J. For. Sci., 2014, 60(10):406-416 | DOI: 10.17221/35/2014-JFS

An influence of different thinning methods on qualitative wood production of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) on two eutrophic sites in the Western CarpathiansOriginal Paper

I. Štefančík1,2, M. Bošeľa1,3
1 National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovak Republic
2 Department of Silviculture, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
3 Department of Forest Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The issues related to appropriate management methods of beech stands have been considered as a crucial topic from the past up to now. Although the positive effect of tending on wood quality in beech stands is a generally known fact, the results from long-term experiments are very scarce. We investigated the qualitative production of beech forests, treated by different thinning methods during a long-term period of 53 years. For this purpose two long-term (lasting 53 years with a measurement interval of 5 years) series of research plots were used. On each plot three different thinning methods were applied: i) heavy thinning from below (C-grade according to the German forestry research institutes in 1902), ii) free crown thinning (original thinning method developed in Slovak Republic), and iii) control plot (without treatments). As much as 6,316 trees at the beginning of research and 864 trees at the last measurement were assessed and measured. Chi-squared test was used to quantify the effect of different thinning methods on qualitative wood production. The results showed the highest proportion of target trees, as well as the best average quality of the stem and crown on plots where the free crown thinning was applied followed by the plots with heavy thinning from below and control ones. We found that the proportion (expressed out of the total growing stock of crop trees) of veneers was the highest on plots managed by the free crown thinning (30 and 36%) and the lowest on control (unthinned) plots (10 and 19%). It is concluded that no significant differences between the two studied sites were found, which demonstrates a similar effect of the investigated thinning methods at different places across the region of Slovak Republic, but with similar site conditions. On the other hand, the most appropriate and hence successful thinning method was proved to be the free crown thinning, which is also recommended for management of beech forests from the aspect of silvicultural wood quality.

