J. For. Sci., 2009, 55(12):556-566 | DOI: 10.17221/10/2009-JFS

Differences in fine root traits between Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) - A case study in the Kysucké Beskydy Mts

B. Konôpka
Department of Forest Protection and Game Management, National Forest Centre - Forest Research Institute in Zvolen, Zvolen, Slovakia

Interspecific comparisons of the fine root "behaviour" under stressful situations may answer questions related to resistance to changing environmental conditions in the particular tree species. Our study was focused on Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) grown in an acidic soil where acidity was caused by past air pollution in the Kysucké Beskydy Mts., North-Western Slovakia. Between April and October 2006, the following fine root traits were studied: biomass and necromass seasonal dynamics, vertical distribution, production, mortality, fine root turnover and production to mortality ratio. Sequential soil coring was repeatedly implemented in April, June, July, September, and October including the soil layers of 0-5, 5-15, 15-25, and 25-35 cm. Results indicated that spruce had a lower standing stock of fine roots than beech, and fine roots of spruce were more superficially distributed than those of beech. Furthermore, we estimated higher seasonal dynamics and also higher turnover of fine roots in spruce than in beech. The production to mortality ratio was higher in beech than in spruce, which was hypothetically explained as the effect of drought episodes that occurred in July and August. The results suggested that the beech root system could resist a physiological stress better than that of spruce. This conclusion was supported by different vertical distributions of fine roots in spruce and beech stands.

Keywords: fine root biomass and necromass; mortality; production; seasonal dynamics; turnover

