J. For. Sci., 2010, 56(11):505-517 | DOI: 10.17221/127/2010-JFS

State and development of phytocenoses on research plots in the Krkonoše Mts. forest stands

S. Vacek1, K. Matějka2
1 Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
2 IDS, Prague, Czech Republic

The paper assesses the state and development of phytocenoses in beech, mixed and spruce stands on permanent research plots (PRP) 1-32 in the Krkonoše (Giant) Mts. in the years 1980-2005, i.e. during the air-pollution calamity and afterwards. Dynamics (the extent of change) of the vegetation structure has been expressed as the overall change of species composition in comparison with the year 1980. The change was quantified using the Euclidean distance or as the change of the several first ordination axes (DCA 1-DCA 4). Species composition was significantly changing on all 32 PRP stands in the period 1980-2005; some species completely disappeared (e.g. Cicerbita alpina, Lamium maculatum, Phyteuma spicatum, Viola biflora) or their ratio was reduced (e.g. Blechnum spicant, Dentaria enneaphyllos, Homogyne alpina). From the viewpoint of diversity, the most significant change is the reduction of species in the moss layer, which was observed in all types of stands; in beech and mixed forests the average number of species dropped from 4.8 to 2.7 (44%), in non-declining spruce stands the number fell from 11.6 to 5.5 (53%), and in declining spruce stands it dropped from 10.4 to 3.3 (68%). The overall reduction of species diversity ranged between 31% and 43%; the highest reduction was recorded at species with lower representation. The most significant factors influencing the species composition were altitude and exposition of plot.

Keywords: beech; mixed and spruce stands; classification; Krkonoše Mts.; ordination; state and development of phytocenoses

Published: November 30, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Vacek S, Matějka K. State and development of phytocenoses on research plots in the Krkonoše Mts. forest stands. J. For. Sci. 2010;56(11):505-517. doi: 10.17221/127/2010-JFS.
Download citation

