J. For. Sci., 2013, 59(12):487-492 | DOI: 10.17221/44/2013-JFS

Analytical hierarchy process to choose the best earthwork machine in northern forests of IranOriginal Paper

A. Parsakhoo1, S.A. Hosseini2
1 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Forest Sciences, Gorgan Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Gorgan, Iran
2 Department of Forestry, Faculty of Natural Resources, Sari Agricultural Sciences and Natural Resources University, Sari, Iran

This study attempts to use the analytical hierarchy process to choose the most appropriate earthwork machine for slope classes of 30-50% and 50-70%. Required data were collected by pairwise comparison as questionnaires filled by experts of forest engineering. Results showed that cross-sections and grade line (Technical criteria), soil excavation and displacement (Environmental criteria), production rate and multi-application (Operational criteria), production cost (Economic criteria) with the respective weights of 0.345, 0.345, 0.136, 0.058, 0.058 and 0.058 were the most important criteria for choosing the earthwork machines in the slope class of 30-50%. These coefficients for the slope class of 50-70% were 0.329, 0.329, 0.174, 0.056, 0.056 and 0.056, respectively. Overall priority of bulldozer in slope classes of 30-50% and 50-70% was 0.51 and 0.48, respectively. Therefore, in slope class of 30-50% bulldozer and in slope class of 50-70% hydraulic excavator must be selected for earthwork operation.

Keywords: best selection; earthwork machine; environmental criteria; analytical hierarchy process; northern forests

Published: December 31, 2013  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Parsakhoo A, Hosseini SA. Analytical hierarchy process to choose the best earthwork machine in northern forests of Iran. J. For. Sci. 2013;59(12):487-492. doi: 10.17221/44/2013-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Acaroglu O., Ergin H., Eskikaya S. (2006): Analytical hierarchy process for selection of roadheaders. Journal of South African Institute, 106: 569-575.
  2. Aykul H., Yalcin E., Ediz I.G., Dixon-Hardy D.W., Akcakoca H. (2007): Equipment selection for high selective excavation surface coal mining. Journal of South African Institute, 107: 195-210.
  3. Abeli W.S. (1993): Comparing productivity and costs of three subgrading machines. Journal of Forest Engineering, 5: 33-39. Go to original source...
  4. Akay A.E., Erdas O., Mahmut R., Yuksel A. (2008): Estimating sediment yield from a forest road network by using a sediment prediction model and GIS techniques. Building and Environment, 43: 687-695. Go to original source...
  5. Budny E., Chlosta M., Gutkowski W. (2003): Loadindependent control of a hydraulic excavator. Automation in Construction, 12: 245-254. Go to original source...
  6. Coulter E.D., Sessions J., Wing M.G. (2006): Scheduling forest road maintenance using the analytic hierarchy process and heuristics. Silva Fennica, 40: 143-160. Go to original source...
  7. Dey P.K., Ramcharan, E. (2008): Analytic hierarchy process helps select site for limestone quarry expansion in Barbados. Journal of Environmental Management, 88: 1384-1395. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  8. Filipsson S., Eriksson L.O. (1989): A model for predicting productivity in subgrade preparation of forest roads by excavator. Journal of Forest Engineering, 1: 3- 8. Go to original source...
  9. Gorton F. (1985): Praxis und Kosten einer landschaftsschonenden Bauausführung von Forst-strassen. Allgemeine Forstzeitung Wien, 96: 241-244.
  10. Johansson J. (1995): Excavators as base machines in logging operations. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 7: 7-17. Go to original source...
  11. Kagayo T. (1997): Methodology and evaluation of priorities for energy and environmental research projects. Energy, 22: 121-129. Go to original source...
  12. Parsakhoo A., Hosseini S.A., Jalilvand H., Lotfalian M. (2008a): Physical soil properties and slope treatments effects on hydraulic excavator productivity for forest road construction. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences, 11: 1422-1428. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  13. Parsakhoo A., Hosseini S.A., Lotfalian M., Jalilvand H. (2008b): Bulldozer and hydraulic excavator traffic effects on soil bulk density, rolling project and root responses. International Journal of Natural and Engineering Sciences, 2: 139-142.
  14. Stentz A., Bares J., Singh S., Rowe P. (1999). A robotic excavator for autonomous truck loading. Autonomous Robots, 7: 175-186. Go to original source...
  15. Saaty T.L. (1980). The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. New York, McGraw-Hill: 19. Go to original source...
  16. Tunay M., Melemez K. (2004). Environmental effects of forest road construction on steep slope. CAB Abstracts, 13: 33-37.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.