J. For. Sci., 2010, 56(4):171-176 | DOI: 10.17221/49/2009-JFS

Different approaches to the classification of vertical structure in homogeneous and heterogeneous forests

V. Šebeň, M. Bošeľa
National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

The paper shows difficulties in the evaluation of the forest status when considering forests with different height structure (uneven-aged forests). It is the main problem in categorizing such forests. Concerning the actual forest management conception in Slovakia, it is assumed that the area of forests with close-to-nature management system will increase. It leads to more structured forests, as for the tree species, age, height, as well as the spatial structure. The typical vertically homogeneous forests account for only 50% of all Slovak forests, according to results from the National Forest Inventory in Slovakia (NFI SR). During the processing of NFI data the stands were divided into 2 classes as follows: (i) vertically homogeneous stands, which are classified into nine growth stages; (ii) vertically heterogeneous stands, which are classified into two growth stages (lower and advanced), and stands in the process of regeneration. New approaches are not based on the visual subjective estimation of forest homogeneity, but on objective analyses of measured values from inventory plots (tree heights, diameters, and age). The paper shows a new approach to the classification of forest stands on an example of the variability of measured heights on inventory plots from NFI.

Keywords: height variability; forest status survey; NFI; structural classification

Published: April 30, 2010  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Šebeň V, Bošeľa M. Different approaches to the classification of vertical structure in homogeneous and heterogeneous forests. J. For. Sci. 2010;56(4):171-176. doi: 10.17221/49/2009-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Korpeľ Š. (1989): Virgin Forest in Slovakia. Bratislava, Veda: 328. (in Slovak)
    2. Lesoprojekt (2000): Available at http://www.lesoprojekt.sk/ekoprirucka/frameset/ciselniky_frame.html (accesed on March 27, 2009)
    3. Málek B. (2001): Forest management on the way between clear-felling and shelterwood systems, its immediate and future needs. Text book of seminar: Heritage of Opočno Hugo's Konias forest management. Opočno, VÚLHM: 46-52. (in Czech)
    4. Merganič J., Vorčák J., Merganičová K., Ďurský J., Miková A., Škvarenina J., Tuček J., Minďáš J. (2003): Diverzity Monitoring in Mountain Forests of Northern Orava. Tvrdošín, EFRA: 200. (in Slovak)
    5. Saniga M. (1999): Structure, production conditions and regenerative processes in the Badín virgin forest. Journal of Forest Science, 45: 121-130. (in Slovak)
    6. Šmelko Š., Merganič J., Šebeň V., Raši R. Jankovič J. (2006): National inventory and monitoring in Slovakia 2005-2006. Methodology of field data collection. Zvolen, Národné lesnícke centrum: 130. (in Slovak)
    7. Vorčák J., Merganič J., Saniga M. (2006): The structural diversity change and the regeneration processes of the Norway spruce natural forest in NNR Babia hora according to the altitude. Journal of Forest Science, 52: 399-409. Go to original source...

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content