J. For. Sci., 2011, 57(7):312-320 | DOI: 10.17221/100/2010-JFS

Evaluation of changes in the landscape management and its influence on animal migration in the vicinity of the D1 motorway in Central Bohemia

T. Kušta1, Z. Keken2, M. Ježek1
1 Department of Forest Protection and Game Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 Department of Landscape Ecology, Faculty of Environmental Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic

The article summarizes changes detected in landscape structures and interrelated changes in landscape management surrounding a model section of the D1 motorway (11th-29th km). Biotopes' gradual development was determined based on historical aerial photographs from 1949, 1974, 1988 and 2007. Issues evaluated include especially direct occupation of biotopes and agricultural lands due to constructing industrial areas in the motorway's vicinity, changes in area dimensions of agricultural and forest land, construction of residential complexes and complementary infrastructure. Also investigated was how these transformations and other negative factors of the linear construction, particularly barriers along the motorway and traffic intensity, influence migration of large ungulates. The aerial photographs show significant decrease in polygons in the Crop fields category between 1949 and 2007. While in 1988 the area of Commercial zones in this territory was only 0.16%, in 2007 these already constituted 8.53% of the entire territory. Forested area increased slightly. Traffic intensity and barriers along the motorway were found to create sections through which large mammals have great difficulty passing.