Published: December 31, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Konôpka B. Differences in fine root traits between Norway spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) - A case study in the Kysucké Beskydy Mts. J. For. Sci. 2009;55(12):556-566. doi: 10.17221/10/2009-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. FAO, 2006. World reference base for soil resources 2006. A framework for international classification, correlation and communication. World Soil Resources Reports, 103: 132.
    2. FaIrley R.I., Alexander I.J., 1985. Methods of calculating fine root production in forests. In: Fitter A.H. (ed.), Ecological Interactions in Soil. Special Publication the British Ecological Society, 4: 37-42.
    3. Finér L., Helmisaari H.S., Lohmus K., Majdi H., Brunner I., Borja I., Eldhuste T., Godbold D., Grebenc T., Konôpka B., Kraigher H., Mottonen M.R., Ohashi M., Oleksyn J., Ostonen I., Uri V., Vanguelova E., 2007. Variation in fine root biomass of three European tree species: beech (Fagus sylvatica L.), Norway spruce (Picea abies L. Karst.), and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.). Plant Biosystems, 141: 394-405. Go to original source...
    4. Gaul F., hertel d., borken w., matzner e., leuschner ch., 2008. Effects of experimental drought on the fine root system of mature Norway spruce. Forest Ecology and Management, 256: 1151-1159.
    5. Gill R.A., Jackson R.B., 2000. Global patterns of root turnover for terrestrial ecosystems. New Phytologist, 147: 13-31. Go to original source...
    6. Godbold D.L., Fritz H.W., Jentschke G., Meesenburg H., Rademacher P., 2003. Root turnover and root necromass accumulation of Norway spruce (Picea abies) is affected by soil acidity. Tree Physiology, 23: 915-921. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    7. Ihaka R., Gentleman R., 1996. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 5: 299-314. Go to original source...
    8. Jackson R.B., Mooney H.A., Schulze E.D., 1997. A global budget for fine root biomass, surface area, and nutrient contents. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 94: 7362-7366. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    9. KONôPKA B., LUKAC M., 2009. Fine root condition relates to visible crown damage in Norway spruce in acidified soils. Forest Pathology. (in press) Go to original source...
    10. Konôpka B., Curiel Yuste J., Janssens I.A., Ceulemans R., 2005. Comparison of fine root dynamics in Scots pine and Pedunculate oak in sandy soil. Plant and Soil, 276: 33-45. Go to original source...
    11. Konôpka B., Noguchi K., Sakata T., Takahashi M., Konôpková Z., 2006a. Fine root dynamics in a Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) plantation throughout the growing season. Forest Ecology and Management, 225: 278-286. Go to original source...
    12. Konôpka B., Janssens I.A., Curiel Yuste J., Ceulemans R., 2006b. Fine root turnover in a temperate Scots pine forest. Lesnícky časopis - Forestry Journal, 52: 107-117.
    13. Konôpka B., Noguchi K., Sakata T., Takahashi M., Konôpková Z., 2007. Effects of simulated drought stress on the fine roots of Japanese cedar (Cryptomeria japonica) in a plantation forest on the Kanto Plain, eastern Japan. Journal of Forest Research, 12: 143-151. Go to original source...
    14. Köstler J.N., Brückner E., Bibelriether H., 1968. Die Wurzeln der Waldbäume. Hamburg, Paul Parey.
    15. Kozlowski T.T., Pallardy S.G., 1997. Physiology of Woody Plants. San Diego, Academic Press: 411.
    16. Lukac M., Calfapietra C., Godbold D.L., 2003. Production, turnover and mycorrhizal colonization of root system of tree Populus species grown under elevated CO2 (POPFACE). Global Change Biology, 9: 838-848. Go to original source...
    17. Mainiero R., Kazda M., 2006. Depth-related fine root dynamics of Fagus sylvatica during exceptional drought. Forest Ecology and Management, 237: 135-142. Go to original source...
    18. Minďáš J., Škvarenina J., 2003. Lesy Slovenska a globálne klimatické zmeny. Zvolen, EFRA, LVÚ Zvolen: 129.
    19. Mooney H.A., Chu C., 1974. Seasonal carbon allocation in Heteromeles arbutifolium, a California evergreen shrub. Oecologia, 14: 295-306. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
    20. Moravčík M. et al., 2006. Report on Forestry in the Slovak Republic 2006. (Green Report.) Bratislava, Ministry of Agriculture SR: 147.
    21. Moravčík M. et al., 2008. Report on Forestry in the Slovak Republic 2008. (Green Report.) Bratislava, Ministry of Agriculture SR: 168.
    22. Norby R.J., Fitter A.H., Jacskon R.B., 2000. Root dynamics and global change. An ecosystem perspective. New Phytologist, Special Issue, 147: 3-12. Go to original source...
    23. Pregitzer K.S., King J.S., Burton A.J., Brown S.E., 2000. Responses of tree fine roots to temperature. New Phytologist, 147: 105-115. Go to original source...
    24. Rewald B., Leuschner Ch., 2009. Belowground competition in a broad-leaved temperate mixed forest: pattern analysis and experiments in a four-species stand. European Journal of Forest Research, 128: 387-398. Go to original source...
    25. Schmid I., 2002. The influence of soil type and interspecific competition on the fine root system of Norway spruce and European beech. Basic and Applied Ecology, 3: 339-346. Go to original source...
    26. Schmid I., Kazda M., 2002. Root distribution of Norway spruce in monospecific and mixed stands on different soils. Forest Ecology and Management, 159: 37-47. Go to original source...
    27. Smit A.L., Bengough A.G., Engels C., van Noordwijk M., Pellerin S., van de Geijn S.C., 2000. Root Methods a Handbook. Berlin, Springer: 587. Go to original source...
    28. Teskey R.O., Hinckley T.M., 1981. Influence of temperature and water potential on root growth of white oak. Physiologia Plantarum, 52: 363-369. Go to original source...
    29. Turčáni M., Hlásny T., 2007. Spatial distribution of four spruce bark beetles in north-western Slovakia. Journal of Forest Science, Special Issue, 53: 45-53. Go to original source...
    30. Vogt K.A., Edmonds R.L., Grier C.C., 1981. Seasonal changes in biomass and vertical distribution of mycorrhizal and fibrous-textured conifer fine roots in 23- and 180-yearold subalpine Abies amabilis stands. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 11: 223-229. Go to original source...
    31. Vogt K.A., Bloomfield J., 1991. Root turnover and senescence. In: WAISEL Y., ESHEL A., KAFKAFI U. (eds), Plant Roots: the Hidden Half. New York, Basel: Marcel Dekker Inc.: 287-306. http://www.icp-forests.org

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content