J. For. Sci., 2014, 60(3):96-108 | DOI: 10.17221/77/2013-JFS

Phenotype features in juvenile populations of Picea abies and their growthOriginal Paper

K. Matějka1, J. Leugner2, V. Krpeš3
1 IDS, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Forestry and Game Management Research Institute, Jíloviště-Strnady (Prague), Opočno Research Station, Opočno, Czech Republic
3 Faculty of Science, University of Ostrava, Ostrava, Czech Republic

The young populations of Norway spruce (Picea abies) can be evaluated in terms of both variability in the quantitative characteristics and share of different phenotypes according to the needle types. A set of two-years-old seedlings produced in the nursery and several populations of natural regeneration in the Krkonoše Mts. and the Krušné hory Mts. were evaluated using the needle anatomy, size and colour. The tree height growth was measured simultaneously. The growth was related to some needle features. Four basic anatomical types of needles were distinguished in the mountain Norway spruce seedlings: flat needles, intermediate needles, inversion type and sclerotized needles. The growth of natural regeneration populations is mainly correlated with the needle width and the length/width ratio. The population variability according to growth can be related to the variability of some phenotype characteristics. This relationship differs in natural regeneration and planting.

Keywords: anatomy; height growth; needle types; population variability; seedlings

Published: March 31, 2014  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Matějka K, Leugner J, Krpeš V. Phenotype features in juvenile populations of Picea abies and their growth. J. For. Sci. 2014;60(3):96-108. doi: 10.17221/77/2013-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Blujdea V.N.B., Pilli R., Dutca I., Ciuvat L., Abrudan I.V. (2012): Allometric biomass equations for young broadleaved trees in plantations in Romania. Forest Ecology and Management, 264: 172-184. Go to original source...
  2. Cudlín P., Novotný R., Chmelíková E. (1999): Recognition of stages of montane Norway spruce response to multiple stress impact using crown and branch structure transformation analysis. Phyton, 39: 149-153.
  3. Cudlín P., Novotný R., Moravec I., Chmelíková E. (2001): Retrospective evaluation of the response of montane forest ecosystems to multiple stress. Ekológia (Bratislava), 20: 108-124.
  4. Danusevicius D., Lindgren D. (2002): Efficiency of selection based on phenotype, clone and progeny testing in long-term breeding. Silvae Genetica, 51: 19-26.
  5. Fanta J. (1974): Morphologische Variabilität der Fichte und Grundzüge der genetischen Rekonstruction der Gebirgsfichtenwälder im Krkonoše Nationalpark (ČSSR). Archiv für Naturschutz und Landschaftsforschung, 14: 179-200.
  6. Fanta J. (1976): Morfologická proměnlivost původních populací smrku v Krkonoších. [Morphological variability of autochthonous populations of Norway spruce in the Krkonoše Mountains (ČSSR).] Lesnictví, 22: 415-434.
  7. Boháčová L., Buriánek V., Fabiánek P., Hejdová J., Kapitola P., Lachmanová Z., Lomský B., Novotný R., Šrámek V., Uhlířová H. (2004): Monitoring zdravotního stavu lesa v České republice. Ročenka programu Forest Focus - Data 2004. [Forest Condition Monitoring in the Czech Republic. Annual Report Forest Focus - Data 2004.] Jíloviště-Strnady, VÚLHM: 431.
  8. Hasenauer H. (ed.) (2006): Sustainable Forest Management. Growth Models for Europe. Berlin, Springer: 398. Go to original source...
  9. Hill T., Lewicki P. (2007): STATISTICS: Methods and Applications. Available at http://www.statsoft.com/textbook/
  10. Ivanek O., Matějka K., Novotný P. (2009): Genetická struktura dvou částí porostu smrku ztepilého při horní hranici lesa na území KRNAP. [Genetic structure of two parts of Norway spruce stand near the alpine forest limit in the Krkonoše National Park.] Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 54: 300-306.
