J. For. Sci., 2009, 55(9):423-431 | DOI: 10.17221/79/2008-JFS

Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations

M. R. Ghaffarian1, K. Stampfer1, J. Sessions2
1 Department of Forest and Soil Sciences, Institute of Forest Engineering, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
2 Department of Forest Engineering, College of Forestry, Oregon State University, Corvallis, USA

Optimum road spacing (ORS) of forwarding operation in Styria in Southern Austria is studied in this paper. In a harvesting operation it is important to compute the ORS to minimize the total cost of harvesting and roading. The aim of this study was a comparison of different methods to study ORS. Data from 82 cycles were used to develop two models for predicting the cycle time using statistical analysis of a time study data base. The ORS was computed by three methods including Matthews' formula (1942), Sundberg's method (1976), and the two statistical models for predicting the cycle time. The results gave the ORS for one-way forwarding using Matthew's formula as 1,969 m, Sund-berg's model as 394.4 m, and the two time study models as 463 and 909 m. The analysis of forwarding data indicated that the speed was related to a distance which contributed to the difference between models and that the loading and unloading time may be related to one or several other study variables.

Keywords: forwarding; production; cost; travelling model; optimum road spacing

Published: September 30, 2009  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago Chicago Notes IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Ghaffarian MR, Stampfer K, Sessions J. Comparison of three methods to determine optimal road spacing for forwarder-type logging operations. J. For. Sci. 2009;55(9):423-431. doi: 10.17221/79/2008-JFS.
Share...
Download citation
  • BibTeX (.bib)
  • Bookends (.ris)
  • EasyBib (.ris)
  • EndNote (.enw)
  • EndNote 8 (.xml)
  • ISI WoS (.isi)
  • Medlars (.medlars)
  • Mendeley (.ris)
  • MODS (.xml)
  • Papers (.ris)
  • RefWorks (.txt)
  • RefManager (.ris)
  • RIS (.ris)
  • MS Word (.xml)
  • Zotero (.ris)
    • Open full article

    References

    1. Abelli W.S., Magomu G.M., 1963. Optimal road spacing for manual skidding sulkies. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 6: 8-15.
    2. AFFENZELLER G., 2005. Integrierte Harvester-ForwarderKonzepte Harwarder. [MSc Thesis.] Vienna, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Forest Engineering: 63.
    3. AKAY A., SESSIONS J., 2001. Minimizing road construction plus forwarding costs under a maximum soil disturbance constraint. In: The International Mountain Logging and 11th Pacific Northwest Skyline Symposium, December 10-12, Seattle. Washington, D.C.: 268-279.
    4. BRYER J.B., 1983. The effects of a geometric redefinition of the classical road and landing spacing model through shifting. Journal of Forest Science, 29: 670-674.
    5. DYKSTRA D.P., 1983. Fundamentals of forest road design and layout. Stencil No. EFn 7. Morogoro, University of Dar es Salaam, Division of Forestry: 28.
    6. FAO, 1974. Logging and Log Transport in Tropical High Forest. Rome, FAO: 50-52.
    7. GHAFFARIAN M.R., STAMPFER K., SESSIONS J., 2007. Forwarding productivity in Southern Austria. Croatian Journal of Forest Engineering, 28: 169-175.
    8. HEINIMANN H.R., 1997. A computer model to differentiate skidder and cable-yarder based road network concepts on steep slopes. Journal of Forest Research (Japan), 3: 1-9. Go to original source...
    9. HEINIMANN H.R., 2002. Erschliessungsplanung im laendlichen Raum. Class Notes. Zurich, ETH: 73.
    10. HUGGARD E.R., 1978. Optimum road spacing. Quarterly Journal of Forestry, 72: 207-210.
    11. LIU S., CORCORAN T.J., 1993. Road and landing spacing under the consideration of surface dimension of road and landings. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 5: 49-53. Go to original source...
    12. MATTHEWS D.M., 1942. Cost Control in the Logging Industry. New York, McGraw-Hill: 374.
    13. NAGHDI R., 2004. Study of optimum road density in tree length and cut to length system. [PhD Thesis.] University of Tarbiat Modarres, Faculty of Natural Resources: 152.
    14. PETERS P.A., 1978. Spacing of roads and landings to minimize timber harvest cost. Journal of Forest Science, 24: 209-217.
    15. PICMAN D., PENTEK T., 1998. The influence of forest roads building and maintenance costs on their optimum density in low lying forests of Croatia. In: Seminar on Environmentally Sound Forest Roads and Wood Transport in Sinaia, Romania. Rome, FAO: 87-102.
    16. SEGEBADEN G.V., 1964. Studies of cross-country transportation distances and road net extension. Studia Forestalia Suecica, No. 18: 70.
    17. SESSIONS J., 1986. Can income tax rules affect management strategies for forest roads. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 1: 26-28. Go to original source...
    18. SESSIONS J., BOSTON K., 2006. Optimization of road spacing for log length shovel logging on gentle terrain. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 17: 67-75. Go to original source...
    19. SUNDBERG U., 1976. Harvesting Man-made Forests in Developing Countries. Rome, FAO: 185.
    20. THOMPSON M.A., 1988. Optimizing spur road spacing on the basis of profit potential. Forest Product Journal, 38: 53-57.
    21. THOMPSON M.A., 1992. Considering overhead costs in road and landing spacing models. International Journal of Forest Engineering, 3: 13-19. Go to original source...
    22. WENGER K., 1984. Cost Control Formulas for Logging Operations. 2nd Ed. Society of American Foresters. New York, John Wiley and Sons: 1335.
    23. WRATSCHKO B., 2006. Einsatsmöglichkeiten von Seilforwarded. [MSc Thesis.] Vienna, University of Natural Resources and Applied Life Sciences, Institute of Forest Engineering: 66.
    24. YEAP Y.H., SESSIONS J., 1988. Optimizing road spacing and road standards simultaneously on uniform terrain. Journal of Tropical Forest Science, 1: 215-228. http://www.bfw.ac.at

    This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY NC 4.0), which permits non-comercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original publication is properly cited. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.


    Return to the content