References

  1. Ambros Z., Míchal I. (1992): Phytoindication of changes in the natural forests of the Moravian-Silesian Beskids in the course of the years 1952-1986. Ekologia, 11: 205-214.
  2. Bohn U., Gollub G., Hettewer Ch. (2000): Karte der natürlichen Vegetation Europas - 1:2 500 000. Bonn, Bundesamt für Naturschutz.
  3. Brang P. (2005): Virgin forests as a knowledge source for central European silviculture: reality or myth? Forest Snow and Landscape Research, 79: 19-32
  4. Elenberg H. (1996): Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht. Stuttgart, Verlag Eugen Ulmer: 1095.
  5. Hédl R. (2004): Vegetation of beech forests in the Rychlebské Mountains, Czech Republic re-inspected after 60 years with assessment of environmental changes. Plant Ecology, 170: 243-265. Go to original source...
  6. Hill M.O. (1979): TWINSPAN - a FORTRAN Program for Arranging Multivariate Data in an Ordered Two Way Table by Classification of Individuals and Attributes. Ithaca, Cornell University: 48.
  7. Málek J. (1970): Sphagnum fir-spruce forests (AbietoPiceetum sphagnosum) in the Czech-Moravian highlands. Vlastivivědný sborník Vysočiny, Oddělení věd přírodních, 6: 61-70. (in Czech)
  8. Málek J. (1973): Fir and spruce forests in the southern parto of the Czech-Moravian highlands. Lesnictví, 19: 37-58. (in Czech)
  9. Matjka K. (2000): DBreleve Software Help. Available at http://infodatasys.cz/software/dbreleve.htm (accesed on December 16, 2009)
  10. Matjka K. (2007): New methods of evaluation of community diversity (with examples of forest ecosystems). In: Križová E., Ujházy K. (eds): Dynamics, Stability and Diversity of Forest Ecosystems. Zvolen, Technical University in Zvolen, 161-170. (in Czech)
  11. Matjka K. (2009): PlotOA software help (Plotting of ordination diagrams and cartograms). Available at: http://www.infodatasys.cz/software/hlp_PlotOA/PlotOA.htm (accessed on December 2, 2009)
  12. Matjka K., Vacek S. (2007): Examples of forest ecosystems dynamics and their evaluation. In: Križová E., Ujházy K. (eds): Dynamics, stability and diversity of forest ecosystems. Zvolen, TU in Zvolen: 7-13. (in Czech)
  13. Matjka K., Vacek S., Podrázský V. (2010): Development of forest soils in the Krkonoše Mts. in the period 1980-2009. Journal of Forest Science, 56: 485-504. Go to original source...
  14. Matuszkiewicz W., Matuszkiewicz A. (1960): Pflanzensoziologische Untersuchungen der Waldgesellschaften des Riesengebirges. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae, 29: 499-530. Go to original source...
  15. Matuszkiewicz W., Matuszkiewicz A. (1967): Groupments végétaux du Parc national Karkonosze (Sudétes occidentales). Partie 1. Groupments forestiers. Prace Wrocławskie Towarzystwo Naukowe., serie B No. 135: 1-100. (in Polish)
  16. Mikeska M., Vacek S., Podrázský V. (2007): Concept of forestry typology in the bilateral biospheric reserve in the Krkonoše/Karkonosze mountains. Opera Corcontica, 44: 471-483. (in Czech)
  17. Mikyška R. (1968): Geobotanical map of the ČSSR. 1 Bohemia. Vegetation of the ČSSR. Praha, Academia: 204. (in Czech)
  18. Mikyška R. (1972): Die Wälder der böhmischen mittleren Sudeten und ihrer Vorberge. Rozpravy Československé akademie věd, Řada MPV, 82(3): 1-162.
  19. Moldan B., Hak, T. (2007): Environment in the Czech Republic: a positive and rapid change. Environmental Science & Technology, 41: 359-362. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  20. Moravec J. (1974): Zusammensetzung und Verbreitung der Dentario enneaphylli-Fagetum in der Tschechoslowakei. Folia geobotanica phytotaxonimica bohemoslovaca, 9: 113-152. Go to original source...
  21. Pišta F. (1972): Forest communities of the Šumava primeval forest. Lesnictví, 18: 415-437. (in Czech)
  22. Pišta F. (1978): Spruce-beech stands in the southern prat of the Šumava mountains. Lesnictví, 24: 219-236. (in Czech)
  23. Pokorný P. (2002): Role of man in the development of Holocene vegetation in Central Bohemia. Preslia, 77: 113-128.
  24. Podlaski R. (2008): Dynamics in Central European near-natural Abies-Fagus forests: Does the mosaic-cycle approach provide an appropriate model? Journal of Vegetation Science, 19: 173-182. Go to original source...
  25. Prša E. (1985): Die böhmischen und mährischen Urwalder - ihre Struktur und Ökologie. Praha, Academia Verlag: 578.
  26. Samek V. (1986): Problems and typisation of the monitoring of the influence of human activities on phytocenoses and the issues of experimental testing of phytotechnical measures. In: Preventive and remedial measures in endangered phytocenoses. Praha, ČSVTS - lesnická společnost, Botanický ústav ČSAV: 10-16. (in Czech)
  27. Sofron J. (1981): Natural spruce forests in West and Southwest Bohemia. Study of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, 7: 127. (in Czech)
  28. Stöcker G. (1968): Das Anastrepto-Piceetum im Harz und Riesengebirge (Krkonoše). Opera Corcontica, 5: 135-155.
  29. Sýkora T. (1967): Contribution to the study of mountain beech stands in the Krkonoše mountains. Opera Corcontica, 4: 43-53. (in Czech)
  30. Šamonil P., Vrška T. (2008): Long-term vegetation dynamics in the Šumava Mts. Natural spruce-fir-beech forests. Plant Ecology, 196: 197-214. Go to original source...
  31. Ujházy K., Križová E., Vano M., Freáková E., Ondruł M. (2005): Herb layer dynamics of primeval fir-beech forests in central Slovakia. In: Cammarmot B., Hamor F.D. (eds): Natural Forests in the Temperate Zone of Europe - Values And Utilisation. Birmensdorf, Rakhiv, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Carpatien Biosphere Reserve: 193-202.
  32. Vacek S. (1984): Phytocenoses analysis on the Strmá stráň location in the Krkonoše mountains. Opera Corcontica, 21: 67-101. (in Czech)
  33. Vacek S., Lepš J. (1991): Analysis of the vegetation changes in the beech stands of the Orlické mountains.. Lesnictví, 37: 993-1007. (in Czech)
  34. Vacek S., Lepš J. (1992): Analysis of the vegetation changes in the spruce stands of the Orlické mountains. Lesnictví, 38: 773-749. (in Czech)
  35. Vacek S., Lepš J. (1996): Spatial dynamics of forest decline: the role of neighbouring trees. Journal of Vegetation Science, 7: 789-798. Go to original source...
  36. Vacek S., Lepš J. (1999): Vegetation dynamics in forest ecosystems if the Krkonoše mountains. Zprávy České botanické společnosti, 17: 89-101. (in Czech)
  37. Vacek S., Matjka K. (1999): The state of forest stands on permanent research plots in the Krkonoše Mts. in years 1976-1997. Journal of Forest Science, 45: 291-315.
  38. Vacek S., Matjka K. (2003): Vegetation changes in beech and spruce stands in the Orlické hory Mts. in 1951-2001. Journal of Forest Science, 49: 445-473. Go to original source...
  39. Vacek S., Podrázský V, Matjka K. (2006): Dynamics of the health status of forest stands and its prediction on research plots in the Šumava Mts. Journal of Forest Science, 52: 457-473. Go to original source...
  40. Vacek S., Podrázský V., Mikeska M., Simon J. (2006): Forests and Ecosystems above the Upper Forest Boundary in the National Parks of the Krkonoše Mountains. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce: 112. (in Czech)
  41. Vacek S., Matjka K., Simon J., Malík V., Schwarz O., Podrázský V., Minx T., Tesa V., Andl P., Jankovský, L., Mikeska M. (2007): State and dynamics of forest ecosystems if the Krkonoše mountains under air pollution-induced stress. Kostelec nad Černými lesy, Lesnická práce: 216. (in Czech)
  42. Viewegh J. (1994): Changes in the vegetation in some nature reserves of the Moravian-Silesian Beskids. Lesnictví- Forestry, 40: 523-536. (in Czech)

This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.