extraction for energy. The investigation was carried out in Ireland on three different locations which had a slightly different proportion of stones in their soils. Two of the soils were purely mineral soils, and the third was a mineral soil affected by anthropogenic activities. To ensure comparable results as much as possible, the moisture content of the soil on wet basis was investigated. Each location was purposely treated. Therefore, on each location plots were identified as follows: plots unaffected by operation (reference area), plots after timber harvesting, plots after timber harvesting and bundling operation, and plots after timber harvesting and stump extraction operation. According to the experimental design 40 repetitions on each of the three different treatments were set. The results showed that the compaction of soil occurred on plots after timber harvesting, but there was not a significant difference between compaction grades with and without logging residue bundling operation. However, once the site was extracted of stumps, the soil became too loose and no significant difference was found compared to unaffected soil.

Keywords: mineral soil; moisture content; penetration resistance; soil compaction; stump extraction

Published: December 31, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Pohořalý J, Klvač R, Kent T, Kleibl M, Coates E, Horgan B. Impact of forest biomass for energy harvesting on soil compaction - Irish case study. J. For. Sci. 2014;60(12):526-533. doi: 10.17221/89/2014-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Ampoorter E., van Nevel L., de Vos B., Hermy M., Verheyen K. (2010): Assessing the effects of initial soil characteristics, machine mass and traffic intensity on forest soil compaction. Forest Ecology and Management, 260: 1664-1676. Go to original source...
    2. Anonymous (2006): IUSS Working Group WRB. World Reference Base for Soil Resources 2006. 2nd Edition. World Soil Resources Report 103. Rome, FAO: 145.
    3. Athanassiadis D., Lindroos O., Nordfjell T. (2011): Pine and spruce stump harvesting productivity and costs using a Pallari KH 160 stump-lifting tool. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 26: 437-445. Go to original source...
    4. Berch S.M., Curran M., Dymond C., Hannam K., Murray M., Tedder S., Titus B., Todd M. (2012): Criteria and guidance considerations for sustainable tree stump harvesting in British Columbia. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 27: 709-723. Go to original source...
    5. Curzon M.T., D'Amato A.W., Palik B.J. (2014): Harvest residue removal and soil compaction impact forest productivity and recovery: Potential implications for bioenergy harvests. Forest Ecology and Management, 329: 99-107. Go to original source...
    6. Dexter A.R. (2004): Soil physical quality: Part I. Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma, 120: 201-214. Go to original source...
    7. Ezzati S., Najafi A., Rab M.A., Zenner E.K. (2012): Recovery of soil bulk density, porosity and rutting from ground skidding over a 20-year period after timber harvesting in Iran. Silva Fennica, 46: 521-538. Go to original source...
    8. Gebauer R. (2005): Porovnání struktury orgánu smrku ztepilého (Picea abies/L./Karsten) (zejména kořenových systémů) za různých abiotických a biotických podmínek. [Comparison of Norway spruce (Picea abies /L./ Karsten) organs structure (especially root systems) in different abiotic and biotic conditions.] [PhD Thesis.] Brno, Mendelova univerzita v Brně: 122.
    9. Głab T., Gondek K. (2014): The influence of soil compaction and N fertilization on physico-chemical properties of Mollic Fluvisol soil under red clover/grass mixture. Geoderma, 226-227: 204-212. Go to original source...
    10. Greacen E.L. (1986): Root response to soil mechanical properties. Trans International Congress Society of Soil Science, 5: 20-47.
    11. Jourgholami M., Majnounian B., Abari M.E. (2014): Effects of tree-length timber skidding on soil compaction in the skid trail in Hyrcanian forests. Forest Systems, 23: 288-293. Go to original source...
    12. Kleibl M., Klva R., Lombardini C., Pohoalý J., Spinelli R. (2014): Soil compaction and recovery after mechanized final felling of Italian coastal pine plantations. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 35: 63-71.
    13. Kleibl M., Klva R., Pohoalý J. (2012): Strip road compaction caused by logging technology (measured by penetrologger and deflectometer). In: Pentek T., Poršinsky T., 532
    14. J. FOR. SCI., 60, 2014 (12): 526-533 Špori M. (eds): Proceedings of 45th International Symposium on Forestry Mechanization. Forest Engineering: Concern, Knowledge and Accountability in Today's Environment. Zagreb, 8-9 October 2012. Zagreb, Forestry Faculty of Zagreb University: 1-9.
    15. Klva R., Vrána P., Jiroušek R. (2010): Possibilities of using the portable falling weight deflectometer to measure the bearing capacity and compaction of forest soils. Journal of Forest Science, 56: 130-136. Go to original source...
    16. Matys M., Ťavoda O., Cuninka M. (1990): Poľné skúšky zemín. [Field Tests of Soils.] Bratislava, ALFA: 301.
    17. Motavalli P.P., Anderson S.H., Pengthamkeerati P., Gantzer C.J. (2003): Use of soil penetrometers to detect the effects of compaction and organic amendments in claypan soils. Soil and Tillage Reserch, 74: 103-114. Go to original source...
    18. Motulsky H.J., Brown R.E. (2006): Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression - a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinformatics, 7: 123. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    19. Motulsky H.J. (2007): GraphPad Prism. Version 5.0. San Diego, GraphPad Software. Inc.: 294.
    20. Neruda J., Kadlec J., Ulrich R., Cudzik A. (2010): Soil carbon dioxide concentration and efflux changes in ruts after heavy machine passes. [CD-ROM]. FORMEC: 1-8.
    21. Press W.H., Teukolsky S.A., Vettering W.T., Flannery B.P. (1988): Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing. New York: Cambridge University Press: 994.
    22. Rejšek K., Buchar J., Vaníek I., Hromádko L., Vranová V., Marosz K. (2011): Results of dynamic penetration test an indicator of the compaction of surface soil horizons by forestry machinery. Journal of Forest Science, 57: 439-450. Go to original source...
    23. Saarinen V.M. (2006): The effects of slash and stump removal on productivity and quality of forest regeneration operations - preliminary results. Biomass and Bioenergy, 30: 349-356. Go to original source...
    24. Schäffer J. (2005): Bodenverformung und Wurzelraum. In: von Teuffel et al. (eds): Waldumbau für eine zukunftsorientierte Waldwirtschaft. Berlin, Springer: 345-361.
    25. SOP Number: METH 001.00. Standard Operating Procedure, Soil Water Content Determination, Sacramento, California Department of Pesticide Regulation: 4.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content