J. For. Sci., 2011, 57(7):285-292 | DOI: 10.17221/102/2010-JFS

Reproductive and morphometric characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Czech Republic

M. Ježek, K. Štípek, T. Kušta, J. Červený, J. Vícha
Department of Forest Protection and Game Management, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague. Czech Republic

Our study aimed to determine morphometric data for wild boar (Sus scrofa) in various areas of the Czech Republic and the potential influence of environment on its body measurements. Three localities with varying agricultural systems and overall landscape structure were selected. Hunted boars were measured for height at the withers, body length, ear length, metatarsal length and weight (depending on the circumstances, either dressed with head, without head, or undressed). We also determined the age of the hunted boars according to teeth development. During 2003-2007, a total 654 boars were examined in various age categories. Body development was similar in all areas and without statistically significant differences until the age of 6-7 months. From 8 months, statistically significant differences in body proportions occur across all localities. It is just at that time that carrying capacities change in the selected localities. The results show that morphometric differences among boars of the same age are influenced by external environmental conditions in which the boars live.

Keywords: environmental factors; juvenile individuals; morphometry; Sus scrofa; wild boar

Published: July 31, 2011  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ježek M, Štípek K, Kušta T, Červený J, Vícha J. Reproductive and morphometric characteristics of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Czech Republic. J. For. Sci. 2011;57(7):285-292. doi: 10.17221/102/2010-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Anděra M., Horáček I. (2005): We recognize our mammals. Prague, Sobotáles. (in Czech)
  2. Briedermann L. (1971): Zur Reproduktion des Schwarzwildes in der Deutschen Demokratischen Republik. Tagungsberichte der Deutschen Akademie der Landwirtschaftlichen Wissenschaften. Berlin, 113: 169-186.
  3. Briedermann L. (1986): Schwarzwild. Berlin, NeumannNeudamm.
  4. Brooks P.H., Cole D.J.A. (1970): Effect of presence of a boar on attainment of puberty in gilts. Journal of Reproduction and Fertilization, 23: 435-440. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  5. Delcroix, I., Mauget R., Signoret J.P. (1990): Existence of synchronization of reproduction at the level of the social group of the European wild boar (Sus scrofa). Journal of Reproduction and Fertilization, 80: 613-617. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Fernandéz-Llario P., Mateos-Quesada P. (2005): Influence of rainfall on the breeding biology of Wild boar (Sus scrofa) in a Mediterranean ecosystem. Folia Zoologica, 54: 240-248.
  7. Fonseca C., Fernandez-Llario P., Santos P., Monzón A., Soares A., Mates-Quesada P., Fonseca F. (2004): Reproduction in the wild boar (Sus scrofa) populations of Portugal. Galemys, 16: 53-65.
  8. Gallo Orsi U., Macchi E., Perrone A., Durio P. (1995): Biometric data and growth rates of a wild boar population living in the Italian Alps. Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 60-63.
  9. Gethoffer F., Sodekeit G., Pohlmayer K. (2007): Reproductive parameters of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in three different parts of Germany. European Journal of Wildlife Research, 53: 287-297. Go to original source...
  10. Hebeisen C. (2007): Population size, density and dynamics, and social organization of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the Basin of Geneva. [PhD. Thesis.] Geneva, La faculté des science de l'Université de Neuchâtel.
  11. Hladíková B., Zbořil J., Tkadlec E. (2008): Population dynamics of the Wild Boar (Sus scrofa) in central Moravia, Czech Republic (Artiodactyla: Suidae). Lynx, 39: 55-62. (in Czech)
  12. Kratochvíl Z., Kux. Z., Pikula J. (1986): Age structure and reproduction of a population of Sus scrofa in Czechoslovakia. Folia Zoologica, 35: 311-324.
  13. Markina F., Sáez-Royuela C., Garnica R. (2004): Physical development of wild boar in the Cantabric mountains, Alava, Northern Spain. Galemys, 16: 25-34.
  14. Mattioli S., Pedone P. (1995): Body growth in a confined wild boar population. Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 64-65.
  15. Maillard D., Fournier L. (2004): Timing and synchrony of births in the wild boar (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758) in a mediterrean habitat: the effect of food availability. Galemys, 16: 67-74.
  16. Moretti M. (1995): Birth distribution, structure and dynamics of a hunted mountain population of wild boar, Ticino, Switzerland. Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 192-196.
  17. Niethammer J., Krapp F. (1986): Handbuch der Säugtiere Europas. Wiesbaden, Aula.
  18. Pedone P., Mattioli L., Mattioli S., Siemoni N., Lovari C., Mazzarone V. (1991): Body growth and fertility in wild boars of Tuscany, Central Italy. In: Transactions XXth IUGB Congress: 604-607.
  19. Peracino V., Bassano B. (1995): The wild boar in the Grand Paradiso National Park: presence and distribution. Journal of Mountain Ecology, 3: 145-146.
  20. Santos P.., Fernandez-Llario P., Fonseca C., Monzón A., Soares A.M.V.N., Mates-Quesada P., PetrucciFonseca F. (2006): Habitat and reproductive phenology of wild boar (Sus scrofa) in the western Iberian Peninsula. European Journal Wildlife Research, 52: 207-212. Go to original source...
  21. Stubbe W., Stubbe M. (1977): Vergleichende Beiträge zur Geburts- und Reproduktionsbiologie von Wild- und Hausschwein - Sus scrofa L., 1758. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung, 10: 153-179.
  22. Stubbe I., Stubbe M., Stubbe W. (1980): Die Korperentwicklung des Schwarzwildes im Wildforschungsgebiet Hakel. Beiträge zur Jagd- und Wildforschung, 11: 245-259.
  23. Walton J.S. (1986): Effect of boar presence before and after weaning on estrus and ovulation in sows. Journal of Animal Science, 62: 9-15. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  24. Wolf R., Rakušan C. (1977): Wild Boars. Prague, SZN. (in Czech)
  25. Wolf R. (1987): Weights of hunted wild boars in the Czechoslovakia. Folia Venatoria, 17: 81-89. (in Czech)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.