  11. Jurásek A., Leugner J., Martincová J. (2009): Effect of initial height of seedlings on the growth of planting material of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) in mountain conditions. Journal of Forest Science, 55: 112-118. Go to original source...
  12. Kindlmann P., Matějka K., Doležal P. (2012): Lesy Šumavy, lýkožrout a ochrana přírody. [Forests of the Šumava Mts., Bark Beetle, and Nature Conservation.] Praha, Karolinum: 326.
  13. MacArthur R.H., Wilson E.O. (1967): The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, Princeton University Press: 224.
  14. Matějka K. (2009): Nápověda k programu PlotOA. Plotting of ordination diagrams and cartograms. Available at http://www.infodatasys.cz/software/hlp_PlotOA/plotoa.htm
  15. Matějka K. (2012): Zpráva spoluřešitele projektu QI112A170 za rok 2012. Možnosti cíleného pěstování a využití geneticky hodnotných částí populací sadebního materiálu smrku ztepilého s klimaxovou strategií růstu pro horské oblasti. [The associate's final report on the project QI112A170, year 2012. Options for cultivation and use of genetically valuable part of the Norway spruce population with the climax growth strategy for mountain areas.] Available at http://www.infodatasys.cz/proj005/QI112A170_results2012.pdf
  16. Matějka K., Leugner J. (2013): Growth of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karsten) from artificial and natural regeneration in the Krkonoše Mts. and air temperature variability. Journal of Forest Science, 59: 150-158. Go to original source...
  17. Pianka E.R. (1970): On r- and K-selection. American Naturalist, 104: 592-597. Go to original source...
  18. Popov P.P. (2013): Structure and differentiation of spruce populations in the Komi Republic. Russian Journal of Ecology, 44: 193-198. Go to original source...
  19. Pretzsch H. (2009): Forest Dynamics, Growth and Yield. Berlin, Springer: 664. Go to original source...
  20. Pretzsch H., Dauber E., Biber P. (2013): Species-specific and ontogeny-related stem allometry of European forest trees: evidence from extensive stem analyses. Forest Science, 59: 290-302. Go to original source...
  21. Reznick D., Bryant M.J., Bashey F. (2002): r- and Kselection revisited: the role of population regulation in life-history evolution. Ecology, 83: 1509-1520. Go to original source...
  22. Samek V. (1964): Metodika výzkumu morfologické proměnlivosti smrku z hlediska fytogeografického. [Research methodology of morphological variability of spruce - phytogeography.] Zprávy lesnického výzkumu, 10: 18-25.
  23. Slodičák M., Lomský B. (2008): Vývoj poškození lesních porostů v Krušných horách. [Development of the damage of forest stands in the Krušné hory Mts.] In: Slodičák M. et al. (eds): Lesnické hospodaření v Krušných horách. Hradec Králové, Lesy České republiky: 13-28.
  24. Schmidt-Vogt H. (1977): Die Fichte. Ein Handbuch in zwei Bänden. Hamburg, Berlin, Verlag Paul Parey: 647.
  25. Šrámek V., Hadaš P., Lachmanová Z., Fadrhonsová V., Vortelová L., Lomský B., Kulhavý J. (2008): Imisní zatížení Krušných hor. [Air pollution in the Krušné hory Mts.] In: Slodičák M. et al. (eds): Lesnické hospodaření v Krušných horách. Hradec Králové, Lesy České republiky: 45-70.
  26. Tollefsrud M.M., Kissling R., Gugerli F., Johnsen O., Skroppa T., Cheddadi R., van der Knaap W.O., Latalowa M., Terhürne-Berson R., Litt T., Geburek T., Brochmann C., Sperise C. (2008): Genetic consequences of glacial survival and postglacial colonization in Norway spruce: combined analysis of mitochondrial DNA and fossil pollen. Molecular Ecology, 17: 4134-4150. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  27. Viewegh J., Kusbach A., Mikeska M. (2003): Czech forest ecosystem classification. Journal of Forest Science, 49: 85-93. Go to original source...
  28. Ward M. H. (2005): Age-related Trends in Red Spruce Needle Anatomy and Their Relationship to Declining Productivity. [Ph.D. Thesis.] Orono, University of Maine: 110.
  29. Wehenkel C., Corral-Rivas J.J., Castellanos-Bocaz H.A. (2010): Is there selection by species diversity in Picea abies L.? Plant Ecology, 208: 47-54. Go to original source...

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.