J. For. Sci., 2012, 58(10):436-445 | DOI: 10.17221/28/2012-JFS

Modelling forest dynamics in a nature reserve: a case study from south-central Sweden

I. Kozak1, G. Mikusiński2,3, A. Stępień1, H. Kozak1, R. Fr±k1
1 Department of Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
2 Department of Ecology, Grimsö Wildlife Research Station, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Riddarhyttan, Sweden
3 School for Forest Engineers, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Skinnskatteberg, Sweden

This paper presents a modelling study on the forest dynamics in Helgedomen Nature Reserve (HNR) in Sweden. The main components of the forest transitions that occurred between 1930 and 2010 were described. The gradual conversion of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) dominated stands into stands with a high proportion of Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) was observed. Next, the capabilities of the modelling system (FORKOME) in predicting the future development of forests in the reserve were tested. The model was validated by simulating forest development from 1930 to 2010, and then it was applied to project the future development of forests in the reserve. Scenarios generated in the forecasting component of the model were (1) no intervention, (2) removal of spruce, and (3) prescribed burning. The FORKOME model was able to predict possible alterations of species composition, stem volume, total biomass in the next 100 years under these three scenarios. We argue that in the absence of natural fires, the active management of small reserves is required in order to maintain the major natural values. Prescribed burning is more effective than spruce removal for maintaining the pine-dominated character of the stands and to sustain the conservation value of the reserve.