Keywords: European beech; tending; qualitative production; crop trees

Published: October 31, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Štefančík I, Bošeľa M. An influence of different thinning methods on qualitative wood production of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) on two eutrophic sites in the Western Carpathians. J. For. Sci. 2014;60(10):406-416. doi: 10.17221/35/2014-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Assmann E. (1968): Náuka o výnose lesa. [Science on Yield Production.] Bratislava, Príroda: 488.
  2. Badoux E. (1939): De l´influence de divers modes et degres d´eclaircie dans les hetraies pures. Mitteilungen der Schweizerischen Anstalt für das forstliche Versuchswesen, 21: 59-146.
  3. Dhôte J.F. (1997): Effets des sclaircies sur le diametre dominant dans des futaies regulieres de hetre ou de chene sessile. Revue Forestiere Francaise, 49: 557-578. Go to original source...
  4. Ferrand J.C. (1982): Variabilité en forêt des contraintes de croissance du hêtre (Fagus sylvatica L.). Annals of Forest Science, 39: 187-218. Go to original source...
  5. Hein S., Lenk E., Klädtke J., Kohnle U. (2007): Effect of crop tree selective thinning on beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 178: 8-20.
  6. Hladík M., Sedmák R. (1996): Vplyv výchovných zásahov na štruktúru a množstvo produkcie bukového porastu (na príklade trvalej výskumnej plochy Poruba). [Influence of thinning on structure and production of beech stand (on permanent research plot Poruba).] Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen, 38: 127-149.
  7. Kató F., Mülder D. (1983): Qualitative Gruppendurchforstung der Buche. Allgemeine Forst- und Jagdzeitung, 154: 139-145.
  8. Keller R., Le Tacon F., Timbal J. (1976): La densité du bois de hêtre dans le nord-est de la France. Influence des caractéristiques du milieu et du type de sylviculture. Annals of Forest Science, 33: 1-17. Go to original source...
  9. Kennel R. (1972): Die Buchendurchforstungsversuche in Bayern von 1870 bis 1970. Forstliche Forschungsberichte München, 7: 264.
  10. Korpe Š. (1988): Dynamika rastu a vývoja bukových porastov vo fáze mladiny až žrďoviny vplyvom pestovnej techniky. [Dynamics of growth and development of beech stands in the stage of young growth to pole stage due to silvicultural technique.] Acta Facultatis Forestalis Zvolen, 30: 9-38.
  11. Le Goff N., Ottorini J.M. (1993): Thinning and climate effects on growth of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in experimental stands. Forest Ecology and Management, 62: 1-14. Go to original source...
  12. Mlinšek D., Bakker A. (1990): Jugendwachstum und Holzqualität bei der Buche. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 109: 242-248. Go to original source...
  13. Pardé J. (1982): De 1882 á 1976/80 les places d´expérience de sylviculture du hêtre en forêt domaniale de Haye. Revue Forestiere Francaise, 33: 41-64. Go to original source...
  14. Polge H. (1981): Influence des éclaircies sur les contraintes de croissance du hêtre. Annals of Forest Science, 38: 407-423. Go to original source...
  15. Poljanec A., Kadunc A. (2013): Quality and timber value of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees in the Karavanke region. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 34: 151-165.
  16. Pretzsch H. (2005): Stand density and growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.): evidence from long-term experimental plots. European Journal of Forest Research, 124: 193-205. Go to original source...
  17. Réh J. (1968): Štúdium štruktúry bukovej húštiny. [A study in the structure of beech thicket.] Lesnický časopis, 14: 651-671.
  18. Réh J. (1994): Vplyv systematickej a oneskorenej výchovy v bukových porastoch na niektoré biometrické a morfologické znaky porastu a budúcich rubných stromov. [The influence of systematic and delayed tending in beech stands on some biometrical and morphological traits of stands and future crop trees.] Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 40: 409-419.
  19. Šebík L. (1970): Kvalita a vplyv prvých úrovňových prebierok na kvalitu predrubných bukových porastov. [The state of quality and influence of first crown thinnings upon the quality of premature beech stands.] Zborník vedeckých prác LF VŠLD vo Zvolene, 12: 31-50.
  20. Šebík L. (1971): Vplyv miernej podúrovňovej a akosťovej úrovňovej prebierky na štruktúru a produkciu predrubných bukových porastov. [Influence of moderate low thinning and quality crown thinning upon structure and production of beech stands.] Zborník vedeckých prác LF VŠLD vo Zvolene, 13: 63-91.
  21. Šebík L., Polák L. (1990): Náuka o produkcii dreva. [Science on Yield Production.] Bratislava, Príroda: 322.
  22. Štefaník I. (2013a): Effect of delayed tending on development of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) pole stage stand. Folia Oecologica, 40: 272-281.
  23. Štefaník I. (2013b): Vplyv dlhodobej rozdielnej výchovy na vývoj kvantitatívnej produkcie bukovej žŕdkoviny v oblasti stredného Slovenska. [Effect of long-term tending by dofferent thinning methods on quantitative development of small pole-stage beech stand in central Slovakia]. Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 58: 307-313.
  24. Štefaník I. (2014): Dopad výchovy na kvantitatívnu produkciu bukovej (Fagus sylvatica L.) žŕdkoviny v oblasti Vihorlatských vrchov. [Effect of tending on quantitative production of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) pole stage stand in Vihorlat Mts. Region.] Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 59: in press.
  25. Štefaník L. (1974): Prebierky bukových žrďovín. [Thinnings in Beech Pole Stage Stands.] Bratislava, Príroda: 141.
  26. Štefaník L. (1975): Pestovanie akostnej produkcie v bukových porastoch. [Growing quality production in beech stands.] Lesnictví, 21: 749-766.
  27. Štefaník L. (1976): Hromadná kvalita bukového porastu a jej zmeny vplyvom prirodzeného vývoja a prebierky. [Mass quality of a beech stand and its changes by natural development and thinnings.] Lesnícky časopis, 22: 141-157.
  28. Štefaník L. (1984): Freie Hochdurchforstung in ungepflegten Buchenstangenhölzern. Allgemeine Forstzeitung, 95: 106-110.
  29. Štefaník L., Leontovy R. (1966): O nekróze kôry - miazgotoku buka na východnom Slovensku. [About beech bark necrosis expanded on East part of Slovakia.] Lesnícky časopis, 12: 521-532.
  30. Utschig H., Küsters E. (2003): Growth reactions of common beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) related to thinning - 130 years observation of the thinning experiment Elmstein 20. Forstwissenschaftliches Centralblatt, 122: 389-409. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.