J. For. Sci., 2012, 58(4):152-164 | DOI: 10.17221/131/2010-JFS

Belowground biomass and its annual increment in a montane beech forest in Mavrovo National Park, north-west Macedonia

S. Hristovski1, Lj. Melovski1, M. Šušlevska2, Lj. Grupče3
1 Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, Institute of Biology, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
2 Farmahem, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia
3 Macedonian Ecological Society, Skopje, Republic of Macedonia

The aim of this paper is to present the results of the investigation on belowground biomass and its annual increment in a beech ecosystem (Calamintho grandiflorae-Fagetum) in Mavrovo National Park, Republic of Macedonia. Belowground biomass was estimated in three layers of the ecosystem (tree, shrub and herb layers) for seven years during the period 1997-2005. Allometric regressions were established for the relationship of root biomass from volume index (D2H, diameter squared × height) on a sample of 10 model trees and 13 model shrubs of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.). Fine root biomass of trees and shrubs was estimated in soil samples to a depth of 145 cm and divided into live and dead fine roots and subdivided into thickness classes. Belowground biomass of the herb layer was assessed in 20 herb species. It was estimated that the total belowground biomass in the ecosystem was 57.75 .ha-1. The contribution of shrub and herb layers was insignificant (less than 0.2%). Biomass of the live fine roots was 10.16 t.ha-1, i.e. 18% of the total belowground biomass. Annual increment of trees and shrubs was 1.03 t.ha-1.y-1 and 4.6 kg.ha-1.y-1, respectively.

