J. For. Sci., 2011, 57(11):472-482 | DOI: 10.17221/99/2010-JFS
Does intraguild predation of Cosmia trapezina L. (Lep.: Noctuidae) influence the abundance of other Lepidoptera forest pests?
- Department of Forest Protection and Game Management , Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
The noctuid C. trapezina (CT) has been considered an occasional predator of other Lepidoptera larvae. Functional/numerical response of predator and/or prey was estimated using 27 years of time-series data from Slovakia and stepwise multiple regression models (SMRM). SMRM were used to examine a possible delayed density-dependent feedback. We constructed 12 order-three autoregressive models [AR(3)] for CT and candidate prey. Independent variables were abundance of C. trapezina and abundance of candidate prey in lags 1, 2, and 3. Model variants were: (1) predation on free feeder models (FFM); (2) predation on shelter feeder models (SFM); (3) predation on the sum of 8 species models (S8M); (4) predation on all Lepidoptera models (ALM). Models were constructed for three areas (created by grouping sites based on significant correlations among CT populations). Additional comparative models were constructed for another three noctuid species and one geometrid species to compare their regression parameters under the same conditions as for CT. In total, 48 AR(3) SMRM were constructed for comparative species. A negative response of shelter feeders was found in models mainly for CT. We also found the positive response of CT growth rate to abundance of shelter feeders in lag 3 on two out of three models. This pattern was not found for any other comparison of species in the analysis. Possible mechanisms for these results are discussed.
Keywords: Cosmia trapezina; intraguild predation; Lepidoptera larvae; time series
Published: November 30, 2011 Show citation
References
- Arim M., Marqueut P.A. (2004): Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecology Letters, 7: 557-564.
Go to original source...
- Beryman A.A. (1991): Stabilization or regulation: what it all means! Oecologia, 86: 140-143.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Beryman A.A., Turchin P. (1997): Detection of delayed density dependence: comment. Ecology, 78: 318-320.
Go to original source...
- Bjørnstad O.N. (2000): Cycles and synchrony: two historical 'experiments' and one experience. Journal of Animal Ecology, 69: 869-873.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Csóka Gy. (1998): Naturally occuring insect defoliators on the oaks in the Hungary. Erdészeti Kutatások, 88: 311-318. (in Hungrian)
- Csóka Gy., Szabóky Cs. (2005): Cheklist of Herbivorous Insects of Native and Exotic Oaks in Hungary I (Lepidoptera). Acta Silvatica et Lignaria Hungarica, 1: 59-72.
- Čapek M. (1973): The results of study of influence of natural enemies on some oak defoliators during the latency phase. Zvolen, Vedecké práce Výskumného ústavu lesného hospodárstva vo Zvolene: 189-202. (in Slovak)
- Gotelli N. J. (2001): A Primer of Ecology. 3rd Ed. Sunderland, Sinauer Associates: 265.
- Hunter D.M. (1998): Interactions between Operophtera brumata and Tortrix viridana on oak: new evidence from time-series analysis. Ecological Entomology, 23: 168-173.
Go to original source...
- Hunter M.D., Varley G.C., Grandwell G.R. (1997): Estimating the relative roles of top-down and bottom-up forces on insect herbivore populations: A classic study revisited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 94: 9176-9181.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Hunter D.M., Price W.P. (1998): Cycles in insect populations: delayed density dependence or exogenous driving variables? Ecological Entomology, 23: 216-222.
Go to original source...
- Hunter D. M., Price W. P. (2000): Detecting cycles and delayed density dependence: a reply to Turchin and Berryman. Ecological Entomology, 25: 122-124.
Go to original source...
- Liebhold A., Kamata N. (2000): Are population cycles and spatial synchrony a universal characteristic of forest insect populations? Population Ecology, 42: 205-209.
Go to original source...
- Lill J.T., Marquis R.J. (2003): Ecosystem engineering by caterpillars increases insect herbivore diversity on white oak. Ecology, 84: 682-690.
Go to original source...
- Linden H., Wikman M. (1983): Goshawk predation on tetraonids: availability of prey and diet of the predator in the breeding season. Journal of Animal Ecology, 52: 953-968.
Go to original source...
- Montgomery S.L. (1982): Biogeography of the moth genus Eupithecia in Oceania and the evolution of ambush predation in Hawaiian caterpillars (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Entomologia Generalis, 8 (1): 27-34.
Go to original source...
- Patočka J., Krištín A., Kulfan, J., Zach P. (1999): Die Eichenschädlinge und ihre Feinde. Zvolen, Institut für Waldökologie der Slowakischen Akademie der Wissenschaften: 396.
- Peltonen M., Liebhold A.M., Bjornstad O.N., Williams, D.W. (2002): Spatial synchrony in forest insect outbreaks: roles of regional stochasticity and dispersal. Ecology, 83: 3120-3129.
Go to original source...
- Polis G. A. (1981): The evolution and dynamics of intraspecific predation. ARES, 12: 225-251.
Go to original source...
- Polis G.A., Myers C.A., Holt R.D. (1989): The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20: 297-330.
Go to original source...
- Pollard E. (1991): Synchrony of population fluctuations: the dominant influence of widespread factors on local butterfly populations. Oikos, 60: 7-10.
Go to original source...
- Ranta E., Kaitala V., Lindström J., Linden H. (1995): Synchrony in population dynamics. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 262: 113-118.
Go to original source...
- Royama T. (1997): Population persistance and density dependence. Ecological Monographs, 47: 1-35.
Go to original source...
- Schuette F. (1957): Übersuchungen über die Populationsdynamik des Eichenwicklers (Tortrix viridana L.). Zeitschrift für Angewandte Entomologie-Journal of Applied Entomology, 40: 285-331.
Go to original source...
- Turchin P. (1990): Rarity of density dependence or population regulation with lags? Nature, 344: 660-663
Go to original source...
- Turchin P., Beryman A. A. (2000): Detecting cycles and delayed density dependance: a comment on Hunter and Price (1998): Ecological Entomology, 25: 119-121.
Go to original source...
- Turčani M. (2006): Selected aspects of abundance dynamics of model moth defoliators and possible impact of climate change to that dynamics in the southwestern Slovakia [Habilitation Thesis] Prague, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague: 156. (in Czech)
- Turčáni M., Patočka J., Kulfan M. (2009): How do lepidopteran seasonal guilds differ on some oaks (Quercus spp.) - A case study. Journal of Forest Science, 55: 578-590.
Go to original source...
- Venzon M., Jansses A., Sabelis M.W. (2001): Prey preference, intraguild predation and population dynamics of an arthropod food web on plants. Experimental and Applied Acarology, 25: 785-808.
Go to original source...
Go to PubMed...
- Weseloh R.M. (1990): Gypsy moth predators: an example of generalist and specialist natural enemies. In: Watt A.D., Leather S.R., Hunter M.D., Kidd N.A.C. (eds): Population Dynamics of Forest Insects. Intercept L.T.D., Andover: 233-243.
This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.