J. For. Sci., 2010, 56(6):265-270 | DOI: 10.17221/70/2009-JFS

Rodent-caused damage to forest trees from the viewpoint of forestry practice

J. Kamler1,2, K. Turek2, M. Homolka1, E. Bukor2
1 Institute of Vertebrate Biology, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, Brno, Czech Republic
2 Mendel University in Brno, Brno, Czech Republic

Small mammals cause serious damage to forests but there is only little knowledge of their ecology and possibilities of plantation protection. The objective of our study was to collect information on the damage caused by rodents to plantations of forest tree species. Data were obtained from a survey conducted in 2008 that was aimed at damage caused by small mammals. Questionnaires were sent mostly to foresters engaged in the Lesy CR state enterprise. We obtained usable data from 316 foresters. The response rate was 81%. It was confirmed that rodents cause significant damage all over the Czech Republic and that the occurrence of damage cannot be easily predicted with certainty as significant damage may appear perhaps in a small part of the threatened plantations where the key conditions for small mammals have been fulfilled. The main factors which affected probability of damage include: presence of a woody species attractive to rodents; suitable structure of ground vegetation enabling the pest species to breed sufficiently during the vegetation period; and also long-lasting snow cover. The current approach of forestry practice to damage by small mammals is considerably passive and we are missing an alert system of threat to stands and a methodology of dealing with problematic situations. Most of the foresters are uninterested in small mammals and many have only very smattering knowledge of the dangerousness of individual species and their ecological requirements. The use of rodenticides is expensive and the most effective and economic measure to lower damage by small mammals is to support forest management favouring natural regeneration of forest stands.

Keywords: bank vole; bark damage; field vole; forest damage

Published: June 30, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Kamler J, Turek K, Homolka M, Bukor E. Rodent-caused damage to forest trees from the viewpoint of forestry practice. J. For. Sci. 2010;56(6):265-270. doi: 10.17221/70/2009-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Augustine D.J., McNaughton S.J. (1998): Ungulate effects on the functional species composition of plant communities: Herbivore selectivity and plant tolerance. Journal of Wildlife Management, 62: 4. Go to original source...
    2. Baubet O., Ducourtieux C., Royer P. (2005): And if we talked about rodent damage. Rendl Vous Techniques, 7: 46-50.
    3. Conover M.R. (1998): Perceptions of American agricultural producers about wildlife on their farms and ranches. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 26: 597-604.
    4. Dillman, D.A. (1978): Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. New York, John Eley and Sons.
    5. Genghini M., Spalatro F., Gellini S. (2002): Farmers' attitudes toward the carrying out of wildlife habitat improvement actions (WHIA) in intensive agricultural areas of Northern Italy. Zeitschrift für Jagdwissenschaft, 48: 309-319. Go to original source...
    6. Gill R.M.A. (1992): A review of damage by mammals in north temperate forests: 1. Deer. Forestry, 65: 145-169. Go to original source...
    7. Hansson L. (2002): Consumption of bark and seeds by voles in relation to habitat and landscape structure. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 17: 28-34. Go to original source...
    8. Heidecke T., Pelz H.J. (2003): Abwehr von mäuseschäden. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift der Wald, 21: 1076-1078.
    9. Hjalten J., Palo T. (1992): Selection of deciduous trees by free ranging voles and hares in relation to plant chemistry. Oikos, 63: 477-484. Go to original source...
    10. Klenner W., Sullivan T.P. (2003): Partial and clear-cut harvesting of high-elevation spruce-fir forests: implications for small mammal communities. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 33: 2283-2296. Go to original source...
    11. Modzel G., Dubbel V., Schneider M. (2004): Zertifizierung und waldschutz gegen mause. Forst und Holz, 59: 178-182.
    12. Niemeyer H., Haase R. (2003): Zur forstlichen Bedeutung von Wuhlmausen in Erstaufforstungen Osthosteins. Forst und Holz, 58: 26-31.
    13. Schneider M. (1996): Aktuelles zur Mäusebekämpfung. Allgemeine Forstzeitschrift der Wald, 6: 315-318.
    14. Sullivan T.P., Coates H., Jozsa L.A., Digge P.K. (1993): Influence of feeding damage by small mammals on tree growth and wood quality in young lodgepole pine. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 23: 799-809. Go to original source...
    15. Sullivan T.P., Sullivan D.S. (2001): Influence of variable retention harvests on forest ecosystems. II. Diversity and population dynamics of small mammals. Journal of Applied Ecology, 38: 1234-1252. Go to original source...
    16. Sullivan T.P., Sullivan D.S., Lindgren P.M.F., Ransome D.B. (2005): Long-term responses of ecosystem components to stand thinning in young lodgepole pine forest - II. Diversity and population dynamics of forest floor small mammals. Forest Ecology and Management, 205: 1-14. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content