Keywords: landscape; migration; wildlife; motorway

Published: July 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kušta T, Keken Z, Ježek M. Evaluation of changes in the landscape management and its influence on animal migration in the vicinity of the D1 motorway in Central Bohemia. J. For. Sci. 2011;57(7):312-320. doi: 10.17221/100/2010-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Aberg J., Swenson J.E., Andren H. (2000): The dynamics of hazel grouse (Bonasa bonasia) occurrence in habitat fragments. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 78: 352-358. Go to original source...
  2. Alexander S.M., Waters N.M. (2000): The effects of highway transportation corridors on wildlife: a case study of Banff National Park. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 8: 307-320. Go to original source...
  3. Alig R.J., Plantinga A. (2004): Future forest land area: impacts from population growth and other factors that affect land values. Journal of Forestry, 102: 19-24. Go to original source...
  4. Alig R.J., Lewis D. J., Swenson J. J. (2005): Is forest fragmentation driven by the spatial configuration of land quality? Forest Ecology and Management, 9381: 1-9. Go to original source...
  5. Antrop M. (2000): Changing patterns in the urbanized countryside of Western Europe. Landscape Ecology, 15: 257-270. Go to original source...
  6. Broker H., Vastenhout M. (1995): Nature across motorways. Ministry of Transport, Delft, Public Works and Water Management: 103.
  7. Clevenger A.P., Waltho N. (2005): Performance indices to identify attributes of highway crossing structures facilitating movement of large mammals. Biological Conservation, 121: 453-464. Go to original source...
  8. Crow T.R., Host G.H., Mladenoff D.J. (1999): Ownership and ecosystem as sources of spatial heterogeneity in a forested landscape, Wisconsin, USA. Landscape Ecology, 14: 449-463. Go to original source...
  9. Cerveny J., Bufka L., Suk M., Sustr P., Belková M. (2007): Spatial activity of the roe deer (Capreolus capreolus) in the Bohemian Forest. Zoologické dny Brno 2007. In: Bryja J., Zukal J. (eds): Sborník abstraktů z konference: 161. (in Czech)
  10. Dramstad W.E., Fjellstad W.J., Fry G.L.A. (1998): Landscape indices - useful tools or misleading numbers? In: Dover J.W., Bunce R.G.H. (eds): Key Concepts in Landscape Ecology, Proceedings of the 1998 European Congress of IALE, 3rd-5th September 1998, Myerscough College, UK: 63-68.
  11. Eetvelde V.V., Antrop M. (2004): Analyzing structural and functional changes of traditional landscapes - two examples from Southern France. Landscape and Urban Planning, 67: 79-95. Go to original source...
  12. Hell P., Plavý R., Slamečka J., Gašparík J. (2005): Losses of mammals (Mammalia) and birds (Aves) on roads in the Slovak part of the Danube Basin. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 51: 35-40. Go to original source...
  13. Hlaváč V., Anděl P. (2001): Methodological manual to providing continuity trespassing of motorways for wildlife. Praha, AOPK ČR: 51. (in Czech)
  14. Huber D., Kusak J. (2006): Green bridges and other mitigation structures on highways in Croatia for large carnivores. In: 1st European Conference in Conservation Biology, 22-26 August 2006 Eger, Hungary. Book of Abstracts: 37.
  15. Ihse M. (1995): Swedish agricultural landscapes - patterns and changes during the last 50 years, studied by aerial photos. Landscape Urban Planning, 31: 21-37. Go to original source...
  16. Ihse M. (1996): Monitoring cultural landscapes in Sweden - methods and data of landscape change. In: Jongman R.H.G. (ed.): Proceedings of the First ECNC Seminar on Land Use Change and its Ecological Consequences, Ecological and Landscape Consequences of Land Use Change in Europe, Vol. 2, 16-18 February 1995. ECNC Publication Series on Man and Nature, Tilburg: 103-129.
  17. Keller V. (2003): Fauna passages and other things: an overview of measures to mitigate habitat fragmentation by transport infrastructure. Habitat fragmentation due to transportation Infrastructure - IENE: 53-54.
  18. Klijn J., Vos W. (2000): From Landscape Ecology to Landscape Science. Wageningen, Kluwer Academic Publishers: 162.
  19. KonÔpka J., Hell P. (2001): Impact monitoring of highways construction on wildlife. Folia Venatoria, 30-31: 159-171. (in Czech)
  20. Lipský Z. (1995): The changing face of the Czech rural landscape. Landscape Urban Planning, 31: 39-45. Go to original source...
  21. Lipský Z. (2000): Monitoring changes in the cultural landscape. Praha, ČZU Praha: 71. (in Czech)
  22. Luell B., Bekker G.J., Cuperus R., Dufek J., Fry G., Hicks C., Hlavac V., Keller V., Rosell C., Sangwine L., Torslov N., Wandall B. (2003): Wildlife and Traffic: A European Handbook for ldentifying Conflicts and Designing Solutions. Brusel, KNNV Publisher: 172.
  23. Mata C., Hervas I., Herranz J., Suarez F., Malo J.E. (2007): Are highway wildlife passages worth building? Vertebrate use of road-crossing structures on a Spanish highway. Journal of Environmental Management, 88: 407-415. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Meeus J.H.A. (1993): The transformation of agricultural landscapes in Western Europe. The Science of the Total Environment, 129: 171-190. Go to original source...
  25. Miquet A. (1994): Effects of summer human disturbance on carrying capacity for Black Grouse in an alpine touristic area. Atti del 6° Convegno Italiáni di Ornitologia. Museo Regionale di Scienze Naturali, Torino, 315-324.
  26. Müller S., Berthould G. (1997): Fauna/Traffic safety. Manual for Civil Engineers, Lausanne, LAVOC - EPFL: 119.
  27. Naveh Z. (1993): Interactions of landscapes and cultures. Landscape and Urban Planning, 32: 43-54. Go to original source...
  28. Rico A., Kindlmann P., Sedlacek F. (2007): Barrier effects of roads on movements of small mammals. Folia Zoologica, 56: 1-12.
  29. Rigehetti A., Malli H., Berthold G., Georgii B., Leuzinger E., Schlup B. (2003): Effect of unfenced (highspeed)-railway lines on wildlife. IENE: 23-24.
  30. Ritters K.H., Wickham J.D., O'Neill R.V., Jones K.B., Smith E.R., Coulston J.W., Wade T.G., Smith J.H. (2002): Fragmentation of continental United States forests. Ecosystems, 5: 815- 822. Go to original source...
  31. SaekiM., Macdonald D.W. (2004): The effects of traffic on the raccoon dog (Nyctereutes procyonoides viverrinus) and other mammals in Japan. Biological Conservation, 118: 559-571. Go to original source...
  32. Sanchez T.W., Oner A.C., Lang R.E. (2009): Betone edge city: office geography in the new metropolis. Urban Geography, 30: 726-755. Go to original source...
  33. Skånes H.M., Bunce R.G.H. (1997): Directions of landscape change (1741-1993) in Virestad, Sweden - characterised by multivariate analyses. Landscape Urban Planning, 38: 61-75. Go to original source...
  34. Stanfield J.B, Bliis J.C., Spies T.A. (2002): Land ownership and landscape structure: a spatial analysis of sixty-six Oregon (USA) Coast Range watersheds. Landscape Ecology, 17: 685-697. Go to original source...
  35. Swenson J.E., Angelstam P. (1993): Habitat separation by sympatric forest grouse in Fennoscandia in relation to boreal forest succession. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71: 1303-1310. Go to original source...
  36. Swenson J.E., Gerstl N., Dahle B., Zedrosser A. (2000): Action plan for the conservation of the brown bear in Europe (Ursus arctos). Nature and Environment, No. 114. Strassbourg, Council of Europe Publishing: 69.
  37. Šustr P., Jirsa A. (2007): Spatial activity and use of the environment by red deer (Cervus elaphus) in the Bohemian Forest. In: Bryja J., Zukal J. (eds): Zoologické dny Brno, Sborník abstraktů z konference: 201-202. (in Czech)
  38. Trocme M. (2003): Habitat Fragmentation due to Transportation lnfrastructure - The European Review. European Commission, Directorate - General for Research, Luxembourg: 8-9.
  39. Vuorela N. (2000): Can data combination help to explain the existence of diverse landscapes? Fenina, 178: 55-80.
  40. Wrbka T. (1998): Landscape structure as indicators for sustainable land use? A case study in alpine and lowland landscapes of Austria. In: Dover J.W., Bunce R.G.H. (eds): Key Concepts in Landscape Ecology, Proceedings of the 1998 European Congress of IALE, 3rd-5th September 1998, Myerscough College, UK: 177-180.

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.