Keywords: root biomass; coarse roots; fine roots; trees; shrubs; beech ecosystem

Published: April 30, 2012  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Hristovski S, Melovski L, Šušlevska M, Grupče L. Belowground biomass and its annual increment in a montane beech forest in Mavrovo National Park, north-west Macedonia. J. For. Sci. 2012;58(4):152-164. doi: 10.17221/131/2010-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Bartelink H.H. (1998): A model of dry matter partitioning in trees. Tree Physiology, 18: 91-101. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    2. Bascietto M., Cherubini P., Scarascia-Mugnozza G. (2004): Tree rings from a European beech forest chronosequence are useful for detecting growth trends and carbon sequestration. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 34: 481-492. Go to original source...
    3. Bolte A., Rahmann T., Kuhr M., Pogoda P., Murach D., v. Gadow K. (2004): Relation ships between tree dimension and coarse root biomass in mixed stands of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.). Plant and Soil, 264: 1-11. Go to original source...
    4. Brown S. (2002): Measuring carbon in forests: current status and future challenges. Environmental Pollution, 116: 363-372. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    5. Burke M.K., Raynal D.J. (1994): Fine root growth phenology, production, and turnover in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem. Plant and Soil, 162: 135-146. Go to original source...
    6. Cairns M.A., Brown S., Helmer E.H., Baumgardner G.A. (1997): Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia, 111: 1-11. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Chojnacky D.C., Heath L.S. (2002): Estimating down deadwood from FIA forest inventory variables in Maine. Environmental Pollution, 116: S25-S30. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    8. Collet C., Lanter O., Pardos M. (2002): Effects of canopy opening on the morphology and anatomy of naturally regenerated beech seedlings. Trees, 16: 291-298. Go to original source...
    9. Curt T., Prévosto B. (2003): Rooting strategy of naturally regenerated beech in Silver birch and Scots pine woodlands. Plant and Soil, 255: 256-279. Go to original source...
    10. Curt T., Lucot E., Bouchaud M. (2001): Douglas-fir root biomass and rooting profile in relation so soils in a midelevation area (Beaujolais Mounts, France). Plant and Soil, 233: 109-125. Go to original source...
    11. DeAngelis D.L., Gardner R.H., Shugart H.H. (1981): Productivity of forest ecosystems studies during the IBP: The woodland data sets. In: Reichle D.E. (ed.): Dynamic Properties of Forest Ecosystems. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press: 567-672.
    12. Drexhage M., Colin F. (2001): Estimating root system biomass from breast-height diameters. Forestry, 74: 491-497. Go to original source...
    13. Duvigneaud P., Kestemont P., Timperman J., Moniquet J.-C. (1977): La hetraie ardennaise a Festuca altissima a mirwart biomasse et productivite primaire. In: Duvigneaud P., Kestemont P. (eds): Productivite biologique en Belgique. Paris-Gembloux, Editions Duculot: 107-154.
    14. Fahey T.J., Hughes J.W. (1994): Fine root dynamics in a northern hardwood forest ecosystem, Hubbard Brook experimental forest, NH. Journal of Ecology, 82: 533-548. Go to original source...
    15. Filipovski GJ., Rizovski R., Ristevski P. (1996): The Characteristics of the Climate-vegetation-soil Zones (Regions) in the Republic of Macedonia. Skopje, MASA: 178.
    16. Gill R.A., Jackson R.B. (2000): Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 147: 13-31. Go to original source...
    17. Helmisaari H-S., Makkonen K., Kellomäki S., Valtonen E., Mälkönen E. (2002): Below- and aboveground biomass, production and nitrogen use in Scots pine stands in eastern Finland. Forest Ecology and Management, 165: 317-326. Go to original source...
    18. Hendrick R.L., Pregitzer K.S. (1992): The demography of fine roots in a northern hardwood forest. Ecology, 73: 1094-1104. Go to original source...
    19. Hendrick R.L., Pregitzer K.S. (1996): Temporal and depth-related patterns of fine root dynamics in northern hardwood forests. Journal of Ecology, 84: 167-176. Go to original source...
    20. Hendriks C.M.A., Bianchi F.J.J.A. (1995): Root density and root biomass in pure and mixed forest stands of Douglas-fir and beech. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 43: 321-331. Go to original source...
    21. Hertel D. (1999): Das Feinwurzelsystem von Rein- und Mischbeständen der Rotbuche: Struktur, Dynamik und interspezifische Konkurrenz. Dissertationes Botanicae, 317: 1-90.
    22. Jackson R.B., Mooney H.A., Schulze E.-D. (1997): A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (Ecology), 94: 7362-7366. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    23. Kodrík J., Kodrík M. (2002): Root biomass of beech as a factor influencing the wind tree stability. Journal of Forest Science, 48: 549-564. Go to original source...
    24. Lazarevski A. (1993): Klimata na Makedonija. [Climate of Macedonia.] Skopje, Kultura: 278.
    25. Le Goff N., Ottorini J.-M. (2001): Root biomass and biomass increment in a beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) stand in North-East France. Annals of Forest Science, 58: 1-13. Go to original source...
    26. Leuschner C., Backes K., Hertel D., Schipka F., Schmitt U., Terborg O., Runge M. (2001): Drought response at leaf, stem and fine root levels of competitive Fagus sylvatica L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. trees in dry and wet years. Forest Ecology and Management, 149: 33-46. Go to original source...