Keywords: pine; spruce; computer simulation; ecological model

Published: October 31, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kozak I, Mikusiński G, Stępień A, Kozak H, Fr±k R. Modelling forest dynamics in a nature reserve: a case study from south-central Sweden. J. For. Sci. 2012;58(10):436-445. doi: 10.17221/28/2012-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Andersson F., Angelstam P., Feger K.H., Hasenhauer H., Kräuchi N., Marell A., Matteuci G., Schneider U., Tabbush P. (2005): A Research Strategy for Sustainable Forest Management in Europe. COST Action 25. Technical Report 5. Paris, Groupement d'Intérêt Public Ecosystèmes Forestiers: 149.
    2. Bossel H. (1991): Modelling forest dynamics: moving from description to explanation. Forest Ecology and Management, 42: 129-142. Go to original source...
    3. Botkin D.B. (1993): Forest Dynamics: An Ecological Model. Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press: 309.
    4. Botkin D.B., Janak F.J., Wallis J.R. (1972): Some ecological consequences of computer model of forest growth. Journal of Ecology, 60: 649-873. Go to original source...
    5. Bugmann H. (2001): A review of forest gap models. Climatic Change, 51: 259-305. Go to original source...
    6. COM (2006): Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the EU Forest Action Plan. Commission of the European Communities. COM 302, Brussels: 13.
    7. Erricsson T.S., Berglund H., Ostlund L. (2005): History and forest biodiversity of woodland key habitats in south boreal Sweden. Biological Conservation, 122: 289-303. Go to original source...
    8. Gustafsson L., Perhans K. (2010): Biodiversity conservation in Swedish forests: Ways forward for a 30-year-old multi-scaled approach. Ambio, 39: 546-554. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. Hancock M.H., Summers R.W., Amphlett A., Willi J. (2009): Testing prescribed fire as a tool to promote Scots pine Pinus sylvestris regeneration. European Journal of Forest Research, 128: 319-333. Go to original source...
    10. Hunter Jr. M.L. (1993): Natural fire regimes as spatial models for managing boreal forests. Biological Conservation, 65: 115-120. Go to original source...
    11. Hytönen M. (1995): History, evolution and significance of the multiple-use concept. In: Hytönen M. (ed.): Multipleuse Forestry in the Nordic Countries. METLA, The Finnish Forest Research Institute, Helsinki Research Centre, Helsinki: 43-65.
    12. Hyvärinen E., Kouki J., Martikainen P. (2006): Fire and green-tree retention in conservation of red-listed and rare deadwood-dependent beetles in finnish boreal forests. Conservation Biology, 20: 1711-1719. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    13. Kozak I., Menshutkin V. (2002): Predictions of Spruce Forest Dynamics in the Polish Bieszczady and Ukrainian Bieskidy Using the Computer Modelling. Baltic Forestry, 8: 28-34.
    14. Koz ak I., Chłodek D., Z awadzki A., Koz ak H., Potaczała G. (2007): Symulacja przebudowy drzewostanów ¶wierkowych w Bieszczadach za pomoc± modelu FORKOME. [Conversion simulation of spruce stands in the Bieszczady mountains with the aid of FORKOME model.] Le¶ne prace badawcze, 2: 7-26.
    15. Kozak I., Menshutkin V., Ferchmin M., Potaczała G., JóĽwina M., Kozak O. (2003): Prognozowanie zmian lasu sosnowego w obszarze ochrony ¶cisłej Nart w Kampinoskim Parku Narodowym z wykorzystaniem modelu FORKOME.[Pine forest prognosis with use of FORKOME model in the Kampinoski National Park] Parki Narodowe i Rezerwaty Przyrody, 22: 483-497.
    16. Linder P. (1998): Structural changes in two virgin boreal forest stands in central Sweden over 72 years. Scandinavian. Journal of Forest Research, 13: 451-461. Go to original source...
    17. Linder P., Elfving B., Zackrisson O. (1997): Stand structure and successional trends in virgin boreal forest reserves in Sweden. Forest Ecology and Management, 98: 17-33. Go to original source...
    18. MCPFE (2000): General Declarations and Resolutions Adopted at the Ministerial Conferences on the Protection of Forests in Europe. Strasbourg 1990 - Helsinki 1993 - Lisbon 1998. Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe (MCPFE). Liaison Unit Vienna, Vienna: 88.
    19. Mikusiński G., Pressey R. L., Edenius L., Kujala H., Moilanen A., Niemelä J., Ranius T. (2007): Conservation planning in forest landscapes of Fennoscandia and an approach to the challenge of Countdown 2010. Conservation Biology, 21: 1445-1454. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Mochren G.M.J., Kienast F. (1991): Modelling forest succession in Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 42: 1-2. Go to original source...
    21. MP (2009): Criteria and Indicators for the Conservation and Sustainable Management of Temperate and Boreal Forests. Available at http://www.rinya.maff.go.jp/mpci/2009p_4.pdf (accessed September 21, 2012).
    22. Nagel J., Schmidt M. (2006): The Silvicultural Decision Support System BWINPro. In: Hasenauer H. (ed.): Sustainable Forest Management. Berlin, Springer: 59-63. Go to original source...
    23. Östlund L., Zackrisson O., Axelsson A.L. (1997): The history and transformation of a Scandinavian boreal forest landscape since the 19th century. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 27: 1198-1206. Go to original source...
    24. Porte A., Bartelink H.H. (2002): Modeling mixed forest growth: a review of models for forest management. Ecological Modeling, 150: 141-188. Go to original source...
    25. Prentice I.C., Leemans R. (1990): Pattern and process and the dynamics of forest structure: a simulation approach. Journal of Ecology, 78: 340-355. Go to original source...
    26. Prentice I.C., Sykes T. Cramer W. (1993): A simulation model for the transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 65: 51-70. Go to original source...
    27. Pretzsch H., Biber P., Dursky J. (2002): The single treebased stand simulator SILVA: Construction, applicationand evaluation. Forest Ecology and Management, 162: 3-21. Go to original source...
    28. Reynolds J.F., Bugmann H., Pitelka L.F. (2001): How much physiology is needed in forest gap models for simulating long-term vegetation response to global change? Challenges, limitations and potentials. Climatic Change, 51: 541-557 Go to original source...
    29. Scheller R.M., Mladenoff D.J. (2007): An ecological classification of forest landscape simulation models: Tools and strategies for understanding broad-scale forested ecosystems. Landscape Ecology, 22: 491-505. Go to original source...
    30. Shugart H.H. (1984): Theory of Forests Dynamics. New York, Springer: 278. Go to original source...
    31. Shugart H.H., West D.C. (1977): Development of an Appalachian deciduous forest model and its application to assessment of the impact of the chestnut blight. Journal of Biogeography, 5: 161-179.
    32. Sidoroff K., Kuuluvainen T., Tanskanen H., VanhaMajamaa I. (2007): Tree mortality after low-intensity prescribed fires in managed Pinussylvestris stands in southern Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 22: 2-12. Go to original source...
    33. Szwagrzyk J. (1994): Symulacyjne modele dynamiki lasu oparte na koncepcji odnawiania drzewostanu w lukach. [Simulation models of forest dynamic based on concept of stand gap regeneration] Wiadomo¶ci Ekologiczne, 40: 57-75.
    34. UN (1992): Non-legally Binding Authoritative Statement of Principles for a Global Consensus on the Management, Conservation and Sustainable Development of All Types of Forests. Report of the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro 3-14 June 1992. United Nations, New York. Available at http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-3annex3.htm (accessed September 21, 2012).
    35. Uotila A., Kouki J., Kontkanen H., Pulkkinen P. (2002): Assessing the naturalness of boreal forests in eastern Fennoscandia. Forest Ecology and Management, 161: 257-277. Go to original source...
    36. Urban D.L. (1990): A versatile model to simulate forest pattern: a user's guide to ZELIG version 1.0. Charlottesville, VA: University of Virginia, Environmental Sciences Department. Forest Ecology and Management, 42: 95-110. Go to original source...
    37. Vanclay J.K. (1994): Modelling Forest Growth and Yield. Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests.Wallingford, CAB International: 312.
    38. Weinstein D.A., Shugart H.H., West D.C. (1982): The Long-term Nutrient Retention Properties of Forest EcoSystems: A simulation Investigation. Oak Ridge, Tennessee, Oak Ridge National Laboratory: 214.

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content