J. For. Sci., 2012, 58(12):536-544 | DOI: 10.17221/57/2012-JFS

Steady infiltration rates estimated for a mountain forest catchment based on the distribution of plant species

L. Jačka, J. Pavlásek, M. Jindrová, P. Bašta, M. Černý, A. Balvín, P. Pech
Department of Water Resources and Environmental Modelling, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

Among other important factors, vegetation cover strongly affects the hydrological processes in mountain catchments. In this paper, we present the results of field infiltration measurements at the location of various vegetation covers, together with an estimation of the infiltration characteristics of a small mountain forest catchment. Measured steady infiltration rate values were extrapolated on the basis of the dominant plant species distribution in the catchment. We determined which plant species are dominant, and infiltration tests were carried out where these species were located in selected sites in the catchment. The characteristic steady infiltration rates were averaged for each dominant vegetation species. The percentages of dominant plant species were determined for established points placed in a regular network throughout the basin. An extrapolation of the directly measured infiltration values to these established points was calculated using (1) percentages of the dominant plant species determined at these points, and (2) characteristic infiltration rates averaged for these species. An infiltration map was created from the infiltration values calculated for the established points.

Keywords: Bohemian Forest; experimental catchment; infiltration map; mountain Podzols; vegetation cover

Published: December 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Jačka L, Pavlásek J, Jindrová M, Bašta P, Černý M, Balvín A, Pech P. Steady infiltration rates estimated for a mountain forest catchment based on the distribution of plant species. J. For. Sci. 2012;58(12):536-544. doi: 10.17221/57/2012-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Dingman S. L. (2002): Physical Hydrology, 2nd Ed. PrenticeHall, New Jersey: 646.
    2. Dirksen C. (1999): Soil Physics Measurements. Catena Verlag, Reiskirchen: 154.
    3. Harden C.P., Scruggs P.D. (2003): Infiltration on mountain slopes: a comparison of three environments. Geomorphology, 55: 5-24. Go to original source...
    4. Hillel D. (1998): Environmental Soil Physics. Academic Press, San Diego: 771.
    5. Jaramillo R.A., Vandervaere J.P., Roulier S., Thony J.L., Gaudet J.P., Vauclin M. (2000): Field measurement of soil surface hydraulic properties by disc and ring infiltrometers. A review and recent developments. Soil & Tillage Research, 55: 1-29. Go to original source...
    6. Germer S., Neill C, Vetter T., Chaves J., Krusche A.V., Elsenbeer H. (2009): Implications of long-term land-use change for the hydrology and solute budgets of small catchments in Amazonia. Journal of Hydrology, 364: 349-363. Go to original source...
    7. Jaka L., Pavlásek J. (2010): Vybrané hydropedologické charakteristiky podzolů v centrální oblasti NP Šumava. [Chosen hydropedological characteristics of podzols in the central area of the Šumava National Park.] The Water Management Technical and Economic Information Journal (VTEI), 5: 17-19. (with English summary)
    8. Jindrová M. (2011): Vymezení charakteristických hydropedologických jednotek na povodí Modrava 2 na základě fytocenologického průzkumu. [Delimitation of characteristic hydropedological units in Modrava 2 catchment on the basis of phytocenological survey.] [MSc Thesis.] Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague: 89.
    9. Kuráž V. (1996): Soil moisture models in hydrological modelling - evaluation of soil physical parameters. In: Nachtnebel P.H., Ková P., Kuráž V. (eds): Rainfall- runoff models (Lecture Notes on the Workshop). Prague, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague: 1-14.
    10. Kutílek M., Nielsen D.R. (1994): Soil hydrology. Cremlingen-Destedt, Catena Verlag: 370.
    11. Kvítek T., Peterková J., Duffková R. (2001): Seasonal dynamics of infiltration in soil horizon A in Zhůří enclave. Silva Gabreta, 7: 119-130.
    12. Li X.Y., Contreras S., Solé-Benet A. (2008): Unsaturated hydraulic conductivity in limestone dolines: Influence of vegetation and rock fragments. Geoderma, 145: 288-294. Go to original source...
    13. McKenzie N., Cresswell H. (2008): Selecting a method for hydraulic conductivity. In: McKenzie N., Couglan K., Cresswell H. (eds): Soil Physical Measurement and Interpretation for Land Evaluation. New Delhi, SBS Publishers & Distributors PVT., Ltd.: 379.
    14. Pavlásek J., Ředinová J., Skalská P. (2009): Evaluation of Monitoring on Modrava Catchments. Soil and Water Research 4, 66-74. Go to original source...
    15. Pavlásek J., Tesa M., Máca P., Hanková R., Hudeková K., Jaka L., Klose Z., Ředinová J. (2010): Ten years of hydrological monitoring in upland microcatchments in the Bohemian Forest, Czech Republic. In: Herrmann A., Schumann S. (eds): Status and Perspectives of Hydrology in Small Basins. IAHS, 336: 213-218.
    16. Pennock D., Yates C., Braidek J. (2008): Soil sampling designs. In: Carter M.R., Gregorich, E.G. (eds): Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Boca Raton, Taylor & Francis Press: 1-14.
    17. Reynolds W.D. (2008): Saturated hydraulic properties: Well permeameter. In: Carter M.R., Gregorich, E.G. (eds): Soil Sampling and Methods of Analysis. Boca Raton, Taylor & Francis Press: 1025-1042. Go to original source...
    18. Reynolds W.D., Elrick D.E. (1985): In situ measurement of field saturated hydraulic conductivity, sorptivity and the α-parameter using the Guelph permeameter. Soil Science 140: 292-301. Go to original source...
    19. Schaake J., Coong S., Duan Q. (2006): The US MOPEX Data Set. In: Andréassian V., Hall A., Chahinian N., Schaake J. (eds): Large Sample Basin Experiments for Hydrological Model Parameterization: Results of the Model Parameter Experiment. IAHS, 307: 9-28.
    20. Solon J., Degórski M., Roo-Zielínska E. (2007): Vegetation response to a topographical-soil gradient. Catena 71: 309-320. Go to original source...
    21. Stothoff S.A., Orb D., Groeneveld D.P., Jones S.B. (1999): The effect of vegetation on infiltration in shallow soils underlain by fissured bedrock. Journal of Hydrology 218: 169-190. Go to original source...
    22. Tachecí P. (2002): Hydrologický režim malého horského povodí a odhad účinků změny porostu. [Hydrological regime of small mountainous catchment and assessment of vegetation change effect.] [Ph.D. Thesis.] Czech Technical University in Prague, Prague: 128.
    23. Zhang W., An S., Xu Z., Cui J, Xu Q. (2011): The impact of vegetation and soil on runoff regulation in headwater streams on the east Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, China. Catena, 87: 182-189. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content