    27. López B., Sabaté S., Gracia C.A. (2001): Annual and seasonal changes in fine root biomass of a Quercus ilex L. forest. Plant and Soil, 230: 125-134. Go to original source...
    28. Makkonen K., Helmisaari H.-S. (1999): Assessing fineroot biomass and production in a Scots pine stand - comparison of soil core and root ingrowth core methods. Plant and Soil, 210: 43-50. Go to original source...
    29. McClaugherty C.A., Aber J.D., Melillo J.M. (1982): The role of fine roots in the organic matter and nitrogen budgets of two forested ecosystems. Ecology, 63: 1481-1490. Go to original source...
    30. Melovski L., Grupche L., Hristovski S., Shushlevska M. (2003): Aboveground phytomass and primary production in the tree layer of the beech ecosystem (Calamintho grandiflorae-Fagetum) in Mavrovo National Park, Macedonia. In: Rosnev B. (ed.): 75 years of the Forest Research Institute of Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. Sofia, 1.-5. October 2003. Sofia, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences: 364-368.
    31. Melovski L., Šušlevska M., Hristovski S., Grupče L. (2004a): Biomass and the mineral quantity in the herb layers litter-fall in the beech ecosystem Calamintho grandiflorae-Fagetum in Mavrovo National Park. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Congress of Ecologists of the Republic of Macedonia with International Participation, Ohrid, 25.-29. October 2004. Skopje, Macedonian Ecological Society: 1-5.
    32. Melovski L., Hristovski S., Šušlevska M., Grupče L. (2004b): Dynamics of the forest floor biomass in the beech ecosystem Calamintho grandiflorae-Fagetum in Mavrovo National Park. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Congress of Ecologists of the Republic of Macedonia with International Participation, Ohrid, 25.-29. October 2004. Skopje, Macedonian Ecological Society: 6-11.
    33. Newbould P.J. (1967): Methods for Estimating the Primary Production of Forests. International Biological Programme, IBP Handbook No. 2. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific: 62.
    34. Nihlgård B. (1972): Plant biomass, primary production and distribution of chemical elements in a beech and a planted spruce forest in South Sweden. Oikos, 23: 69-81. Go to original source...
    35. Nihlgård B., Lindgren L. (1977): Plant biomass, primary production and bioelements of three mature beech forests in South Sweden. Oikos, 28: 95-104. Go to original source...
    36. Ovington J.D. (1956): Studies of the development of woodland conditions under different trees. V. The mineral composition of the ground flora. Journal of Ecology, 44: 597-604. Go to original source...
    37. Petkovski D., Melovski L., Hristovski S., Šušlevska M. (2008): Nekoi fizički i vodno-fizički svojstva na kafeavite šumski počvi od NP "Mavrovo". [Some physical and hydrophysical characteristics of the dystric cambisols from "Mavrovo" National Park.] Ekologija i zaštita na životnata sredina, 11: 19-25.
    38. Power S.A., Ashmore M.R. (1996): Nutrient relations and root mycorrhizal status of healthy and declining beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in southern Britain. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 86: 317-333. Go to original source...
    39. Pregitzer K.S., Kubiske M.E., Mark E., Yu C.K., Hendrik R.L. (1997): Relationships among root branch order, carbon, and nitrogen in four temperate species. Oecologia, 111: 302-308. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    40. Prévosto B., Curt T. (2004): Dimensional relationships of naturally established European beech trees beneath Scots pine and Silver birch canopy. Forest Ecology and Management, 194: 335-348. Go to original source...
    41. Pritchard S.G., Davis M.A., Mitchell R.J., Prior S.A., Boykin D.L., Rogers H.H., Runion G.B. (2001): Root dynamics in an artificially constructed regenerating longleaf pine ecosystem are affected by atmospheric CO2 enrichment. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 46: 55-69. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    42. Richardson A.D., Statland C.B., Gregoire T.G. (2003): Root biomass distribution under three cover types in a patchy Pseudotsuga menziesii forest in western Canada. Annals of Forest Science, 60: 469-474. Go to original source...
    43. Rochow J.J. (1974): Estimates of above-ground biomass and primary productivity in a Missouri forest. Journal of Ecology, 62: 567-577. Go to original source...
    44. Silva J.S., Rego F. (2003): Root distribution of a Mediterranean shrubland in Portugal. Plant and Soil, 255: 529-540. Go to original source...
    45. Vogt K.A., Vogt D.J., Bloomfeld J. (1998): Analysis of some direct and indirect methods for estimating root biomass and production of forests at an ecosystem level. Plant and Soil, 200: 71-89. Go to original source...
    46. West J.B., Espeleta J.F., Donovan L.A. (2004): Fine root production and turnover across a complex edaphic gradient of a Pinus palustris-Aristida stricta savanna ecosystem. Forest Ecology and Management, 189: 397-406. Go to original source...
    47. Zianis D., Mencuccini M. (2005): Aboveground net primary productivity of a beech (Fagus moesiaca) forest: a case study of Naousa forest, northern Greece. Tree Physiology, 25: 713-722. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    48. Zianis D., Muukkonen Mäkipää R., Mencuccini M. (2005): Biomass and stem volume equations for tree species in Europe. Silva Fennica Monographs, 4: 1-63. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content